Welp, on the other side, exposing of #FACTS that shilling for the left-wing cacs hasn't done shit for the last 50 years is met with deflection and simpleton talking points. We can't just be selective about proof, can we?
I read what you linked and that part about a permanent underclass is spot on. It's what I just talked about the other day when I said something about all the immigrant success stories from the Jim Crow era. The conferences were indeed very interesting.
Listen man. Folks are much more concerned that 'billy bob earl' is against immigration and that 'Hipster fred' is for it. These cats are basing their fucking positions off what the fuck white people think. Period. Point blank. Bottom fucking line.
I been wanted America out of the middle east and Afghanistan for years now. So do sand cac radicals. Now is my stance a sand cac talking point? Should I be labeled anti-American? Am I an anti-Semite? See how that bullshit works? I just happen to agree with radicals on this one thing. So do a good number on the left and it has been used by the right the same way shit is used here.
If one day a black person wakes up, looks at the data, and says,

"wait, hey hipster Fred. How is the black community benefitting from illegal immigration?" Hipster fred goes from

to

"shut up. Don't question me. Why are you using right wing talking points!?!!?"
It''s easy to attack ADOS because of a shared belief that illegal immigration and some aspects of legal immigration have to be checked.