It’s a massive shock to the system for sure but these kids also don’t know, or care much about sacrifice and family. Much of what they’re taught is entitlement and self absorption via social media. To go outta their way and put someone else in front of them isn’t on their radar cause it seems counterproductive to the image of being seen on social media.
You accept and love your kid for whoever they are.
My feel exactly. Most people "outraged" about the trannies are either in the closet homos or people outraged about the "inclusion" part, not the trannies themselves.
Ok then. They're 0.2% of the population.
It is the same people that claim "woke" when a company uses a black or latino as a game hero or doing something simple like eating cereal.
www.northernpublicradio.org
It’s one thing to use the term to separate oneself from a skin color, political or religious affiliation, or a cultural norm, but quite another to use the term separate from one’s true self. There are some things that are staples in this world, and are consistent such as air, the sun, water, food, etc and most will agree that those consistencies include what we have always considered natural born, biological men & women. These are regular things we use and know the world as & shouldn’t have to come under attack simply to include a small group of people into a space lead by insecure white men.Perspective: 'Regular people'
Taylor Atkins checks the codewords bigots have used since the days of Archie Bunker.
The term “regular people” implies there is a default human being — who just happens to look, think, and behave like Archie Bunker — and everyone else is a deviation from that (the “anti-woke” mob now use the phrase “real Americans,” which basically means the same thing).But how often have the rest of us pointed out someone in a crowd or onscreen, or told a story about an encounter, and identified that person by their skin color, disability, or some other immutable characteristic, rather than another visible marker, such as their clothing? When we draw attention to those things, are we not unthinkingly suggesting that they’re not “regular?”The “regular people” mentality, even when expressed benignly and thoughtlessly, indicates the degree to which white supremacy, in particular, has infected our culture. I pray we can eventually purge it from our minds and speech.———————“Oh, don't pay
no attention to him.
He's one of them colored guys
who's always trying
to make fun of us
regular people.”
Then your kid grows to resent you or you forced them into some career they aren't passionate about.
What are you arguing for? People should live their lives for the comfort of others? A parent's duty is to raise their kid to be a responsible adult, not to fulfill some bucket list of dreams and fantasies.
You believe something purely by anecdotal evidence pushed by an algorithm. You don't know if it's happening more without data. There is a reason why Fox News viewers are less informed than someone that watches no news at all. They're being pushed propaganda. You're being pushed propaganda because none of the proof comes with data. Step back and ask yourself why they aren't presenting data, and who is funding those video segments. It surely won't be an advocacy group, but most likely some right wing think tank or PAC.
They're still regular. They have the same organs, need water, have friends...yadda yadda. Now if we are saying they aren't normal because they made a different life decision, then no person is normal. A Sherpa lives a completely different lifestyle than most of the people on the planet. Are they normal?
I don’t think lifestyle means you’re not a man or a woman. You are.
By argue, I meant what point were you trying to get across. That people don't consider others? Yes. That's true for texting and driving, because that literally puts others in danger. If my coworker Ed came to work in a dress, he's not harming anyone. If anyone's feelings are hurt because a family member or friend didn't abide by some standard...fuck em.
There’s plenty of them like you said and as I stated throughout this thread, social media was/is at the forefront for many of them.
They aren't video segments. They are personal youtube videos by de-transitioners
These are their personal stories. You can go and type in 'detransition' on youtube yourself and see hundreds of their personal videos yourself. Go on with that "Fox news" bullshit.
Brah, listen to me for a second. If you're searching for these things, it's going to seem like it is everywhere because the algorithm will keep feeding you things to soothe your bias. That's why I mentioned Fox News.
They aren't video segments. They are personal youtube videos by de-transitioners
These are their personal stories. You can go and type in 'detransition' on youtube yourself and see hundreds of their personal videos yourself. Go on with that "Fox news" bullshit.
That's not the point. The point is that people are detransitioning and telling their stories. A lot of trans people were trying to have their videos and channels removed until Google started to allow their channels.
I see what you are saying, but them male times is the top of the top. That means a trans person with hormone therapy gonna eclipse that fine as woman's record. It is not going to happen. Again, if a trans person is doing times like that why would he change sex. He could be trans and still compete as a man. It's just my thoughts on it.The 10s those guys were running where high 10s tho...look at the times of this race
The SLOWEST male there is running 10.30...FloJo's record is 10.49...Elaine Thompson is 10.54....Sharcarri and Sherika can run 10.60s. If a trans sprinter can be on the field with them in the first place then its likely they can realistically break those times. I'll put it this way it wouldnt be shocking to see the first "woman" hit 10.50...just one tick below FloJo. And if that were to happen it would make every ones case for why trans women shouldn't be competing with biological females. Her record has stood for over 30 YEARS...and in all that time only one woman has come within the ballpark of touching it. And mind you over all that time there were women busted for PEDs and actively cheating and still couldnt do it.
You gonna tell me a trans woman doing it wouldnt raise eyebrows??
That's why we need the data. I'm sure some people regret it. It's not like buying a chinchilla coat. It'd be nice to have the data of how many people, out of X amount of trans people, regretted their transition. I'm not denying it happened or happens, but I we can't say it happens a lot, if we don't know the percentage of people facing regret.
Youre assuming that the trans person is switching for competition reasons when the two things aren't necessarily connected.
