You've force my hand...

And I'm not spell checking this long ass shit
First off those images are real. The data is imported from satellite in ASCII format such as this:
This is raw satellite data I have just recently obtained. The total size of this text file is 450 megabytes, so I outputted some of the content in my linux terminal so you can see. I obtained this data from here: http://pmm.nasa.gov/data-access and here: http://www.goes.noaa.gov/.
Not all sats are not taking photos. Some sats are sending back numbers that need to be processed into images. Once the data is obtained it must be processed through series file conversions to display the data as a visual image. The conversion process is HELL. You have to have knowledge of FORTRAN coding, netcdf, HDF5, AREA files, gini files, GrADS, XML and grib file formatting. A simple windows machine can not handle this.
This flat picture the OP say is the true image of earth is nothing but a stereographic projection map. Please click here for the examples of that map.
If the OP knew what he was talking about he would have known what type of projection he was looking at when he posted his so called true image. At that point in his argument, everything else was moot. I'm not going to get into the mathematical details on how this map is made, but check here to try and grasps the concepts.
Then the OP says this:
This is totally absurd. If he knew anything about weather, then he would have realized that the Antarctic Jetstream flows around the south polar regions due to the temperature difference between 60 south and 90 south in latitude. This has not way in shape or form effect the weather in the northern hemisphere. Our weather in the northern hemisphere is controlled by the polar jet in the north.
Then he goes to say:
Where is the treaty? Why didn't the OP produce some type of information to back his claim?
If anything the preservation of Antarctic is due to hole in the Ozone layer.
http://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Which is monitored very carefully because of CO2 emissions from Earth.
Then he says:
Where is the proof of his claim? I can tell you how we measure distance from the sun.
Measuring distance from the sun
If you remember the pythagorean theorem (a^2 + b^2 = c^2), then you'll notice that the hypotenuse is used to measure the distance from earth to the sun.
Also read here: http://www.badastronomy.com/mad/1996/au.html
And then he ends with this jibberish;
Again, where is the proof? If you make a claim, back it up with documents or literature. Give the people a reason to want to debunk it.
All I am saying he, the OP made nothing but blank statements with nothing to back up his claim. The OP don't want the science. He made that clear. His mind is set on whatever is brain puts together. His claims are as bad as the people having video footage of Eric Gardner's death and the police still not getting prosecuted for it.
1) You are not impressing ANYONE because you use a
Linux terminal. Are you the only one who knows something about
Linux????
Stoppit you
"please give me a cookie" boy...
2) Selfscience - "I obtained this data from here:
http://pmm.nasa.gov/data-access"
So you obtained your data from NASA??? The same people who faked the moon landings and just about every other mission they've announced???
I guess your dumb ass thinks we have rovers on mars too don't ya????
If
lying ass NASA told you that your
asshole was blue, you would believe it right???
3)
When you get close to the truth, they have "unknowing agents" in place that will shoot all kinds of formulas at your ass to make you come back to the "system" they have for you...
4) As far as how the map was made - just look up
Azimuthal Equidistant ok fuck-boy???? I never understood why you felt the need to be the
authority on the skies and planets when you actually don't know shit but what you're
trained to know...
5) You know NOTHING about the Jetstream you classroom (I want to say monkey so bad but fear being banned) robot... Even though you think you do...
I will soon show you a model of the jet-stream on the
globe (which makes no sense) as compared to a jet stream on
Flat Earth (which makes perfect sense)...
6) You want the treaty??? This will set you off in the right path (you have to do your own digging):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Treaty_System
7) MEASURING THE DISTANCE FROM EARTH TO SUN? You are getting too complicated
House-Nigga-Science-Bruh....
FOR EVERY MILE THE EARTH SHOULD CURVE 8 INCHES...
SO IF YOU CAN SEE AN OBJECT 5 MILES AWAY, IT SHOULD BE SUBMERGED BY THE CURVATURE OF THE EARTH BY AT LEAST 40 INCHES...
After all the Earth IS a globe right???
THE PROBLEM IS THAT YOU WON'T SEE
SUBMERGENCE...
We should see distant buildings LEANING AWAY from us because the Earth is a globe. That would be because of curvature smart-boy...
The Earth spins at the Equator at 1000 miles per hour. What keeps us from being slung off of earth at that speed????
I know you will contest it because you are a trained (m_nk__ -boy). But you can't deny the physics THAT ACTUALLY DEFY THE FALSE NOTION OF GRAVITY...
(Yes, GRAVITY does
not exist. Fuck Newton and his apples. Fuck SELFSCIENCE trying to keep you prescribed to OLD THEORIES. ASK ANY OF THE TRENDSETTING PHYSICISTS IF GRAVITY EXISTS... )
They made a movie called GRAVITY just to keep you in that OLD MIND-FRAME...
Selfscience is acting like a fucking scientific AGENT!!!
WATCH HIM...