damn there not going to let ortiz at least milk a couple title defenses to build his name first...this smells like they're cashing him out
The Berto fight was the cash in and he fucked it up and won.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
damn there not going to let ortiz at least milk a couple title defenses to build his name first...this smells like they're cashing him out
I'f you wasn't then why say THIS? Don't Start man...Don't.. we don't need any instigating Bs so chill.
What?
Bruh, nobody seriously gave Clottey or Margarito even a puncher's chance against Pacquiao so I don't know where you saw all this. The only people that even let those thoughts pass through their minds were people who don't really follow boxing or worked for Top Rank (and that includes media people who go into sell mode as a fight gets closer, even if they shit on the fight when it was announced).
If Manny had fought him (btw, stop telling people what they would have done in a hypothetical, again, that's looking for an argument that doesn't exist), I would be praising him for fightinig a real challenge as opposed to everyone he's fought since JMM. Ortiz would be an even bigger threat to Pacquiao because of the style matchup which is probably why he's not fighting Pac.
In this thread, there was talk of preferring to see May fight Khan or Bradley but some of those were guys who have complained that Mayweather only fights smaller guys.
If Mayweather dominates Ortiz, he'll get the props for beating up a younger, bigger, stronger guy but it will still be a case of him doing what he's supposed to do.
Hold up..what did u just write? wait weren't you the same merece77 that called MY logic weak when i said MY FIRST CHOICE WOULD HAVE BEEN Khan? So what now your changing your story? OR is it your Logic is weaker than mine? But wait..you agree with me? so both our logic is weak oh wait maybe you just like quoting ME and not others here that said the same damn thing I said about Khan? Do YOU even know what your trying to say? Your confused is that it? How is it you just refered to my logic being weak. and that Both Bradley and Khan are coming off lackluster so-so performances." But THEN you come right back a few post later and say "Khan's the most talented dude in that division.I agree. Maybe he hasn't proven that he's the best yet, but as far as physical talent and potential, I'd go with Khan over the other guys. i almost wanna call you a CLOWN for that but i won't say anything this time.![]()
Dude, this is the most over used statement on the boxing threads!! It's easy to say this now, after Manny has dominated a fighter, hind site is always 20/20.... Before Manny fought Margarito, even though he was the favorite, there was talk about how much bigger Margarito was than Manny, etc. but once he dominated, he was washed up... Before he fought Clottey, there was talk that Clottey might give him trouble because of his style, defense, etc. once Manny dominated him, he was a shell and used up... When Manny dominated Shane, there were who threads set up to try to pick a part his performance, when in reality he dominated Shane worse than Floyd did, BUT, the excuse is, either Shane is washed up OR Floyd softened him up for Manny, etc. (Like Floyd is THAT type of fighter and puncher?!?!?) it goes on and on. Ortiz has ONE big win over a Berto whom many have said was overrated and a one dimensional fighter, NOW he the best (not that you've said it, but it has been said here) challenge at welterweight?!?!? No doubt he presents his challenges, but if Manny was to have fought and dominated him, you guys would have said he is too young, raw, cherry picking, etc.... but let Floyd dominate him, and there will be talk of a ticker tape parade!!?!?!


What?
Bruh, nobody seriously gave Clottey or Margarito even a puncher's chance against Pacquiao so I don't know where you saw all this. The only people that even let those thoughts pass through their minds were people who don't really follow boxing or worked for Top Rank (and that includes media people who go into sell mode as a fight gets closer, even if they shit on the fight when it was announced).
If Manny had fought him (btw, stop telling people what they would have done in a hypothetical, again, that's looking for an argument that doesn't exist), I would be praising him for fightinig a real challenge as opposed to everyone he's fought since JMM. Ortiz would be an even bigger threat to Pacquiao because of the style matchup which is probably why he's not fighting Pac.
In this thread, there was talk of preferring to see May fight Khan or Bradley but some of those were guys who have complained that Mayweather only fights smaller guys.
If Mayweather dominates Ortiz, he'll get the props for beating up a younger, bigger, stronger guy but it will still be a case of him doing what he's supposed to do.
funny how that works, huh? I really don't understand these cats. For years "Floyd's a bitch for fighting small guys" and now Floyd's a bitch for not picking the smaller guys???????????????

funny how that works, huh? I really don't understand these cats. For years "Floyd's a bitch for fighting small guys" and now Floyd's a bitch for not picking the smaller guys???????????????
![]()
I don't even like Ortiz, but what the fuck do you guys want? Margarito was great for Pac, but Ortiz is shit?![]()


Great points but there were many on bgol and in the general media who gave both of them chances to win prior to the fights. And in terms of my speaking of hypotheticals, those negative arguments have been presented with hatton margarito and mosley concerning mannys wins so there is a track record here that exists.What?
Bruh, nobody seriously gave Clottey or Margarito even a puncher's chance against Pacquiao so I don't know where you saw all this. The only people that even let those thoughts pass through their minds were people who don't really follow boxing or worked for Top Rank (and that includes media people who go into sell mode as a fight gets closer, even if they shit on the fight when it was announced).
If Manny had fought him (btw, stop telling people what they would have done in a hypothetical, again, that's looking for an argument that doesn't exist), I would be praising him for fightinig a real challenge as opposed to everyone he's fought since JMM. Ortiz would be an even bigger threat to Pacquiao because of the style matchup which is probably why he's not fighting Pac.
In this thread, there was talk of preferring to see May fight Khan or Bradley but some of those were guys who have complained that Mayweather only fights smaller guys.
If Mayweather dominates Ortiz, he'll get the props for beating up a younger, bigger, stronger guy but it will still be a case of him doing what he's supposed to do.
Honestly, I wouldn't have been mad if he picked Khan even though he's a jww simply because of his youth and size, dude is gonna end up at 147 in a year anyway. I think I might have had something to say if he'd chosen Bradley. Small guy with no power.
And I'm not even gonna comment on dudes comment about my Khan comment. Some niccas get emotional and make dumb ass statements and don't even try to back them up with anything![]()
I'm surprised that you wrote this. I also remember Clottey and Margarito supposedly being threats and AT LEAST having a puncher's chance because of their perceived size and strength advantage.
Regardless, I'm not sure it's fair to say Ortiz is the livest of opponents compared to Pac's competition. I think Ortiz is a great pick and not an easy fight as I stated in my previous posts but if we want to talk shit about Ortiz and downplay him, it can be done. The Ortiz situation is similar to Cotto if you think about it. I don't really see how Ortiz is so much better than the Cotto that fought Pac. Ortiz got hot based off his last fight. Prior to that he's been getting thrown under the bus. Cotto was also supposedly on the slide but at least he had been a champ, was considered technically sound, and was generally not considered a quitter. Also, Cotto had already been a welter for a minute and was perceived to be larger and possibly stronger than Pac.
He did just become a welter but he's been fighting at jr welter weighing 160 lbs, putting himself at a disadvantage as he fought better opposition. He should have went welter a while ago but he and his people were trying to game the system and were paying the price. He's a big welter and will probably end up as a jr middle by next year since that division is one of the deeper in boxing.Ortiz is good, but although he is perceived to be big (by myself included), in reality the kid JUST got to welterweight, is just one fight removed from being boxing's official quitter, and only managed to beat the most vulnerable champ at 147 in Berto. The same Berto that can't deal with southpaws even if they're bums and for this reason went life and death with Collazo who even though his name is thrown around often has never proven to be anything but a C fighter.
Honestly, I wouldn't have been mad if he picked Khan even though he's a jww simply because of his youth and size, dude is gonna end up at 147 in a year anyway. I think I might have had something to say if he'd chosen Bradley. Small guy with no power.![]()
Great points but there were many on bgol and in the general media who gave both of them chances to win prior to the fights. And in terms of my speaking of hypotheticals, those negative arguments have been presented with hatton margarito and mosley concerning mannys wins so there is a track record here that exists.
I don't recall anyone thinking Margarito or Clottey having a shot but Alaskan has copped to wishing on a star with Clottey so it must have happened.
Dude,what were you thinking?![]()
I was thinking Clottey was a solid fighter with pop and if a brawl broke out Pac might be on the end of a mean shot. It didn't happen like that...![]()
I also was probably still pissed cause I thought he was robbed by Cotto and he is an underdog that I think has gotten the short of the stick even while it is valid that he gives up rounds for no reason. Either way, I had more of a hope than a real logical argument for Clottey winning and I was checked vigorously for it.

See Dave, I told you!![]()
.But really, unfortunately these two are going to be attached at the hip for the remainder o their careers, and frankly I feel like both of them are beyond the point where they should get props for fighting best available, etc. They both are head and shoulders above anyone else in the division and should be called out on bullshit notice whenever they fight anyone but each other. Manny is using his past wars with Marquez to push this fight when in reality his advantages are very pronounced. Same thing with floyd beinng an opportunist when it comes to fighting Ortiz. I can see both of them having a great laugh once this is all said and done. Joking about how each of them pockted 100 mill at the expense of their blind folowers, keeping our interest while dangling the carrot of this ficticious fight in front of us. All the while cashing in on easy pay days...![]()


I see. Alaskan, you're on probation. Probation from what? I don't know. Just know, you're on my list.
Clottey.
Cool.
I still think it will happen eventually but if they're fighting, I have fewer complaints, even if it's other guys. I just want them to fight decent opponents if they don't fight each other.
If they don't make that happen, with all the money at stake, I would be shocked.
Your not gonna comment cuz you CAN'T without putting your shoe in your mouth and besides why would you when your side kick aka tage team partner Alaskanredman already put his cape on to comment on your behalf. We all can say whom we'd rather see this guy fight or that guy fight..it's all speculation and opinons untill the fight actually happens and alot of times MANY of you end up looking like or sounding like fools. But my bad..i forgot..all those that dissagree with you is either a fool or has weak logic. I NEVER said who'd be the BEST challange for dude OR who i thought was the BEST at any weight class.welter in this case what i SAID was I'D LIKE TO SEE HIM FIGHT Khan..i could have said i'd like to see him fight ANY given fighter IF thats what i'd rather see OK! it has nothing to do with emotions or any of your antics. I said i feel Bradly would out work Floyd based on his style of fighting...i also mentioned HIM BEING SMALLER..but his size doesn't have SHIT do do with what I'D PERFER TO SEE. I also know bradly has no real KO power. But to have someone say my logic is weak then come behind his own statement and C/S someone ELSE whom also said Khan would be their fighter of Choice to go against floyd is just clownish. Your logic is no better than any person in this thread when we are mostly commenting on what we FEEL might be the situation on any given night in the ring. But untill THEN anything YOU or ANYONE says in ref to how a fight might turn out OR who'd be a better opponent for whom ever is just heresay,speculation and or opinons.Honestly, I wouldn't have been mad if he picked Khan even though he's a jww simply because of his youth and size, dude is gonna end up at 147 in a year anyway. I think I might have had something to say if he'd chosen Bradley. Small guy with no power.
And I'm not even gonna comment on dudes comment about my Khan comment. Some niccas get emotional and make dumb ass statements and don't even try to back them up with anything![]()
Your not gonna comment cuz you CAN'T without putting your shoe in your mouth and besides why would you when your side kick aka tage team partner Alaskanredman already put his cape on to comment on your behalf. We all can say whom we'd rather see this guy fight or that guy fight..it's all speculation and opinons untill the fight actually happens and alot of times MANY of you end up looking like or sounding like fools. But my bad..i forgot..all those that dissagree with you is either a fool or has weak logic. I NEVER said who'd be the BEST challange for dude OR who i thought was the BEST at any weight class.welter in this case what i SAID was I'D LIKE TO SEE HIM FIGHT Khan..i could have said i'd like to see him fight ANY given fighter IF thats what i'd rather see OK! it has nothing to do with emotions or any of your antics. I said i feel Bradly would out work Floyd based on his style of fighting...i also mentioned HIM BEING SMALLER..but his size doesn't have SHIT do do with what I'D PERFER TO SEE. I also know bradly has no real KO power. But to have someone say my logic is weak then come behind his own statement and C/S someone ELSE whom also said Khan would be their fighter of Choice to go against floyd is just clownish. Your logic is no better than any person in this thread when we are mostly commenting on what we FEEL might be the situation on any given night in the ring. But untill THEN anything YOU or ANYONE says in ref to how a fight might turn out OR who'd be a better opponent for whom ever is just heresay,speculation and or opinons.
If Mayweather asks for it, Ortiz would pee on his mother and give blood to a vampire for this fight.


How'd I miss this one? So who would be the vampire in question? Maybe referee Vic DRACUlich would be a good choice? "In case of repeated fouls I'm gonna have to take a pint away guys."


Again it's what i feel would happen IF they ever fought..NOT a fact yet but it's what i feel might happen. Do you have a problem with that or what? I never said HE WILL...i said i FEEL he would...there IS a difference. A lot of times i also feel you say some of the things you say strictly for ammusement value. See it's guys like you that feel the need to have others agreee with you.. guys like ME...i don't give a fuck who agrees or disagree..i will stand in with anyone in this thread and will say what i FEEL...now if i had to speak FACTS and i had NONE then i could understand the weak logic statements or the intertainment value that YOU always try to bring to threads of disscusion. It's cool tho keep being you. I'll continue being me.Bradley would out work Floyd, though... according to Will Right.
I knew bradly was jr but was unsure about Khan THUS me asking Alaskan was Khan... i also said that i THOUGHT he was..i was looking or asking to be corrected if i wasn't right. When i responded to Alaskan i never stated who'd be the BEST...i said whom I'D like to see him fight...nothing more nothing less.Also Alaskan asked you who would be a better choice at WELTERWEIGHT - you brought in Khan and Bradley being better choices - NEITHER OF WHOM ARE WELTERWEIGHTS. Ortiz is the WELTERWEIGHT CHAMPION. See the logic and fact, not feelings?
The reasson i directed this to you was because i felt your statement was directed at me..if it in fact was not then i apologize. But in order for me to apologize i first have to know whom you were addressing this statement to when you wrote"And I'm not even gonna comment on dudes comment about my Khan comment. Some niccas get emotional and make dumb ass statements and don't even try to back them up with anything"First off, what I said was IF HE WASN'T FIGHTING ORTIZ I'd rather see him fight Khan over Bradley. I didn't catch feelings or anything. Go back and read the thread. Plus I speaking on a comment POET made not you. Again go back and read the thread, quote it if you like.
I knew bradly was jr but was unsure about Khan THUS me asking Alaskan was Khan... i also said that i THOUGHT he was..i was looking or asking to be corrected if i wasn't right. When i responded to Alaskan i never stated who'd be the BEST...i said whom I'D like to see him fight...nothing more nothing less.
The reasson i directed this to you was because i felt your statement was directed at me..if it in fact was not then i apologize. But in order for me to apologize i first have to know whom you were addressing this statement to when you wrote"And I'm not even gonna comment on dudes comment about my Khan comment. Some niccas get emotional and make dumb ass statements and don't even try to back them up with anything"
Now I'm waiting for all the bgol boxing experts to come in here and refer to Alaskan as a 'Casual Boxing Fan' ! Those Dudes crack me up with that shit there!
These two clowns need to fight or else!?!? Do you realize we've spent damn near 2 years and about 1500 posts each debating this!?! Casual boxing fans.... you've got to love us!![]()

I see. Alaskan, you're on probation. Probation from what? I don't know. Just know, you're on my list.
Clottey.
Your not gonna comment cuz you CAN'T without putting your shoe in your mouth and besides why would you when your side kick aka tage team partner Alaskanredman already put his cape on to comment on your behalf. We all can say whom we'd rather see this guy fight or that guy fight..it's all speculation and opinons untill the fight actually happens and alot of times MANY of you end up looking like or sounding like fools. But my bad..i forgot..all those that dissagree with you is either a fool or has weak logic. I NEVER said who'd be the BEST challange for dude OR who i thought was the BEST at any weight class.welter in this case what i SAID was I'D LIKE TO SEE HIM FIGHT Khan..
That's posible..in which case i stand corrected.Whatever you stated, Alaskan's question was who would (in your opinion) be the best choice at welterweight. I stated that the fact was that Khan and Bradley were not welterweights that they were juniors. I also said that of all the junior welters I felt Khan was the best and the best equipped to move up to 147 to fight Floyd - IF Floyd had been picking from the 140 crop. That's all I was saying, reading the thread again, I think you misunderstood my post(s).
Again it's what i feel would happen IF they ever fought..NOT a fact yet but it's what i feel might happen. Do you have a problem with that or what? I never said HE WILL...i said i FEEL he would...there IS a difference. A lot of times i also feel you say some of the things you say strictly for ammusement value. See it's guys like you that feel the need to have others agreee with you.. guys like ME...i don't give a fuck who agrees or disagree..i will stand in with anyone in this thread and will say what i FEEL...now if i had to speak FACTS and i had NONE then i could understand the weak logic statements or the intertainment value that YOU always try to bring to threads of disscusion. It's cool tho keep being you. I'll continue being me.
I still think Clottey took a dive....
Honestly, I wouldn't have been mad if he picked Khan even though he's a jww simply because of his youth and size, dude is gonna end up at 147 in a year anyway. I think I might have had something to say if he'd chosen Bradley. Small guy with no power.![]()
If he was bigger and would you think he was a better option than Khan or Ortiz?Damn, this is why I don't comment on here much. Dudes be catching feelings. Jumping on each other over the slightest shit.
Anyways my bad mixing up the welterweight classes. I think Khan is the man at 140, period. Sure he is green, but it seems like a fight both cats could have made. At 147 it is manny, period. PBF just doesn't fight enough to warrant being considered the man. Also if he does beat Ortiz he can't claim anything except beating a fighter that everyone wrote off (cause he showed he lacked heart) and his most notable win was a upset against a suspect champion, berto.
