Net neutrality is gone under Trump.

[Watcher]

You know who to thank.

Trump Appoints Two Anti-Net Neutrality Advocates To Oversee FCC Transition

In case you’ve been wondering what will happen to net neutrality under the Trump presidency, wonder no more.

On Monday, President-elect Donald Trump appointed Jeffrey Eisenach and Mark Jamison, two vocal opponents of net neutrality, to run his Federal Communications Commission (FCC) transition team. Both Eisenach and Jamison will come on as industry insiders: Eisenach is a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and has been a paid consultant for Verizon Wireless. He also worked the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) transition team under President Reagan and the FCC transition team under George W. Bush. Jamison, meanwhile, runs the Public Utility Resource Center at the University of Florida and is a former lobbyist for Sprint.

Trump had already hired Eisenach in October as an aide to help craft his telecoms policies and plans for the FCC. Monday’s announcement formalizes Eisenach’s role, and names him and Jamison to the “landing team” that will work directly with the current FCC administration on the transition.

Under the Obama administration, the FCC has advanced protections for net neutrality. The FCC’s 2015 Open Internet Order ensured that Internet providers can’t discriminate between different types of content. That means that your Internet service can’t make you pay extra to get a “fast lane” to watch Netflix and relegate others to possibly unusable “slow lanes.”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/shelbyc...i-net-neutrality-fcc-transition/#6e7af39733e1

 

[playahaitian]

f*ck

 

[HeathCliff]

 

[ballscout1]

I am not going to post the article but if you are unsure what net neutrality means or what it could look like..It is already in use in Portugal

If you want to see what America would be like if it ditched net neutrality, just look at Portugal

http://www.businessinsider.com/net-neutrality-portugal-how-american-internet-could-look-fcc-2017-11

 

[ballscout1]

This is another GOP initiative to help their portfolios and the portfolios of their friends and family but this like all others can be reversed if put into play by taking control of congress in 2018

 

[killagram]

Crazy Ass shit... the white man is at his shit again..just like the bullshit back in the day they used to pull.. brah

 

[Camille]

Both parties are the same. Had Hillary won I'm sure the same thing would have happened.

 

[ballscout1]

Crazy Ass shit... the white man is at his shit again..just like the bullshit back in the day they used to pull.. brah

This is in direst response to cable cutters , netflix, hulu, kodi firestick ect ect..

Smart Tvs that connect to the internet.......was all affecting their profits, this way they get their profits back.

Just like automakers did.....When I was coming up people got a new car every 3 years but in recent years people were paying off their cars and keeping them (until the wheels fall off)

So car makers designed cars that were harder for owners to do their own maint and repairs on....So now they make their money on repairs and service as much as sales

 

[xxxbishopxxx]

Well it seems some Republicans want to find a way to make Net Neutrality permanent.


https://www.google.com/search?q=can...oid-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

 

[Dr. Truth]

This is in direst response to cable cutters , netflix, hulu, kodi firestick ect ect..

Smart Tvs that connect to the internet.......was all affecting their profits, this way they get their profits back.

Just like automakers did.....When I was coming up people got a new car every 3 years but in recent years people were paying off their cars and keeping them (until the wheels fall off)

So car makers designed cars that were harder for owners to do their own maint and repairs on....So now they make their money on repairs and service as much as sales

Aka German pieces of shit

 

[Shadow22]

This is in direst response to cable cutters , netflix, hulu, kodi firestick ect ect..

Smart Tvs that connect to the internet.......was all affecting their profits, this way they get their profits back.

Just like automakers did.....When I was coming up people got a new car every 3 years but in recent years people were paying off their cars and keeping them (until the wheels fall off)

So car makers designed cars that were harder for owners to do their own maint and repairs on....So now they make their money on repairs and service as much as sales

Welp yall tried to scheme and save a few dollars. U still gotta pay, I know people that still switch cars like theu change clothes.

 

[ballscout1]

Welp yall tried to scheme and save a few dollars. U still gotta pay, I know people that still switch cars like theu change clothes.

I know a cat with two different color eyes, don't make it anything other than an exception

 

[BronxBomber]

We are in the Matrix.

 

[ballscout1]

This is a good post from @Watcher and should have much more activity........

 

[Multi - Personality]

Greed and Control.

Why do people think that this is ok?

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Crazy Ass shit... the white man is at his shit again..just like the bullshit back in the day they used to pull.. brah

exactly but folks have to understand, there is a major difference between..

the ""white man"" who are the superwealthy that use their money power/influence to hire think tanks to attack the not as rich, middle and lower income folks of all races.

then you have caucasions..

every caucasion is NOT "the white man" no matter how hard they try...

there are few "black' men that fall under the white man category...

if you dont have high powered lawyers and high powered financial advisors on call 24/7 I dont care how pasty you are.. you are NOT "the white man"

so many caucazoids dont realize this...

there is only one war being waged and thats the super wealthy against everybody else..

they got the game so much on lock, they got their enemies fighting on their side...

too many caucasions aka euros think they are "the white man".

 

[THE DRIZZY]

exactly but folks have to understand, there is a major difference between..

the ""white man"" who are the superwealthy that use their money power/influence to hire think tanks to attack the not as rich, middle and lower income folks of all races.

then you have caucasions..

every caucasion is NOT "the white man" no matter how hard they try...

there are few "black' men that fall under the white man category...

if you dont have high powered lawyers and high powered financial advisors on call 24/7 I dont care how pasty you are.. you are NOT "the white man"

so many caucazoids dont realize this...

there is only one war being waged and thats the super wealthy against everybody else..

they got the game so much on lock, they got their enemies fighting on their side...

too many caucasions aka euros think they are "the white man".

They don't here you. Arabs, Latinos, Indians and some would even say Cushites(Horn Africans) fall under the Caucasian umbrella.

 

[kain]

We going back to those 3mbps speeds??? WTF

 

[THE DRIZZY]

Anjit Pai need to sit his ass down somewhere.

 

[Soul On Ice]

Ajit Pai was appointed by Obama tho..

 

[Watcher]

Ajit Pai was appointed by Obama tho..

Not to head the FCC.

Who championed in net neutrality?

 

[xxxbishopxxx]

Ajit Pai was appointed by Obama tho..

The minority party is allowed to have 2 seats on the council.

 

[Soul On Ice]

Not to head the FCC.

Who championed in net neutrality?

He can do NO harm eh?
Cool

 

[Louis Koo]

can't believe no one sniped trump nor ajit pai yet. drugs, cheap food and free porn is what is keeping society together, especially in the red states. i'll wait

 

[Drayonis]

Both parties are the same. Had Hillary won I'm sure the same thing would have happened.

Absolutely Not! Hillary would have burnt the building down and ate babies live on camera. Hillary would have been worse!!!

 

[godofwine]

exactly but folks have to understand, there is a major difference between..

the ""white man"" who are the superwealthy that use their money power/influence to hire think tanks to attack the not as rich, middle and lower income folks of all races.

then you have caucasions..

every caucasion is NOT "the white man" no matter how hard they try...

there are few "black' men that fall under the white man category...

if you dont have high powered lawyers and high powered financial advisors on call 24/7 I dont care how pasty you are.. you are NOT "the white man"

so many caucazoids dont realize this...

there is only one war being waged and thats the super wealthy against everybody else..

they got the game so much on lock, they got their enemies fighting on their side...

too many caucasions aka euros think they are "the white man".

Most Caucasian people want to be The White man so bad. They are convinced they are Temporarily Displaced White people who are only temporarily poor

 

[ballscout1]

Ajit Pai was appointed by Obama tho..

Not to head the FCC.

Who championed in net neutrality?

But why would he appoint someone who never agreed with net neutrality? Like nominating a pro-law enforcement centrist for SCOTUS.

The minority party is allowed to have 2 seats on the council.

That's fine but why place someone who is adverse? Someone McConnel recommended, the same prick that blocked the majority of your appointments?


He has served in various positions at the FCC since being appointed to the commission by President Barack Obama in May 2012, at the recommendation of Mitch McConnell. He was confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate on May 7, 2012,[ and was sworn in on May 14, 2012, for a five-year term.

When Ajit Pai was named FCC chairman earlier this year, shortly after the start of the Trump administration, he quickly made it a goal to reverse the net neutrality rules passed in 2015. Today, he got his wish, and he explained why he felt it was appropriate in a speech ahead of the vote.

Some of this shit makes no sense.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Most Caucasian people want to be The White man so bad. They are convinced they are Temporarily Displaced White people who are only temporarily poor

yea that psychosis is strong...

 

[ballscout1]

Absolutely Not! Hillary would have burnt the building down and ate babies live on camera. Hillary would have been worse!!!

*I'd be willing to bet a small amount that Hillary would be better than Trump, but you are being about as dishonest as you can be in trying to promote Hillary as a great alternative...

Nothing in her resume suggests she would be good for black folks at all.

And there is a good chance that had she won, there would be more complacency from the crakkas because without Trump shitting on them,it would just be us getting shit on...and we already know that when it just us getting shit on , nobody pays attention to it

 

[xxxbishopxxx]

But why would he appoint someone who never agreed with net neutrality? Like nominating a pro-law enforcement centrist for SCOTUS.



That's fine but why place someone who is adverse? Someone McConnel recommended, the same prick that blocked the majority of your appointments?


He has served in various positions at the FCC since being appointed to the commission by President Barack Obama in May 2012, at the recommendation of Mitch McConnell. He was confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate on May 7, 2012,[ and was sworn in on May 14, 2012, for a five-year term.

When Ajit Pai was named FCC chairman earlier this year, shortly after the start of the Trump administration, he quickly made it a goal to reverse the net neutrality rules passed in 2015. Today, he got his wish, and he explained why he felt it was appropriate in a speech ahead of the vote.

Some of this shit makes no sense.

The Senate has to approve the minority picks as well. Probably just wanted to get the council staffed and this was the path of least resistance. He had the majority so it really didn't matter who was the minority at that point. It like now, you have two people on the council that wanted to keep Net Neutrality, yet is still got voted down.

 

[ballscout1]

The Senate has to approve the minority picks as well. Probably just wanted to get the council staffed and this was the path of least resistance. He had the majority so it really didn't matter who was the minority at that point. It like now, you have two people on the council that wanted to keep Net Neutrality, yet is still got voted down.

I get that but nominate a republican who is a moderate....I know they xan change up but this guy was always anti

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

They don't here you. Arabs, Latinos, Indians and some would even say Cushites(Horn Africans) fall under the Caucasian umbrella.

yea all them got that RH monkey gene.... that neanderthal gene.... and they try to flip the script on us

saying we are three fifths man, when they know goddam well they are the once with the fucked up genetics...

but you are right in fact those indians are the true aryans.. they are the true parents of the pale faced yellow haired euro....

caucazoids dont really come from us, though we created them...

but thats a whole other thread....

 

[Drayonis]

*I'd be willing to bet a small amount that Hillary would be better than Trump,

That's all I needed to hear. The rest of whatever you said is irrelevant

And for the record. I don't think she'd be great. She'd of been the status quo. I'd rather stand still for 4 years after than Obama than go way back like we are now.

 

[xxxbishopxxx]

I get that but nominate a republican who is a moderate....I know they xan change up but this guy was always anti

Ask yourself this question, If Obama was having problems getting other liberals/moderates into various positions, do you think Mitch and the republican senate would have allowed the appointment of a moderate into the FCC? I think Obama like a lot of us never thought this would be an issue two year later. Everybody had something to gain by keeping Net Neutrality in place (much like Obama Care).

Also, it really didn't matter who Obama nominated for that position. Trump could have re-done the board completely when he got in office. Do you think a moderate/liberal leaning conservative would have been able to keep that position? Especially, the way Trump attacks anything Obama?

 

[BKF]

I get that but nominate a republican who is a moderate....I know they xan change up but this guy was always anti

But why would he appoint someone who never agreed with net neutrality? Like nominating a pro-law enforcement centrist for SCOTUS.



That's fine but why place someone who is adverse? Someone McConnel recommended, the same prick that blocked the majority of your appointments?


He has served in various positions at the FCC since being appointed to the commission by President Barack Obama in May 2012, at the recommendation of Mitch McConnell. He was confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate on May 7, 2012,[ and was sworn in on May 14, 2012, for a five-year term.

When Ajit Pai was named FCC chairman earlier this year, shortly after the start of the Trump administration, he quickly made it a goal to reverse the net neutrality rules passed in 2015. Today, he got his wish, and he explained why he felt it was appropriate in a speech ahead of the vote.

Some of this shit makes no sense.

What difference would that make? Would net neutrality still be in effect today?