Still trippin over the chicken vs beef thing.
Harvard has a course on the wire now.
Harvard has a course on the wire now.
Season 1
Was Bubs sharing needles w/ the whiteboy after he found out he had HIV?
Michael K Williams is a hell of an actor.
That was near the end of Season 3. I think that was the same episode they shot Avon in the arm because Avon and Marlo were battling for corners. So probably 3rd or 4th episode from the end of Season 3.
Correction: Yeah that was a mash-up. Snoop killed that guy with Poot in episode 7, season 3. The scene where Snoop was like "get in the truck" was the beginning of episode 9, season 3.
I know I'm late but I just finished season 1. I'm on season 2 now. Best Buy was having a sale on The Wire so I got a few seasons.
This is where I got mine and a copy for my mom and sister. Cost me %3.99 free shipping for the whole series
http://dvdsalez.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1&products_id=1
which remains to this day, nothing more than your SPECULATION.
no evidence, no proof other than he (stringer) was merely there. you are attributing a measure of barksdale success to stringer bell simply because he was in the mix. not based on anything in the show, but solely because "he was there".
i demand more evidence. and as always, none is forthcoming.
i'm not suggesting your position is outlandish, rather that it is wholly unsupported by evidence or details presented within the show. in fact, i see how someone could occupy your position, but i would still assert it is flawed.
which remains to this day, nothing more than your SPECULATION.
no evidence, no proof other than he (stringer) was merely there. you are attributing a measure of barksdale success to stringer bell simply because he was in the mix. not based on anything in the show, but solely because "he was there".
i demand more evidence. and as always, none is forthcoming.
i'm not suggesting your position is outlandish, rather that it is wholly unsupported by evidence or details presented within the show. in fact, i see how someone could occupy your position, but i would still assert it is flawed.
Hey, dickhead. If you watch the show then you saw the scene I posted below which I mentioned in a previous post which you never answered. Anyway, watch this scene and know that this all happened while Avon was in jail.
i understand what you're saying.. i don't think he was saying stringer was unintelligent.
i believe stringer to be very intelligent.
but in most cases he was really out of his element. he did things he thought were for the best when they weren't
i agree with stringer making the deal with prop joe but stringer wasn't a man about it. he was scared of avon whether yall would like to believe it or not. Avon been checking String since the buy bust ordeal with Orlando went sour.
He should have went to Avon told him what was up and told him to send the brother home that he wasn't needed and that this was the only way to keep it going while he was in jail.. and if he felt different once he got out then they could go from there.
He did tell Avon what was up but he said no so Stringer did what was best for them. As the clip states, profits went up 8 or 9%
Instead he tries to be a mastermind and puts Omar against the brother to try and eliminate the brother and make shit even with Omar... when that shit wasn't even necessary and directly ended up being his demise...
Like you kill dangelo when you didn't have to but you did it behind your "brother's back" and didn't fess up to it until you were upset cause he called you out for not listening to him in the first place about some of the moves and money he was putting into the properties and getting took by clay davis...
Come on man, you didn't see that D was weak? Avon wanted Wallace dead because he thought he MIGHT snitch but D snitch on the whole family, if he wasn't kin to Avon he would have ordered that shyt himself.
i understand what you're saying.. i don't think he was saying stringer was unintelligent.
i believe stringer to be very intelligent.
but in most cases he was really out of his element. he did things he thought were for the best when they weren't
i agree with stringer making the deal with prop joe but stringer wasn't a man about it. he was scared of avon whether yall would like to believe it or not. Avon been checking String since the buy bust ordeal with Orlando went sour.
He should have went to Avon told him what was up and told him to send the brother home that he wasn't needed and that this was the only way to keep it going while he was in jail.. and if he felt different once he got out then they could go from there.
Instead he tries to be a mastermind and puts Omar against the brother to try and eliminate the brother and make shit even with Omar... when that shit wasn't even necessary and directly ended up being his demise...
Like you kill dangelo when you didn't have to but you did it behind your "brother's back" and didn't fess up to it until you were upset cause he called you out for not listening to him in the first place about some of the moves and money he was putting into the properties and getting took by clay davis...
You need to go back and read cranrab's posts, HE IS SAYING THAT STRINGER WAS STUPID, FROM THE BEGINNING!!!
That's why he's saying that there was never ANY proof that String er was nothing more than a hanger on, MY point of contention is that Stringer started out smart and his dream of becoming "the bank" made him make stupid moves, but having "D" killed WAS NOT one of them!
D'angelo's talking to the police ALREADY HAD Wee-Bay picked up in Philly, he was acting out of pocket with Avon in prison, and had already blown up @ Stringer (WHERE'S WALLACE STRING, WHERE'S WALLACE?!?!?"
Stringer himself made no mistakes in Season 1.
You're also giving Avon a little too much credit, of course NONE of it goes down w/o Avon, but the same way Stringer's judgement was clouded by his dream, so was Avon's in keeping his name on the street.
He even said so himself when he was arested @ the safehouse.
Stringer went to Avon several times telling him that their product was ABSOLUTE GARBAGE, that they needed to make a deal with Prop Joe, but Avon stubbornly refused, they wouldn't have been making ANY MONEY AT ALL if Stringer didn't make that move himself.
The writers showed that throughout the series EVERYTHING always remains in flux, and that each and every character had their flaws.
Including Avon.
He would have NEVER given the go ahead to take out D'angelo for 2 reasons, he was his nephew AND he felt responsible since it was him who told D to pick up that shipment.
Also, you need to look closer @ the whole Brother/Omar situation, quiet as kept it actually looked to me as if Prop Joe set THE WHOLE THING UP, using Stringer!
Remember when Brother shot Cheese, Cheese immediately went to Prop Joe at which time Joe said something like "We've got a problem, unless..." and then the next scene is Stringer meeting up with Omar for the second time and telling him about Brother!
Oh, and Avon was STRICTLY about GIVING UP NOTHING!!!
Giving up ANYTHING shows that you're weak in Avon's eyes, that was what Stringer was trying to convince him of when he was in prison, but Avon wasn't trying to hear that!!!
You need to go back and read cranrab's posts, HE IS SAYING THAT STRINGER WAS STUPID, FROM THE BEGINNING!!!
That's why he's saying that there was never ANY proof that String er was nothing more than a hanger on, MY point of contention is that Stringer started out smart and his dream of becoming "the bank" made him make stupid moves, but having "D" killed WAS NOT one of them!
Hey, dickhead.
this video is a testament to how monumentally stupid stringer bell is. begin with the rules of conduct he has imposed on the meeting. oh, but i forgot. you're very impressed by the fancy protocol. carry on with that admiration.
for actual business heads, we know that a superior product without plentiful distribution channels to meet demand is worthless. real world example: apple doesn't limit sales to apple store retail locations. you can also purchase at retail from target or best buy. sadly, a young BGOL member listening to an inexperienced buffoon such as yourself (or stringer bell) might mistakenly believe that product trumps distribution.
stringer bell isn't stupid, just doesn't know the business rules of the game, which is why he is taking econ101 at community college.
that apple analogy is a false dichotomy.
taking a weeder course at a community college does not prove not stupid.
taking a weeder course at a community college does not prove intelligent.
taking a weeder course at a community college does not prove the ability to synthesize knowledge proffered.
tighten up your knowledge of fallacies. the real world apple example is not a false dichotomy when speaking about DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS.
man we have brothers still debating the Wire
this simply shows you how great the show was and continues to be
low blow.![]()
i like how u at least try to support the points that you make but the bottom line is that david simon and them gave every major character strengths and weaknesses to show that everybody is flawed yet everybody has some redeeming value.
for u to just act like stringer is this 1 bumbling retarded fuckup in every sense doesnt even make sense if based on nothing other than how we all know they developed characters on the series.
i think it pissed u off that cats werent accepting ur original analysis of stringer so u just doubled down on the hate bro.
sincerely wasn't mean as an insult. merely stating fact.
i've said as much myself, so no disagreement.
couldn't be further from the truth.
stringer bell was a bumbling stooge. fans that somehow identify with stringer bell dislike it when their favorite character's actions are considered stupid. just the way things work. not a phenomenon limited to THE WIRE. so the fanboys get incensed, or enraged and they lash out with ad hominem like petulant children. understood.
television shows like to have dumb characters in the cast: joey in friends, kelso in that 70's show, stringer bell in the wire.
according to the fanboy logic, it is REASONABLE to say that prop joe's organization was successful due in large part to the contributions of drac and cheese.
comparing character development in friends and that 70's show to the wire = fail bro.
Im sorry but Stringer was an idiot
he forgot what was most important....The Corners
Avon knew this
Marlo knew this
Stringer just gave them away
Although the Barkdales had an inferior product, it didnt matter....the junkies were going to buy it regardless.. (we learned that season 1)
but those corners were everything
whoever ruled the corners, ruled the game
Stringer was a failure
i apologize if i was not clear before.
i was in NO WAY referring to character development. most certainly, i was not comparing character development across shows.
i was referring, rather, to character as foil used in plot development.
"territory ain't shit" - stringer bell
you fucking hater.
you're just singling stringer bell out. don't you know everyone was flawed, and that nobody on the show was perfect?
"territory ain't shit" - stringer bell
all i can say is in all the interviews i've seen, heard and read i've never gotten the feeling that david simon wrote the character as ur describing him.