A few months ago, you dummies tried to argue that the globe has no top or bottom because of gravity (which was dumb because it spins on an axis so it has to have a top and bottom, the fucking north pole and south pole, you asshole), but if I accept that the globe has no top or bottom and anyplace on it can be considered the top, then no matter how big the ball is, every direction from where you are will be DOWNHILL. And the higher I elevate above this ball, the lower the horizon will be in the distance. A sphere is a CONSTANT CURVE. And if you are standing up straight, at sea level, the horizon is going to be BELOW YOU.
You're trying to use scale as an excuse for the observable flatness we see daily instead of just accepting the fact that it really is just flat.
The horizon will ALWAYS be lower on a ball. It can NEVER rise with you as you ascend. And for that simple, uncomplicated fact, THE EARTH IS FLAT.
By your logic we live on a polygon with sections of flatness, not a sphere.
And also,
At 24 miles above the earth, above your "atmosphere", does refraction make the horizon appear parallel to the observer's eyesight?
Edit: I forgot, the atmosphere is no longer what it used to be, NASA recently updated Earth's atmosphere to include the moon, which I guess that means the Van Allen Belts aren't really acting as a container for the earth...or do they?
@MasonPH650 @RoadRage
Yall can call me dumb and crazy all day for the rest of your life, but you CAN'T disprove what I just typed. You simply can't.