If THIS aint a clear ADMISSION THE MOON LANDING WAS FAKE I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS!!!!

wow...some truly uninformed opinions in here.

the flag wasn't moving in space, it was held up by a wire in the top of the flag.

we CAN do it now, there just isn't much of a reason to.

we went to the moon as part of the ARMS race, in competition with the U.S.S.R. and People's Republic of China. they tracked us with radar, they watched our every move. if the moon landing had been faked, they would've said it first.

man, i'm starting to think the whole world is going crazy.

At last a voice of reason, Thank you.

BTW the moon does have gravity, 1/8 that of Earths. None of that however explains the stupidity of NASA losing the footage. That's totally irresponsible for an agency that get's trillions of dollars from the government.
 
Did this cat say he doesn't believe in gravity?

:confused: :hmm: :smh:

I think that means I don't need to come back to this thread.

Yeah this thread just:

fonzie_jumps_the_shark-300x251.png


:lol:

I'm done.
 
I actually read the whole thing, from complete idiocy to logic, and should've probably stopped with the continued posts of, "We only went to the moon ONCE in 40 years," but there were some decent posts.
 
Neil Armstrong said his famous quote wrongly. He said "One small step for man..." when it should have been "One small step for A man...". That was the way he practiced it. It didn't make sense the way he actually said it since 'man' and 'mankind' essentially mean the same thing.

If it was a studio recording couldn't they simply have done another take to correct the mistake?





Or did he say it wrong on purpose to make it look more authentic.
 
He also said he doesn't believe there was a cold war or that the Earth is a sphere....
you fools have no idea how far and deep the rabbit hole goes. you people who are so grounded in your conventional "wisdom" have no ability to think outside of it and when you meet people who do, you foolishly think something is wrong with THEM.

i laugh at you heartily.
 
you fools have no idea how far and deep the rabbit hole goes. you people who are so grounded in your conventional "wisdom" have no ability to think outside of it and when you meet people who do, you foolishly think something is wrong with THEM.

i laugh at you heartily.

You said the Earth isn't round. People sail around it all the time.
 
You said the Earth isn't round. People sail around it all the time.

In actuality, the US Government has them in a bathtub projecting sailing images around them. They never move from that spot.
 
Actually the Soviets were the first to reach the moon.

Incorrect. The Soviets were the 1st to send a satellite into space prompting the US to make haste & be the 1st to do something that surpassed the Soviets.

To add to the conspiracy theory, the pics that were "allegedly" taken from being on the moon itself had no visual signs of any stars despite their being no atmosphere to block the potential view of any other celestial objects.
 
you fools have no idea how far and deep the rabbit hole goes. you people who are so grounded in your conventional "wisdom" have no ability to think outside of it and when you meet people who do, you foolishly think something is wrong with THEM.

i laugh at you heartily.

What you're talking about is not "wisdom", it's unsubstantiated hearsay. If you claim something to be true you have to be ready to prove it. BTW, calling people sheep or sleeping is not proving your point.

If you say there was no cold war, show me some facts or data. If you say the world is not a sphere, show me some facts or data. I can claim I'm fucking Beyonce and Christina Millian as I type this, but I'm sure you'd want proof before believing it.
 
Incorrect. The Soviets were the 1st to send a satellite into space prompting the US to make haste & be the 1st to do something that surpassed the Soviets.

To add to the conspiracy theory, the pics that were "allegedly" taken from being on the moon itself had no visual signs of any stars despite their being no atmosphere to block the potential view of any other celestial objects.

http://www.clavius.org/stars.html

The first thing every conspiracist notices about photography in space is that there are no stars in any of the pictures. The general public brought up on science fiction motion pictures is used to seeing stars in pictures purporting to be taken in outer space. And so the real photos seem strange.

On earth we see the stars in the sky because there is little other light. Those who live in mountainous country can go up into the mountains where the air is thin and there are no distracting lights, the stars are quite magnificent. But when you return to the brightly lit city and look at the same night sky, you see only the brightest stars. If you go inside the house and turn on all the lights and look out the window, you can't see any stars.

Why not?

Because the human eye has adjusted to the amount of light, first by adjusting the iris and then by changing the chemical composition of the retina to make it more or less sensitive. In the pitch blackness of the mountains they're open just as wide as they can be, allowing more light to enter. In the night city, they close somewhat to adjust for the street lights. And inside the house, they are as closed as they are during the daytime in sunlight. A camera's aperture works the same way. To set the exposure for bright exposure means that subtle lights like stars simply won't show up.

Because the sky on the moon is black, we tend to believe the viewing conditions are the same as night on earth. Not true. The sun shines just as brightly (slightly brighter, in fact) on the lunar surface, and so the astronauts' eyes (and camera apertures) were set for photographing in daylight conditions. Neil Armstrong reported not seeing any stars from the lunar surface, except through the navigation scopes (where the eyepiece screened out the other lights). Ed Mitchell reported seeing stars only when he specifically shut out extraneous light.
 
you fools have no idea how far and deep the rabbit hole goes. you people who are so grounded in your conventional "wisdom" have no ability to think outside of it and when you meet people who do, you foolishly think something is wrong with THEM.

i laugh at you heartily.

Instead of making blank statements to save face you could explain and argue your point :smh:
 
What you're talking about is not "wisdom", it's unsubstantiated hearsay. If you claim something to be true you have to be ready to prove it. BTW, calling people sheep or sleeping is not proving your point.

If you say there was no cold war, show me some facts or data. If you say the world is not a sphere, show me some facts or data. I can claim I'm fucking Beyonce and Christina Millian as I type this, but I'm sure you'd want proof before believing it.

Christina Millian I would take someone's word on...:lol:
 
Scientifically that makes sense since cameras are made to mimic how the eye works when it comes creating an image relative to how much light enters it but I doubt that if they were on the moon they would be able take any pictures. First you have to take into account that daytime temperatures on the moon can reach as high as 200+ degrees farenheit in shaded areas making the working conditions very difficult. Also the lens on a camera can only take in so much light to provide a distinguishabe picture. The pictures they have are too sharp in my opinion to have been taken during the day as the light from the sun would've rendered the picture blurry. So setting their cameras for daytime shots seems like a stretch.
 
if that's what you think i said, it only proves that you're in fact the idiot.

What is in fact idiotic is saying that water should fall off of the "sides" of a globe; that is saying that you do not believe in gravity, that you took no science classes in middle or high school which would explain gravity, or you just had to find something to try to insult me to cover your willful ignorance.



Dammit, I came back!
 
What is in fact idiotic is saying that water should fall off of the "sides" of a globe; that is saying that you do not believe in gravity, that you took no science classes in middle or high school which would explain gravity, or you just had to find something to try to insult me to cover your willful ignorance.



Dammit, I came back!
if i don't believe the earth is the shape that our science books tell us it is, why would i believe the force known as gravity works the way they tell us it does? i have plenty of information to back up my beliefs on the shape of this planet and i've posted it in numerous threads. and as far as big tex's post about facts or data that show the cold war was a huge hoax, look no further than the FACT that the vietnam war was nothing but a hoax to see an example of how wars are manufactured for profit. then take a look at the afghan-soviet conflict to see who the instigator was in that, and look who popped up 20 years later as the boogey man threatening america's "freedom". then look at the way the boogeyman disappeared and all of a sudden we're in fucking iraq for god knows what.

you cats just don't understand how this shit works out here. keeping the masses confused about even the most basic shit is a part of the plan. there's plenty of evidence in a book by zech sitchin called "genesis revisited" also.

you cats think i'm an idiot but im actually on a whole different level.



it's a cylindrical disk. remember, mufuckas thought it was flat at first for a reason. astronomy has been around for so long, if they knew as much as they knew about the universe so far back then, how could they have gotten the formation of the planet wrong? i don't give a fuck who say what, but there is a HUGE conspiracy about the true nature of the planets and the rest of the universe that if revealed would destroy all of the control mechanisms in the world mainly religion.

flatmap.jpg


http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/flat/flateart.htm


Flat-Earth.gif


http://www.freewebs.com/cosmologies/medievalrationalism.htm
 
it's a cylindrical disk. remember, mufuckas thought it was flat at first for a reason. astronomy has been around for so long, if they knew as much as they knew about the universe so far back then, how could they have gotten the formation of the planet wrong? i don't give a fuck who say what, but there is a HUGE conspiracy about the true nature of the planets and the rest of the universe that if revealed would destroy all of the control mechanisms in the world mainly religion.

You think the Earth is shaped like a Cylinder :confused:

What about all the other planets(Mars, Saturn, Jupiter, ect)? In your opinion are they cylinders, or Spherical?
 
So ALL the other Planets in the Solar system are Spherical except the earth? Even Venus(which is almost identical to the earth in Size), and Mars?
lol @ you actually believing they have the ability to measure other planet sizes and shit. it's really comical how much you people believe in a lying ass organization like nasa.
 
If you want your comedy career to really take off, you should start explaining some of this stuff at your shows ...






















:D

OK, I have nothing else to say, except this: you know those links didn't back up your beliefs, right?
 
lol @ you actually believing they have the ability to measure other planet sizes and shit. it's really comical how much you people believe in a lying ass organization like nasa.

:lol:

Why wont you answer the question? In your opinion are the other Terrestrial planets besides earth shaped like a Cylinder, or are they shaped like a sphere?
 
Can you elaborate on how one can fly or sail around the world ? how can you get to Australia from south Africa on that map? I'm curious how this works? seriously please please explain?
 

Does this picture say that the sun is 27 miles in diameter and orbits 3000 miles directly above the equator?

Why does North America touch Asia? Do you think it's possible to drive from the U.S. to Asia?

Why is Australia bigger than North America?

You sit there typing on a computer connected to people all over the world but you think we don't yet have the technology to measure the size of a country?

Have you ever ventured out of your neighborhood?
 
Well the moon does have gravity. You can stand on it. It's like 1/8 that of Earth I think....(prolly wrong)....

Actually you're exactly right, the moon's gravity is 1/8 of that of the Earth's. This whole discussion is ridiculous. This is one of the most pathetic conspiracy theories of them all. Use your minds to analyze something truly plausible people and capable of making a difference people. :smh:
 
Does this picture say that the sun is 27 miles in diameter and orbits 3000 miles directly above the equator?

Why does North America touch Asia? Do you think it's possible to drive from the U.S. to Asia?

Why is Australia bigger than North America?

You sit there typing on a computer connected to people all over the world but you think we don't yet have the technology to measure the size of a country?

Have you ever ventured out of your neighborhood?
muthafucker have you ever heard of the bering strait?

and who the fuck said this map was to SCALE?

you're grasping at straws because you cannot wrap you head around the concept being presented.

go back to lurking.
 
Actually you're exactly right, the moon's gravity is 1/8 of that of the Earth's. This whole discussion is ridiculous. This is one of the most pathetic conspiracy theories of them all. Use your minds to analyze something truly plausible people and capable of making a difference people. :smh:
oh yea? so what groundbreaking thoughts are you putting into action? have you been to the moon before? or are you taking someone else's word for what the gravitational pull of the moon is? they can't even get it right in the "footage" so wtf does that tell you? keep it moving son
 
Back
Top