The Cashie B's Undoing. Are The Planets In The Solar System Flat?
- Thread starter BrownTurd
- Start date
But your illustration is wrong, therefore your conclusion about the arc planes fly is wrong.
Cashie thinks that airPLANES fly about 3 football fields
There is no such arc lmao.
Nigga, I have a master's in Acoustics Engineering. And I worked in the field for 3 years after teaching on the collegiate level for 14 years. I got the degree because I needed it to keep my job while I was teaching.
I'm saying there SHOULD be parallax. As the camera moves up the sun should get closer to the earth. If the camera goes down the sun should get further from the earth. Dude you don't understand parallax talking about some fucking "range of motion" nigga you silly. THE EARTH IS IN THE WHOLE FOREGROUND. THE SUN IS SUPPOSED TO BE 92 MILLION MILES AWAY. How much goddamn range of motion do you need fool??? An object doesn't need to be close to the camera to demonstrate parallax. Parallax is about the distance BETWEEN TWO OBJECTS as the camera's perspective moves.
EDIT: I only posted this video because of the clips of the parallax. I haven't watched the whole thing so I can't vouch for everything he's saying. But it sounds like what he's saying is accurate.
Last edited:
Lmaoo. He outdid himself again with airPLANES.
My illustration is not wrong. Have you ever worked in a 3d program? C4D? AutoCad? Sketchup???
I don't know what this resistance is yall have about the earth having a diameter, the fuck is that??
Nigga called u Queso Cheese
Exactly. 500 miles "up" to ATL from LAX. airPLANE must have the right arc though.
It’s wrong because your lines are arbitrary as well as your idea that you think you can turn the globe however you please to make your point. No one is resisting the earth having a diameter.
I have been graphing and mapping variables on earth for over 10 years now. I’ve ran numerous prediction models based on staggered grids develop to calculate physical dynamics of the atmosphere and land-ocean. I also understand that once we reach 70N and 70S that we move to a polar coordinate system. Each point on a coordinate system is strictly set. It can’t be adjusted nor can you graph on without some evidence of grid you are using having coordinate values.
At no point is acceptable to arbitrarily place lines on a Google Erf map with some scale YOU and only YOU deem acceptable.
I took CAD in highschool
If the earth is moving at 1000mph, and you can SEE it moving on that bullshit ass ISS footage (of a CGI earth), then how close do you have to before you stop seeing the earth move??
All of that doesn't erase the fact that the globe earth is a spherical, physical object that has measurements. And those measurements can be subdivided which is ALL I DID.
It's a moot point because we live on a flat plane. The trim system on a plane doesn't adjust for curvature.
Man, I'm just trying to get bruh to understand the calculated differences between this
and this
Nothing about my 3D Earth model is arbitrary. These are coordinates I can use to make calculations. And that you simply can't place Atanta in the North Pole
The nigga is googling to find out about the z axis right now.
So, you are back to defending ATL being 500 miles "higher" than LA again. Only a few days ago you claimed you never said that dumb shit.
Man, I'm just trying to get bruh to understand the calculated differences between this
and this
Nothing about my 3D Earth model is arbitrary. These are coordinates I can use to make calculations. And that you simply can't place Atanta in the North Pole
Dude, I can produce the same shit with my 3d software. The one you're posting is saying the same thing as mine. From the center of the ball to the top the distance is 4000 miles. Divide it by 8 and that's 500 miles. I didn't place Atlanta AT THE NORTH POLE. If the globe is a sphere like the NASA pics show then the diameter is practically the same at any point.
I'm repeating myself too many times man.
So, you are back to defending ATL being 500 miles "higher" than LA again. Only a few days ago you claimed you never said that dumb shit.
Then do it. At least it would be a better representation than your paintshop job.
In a nutshell.
And stop worshipping these cacs. Haven't they led you astray far enough?
They stole all that shit from Kemet anyway! And got it WRONG in the process!
It doesn't need to, which is why I wasn't using lat/lat. The point I was talking about was 500 miles WITHIN the globe, along the diameter.
Is the diameter not practically the same at any point on a sphere??
This can't possibly be that hard for you to understand...
So you're gonna sit there and ignore ALL THE TIMES I said the flight distance between ATL and LA is 2000 miles??
The world does NOT need another fake globe render. That's why I used Google Earth.
All u have to do is look up
You didn't make the dumb shit below showing LA and ATL 500 miles apart?
So the answer is YES, you're gonna sit there and ignore ALL THE TIMES I said the flight distance between ATL and LA is 2000 miles.
I think it's awesome that you possess that acoustic engineering knowledge and credential.
That does not change one bit how you attempted to present yourself and why, and I wish yo black ass would try to lie about it.
But will not at all devalue your real world accomplishments, big up black man.
Regarding parallax and that video, I only saw lateral movement and yet again you show your total lack of understanding of the very concept you present.
It is also becoming apparent that you have great difficulty with concepts of scale.
I honestly feel this is the root of it all.
thanks
look again. The camera is bouncing up and down almost the whole time. It never stays level. I'm not talking about panning.
And no, you are showing your total lack of understanding of the concept I present. There should be parallax between the sun and the earth. The distance between the two is the absolute BEST candidate for parallax, yet we don't see it. The sun is right there, above the earth, not 92 million miles away.
No I don't. Concepts of scale just mean adding 0's to the numbers. The proportions and shapes don't change, only the measurements.