Really, then tell them to collect 10gz from this three-year-old Sexton challenge, where the money is in escrow and the rules are well defined and laid out.
Like I said all you have are claims but now real evidence to back the claims!
BGOL Flat Earth crew - tell us how this is being faked - all woman crew going into space
- Thread starter Big Tex
- Start date
Like I said all you have are claims but now real evidence to back the claims!
Could our solar system have 9 planets after all? Astronomers may have confirmed possible existence.
Our solar system may have a ninth planet after all, following the declassification of Pluto nearly two decades ago, researchers say.
Gotcha, I knew you would eventually dox yourself!!! I finally found Cashie!!!!!
But while you are on the subject of Nazis
Why do all you flattards look Goofy as fuck, question do they look like normal people to you?Could our solar system have 9 planets after all? Astronomers may have confirmed possible existence.
Our solar system may have a ninth planet after all, following the declassification of Pluto nearly two decades ago, researchers say.abcnews.go.com
What do you think is happening to the boat? And by the way, your sense of scale is beyond retarded, because if that's 6 miles the cartoon boat has to be at least 5 miles high. But I bet in your brain it looks normal.
What do you think is happening to the boat? And by the way, your sense of scale is beyond retarded, because if that's 6 miles the cartoon boat has to be at least 5 miles high. But I bet in your brain it looks normal.
you're so goddamn stupid it's unbelievable
There are no flat sections on a ball. It's constantly curving. It's all downhill (360 degrees ) from where you stand.
If you're standing on a ball there's no way that the horizon 3 miles away from you is going to be at eye level. It would be beneath your feet.
Still waiting for the credentialed scientists saying the earth is flat.
There are no flat sections on a ball. It's constantly curving. It's all downhill (360 degrees ) from where you stand.
If you're standing on a ball there's no way that the horizon 3 miles away from you is going to be at eye level. It would be beneath your feet.
I'm stupid. LOLOLOLOL, you are the idiot who only looks at Flat Earth videos without verifying to see if any of it is true. You just take them for face value. This is why you ask dumb questions that have already been debunked a million times and why you post high-altitude balloon footage taken with distorting lenses while ignoring videos that use rectilinear lenses and take foolproof measures to ensure it's not being distorted.you're so goddamn stupid it's unbelievable
So I guess in the idiocracy world that you are from the dumb ones are the ones that are educated and the smart ones are the ones who stick crayons up their nose.
You dumb ass. Here is an obvious way out of proportion example of how we see the horizon on a globe.
There are no flat sections on a ball. It's constantly curving. It's all downhill (360 degrees ) from where you stand.
If you're standing on a ball there's no way that the horizon 3 miles away from you is going to be at eye level. It would be beneath your feet.
Say you were on top of a building that is higher than the ISS orbit and looked down towards the horizon it would look similar to this illustration.
Where everything that is below the curve or the tangent of the line of sight, would appear to be cut off bottom first just like the photo of the boat.
What the Flatties did to trick you was a strawman the normal people's explanation with that bogus photo fooling you into thinking this is our claim.
And yes, you were dumb enough to fall for it, again. Beyond sad!
Also, you should note that there is a direct correlation between the viewing angle, or in the illustration triangle to the height of the viewer, the smaller the person becomes the smaller the triangle becomes, and once the viewer is around 6 feet, then the angle of attack or the triangle should be a little over three miles with no refraction but if the light were to bend a half a degree due to refraction the viewing distance to the horizon could reach 60 miles.
Such refraction index is very rare, but under slightly refracted states seeing an extra 12 miles to the horizon is quite possible.
So the illustration should help you visualize the importance of including viewer height in determining the distance to the horizon (remember the smaller the number the smaller the illustration triangle becomes) and the next variable becomes the height of the target beyond the horizon.
This dictates how much you should see and how much should be blocked. Going back to the illustration, it should be easy to envision the smaller the boat or object beyond the horizon/tangent will have more blocked than a big giant boat. This is why showing a giant man around 3 miles high looking at a boat almost six miles tall, is both disingenuous and ridiculous.
Such refraction index is very rare, but under slightly refracted states seeing an extra 12 miles to the horizon is quite possible.
So the illustration should help you visualize the importance of including viewer height in determining the distance to the horizon (remember the smaller the number the smaller the illustration triangle becomes) and the next variable becomes the height of the target beyond the horizon.
This dictates how much you should see and how much should be blocked. Going back to the illustration, it should be easy to envision the smaller the boat or object beyond the horizon/tangent will have more blocked than a big giant boat. This is why showing a giant man around 3 miles high looking at a boat almost six miles tall, is both disingenuous and ridiculous.
But the best way to debunk your false claim is by asking you for your model or explanation for why ships disappear from the bottom up please include mathematics or science to back this claim, not another derp video, and if you do say words like perspective or refraction please include evidence of how it works and support your claim.
What am I talking about, you are too stupid to understand let alone be able to do any of that stuff. Stick to silly internet memes and videos because when you're this stupid that's all you got!
What am I talking about, you are too stupid to understand let alone be able to do any of that stuff. Stick to silly internet memes and videos because when you're this stupid that's all you got!
Classic cult behavior. Running away from actual experiments, mathematical equations, spaceships, satellites, GPS (even tho they use smartphones), etc. that will disprove the seasonal GRIFT that is shrinking. FLERF tribe is reduced to posting silly fisher price looking "models" online.
You dumb ass. Here is an obvious way out of proportion example of how we see the horizon on a globe.
Say you were on top of a building that is higher than the ISS orbit and looked down towards the horizon it would look similar to this illustration.
Where everything that is below the curve or the tangent of the line of sight, would appear to be cut off bottom first just like the photo of the boat.
What the Flatties did to trick you was a strawman the normal people's explanation with that bogus photo fooling you into thinking this is our claim.
And yes, you were dumb enough to fall for it, again. Beyond sad!
This is it right here. This is absolutely it. This is why I say you are retarded as fuck. You think it's an issue of scale and that I’m blowing things out of "proportion". "If an ant is on a basketball" ass nigga
.A sphere is a CONSTANT CURVE. And if you are standing up straight, at sea level, the horizon is going to be BELOW YOU. A few months ago, you dummies tried to argue that the globe has no top or bottom because of gravity (which was dumb because it spins on an axis so it has to have a top and bottom, the fucking north pole and south pole, you asshole), but if I accept that the globe has no top or bottom and anyplace on it can be considered the top, then no matter how big the ball is, every direction from where you are will be DOWNHILL. And the higher I elevate above this ball, the lower the horizon will be in the distance.
You're trying to use scale as an excuse for the observable flatness we see daily instead of just accepting the fact that it really is just flat.
The horizon will ALWAYS be lower on a ball. It can NEVER rise with you as you ascend. And for that simple, uncomplicated fact, THE EARTH IS FLAT.
You do realize that zooming in on that boat will bring the full view of it back right? It has nothing to do with a goddamn curve. It can't be the curve blocking the view of the boat if I can zoom in on it and bring back the full view of the boat and the water it's sitting on. A zoom lens can't curve around a curve.
You are trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.
No it won't.You do realize that zooming in on that boat will bring the full view of it back right? It has nothing to do with a goddamn curve. It can't be the curve blocking the view of the boat if I can zoom in on it and bring back the full view of the boat and the water it's sitting on. A zoom lens can't curve around a curve.
You are trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.
Cash,
If you get a fact as easily verified as the distance from Tokyo to Mt. Fuji wrong it discredits everything else you post.
No it doesn't. And I don't have to get everything 100% correct in order to still be right that the earth is flat. Yall get shit wrong ALL DAY, so don't give me that bullshit.
You think I don't see yall avoiding the things I post that you CAN'T REFUTE??
A few months ago, you dummies tried to argue that the globe has no top or bottom because of gravity (which was dumb because it spins on an axis so it has to have a top and bottom, the fucking north pole and south pole, you asshole), but if I accept that the globe has no top or bottom and anyplace on it can be considered the top, then no matter how big the ball is, every direction from where you are will be DOWNHILL. And the higher I elevate above this ball, the lower the horizon will be in the distance. A sphere is a CONSTANT CURVE. And if you are standing up straight, at sea level, the horizon is going to be BELOW YOU.
You're trying to use scale as an excuse for the observable flatness we see daily instead of just accepting the fact that it really is just flat.
The horizon will ALWAYS be lower on a ball. It can NEVER rise with you as you ascend. And for that simple, uncomplicated fact, THE EARTH IS FLAT.
By your logic we live on a polygon with sections of flatness, not a sphere.
And also,
At 24 miles above the earth, above your "atmosphere", does refraction make the horizon appear parallel to the observer's eyesight?
Edit: I forgot, the atmosphere is no longer what it used to be, NASA recently updated Earth's atmosphere to include the moon, which I guess that means the Van Allen Belts aren't really acting as a container for the earth...or do they?
@MasonPH650 @RoadRage
Yall can call me dumb and crazy all day for the rest of your life, but you CAN'T disprove what I just typed. You simply can't.
Your post stated that the distance from Tokyo to Mt. Fuji was 900 miles to demonstrate how flat the Earth is, given you could simultaneously see both. This was so easy to disprove that it felt purposely deceptive.
In an earlier post you stated that total solar eclipses proved that the Sun and Moon had to be the same size, ignoring annular eclipses that occur fairly frequently and demonstrate that the Sun and Moon can't be the same size.
The last example was related to whether the moon is flat or a sphere. I posted a video of the Moon's libration that clearly shows more surface area than usual and demonstrates that the moon can't be a flat light. You completely ignored it.
What they do is zoom in on a small boat too small to resolve with your vision, so when it's zoomed out you cannot see it, however, it was never over the curve.You do realize that zooming in on that boat will bring the full view of it back right? It has nothing to do with a goddamn curve. It can't be the curve blocking the view of the boat if I can zoom in on it and bring back the full view of the boat and the water it's sitting on. A zoom lens can't curve around a curve.
You are trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.
Here is your challenge that you will once again dodge because you are a flat earfer and an fucking idiot, show me one video of a boat going over the horizon and being pulled back. better yet show me someone pulling back the moon after it has set and if you want to pull back the moon make sure it has a solar filter so that there aren't any tricks with the flare.
But here is a video that shows exactly what I am talking about.
Remember I know all of your talking points better than you so I know ahead of time you will run and change the subject with another one of Eric Dubay's lies that has been debunked a million times.
Remember this is the same fool who told you there was no midnight sun in Antarctica now he is trying to moonwalk away from his lies.
Annular eclipses don't prove that the Sun and Moon aren't the same size. By globe logic rules, maybe. But with flat earth you have to consider the physic might be different.
I probably ignored it because I missed it trying to keep up with all this dumbass posts rushing me from 5-10 of yall at one time.
I know that the moon's libration doesn't prove it to be a sphere. It looks more like a rounded edge flat button that a sphere. It also could be a projection, holographic or plasma. I know one thing, if it indeed reflects sunlight, the reflection doesn't behave like a spherical reflection. It behaves light a flat surface projecting it's own light.
I also know that the moon travels in retrograde at times as well as the other "planets". If they are all spheres that all retrograde, then why doesn't earth??? Answer that please!!
Also, have you seen the videos that show a refresh rate on the moon???
No dummy if your car tires are spinning on its axis that doesn't mean it has a top or a bottom, because the way we define top and bottom from he reference of earth is by the ground or perhaps the car itself. but if you had a tire attached to an axis or even spinning as if it were attached to an axis without a reference frame to define top and bottom, there wouldn't be a top to the tire or bottom. Likewise being that the earth is in space no reference frame defines top and bottom, and certainly, there wouldn't be a top or bottom bias by gravity being that gravity pulls all matter towards the center of the planter not towards the top or bottom.
This statement alone proves you never graduated from high school and that you lack a basic understanding of how reality works. And why explaining basic concepts to you is like explaining to a five-year-old how computer chips work.
What does North mean? Define the word "North".
North means up. You go north by jumping.
So why do they call it the North Pole if they don't mean it to be regarded as "up"?
Cashie you spammed a lot of misinformation bullshit, that was all debunked.
So moving forward, please point out anything that you feel wasn't properly answered and please point out the errors in what you think is wrong to avoid further embarrassment please have actual scientific evidence to back your claim.
If you cannot do that then please help me with these claims.
Explain how the 24-hour sun works in Antarctica
Explain Eclipses
Explain lunar phases
Explain what the stars and planets are
Explain the direction of the sun and the moon on the flat earth how fast they move and using this model predict the next eclipse
Explain why all Airlines use the haversine formula to calculate distances that cannot work on a flat earth
Show me a working flat earf map
Show me where the ice wall was in the trip to Antarctica
Explain to me why they were able to go there with no problems when you guys claimed it was impossible in the past.
Explain how a balloon fitted with a non-distorting lens plus reference string in front assuring no distortion showed a curve
Explain why every country would fake the globe
Explain how there can be nighttime on a flat imaginary pizza land of make-believe.
Explain what comets are
Explain how tides work on the pizza land
Explain how subduction zones
Explain why P and S waves from earthquakes all point to a global planet
Explain how we get earthquakes on the planet
Explain the Coriolis effect from weather patterns
Explain how the rings of Saturn work or what force causes the moons of Jupiter to orbit (something me and millions of people saw with a telescope)__
Explain how Gravitmeters work
P.S. please do not try to explain something with a question because it only will make you look even more stupid.
Welp this is the end of the road for you because if you try to spam again, all I will do is cut and paste this shit to point out to all that you don't know shit other than avoiding facts. Even if you do it in another post I will post these demands
Cut, Copied, waiting to be pasted!!!
So moving forward, please point out anything that you feel wasn't properly answered and please point out the errors in what you think is wrong to avoid further embarrassment please have actual scientific evidence to back your claim.
If you cannot do that then please help me with these claims.
Explain how the 24-hour sun works in Antarctica
Explain Eclipses
Explain lunar phases
Explain what the stars and planets are
Explain the direction of the sun and the moon on the flat earth how fast they move and using this model predict the next eclipse
Explain why all Airlines use the haversine formula to calculate distances that cannot work on a flat earth
Show me a working flat earf map
Show me where the ice wall was in the trip to Antarctica
Explain to me why they were able to go there with no problems when you guys claimed it was impossible in the past.
Explain how a balloon fitted with a non-distorting lens plus reference string in front assuring no distortion showed a curve
Explain why every country would fake the globe
Explain how there can be nighttime on a flat imaginary pizza land of make-believe.
Explain what comets are
Explain how tides work on the pizza land
Explain how subduction zones
Explain why P and S waves from earthquakes all point to a global planet
Explain how we get earthquakes on the planet
Explain the Coriolis effect from weather patterns
Explain how the rings of Saturn work or what force causes the moons of Jupiter to orbit (something me and millions of people saw with a telescope)__
Explain how Gravitmeters work
P.S. please do not try to explain something with a question because it only will make you look even more stupid.
Welp this is the end of the road for you because if you try to spam again, all I will do is cut and paste this shit to point out to all that you don't know shit other than avoiding facts. Even if you do it in another post I will post these demands
Cut, Copied, waiting to be pasted!!!
No scientific person refers to it, but there is a Northern bias because 90% of the Earth's population lives there.
Thats all for questions, want more questions please respond to my last post or risk getting spammed over and over until you answer..
If you stop treating me like your flat earth liason and go out into the world and look, you'll find plenty of them.
The fuck you think I'm taking a class from you?? You trying to assign homework to me nigga?? You got me fucked up.
I looked, I didn't find any. Since you obviously know there are plenty of them, could you post them please? Thanks.
If you stop treating me like your flat earth liason and go out into the world and look, you'll find plenty of them.
BTW, the Cashie B cycle is about to repeat. Once he gets a question he can't answer, he'll be to busy for this shit, he won't care what you think. then he will announce he is leaving this thread forever and will no longer be discussing the flat Earth....
Until his next post lol
Until his next post lol
Similar threads
