Because it's not biased towards WWE because they have the most exposure and the highest profits, then it's just gotta be biased against WWE
Profits and that ratings margin are literally the only two good things WWE has going for itself and that's what WWE marks are going to continue to hold on to.
But the truth is - ratings and profits do not equate to having the best wrestling product or the best wrestlers - only the best business.
And this list is not about the best business - not most viewed clips on Youtube, the most ad revenue, the biggest profit margins, etc. It's the best wrestler or the best wrestling based on an individual body of work.
And I'm not surprised he did not answer your question because there are no good answers.
There's not a better WWE tag team than the Bucks or Lucha Bros, or a better WWE match than Bucks/Lucha Bros. Roman is all gimmick and 7 moves. And Raw and SD have so much copy and paste that it defeats the purpose of watching them every week.