If THIS aint a clear ADMISSION THE MOON LANDING WAS FAKE I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS!!!!

im sorry i let yall down. i don't have answers to all your questions. and j-boogie i been admitted my mistake on saying cylindrical disk. and kwaz you have a right to your opinion but i definitely dont have an inferiority complex.

Cool, If you find more solid evidence I will give it consideration.

I'm just saying cussing at folks wont help convey your ideas, know matter how "brilliant" you may be. This applies to us all. :)
 
It's cool, Des...

I will admit that I somehow missed your correction of use of terms...

Not to say that I see the importance of this, but yo, fuck it...

But it's just like I said, and others have kind of came at you on: You are coming off too damned strong not to have a STRONGER argument and justifiable facts AS WELL AS an effective deconstruction of ACCEPTED facts readily in place to back you up. You are now the quentessential fat kid on the high dive, everyone is looking, waiting to check your "swan dive" and now, if you ask me, is not the right time to start climbing back down the hypothetical ladder. You have to "jump" bruh'...

HOWEVER...

I now sense that YOU sense the aforementioned "sheep" are closing in on you in this argument like "wolves" and you want to try to play it off. Well... Be careful about insulting other people's processes without firmly formalizing and formatting your own. Because nothing personal, I ain't trying to shit on you or nothing. But ALL credability in you in THIS particular discussion?

Is totally and completely lost...

Pack this shit up and try again another day and with a different format. No harm intended, not trying to be a dick. But hey...
 
Naaaah, I feel you in terms of your so-called different invocations, LOL... I just don't think what you have done with this thread fits the bill. So my question to you, on the converse, is do you believe your alternative invocations are valid just because you say that they are? The brother who DOES agree with you, at least partially, even said you have the duty to place your "alternative invocations" within a common context in order to have them appreciated and properly digested.

So...

For example...

If you wish to prove that the earth is either a "cylandrical disc" (and what the fuck is that? A cylander is a CYLANDER and a disc is a DISC --?????) or 2-dimentionally flat with the sun rotating around it or whatever? You have to first of all disassemble the conventionally accepted scientific consensus that the earth is an imperfect (oblong shaped) sphere that revolves around the sun like all other bodies in the solar system. Then you will have to prove how the model of the solar system you propose functions better than the accepted notions. I mean you started this thread questioning the lunar landing. Well, the entire aeronautical and nautical industries in modern times, ballistic weapons technology and so on are based upon the model of the earth and all of it's surrounding spheres (The earth is more than just "terra-forma", but the atmosphere, magnetosphere, etc, etc, etc...) being round.

I mean even with a lava lamp, you have a fluid material, bubbling inside of another fluid material. Where the former mentioned fluid material can be seen to function as like the protomaterial that forms the earth in the weightlessness, or relative weightlessness of the fluid in the lava lamp. It doesn't form a disc or a cylander. It forms in globs. This seems to be the universal format for maleable material floating within a relatively or completely weightless environment. Thus celestial bodies are some diverse form of a sphere, whether perfectly or imperfectly formed.

So what? Do you mean to imply that the earth is a DELIBERATE (only thousands years old) design created by a higher life form? Complete with ready made deceptions that would cause us lower life forms to be DECIEVED into thinking this devinely inspired, created craft comes off as and functions like a sphere? A more deliberate shape meant to imply something other than the perfection of a circle or sphere???

LOL...

Look, let me toss this out to you:

Why do YOU find it easier to believe that the controlling minority would expend SO many resources and effort into creating this deception? Instead of finding some way to make the supposed truth work for them? You have to labor yourself to prove this too.

HOWEVER, before doing so you propose that this minority of folk who taught YOU these ideas and theories you want us to believe. Okay? Is somehow innocent and only interested in spreading truth and understanding, in an effort to enlighten people, right? As opposed to being the conspiratorial scammers themselves?

Dude it is much more ECONOMICAL and frugal to fool a minority then it is to dupe a majority. People like to talk about conspiracies and hoaxes but I wonder what is your practical experience with the same. It's not that easy, really. All it takes is a small ratio of folks out of a given number to question and inspire a larger ratio into suspicion. Than eventually all hell breaks loose. It really isn't worth it. Not to say it doesn't happen, because it does. But for more practical and immediate rewards, not this shit you are proposing in this thread. Thus, ANOTHER burden of truth that rests on YOUR sholders: Explaining to us "sheep" why it is so important for us to continue believing in the institutional baseed deceptions you have presented to us...

Now conning and scamming a minority or smaller group is easier and more immediately rewarding. Thus religious con men and door to door scammers on other levels experience the level of success that they often do. It is much more rewarding and a thousand or so times more likely...

Don't challenge other people into questioning their beliefs until you are prepared to question your own dude...

THIS is where you fail and on multiple levels...

Or at lest that is what I would say, LOL...

u save me alot of typing:yes:

Damn destrehan, I thought you were gonna blow my mind like Morpheus did Neo!!.


i thought he may have been holdin out til the day time or something
maybe i was wrong......


thanks 14damoney
since we may be sharin a few wavelengths and this thread seems like it may be headed for the grave yard i wanna check something out
Theres a youtube vid that i had a while ago that i wanted to check and see if it was legit
but the vid got removed before i could get it off their site
it was supposed to be a 1977 BBC radio recording ( i think ) that was hijacked by what was believed to be an alien
The message was supposed to have been transmited all over Britain simultaneously
 
Dest, I wasn't just trying to clown on you my man.

But as other have said, if you are going to challenge the very foundations of our understanding of the world and the universe, you had better have lots of ammo to back you up.

But, it was fun nevertheless.
 
Dest, I wasn't just trying to clown on you my man.

But as other have said, if you are going to challenge the very foundations of our understanding of the world and the universe, you had better have lots of ammo to back you up.

But, it was fun nevertheless.
i had alot of ammo but i guess it wasn't good enough. i'll be back after i regroup and do more research. im tryna get rich so i can go up there on one of them trips and see for myself.
 
u save me alot of typing:yes:




i thought he may have been holdin out til the day time or something
maybe i was wrong......


thanks 14damoney
since we may be sharin a few wavelengths and this thread seems like it may be headed for the grave yard i wanna check something out
Theres a youtube vid that i had a while ago that i wanted to check and see if it was legit
but the vid got removed before i could get it off their site
it was supposed to be a 1977 BBC radio recording ( i think ) that was hijacked by what was believed to be an alien
The message was supposed to have been transmitted all over Britain simultaneously

I think (the key word is think) I recall that being proved a hoax. It probably was a "test" by the "illuminated" to see how the masses would react. more psy-ops.
 
That's what American men used to do when somebody invaded their personal space and started hurling insults. I don't know where all this politically correct moral high road shit came from.

Get eeem Buzz!!! LOL
 
Naaaah, I feel you in terms of your so-called different invocations, LOL... I just don't think what you have done with this thread fits the bill. So my question to you, on the converse, is do you believe your alternative invocations are valid just because you say that they are? The brother who DOES agree with you, at least partially, even said you have the duty to place your "alternative invocations" within a common context in order to have them appreciated and properly digested.

So...

For example...

If you wish to prove that the earth is either a "cylandrical disc" (and what the fuck is that? A cylander is a CYLANDER and a disc is a DISC --?????) or 2-dimentionally flat with the sun rotating around it or whatever? You have to first of all disassemble the conventionally accepted scientific consensus that the earth is an imperfect (oblong shaped) sphere that revolves around the sun like all other bodies in the solar system. Then you will have to prove how the model of the solar system you propose functions better than the accepted notions. I mean you started this thread questioning the lunar landing. Well, the entire aeronautical and nautical industries in modern times, ballistic weapons technology and so on are based upon the model of the earth and all of it's surrounding spheres (The earth is more than just "terra-forma", but the atmosphere, magnetosphere, etc, etc, etc...) being round.

I mean even with a lava lamp, you have a fluid material, bubbling inside of another fluid material. Where the former mentioned fluid material can be seen to function as like the protomaterial that forms the earth in the weightlessness, or relative weightlessness of the fluid in the lava lamp. It doesn't form a disc or a cylander. It forms in globs. This seems to be the universal format for maleable material floating within a relatively or completely weightless environment. Thus celestial bodies are some diverse form of a sphere, whether perfectly or imperfectly formed.

So what? Do you mean to imply that the earth is a DELIBERATE (only thousands years old) design created by a higher life form? Complete with ready made deceptions that would cause us lower life forms to be DECIEVED into thinking this devinely inspired, created craft comes off as and functions like a sphere? A more deliberate shape meant to imply something other than the perfection of a circle or sphere???

LOL...

Look, let me toss this out to you:

Why do YOU find it easier to believe that the controlling minority would expend SO many resources and effort into creating this deception? Instead of finding some way to make the supposed truth work for them? You have to labor yourself to prove this too.

HOWEVER, before doing so you propose that this minority of folk who taught YOU these ideas and theories you want us to believe. Okay? Is somehow innocent and only interested in spreading truth and understanding, in an effort to enlighten people, right? As opposed to being the conspiratorial scammers themselves?

Dude it is much more ECONOMICAL and frugal to fool a minority then it is to dupe a majority. People like to talk about conspiracies and hoaxes but I wonder what is your practical experience with the same. It's not that easy, really. All it takes is a small ratio of folks out of a given number to question and inspire a larger ratio into suspicion. Than eventually all hell breaks loose. It really isn't worth it. Not to say it doesn't happen, because it does. But for more practical and immediate rewards, not this shit you are proposing in this thread. Thus, ANOTHER burden of truth that rests on YOUR sholders: Explaining to us "sheep" why it is so important for us to continue believing in the institutional baseed deceptions you have presented to us...

Now conning and scamming a minority or smaller group is easier and more immediately rewarding. Thus religious con men and door to door scammers on other levels experience the level of success that they often do. It is much more rewarding and a thousand or so times more likely...

Don't challenge other people into questioning their beliefs until you are prepared to question your own dude...

THIS is where you fail and on multiple levels...

Or at lest that is what I would say, LOL...

:lol:


the thread started off one way but i missed the next 6 pages or so. wtf ya'll smokin man. the earth is a cylinder? LMAO
i say the earth is like a contact lens case and the ocean is the saline solution
 
I think (the key word is think) I recall that being proved a hoax. It probably was a "test" by the "illuminated" to see how the masses would react. more psy-ops.



definitely a possibility as far as the hoax thing
if it was then who ever did it was way ahead of his time

the illuminati angle is a possibility also but a mass test like this seems alittle too risky
a rouge splinter group maybe........
 
I'm so disappointed in my people right now, I could cry.



thumb_l_137.jpg
 
the views expressed in this thread cant be real! tell me you people are kidding? The moon landing was faked and the earth is flat?
 
Do you understand the purpose/motivation for going in the first place, the sheer cost, and the benefit (if any) gained for doing so?



We blow up shit in other countries and then PAY them to rebuild all the time.
So the sheer cost is not an issue.:cool:
 
Back
Top