And how does what you typed pertain to my post![]()
I thought of BGOL during this pathetic ass game. I was looking at Gasol's pathetic performance and thinking "This is the guy cranrab says is the best player on the Lakers and the true key to their success???"Kobe's going to need a reliable second option, scoring wise, or this team will always be questionable versus good blue collar teams.
Odom isn't consistent enough.
And Gasol just doesn't have the will. If the game doesn't flow a certain way, he's stagnant.
If the Lakers want the chips this year, someone else is going have to step up. Last year, it was Ariza versus Denver. We'll see this year.
"This is the guy cranrab says is the best player on the Lakers and the true key to their success???"
I thought of BGOL during this pathetic ass game. I was looking at Gasol's pathetic performance and thinking "This is the guy cranrab says is the best player on the Lakers and the true key to their success???"
Pretty much. He'll retort to stats but if you actually watch the game you'd see Gasol is a certified soft batch cookie.
pau gasol is a euro. saying pau gasol is a soft batch cookie is redundant, no?
let the O run through him, fakers handle everyone.
let the O run through a fragile primadonna gloryhound with a national audience, fakers never in the game.
you video game heads prove time and again you know nothing about basketball.
costanza knows i'm a fan of the socratic method, so here are 2 questions you (and everyone else who CLAIMS to love BASKETBALL) should be asking in Q1 and Q2.
was pau gasol not getting the ball in scoring positions? if not, was it because of (a) poor ball economy by his teammates (b) poor footwork/effort by pau gasol (c) the D?
answer honestly. if that's not too much of a challenge.
those questions are enough to get you started. it's ALWAYS about BASKETBALL. the statistics are just the evidence.
absolutely.
if you can't see that especially after this game, there isn't much hope for you to become more than a casual fan of the sport.
no foul trouble, 39 minutes, 11 FGAs total for pau gasol.
ask yourself why.
don't listen to the stans for an answer. if you need to, watch the replay.
the answer was evident BEFORE midway through Q2.
stop filtering the TRUTH and let yourself see clearly for a change.
I didn't even say the game until midway through Q3.
I'm just generally unimpressed with Gasol and would never trust him to carry a title contending team.
I'm an active metro league hooper. And you're not.
All right... I'll try to tape ESPN's replay and hopefully there won't be too much edited out.i'm not impressed with pau gasol either.
i understand and do not overstate what pau gasol brings to the table.
his O abilities in the post (scoring, passing, etc) are the most valuable asset the fakers (under coach jackson) have. pau gasol is the SOLE reason for the fakers improved look.
if you have the ability to do so, watch Q1 and Q2. SEE FOR YOURSELF what happens after midway through Q2.
good for you. and correct, i'm not a metro league hooper. i would never attempt to aspire to that grand level of basketball.
i've posted my basketball hardware on the SPORTS board. as i've told you before, people on here have met me.
search the board archives for yourself.
No. I'm not going to search. And who's met you? Who? Names? Post your hardware again, right now, in this thread with a time stamp. This isn't grade school where you can just say something . . .
And Akili Smith still plays metro flag football around here.
And even if so, saying you're a hooper, which I don't believe, you're still wrong about this whole situation.
More smokescreens.
The truth. Gasol is a soft batch cookie when facing blue collared teams. I wish he wasn't. But he is. He doesn't have the will but must find something inside or someone else has to step up and make game changing plays. Or the Lakers will fail.
Who's trying to cater to yourself?
And who's met you? Who? Names? Post your hardware again, right now, in this thread with a time stamp.
Kobe's going to need a reliable second option, scoring wise, or this team will always be questionable versus good blue collar teams.
Like we failed last season, with Gasol?
Kobe's going to need a reliable second option, scoring wise, or this team will always be questionable versus good blue collar teams.
Like we failed last season, with Gasol?
![]()
even the fakers fans catch the tobe stan m.o.
marginalize fakers teammates, deride fakers general managers, diminish fakers head coaches, but never ever under any circumstanes question where the fault actually resides.
funny though, because you are the same dude who on two different occasions said he was going to "expose me", but never did.
even when i invited you to do it, you still balked.
why?
i don't need to repeat myself for you. i've posted everything before. it's still there.
You're missing the point, kid. Your current working theory is that Gasol is heartless and unreliable and that the Lakers will fail in those circumstances. I'm asking you why we won a championship last year with the same circumstances. Please also let me know how we're on top of the league right now, with the same circumstances.
Thank you.
![]()
His contract says great. I don't see it. Have you?
That's not the primary focus here.
NOT my theory.
you need to direct your question at the tobe stan.