Does this pic go with the theory that the continents were connected at one point, and the rise of the oceans caused the current separation?
Naw man, it's just a polar map projection. OP is going off the deep-end and taking others with him.
Ya'll Niccas Sleeping because the Earth is not a Globe... THE EARTH IS FLAT!!!
- Thread starter 14damoney
- Start date
Naw man, it's just a polar map projection. OP is going off the deep-end and taking others with him.
at first i was about to type "i can't believe how many people are responding to this shit seriously" but then oh yeah. bgol.
there are some high functioning fucking retards on this site
and niggas talking about i just don't believe what i'm told, you gotta prove it to me. oh my fucking god you niggas are the absolute worst.
niggas lay out thousands of years of science. you don't even have to believe anyone about shit, it's fucking math. or to put it in nigga ass nigga terms "numbas don't lie mane."
these guys will look past literally millenia of mathematical proof worked out for all to see by thousands of people, and say they need proof, yet some nigga that obviously abuses hard drugs posts some IGNANT random ass shit and that's enough to get a cosign.
because you niggas don't know or care to do the math, you would believe some thunderbird in a paper bag soaked nonsense,
y'all got to smarten up man, christ.
there are some high functioning fucking retards on this site
and niggas talking about i just don't believe what i'm told, you gotta prove it to me. oh my fucking god you niggas are the absolute worst.
niggas lay out thousands of years of science. you don't even have to believe anyone about shit, it's fucking math. or to put it in nigga ass nigga terms "numbas don't lie mane."
these guys will look past literally millenia of mathematical proof worked out for all to see by thousands of people, and say they need proof, yet some nigga that obviously abuses hard drugs posts some IGNANT random ass shit and that's enough to get a cosign.
because you niggas don't know or care to do the math, you would believe some thunderbird in a paper bag soaked nonsense,
y'all got to smarten up man, christ.
I know man. I can't even believed I entertained this shit. That's my bad.
Well when organized religion first open the can of thinking that, your belief holds greater value than reasoning, logic and actual evidence, it then becomes a stupid free for all where the goal is to get people to believing dumb shit rather than examining the evidence and facts..
If you're gonna throw a shot, make it direct.
All I'm asking is if you niggas is so smart, explain these thousands of years of mathematics and science to someone like me who doesn't study it. Explain why this theory is so preposterous. So far I've gotten anger, disrespect, and wrong answers. I started asking questions early in the thread just to get someone to shut the OP up with facts. Now I'm not sure any of you can.
I posted a video that should at least get you thinking reasonably and even offered to answer any questions after that...
come on tuck, i don't sneak diss. and i'm not "taking a shot" either bruh. the phenomenon itself bothers me as it is unfolding here and as it unfolds in the world.
i didn't care to go back and pick the exact names of whoever was saying that over the last few pages so i could shout them out handle by handle, i just know it was more than one person. quoting the thoughts i take issue with was more than direct enough. i still don't know who said the shit besides you but i know it's back there.
the thing is man, it's making everyone else do all the intellectual work for you. several people have pointed out the math that this stuff is based on. are you saying that you want them to then work out the actual equations for you as well? because that's basically the only next step if you're saying that pointing you to the math isn't enough.
and i think chances are that even if that happened, it would likely be over said niggas heads anyway. because even a cursory understanding or DESIRE to understand the math would have already yielded a search for it and accompanying ridicule of the ridiculous dispute of it found in this thread.
Shit, it would definitely be over my head, bruh. I study people, not the cosmos. The shit does fascinate me though so I just asked for one of the more scientifically inclined brothers to break it down. In return I got niggas trying to play me like I'm stupid. My bad for having the quick trigger.
Last edited:
I find it so amusing, how emotional folks get,
when you challenge their belief system...
name calling and shit...
says a lot about their persona......
glad I aint got to put up with
that crap in reality...
sad existence!!!
when you challenge their belief system...
name calling and shit...
says a lot about their persona......
glad I aint got to put up with
that crap in reality...
sad existence!!!
I don't think I can form the words .... This is just beyond me. Let's just say this theory is correct. So I've got a really good telescope. I've seen the stars and I've seen Mars through it. Obviously they are round... The sun is round and clearly revolves around us. Why would the Earth be any different? Also if this is correct then what in the hell is on the underside of flat earth? Is it just dirt? Do we have mole men?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Niggas are actually entertaining this trolling bullshit
If the earth was flat why is there a horizon?
If you're on land and see a ship coming towards you, why do you see its mast first?
Maybe I'm thinking too hard... But I seriously believe this thread was started to see who would actually be truthful enough with themselves to seriously say, "I Don't Know".
And to admit that you only know what you've been told and you accept it wholeheartedly.
If no one ever told you Santa was fake, would you still believe?
And to admit that you only know what you've been told and you accept it wholeheartedly.
If no one ever told you Santa was fake, would you still believe?
You were educated by the roos of genius intellect.
These niggas are fucking with me right? When did crippling ignorance of the observable world become a philosophy, and worse one that demands a defense?
well now i just feel badShit, it would definitely be over my head, bruh. I study people, not the cosmos. The shit does fascinate me though so I just asked for one of the more scientifically inclined brothers to break it down. In return I got niggas trying to play me like I'm stupid. My bad for having the quick trigger.
i apologize man, i wasn't trying to play you. but the whole thing is so patently absurd that it draws that kind of reaction.
i find it amusing that you consider math a belief system.
and refuse...
to acknowledge that...
if you do the math
you ain't gotta believe shit...
yeah this is some next level prison philosopher shit.
There's always the pungent odor of life's constipation that surreptitiously conflicts with the detrimental instability hitherto fore, six-eight, who do we appreciate the unification of Congress...excuse me, condoms, demystifying the squalor of profanity regurgitating over and over again.
Here, let me digress my bowels for a minute and invite to the front the nondescript hernia rectifies the miscommunication of fetal, or fecal depending on where your head is at.
Do not be persecuted by the pompous fedora balanced by the equilibrium fortified by the government's inability to eradicate or foreshadow, taken from the Hebrew word foreskin.
you stupid lol
Last edited:
Wait what..people seriously believe the earth is flat,I thought it was a joke...
You've force my hand...
And I'm not spell checking this long ass shitFirst off those images are real. The data is imported from satellite in ASCII format such as this:
This is raw satellite data I have just recently obtained. The total size of this text file is 450 megabytes, so I outputted some of the content in my linux terminal so you can see. I obtained this data from here: http://pmm.nasa.gov/data-access and here: http://www.goes.noaa.gov/.
Not all sats are not taking photos. Some sats are sending back numbers that need to be processed into images. Once the data is obtained it must be processed through series file conversions to display the data as a visual image. The conversion process is HELL. You have to have knowledge of FORTRAN coding, netcdf, HDF5, AREA files, gini files, GrADS, XML and grib file formatting. A simple windows machine can not handle this.
This flat picture the OP say is the true image of earth is nothing but a stereographic projection map. Please click here for the examples of that map.
If the OP knew what he was talking about he would have known what type of projection he was looking at when he posted his so called true image. At that point in his argument, everything else was moot. I'm not going to get into the mathematical details on how this map is made, but check here to try and grasps the concepts.
Then the OP says this:
This is totally absurd. If he knew anything about weather, then he would have realized that the Antarctic Jetstream flows around the south polar regions due to the temperature difference between 60 south and 90 south in latitude. This has not way in shape or form effect the weather in the northern hemisphere. Our weather in the northern hemisphere is controlled by the polar jet in the north.
Then he goes to say:
Where is the treaty? Why didn't the OP produce some type of information to back his claim?
If anything the preservation of Antarctic is due to hole in the Ozone layer.
http://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Which is monitored very carefully because of CO2 emissions from Earth.
Then he says:
Where is the proof of his claim? I can tell you how we measure distance from the sun.
Measuring distance from the sun
If you remember the pythagorean theorem (a^2 + b^2 = c^2), then you'll notice that the hypotenuse is used to measure the distance from earth to the sun.
Also read here: http://www.badastronomy.com/mad/1996/au.html
And then he ends with this jibberish;
Again, where is the proof? If you make a claim, back it up with documents or literature. Give the people a reason to want to debunk it.
All I am saying he, the OP made nothing but blank statements with nothing to back up his claim. The OP don't want the science. He made that clear. His mind is set on whatever is brain puts together. His claims are as bad as the people having video footage of Eric Gardner's death and the police still not getting prosecuted for it.
i can't believe this is 6 pages and 5 of them aren't gifs laughing at this idiot op.
how you dispute something you can physically see.. as being a lie.. i just don't know.
how you dispute something you can physically see.. as being a lie.. i just don't know.
You've force my hand...
First off those images are real. The data is imported from satellite in ASCII format such as this:
This is raw satellite data I have just recently obtained. The total size of this text file is 450 megabytes, so I outputted some of the content in my linux terminal so you can see. I obtained this data from here: http://pmm.nasa.gov/data-access and here: http://www.goes.noaa.gov/.
Not all sats are not taking photos. Some sats are sending back numbers that need to be processed into images. Once the data is obtained it must be processed through series file conversions to display the data as a visual image. The conversion process is HELL. You have to have knowledge of FORTRAN coding, netcdf, HDF5, AREA files, gini files, GrADS, XML and grib file formatting. A simple windows machine can not handle this.
This flat picture the OP say is the true image of earth is nothing but a stereographic projection map. Please click here for the examples of that map.
If the OP knew what he was talking about he would have known what type of projection he was looking at when he posted his so called true image. At that point in his argument, everything else was moot. I'm not going to get into the mathematical details on how this map is made, but check here to try and grasps the concepts.
Then the OP says this:
This is totally absurd. If he knew anything about weather, then he would have realized that the Antarctic Jetstream flows around the south polar regions due to the temperature difference between 60 south and 90 south in latitude. This has not way in shape or form effect the weather in the northern hemisphere. Our weather in the northern hemisphere is controlled by the polar jet in the north.
Then he goes to say:
Where is the treaty? Why didn't the OP produce some type of information to back his claim?
If anything the preservation of Antarctic is due to hole in the Ozone layer.
http://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Which is monitored very carefully because of CO2 emissions from Earth.
Then he says:
Where is the proof of his claim? I can tell you how we measure distance from the sun.
Measuring distance from the sun
If you remember the pythagorean theorem (a^2 + b^2 = c^2), then you'll notice that the hypotenuse is used to measure the distance from earth to the sun.
Also read here: http://www.badastronomy.com/mad/1996/au.html
And then he ends with this jibberish;
Again, where is the proof? If you make a claim, back it up with documents or literature. Give the people a reason to want to debunk it.
All I am saying he, the OP made nothing but blank statements with nothing to back up his claim. The OP don't want the science. He made that clear. His mind is set on whatever is brain puts together. His claims are as bad as the people having video footage of Eric Gardner's death and the police still not getting prosecuted for it.
Figured that would reel one of yall in. Now this is a good thread.
Figured that would reel one of yall in. Now this is a good thread.
Good job man. You got me on that one. There was no way I could leave you hanging on that one.
More from my PM box scientist...
GoNuts said:Also, the total nut job stating the Earth is not round but flat is partially correct. If one looked at a tennis ball from the top down and assume that we only live in a 2-dimensional environment, yes, the shape would resemble a flat disc not a sphere.
He's right, the Earth is not a sphere. He's also wrong, in that the Earth is not flat.
The Earth is a shape referred to as an oblique spheroid. Fancy geometric talk, I know. What does that means in lay mans terms?
Basically picture a fake, silicone injected ass on a woman. Doesn't have to be special. Pick any one that everyone seems to accept and want lately. (I find them repulsive and wretched looking, but that's a story for another time).
Let's use Nicki Minaj for this example.
Her ass is a good representation of our Earth.
It's general shape is round but not spherical - a sphere is a perfectly round 3-dimensional object.
Her ass is sort of flattened at the top and bottom, but bulges out in the middle the same way a tomato would if you put it on a counter and gently pushed down on it.
The resulting shape mimics the true shape of our Earth (although the Earth is less exaggerated). Our school room Globes, Consumer Maps, Stock Photography, Movies do not emulate. They correct the shape because a sphere is a nice pleasing shape to most people. The human mind likes balance and uniformity. Sheep also like lies so long as it doesn't upset their comfort zone and keeps them calm.
However maps and charts produced for the scientific and professional community tend to accurately reflect the shape of our planet and relative distances. Look up the the Gall-Peter's Map vs. Mercator Projection Map which is the one most everyone is used to seeing.
The bulge is why the longest route around the Earth by distance is to follow the Equator. Most direct flights and experienced travelers will try to avoid flying this route for just that reason - you have a hump in the middle - which takes extra distance, time, and fuel to circumnavigate. It takes more time to circumnavigate the world via the Equator (Taking the East > West route around the world) vs. its Meridian. (Taking the North > South way around the world)
But what works against us in one aspect, works to our (mankind's) benefit in other. Because the middle is bulging out - it's natural relative elevation is higher, but not to the ocean ... to space! The distance to reach space is shorter around the equator. This is why the full moon looks huge when at the equator nations in comparison to other nations north or south of it.
Launching from the equator also means the amount of fuel needed to send objects into orbit via rocket, both LEO (Low Earth Orbit) and HEO (High Earth Orbit) is significantly less than launching them from other locations. Less fuel = less gross weight just for fuel = the rocket can now use that weight difference to carry bigger and heavier payloads.
There was a company call Sea Launch that was pretty slick. The had had a launch ship and a launch barge that they would tow out to the middle of the Pacific Ocean and launch rockets from the Equator. Sea Launch was able to secure some nice contracts because their launch location didn't have to comply with environmental concerns and land based regulations, plus the being closer to space than the competitors allowed them to use less rocket fuel - and the hundreds of thousands of savings from that cost savings alone gave them the ability to come in as cheapest bidder on a number of payload launches.
Probably just gave you more info than you wanted to know ... or even cared about (LMAO) but I wanted to shut that dimwit up. If he still thinks the Earth is flat tell him take a walk for a few years in the same direction and give me a call when reaches the edge of Earth, falls off, and plummets into the Tesseract from Interstellar.
I mean if he believes the Earth is flat, then by extension he must believe there is a pocket in space where a 5th dimensional anomaly exists that allows him to play with time in multiple space timelines at once, right?
They got u niggas conditioned well
You've force my hand...
First off those images are real. The data is imported from satellite in ASCII format such as this:
This is raw satellite data I have just recently obtained. The total size of this text file is 450 megabytes, so I outputted some of the content in my linux terminal so you can see. I obtained this data from here: http://pmm.nasa.gov/data-access and here: http://www.goes.noaa.gov/.
Not all sats are not taking photos. Some sats are sending back numbers that need to be processed into images. Once the data is obtained it must be processed through series file conversions to display the data as a visual image. The conversion process is HELL. You have to have knowledge of FORTRAN coding, netcdf, HDF5, AREA files, gini files, GrADS, XML and grib file formatting. A simple windows machine can not handle this.
This flat picture the OP say is the true image of earth is nothing but a stereographic projection map. Please click here for the examples of that map.
If the OP knew what he was talking about he would have known what type of projection he was looking at when he posted his so called true image. At that point in his argument, everything else was moot. I'm not going to get into the mathematical details on how this map is made, but check here to try and grasps the concepts.
Then the OP says this:
This is totally absurd. If he knew anything about weather, then he would have realized that the Antarctic Jetstream flows around the south polar regions due to the temperature difference between 60 south and 90 south in latitude. This has not way in shape or form effect the weather in the northern hemisphere. Our weather in the northern hemisphere is controlled by the polar jet in the north.
Then he goes to say:
Where is the treaty? Why didn't the OP produce some type of information to back his claim?
If anything the preservation of Antarctic is due to hole in the Ozone layer.
http://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Which is monitored very carefully because of CO2 emissions from Earth.
Then he says:
Where is the proof of his claim? I can tell you how we measure distance from the sun.
Measuring distance from the sun
If you remember the pythagorean theorem (a^2 + b^2 = c^2), then you'll notice that the hypotenuse is used to measure the distance from earth to the sun.
Also read here: http://www.badastronomy.com/mad/1996/au.html
And then he ends with this jibberish;
Again, where is the proof? If you make a claim, back it up with documents or literature. Give the people a reason to want to debunk it.
All I am saying he, the OP made nothing but blank statements with nothing to back up his claim. The OP don't want the science. He made that clear. His mind is set on whatever is brain puts together. His claims are as bad as the people having video footage of Eric Gardner's death and the police still not getting prosecuted for it.
I think this should pretty much end this thread. Time to turn out the lights and go home folks.
Here is an extremely simple explanation...... Most of these you can easily find out yourself and there is zero math. Just logic..
Last edited:
You're like... 1 of the ONLY posters here i'm glad is here.
"how do the seasons happen?"
They just do ok?!
rofllmao. oh wow.
They just do ok?!
rofllmao. oh wow.
jesus the fuck christ man
aiight bruh *gives you a dollar, gets in truck*
a couple of these niggas should be dead ashamed of themselves for being grown ass men that are that gullible and intellectually lazy.
and you're right, math isn't required to figure it out. but it's the one thing that can't be disputed the way words can (even when strung together logically and obviously like here).
this should be much better but this thread will not end here lol
Similar threads
