who would win right now in a war, china or the U.S ?

World War III


  • Total voters
    160
really nothing to do with this topic but i really miss Tupac



but china is a really scrapy fighter they will only consider themselves loser if every single chinaman is dead... its is built into there history the love of the nation and even though many poor people will die the will just keep coming until the US falls

Che said its not how many soliders or guns you have if the men who are fighting don't know what they are fighting for,
China has the most nationalistic people in the world and the largest population, so watch the fuck out!!!

In a conventional war, the US would wipe China off the battlefield even if the Chinese featured 200 million soldiers and the US had 2 million. The disparity in technology is too big.

The US would jam all Chinese communications, use superior guided weapons to cut off Chinese supplies and use superior killing technology to wipe out Chinese army groups by the hour...
 
Were currently fighting war on two fronts, a war with China right now would probably end in the destruction of both countries via nuclear warfare.
 
Become a superpower? China been a superpower for quite some time.



People say this in the USA to convince themselves that China won't surpass the US and become a Superpower, but China's not going to implode, they're not Japan.

The USA is going to have to get used to be in 2nd place.
 
Despite what the fearmongers here would have you believe, China is no match for the US militarily. You will know the Chinese military is ready when they formally try to take back Taiwan.
 
In a conventional war, the US would wipe China off the battlefield even if the Chinese featured 200 million soldiers and the US had 2 million. The disparity in technology is too big.

The US would jam all Chinese communications, use superior guided weapons to cut off Chinese supplies and use superior killing technology to wipe out Chinese army groups by the hour...

co sign, I can't believe there are people here who actually think the Chinese could beat the US at a conventional war.. :lol:

What good is 200 million soldiers if you can't mobilize them? :smh:
 
The US hands down at this point. In a couple of years things may change but weather you know it or not War is about money and when the Governments are fairly organized you don't have face the same situation of trying occupy and take over because in and all out war of that level with a full declaration you can just decimate cities at will. Go in and occupy later if its in your goals.

All these weapons the US don't really get to use to thier full potential because they are trying to battle insurgents and have to watch out for collateral damage of civilians...game over air strikes all day civilian casualties will just have to be collateral damage. Yeah they (China) are the ones buying our bonds but the only time when the debt exceeded GDP were during times of war. You think we couldn't encourage other borrowers during that time. What you have to keep in mind is that China seems prepped to take the economic lead in the world. So the other countries are preparing subtly for the best way to handle the situation by getting involved with investment in the area and building ties. They are not pushing this fast. Countries like to allow future economic interest with nations who are somewhat like them. Rome ruled the world the longest, the UK had the biggest empire and ruled the world longer then we will there downfall was them running out of money. Which started for the English just before the 1900's then the two world war sealed that fate. It was easy for them to pass the torch to us. They needed our help to win that war and it lied in there best economic interest. Marshal Plan and all. They gave us the blue print to fuck with Iran for that oil back in the day cause they didn't have the money to do thier plan so they was like this is how we do it.

So from an ally point of view most of the super powers will fuck us. Soldier wise lets look at North Korea. They have X times number of soldiers then the US. Some multiple maybe 2 or 3 times depending on whether if you count the reserves on both sides. Yet do you think a large number of those guys are trained. Its like put on these boots grab this gun and get to it. China is a different story they actually have training but we just been doing this longer. We better at it.

It's all coming to an end sooner or later as this money looses steam we won't be able to hold up all that well in a war. Now for the cat who talked about a ground war in Asia. Yeah its a real problem. Now don't underestimate any body trying to occupy the US. you thought the Iraq and Afghanistan and Vietnam insurgency was in issue. These rednecks out here is serious...even the hood will come up. We just to out there. Anybody trying to occupy us is going to hurt doing it for years...
 
Well, based on past supposed enemies of the US, I guess it's time for another boogeyman. The US waged a Cold War for decades until documents revealed that the USSR was never a economic nor military threat to the US.

^^^ is an example of good, ole republican bullshit. the $$$ behind the military industrial complex made a killing during the cold war charade.

see bush #2 for part 2 of the gop running this country for the top 2%. again.

America may lose a war, but mark my words, those white boys would blow up the world ten times over before they give up a inch of their land and power.

:yes::yes::yes:

nuclear war: no one wins. we all lose. period.

conventional war, usa soil: china can NOT invade the usa because of the citizens being armed. usa technology + vigilante guerrilla citizens means the "army" is even larger.

conventional war, china soil: usa air power + conventional weaponry wipes out a weaponless civilian heavily populated area to instill FEAR in the population. subsequent invasions on the ground find the usa forces greeted by the locals as they team-up to overthrow a communist gov't that rules their lowly existence.

in other words, those people are still living in the 18th century in some parts of china.

Become a superpower? China been a superpower for quite some time.

based on what? china has big, powerful nukes that would probably be shot down. the usa has even bigger, more powerful nukes that are satellite guided and can hit their target within 5 ft anywhere in the cot damn world.

dude, never underestimate the "evil" that runs thru the white man's veins.
 
Based upon the combination of their economic and military strength. I guess if superpower had an official definition it would help... but it sounds like your definition would probably only have the U.S. and Russia qualifying.

Mine would be a country that is extremely powerful both militarily and economically... enough have influence over many other countries, while at the same time being a nation that other nations (including other superpowers) would be extremely hesitant to attack, even given some provocation (for instance, things that would get any nation attacked, would not get USA, Russia, China attacked). Also, states that are under the protection of superpowers tend to not be attacked for fear of the protecting power.

None of that means that one superpower doesn't have better weapons than another though. Kinda like the word superstar in sports. Lebron, Kobe and Carmelo are all superstars, but that doesn't mean that they are all equal talents.

Edit: one more qualifier. If the country were to disappear off the face of the earth tomorrrow, the balance of world power would be greatly affected. If spain disappeared tomorrow, world power would not be affected. If the USA, Russia, China went away overnight, a whole lot of countries would all of the sudden be either free of big brother type influence, or able to play a lot rougher with nations that were under the disappeared countries wing the day before.



based on what? china has big, powerful nukes that would probably be shot down. the usa has even bigger, more powerful nukes that are satellite guided and can hit their target within 5 ft anywhere in the cot damn world.

dude, never underestimate the "evil" that runs thru the white man's veins.
 
Last edited:
The US has fought china, we have a north korea today because of chinese intervention. And their nuclear weapons aren't the archaic bullshit you think that they are. They didnt get the bomb 10-20 years ago, they've had it since the '60's and have been stealing/buying our military tech for decades. Matter of fact our spy game has fallen off considerably since the end of the "cold war" while theyve stepped theirs up.

Im not saying they'd defeat the US, but if youd expect some faggy "shock and awe" campaign if a war did happen (which it wont). You'd be horribly surprised.
 
Here is what people need to understand. A war between the US and China, would be short and devastating for China if it was limited to either the ocean or the air.

If was on the ground, it would take a little longer, but the US would massacre the Chinks simply because at this point, the US is the unchallenged master of Blitzkrieg. Simply put, before or at the commencement of the war, the US would wipe out the entire Chinese airforce with guided missiles and strategic cruise missiles from subs, F-117s, B-1s and B-52s..

In the next phase, the US would send legions of M-1A1 Abrams tanks to attack weak points in the Chinese defense. These would be accompanied by engineers, motorised troops and highly mobile infantry men in humvees and armoured troop transports. Because the US would by that time have total air supremacy, it would hunt down Chinese surface to air missiles with its radar homing missiles and drones...The Chinese anti-air defence would be made kaput within hours of commencement of the battle.

The US would use superior technology to jam all Chinese electronic communications, and consign the Chinks to communicating by runners, motor cycle and horsemen, as they did in their short war with India in 1979..

On the battlefield, the German/ American designed Abrams main battle tanks would totally overmatch the Chinese T-90s an annhilate them by the droves. It would be a vicious mismatch, like a German Tiger tanks v several Shermans or Russian T-34s. The Abrams' 120 mm canon would outrage, outpunch and fbe more accurate, whether on the run or at standstill, than the guns on the primitive Chinese tanks. A hit at point blank range would have no effect on the American tank by a Chinese tank; but a hit even at 2 miles by an M-1A1 would demolish any Chinese tank.

In the midst of this carnage, A-10 warhogs would own the battle field, as IL-2 Sturmoviks owned the Germans at Kursk, and ravage Chinese armour from the sky. America close air support bombers would cut the umbilical cords supplying the Chinese field army, and expose it to encirclement. Within days, the Chinese would surrender in droves or be annhilated...

This would be Blitzkrieg on a scale not even envisaged by Guderian..
 
Last edited:
The US has fought china, we have a north korea today because of chinese intervention. And their nuclear weapons aren't the archaic bullshit you think that they are. They didnt get the bomb 10-20 years ago, they've had it since the '60's and have been stealing/buying our military tech for decades. Matter of fact our spy game has fallen off considerably since the end of the "cold war" while theyve stepped theirs up.

Im not saying they'd defeat the US, but if youd expect some faggy "shock and awe" campaign if a war did happen (which it wont). You'd be horribly surprised.

The US army in 1953 was roughly at the same technological level as the Chinese. There was very little technology to war in those days. Since then, things have changed. The are cruise missiles that are guided by satellite, there are tanks that are far much better than others, planes that are far superior, an officer core that is better trained, soldiers who are better trained, motivated and equipped on the US side...This war would be a mismatch between the technologically and tactically most advanced force in history against a primitive army that is ill equipped, ill trained, wieldy, and lack the material wherewhithal to fight at sustained intensity for even a few days...

Where would the Chinese food, oil and raw material come from after the first days of war? The US has all of these things in abundance without need to import them from somewhere. The US could stop importing oil tomorrow and start pressing it out of the shale rock in Colorado, and only have to suffer higher fuel costs..

The US manufacturing capacity is intact; if need be, it could revived within a matter of days in the event of war...China has nothing on the US. If the Europeans were to be trully united, and spend the next 10 years arming themselves, they could pose a challenge to the US...
 
Correct me if i'm wrong, with all the tech toys that the us has available they still haven't been able to catch the guy with the donkey who planed the 911.

And back than the arrogance in this country that "nobody will ever fuck with us ", became a reality, keep underestimating the opposition, this place is a great motivator for the nastiest most evil brains out there.
 
The US army in 1953 was roughly at the same technological level as the Chinese. There was very little technology to war in those days. Since then, things have changed. The are cruise missiles that are guided by satellite, there are tanks that are far much better than others, planes that are far superior, an officer core that is better trained, soldiers who are better trained, motivated and equipped on the US side...This war would be a mismatch between the technologically and tactically most advanced force in history against a primitive army that is ill equipped, ill trained, wieldy, and lack the material wherewhithal to fight at sustained intensity for even a few days...

Where would the Chinese food, oil and raw material come from after the first days of war? The US has all of these things in abundance without need to import them from somewhere. The US could stop importing oil tomorrow and start pressing it out of the shale rock in Colorado, and only have to suffer higher fuel costs..

The US manufacturing capacity is intact; if need be, it could revived within a matter of days in the event of war...China has nothing on the US. If the Europeans were to be trully united, and spend the next 10 years arming themselves, they could pose a challenge to the US...

I think you're wrong as far as them not having the wherewithal to fight. Especially if they had an opponent with a culture as opposite their own as American culture is to identify as their enemy. Like i said before, i dont think theyd defeat the US, but I dont think it would be this clean cut blitzkrieg you think it would be.

And if things are so different from what they were in the korean war the US wouldve rushed over the 49th parallel and toppled the DPRK decades ago. The US would also be less iffy about their support for Taiwan, a country they only half-heartedly support because they dont want to enter armed conflict with china if they decide to take the island back.

If the US wanted conflict or thought it would be as easy as you say they would constantly humor the idea as they do with the "axis of evil". The Chinese would be continuously strong armed into doing things the way the US wanted them. They wouldnt be an opponent for resources, market shares, and political influence as they are today.

And why do you dislike the chinese so much?
 
first of all its WELL KNOWN the US and China cannot go to war because they are both nuclear armed and it would be gameover for both sides.

regarding the article it was silly benq. supercarriers are known sitting ducks, small boats are a huge threat to them as was discussed when Bush was considering attacking Iran and the Iranians ran a bunch of boats out onto the straits of Hormuz to show how they had a deterrent and could take out some US ships. also US big ships have been attacked before such as the USS Cole.

I don't think US power is dependent on supertankers anyway given long range bombers, drones, etc.
 
Fuck that we've got this guy.

tony-stark-iron-man-2.jpg
 
first of all its WELL KNOWN the US and China cannot go to war because they are both nuclear armed and it would be gameover for both sides.

regarding the article it was silly benq. supercarriers are known sitting ducks, small boats are a huge threat to them as was discussed when Bush was considering attacking Iran and the Iranians ran a bunch of boats out onto the straits of Hormuz to show how they had a deterrent and could take out some US ships. also US big ships have been attacked before such as the USS Cole.

I don't think US power is dependent on supertankers anyway given long range bombers, drones, etc.


My dearfriend a Super carrier travels with a carrier group that may have up to 90 other ships. Before you got through to the carrier, you have go through Frigates, subs and destroyers... And even if you could to a carrier, it would blow you out of water with its formidable armaments. But if you somehow reached the hull and blew up your, boat, it is likely that you would not dent as Supercarrier. They have classified armour that includes 15" of steel....

An empty carrier costs about $10billion, by the time you add 200 aircraft at $100 million a piece, you are looking at a shif traversing the ocean that with its payload may be woth between $50billion and $100 billions. If you think the US would leave such a ship without state of the art defence, you are joking.

A carrier is not cheap. There 16 Supercarriers in the world, and the other 15 are all owned by the US. The only other one is owned by the Russians..

Countries like the UK have little carriers that displace 35- 50 000 tons of water. The Nimitz class super carriers displace more than 100 000 tons...
 
Man its late, so ill drop real game for you brothers tomorrow

but a war with china wouldnt last a week

you need a navy to have any chance at all of defeating us and we have the greatest navy in the world

China doesnt even have one if i recall correctly

they would get boxed in and destroyed

thats a nice little invention they have there.....great tech

but how would they protect it?

that shit would be destroyed in hours

some of yall greatly underestimate the united states military

fuck, what do yall think theyre spending all of your money on?

nobody wants a real war with us

and dont let these fake, politically motivated wars fool you

that shit is all deception

theyre not real wars
 
US has dropped bombs on yellow folk before....they would do it again.

c/s

they need to do another one for old times sake.
Man its late, so ill drop real game for you brothers tomorrow

but a war with china wouldnt last a week

you need a navy to have any chance at all of defeating us and we have the greatest navy in the world

China doesnt even have one if i recall correctly

they would get boxed in and destroyed

thats a nice little invention they have there.....great tech

but how would they protect it?

that shit would be destroyed in hours

some of yall greatly underestimate the united states military

fuck, what do yall think theyre spending all of your money on?

nobody wants a real war with us

and dont let these fake, politically motivated wars fool you

that shit is all deception

theyre not real wars

^ +1
 
My dearfriend a Super carrier travels with a carrier group that may have up to 90 other ships. Before you got through to the carrier, you have go through Frigates, subs and destroyers... And even if you could to a carrier, it would blow you out of water with its formidable armaments. But if you somehow reached the hull and blew up your, boat, it is likely that you would not dent as Supercarrier. They have classified armour that includes 15" of steel....

An empty carrier costs about $10billion, by the time you add 200 aircraft at $100 million a piece, you are looking at a shif traversing the ocean that with its payload may be woth between $50billion and $100 billions. If you think the US would leave such a ship without state of the art defence, you are joking.

A carrier is not cheap. There 16 Supercarriers in the world, and the other 15 are all owned by the US. The only other one is owned by the Russians..

Countries like the UK have little carriers that displace 35- 50 000 tons of water. The Nimitz class super carriers displace more than 100 000 tons...

the major military powers all have subs that can take down the US's slow / big ship fleets.

this incident shows your precious supercarrier is a sitting duck. BTW I'm not just making this up, it is well known.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ercise-leaving-military-chiefs-red-faced.html

he uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced

By MATTHEW HICKLEY

Last updated at 00:13 10 November 2007

When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed.

At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders.

That is the theory. Or, rather, was the theory.

Uninvited guest: A Chinese Song Class submarine, like the one that sufaced by the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk

American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board.

By the time it surfaced the 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack submarine is understood to have sailed within viable range for launching torpedoes or missiles at the carrier.


According to senior Nato officials the incident caused consternation in the U.S. Navy.

The Americans had no idea China's fast-growing submarine fleet had reached such a level of sophistication, or that it posed such a threat.

One Nato figure said the effect was "as big a shock as the Russians launching Sputnik" - a reference to the Soviet Union's first orbiting satellite in 1957 which marked the start of the space age.

The incident, which took place in the ocean between southern Japan and Taiwan, is a major embarrassment for the Pentagon.
The lone Chinese vessel slipped past at least a dozen other American warships which were supposed to protect the carrier from hostile aircraft or submarines.

And the rest of the costly defensive screen, which usually includes at least two U.S. submarines, was also apparently unable to detect it.

According to the Nato source, the encounter has forced a serious re-think of American and Nato naval strategy as commanders reconsider the level of threat from potentially hostile Chinese submarines.

It also led to tense diplomatic exchanges, with shaken American diplomats demanding to know why the submarine was "shadowing" the U.S. fleet while Beijing pleaded ignorance and dismissed the affair as coincidence.

Analysts believe Beijing was sending a message to America and the West demonstrating its rapidly-growing military capability to threaten foreign powers which try to interfere in its "backyard".

The People's Liberation Army Navy's submarine fleet includes at least two nuclear-missile launching vessels.

Its 13 Song Class submarines are extremely quiet and difficult to detect when running on electric motors.

Commodore Stephen Saunders, editor of Jane's Fighting Ships, and a former Royal Navy anti-submarine specialist, said the U.S. had paid relatively little attention to this form of warfare since the end of the Cold War.

He said: "It was certainly a wake-up call for the Americans.

"It would tie in with what we see the Chinese trying to do, which appears to be to deter the Americans from interfering or operating in their backyard, particularly in relation to Taiwan."

In January China carried a successful missile test, shooting down a satellite in orbit for the first time.

guess I just blew your argument out of the water like you were a supertanker and I was a sub :eek:
 
No matter what our government says, we still have nukes ready to fire. When you have a billion people compressed in a limited area like China, it is rather easy to take out a couple million. And as they said, we will probably never fight China, but someone that buys that weapon from China might think they the big bully on the block and use it on one of our carriers.

lol the government never said they didnt have nukes ready to fire... as a veteran who served on a ship that was "capable" of carrying nuclear warheads on tomahawks... we were told to say "the United States does not advocate the use of nuclear weapons"... basically it meant the US doesnt say to use them but if we have to we damn sure will lol... look at any ship that has a VLS and I guarantee 5 of those cells have nukes in them...
 
get it straight fellas, the US only fights defenseless nations that have natural resources it wants.

of course the US has unparalleled military hardware but the Chinese are nuclear armed. that is the ultimate F U and the Chinese will push back as hard as they are pushed. they are not going to start anything but trust they are NOT going to back down in the face of threats and bullying either. shit the fucking TALIBAN isn't backing down and they are a bunch of guys running around on foot.

Washington needs to stand down from trying to fight everybody.
 
the major military powers all have subs that can take down the US's slow / big ship fleets.

this incident shows your precious supercarrier is a sitting duck. BTW I'm not just making this up, it is well known.



guess I just blew your argument out of the water like you were a supertanker and I was a sub :eek:

I see your argument here. I would severely hope that the radar guy failed to do an area sweep before they started the exercise and focused their attention elsewhere.

That doesn't mean I agree with you; quite the contrary. I personally watched us damn near level mountains in Afghanistan with conventional bombs. I posted about it, as I joined BGOL fresh from an Afghan tour in around xmas 2001. I can only imagine the devastation we could cause with nukes.

Just the same, this article does make Big Blue look stupid as hell.
 
the major military powers all have subs that can take down the US's slow / big ship fleets.

this incident shows your precious supercarrier is a sitting duck. BTW I'm not just making this up, it is well known.



guess I just blew your argument out of the water like you were a supertanker and I was a sub :eek:

It is not the number of subs, but their quality. Again, there is huge qualitative difference between the primitive subs of China or North Korea (which has more subs than any country in the world). Their subs have limited technology, firepower and are noisy. Furthermore, 10 torpedos from a sub would not sink an aircraft carrier. Do not underestimate the resiliency of that mobile Island.

In the second World War, the Japanese dreadnoughts Yamato and Musashi, which had a displacement of 73 0000 tons each, fought off hundred of aeroplanes and subs. In the battle of Leyte Gulf, the battleship Yamato fought 200 American warplanes for 10 hours, took hundreds of bombs and more than 10 direct torpedo hits before it went down.

The US would not deploy a capital ship, with value of between 50 and $100 billion dollars (when you factor the cargo), without having a proportionate defense.

You can hit an aircraft carrier with a $1000 lb bomb, and the thing keeps ticking on. An aircraft carrier has sides that are at least 15 inches thick, a coating which anti-magnetic, and slew of other gimmicks that make armour impervious to most weapon. In addition to this, it is fitted with the most sophisticated radar and listening devices. If a sub tried to sink it, and it somehow survived by depth charge by destroyers, helicopters and anti-sub planes, the carrier would have some nasty srurprises for it.


A carrier is far from a defenceless platform. It carries the most advanced surface to air, surface weapons. It has a slew of guns that fire thousands of rounds and would form a shield of hot lead to anyone brazen enough to assault the craft...

Previously, it was known that the way you would sink a carrier would be to nuke it, if you could find it...
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...red-faced.html

he uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced

By MATTHEW HICKLEY

Last updated at 00:13 10 November 2007

When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed.

At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield to detect and deter any intruders.

That is the theory. Or, rather, was the theory.

Uninvited guest: A Chinese Song Class submarine, like the one that sufaced by the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk

American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board.

By the time it surfaced the 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack submarine is understood to have sailed within viable range for launching torpedoes or missiles at the carrier.

According to senior Nato officials the incident caused consternation in the U.S. Navy.

The Americans had no idea China's fast-growing submarine fleet had reached such a level of sophistication, or that it posed such a threat.

One Nato figure said the effect was "as big a shock as the Russians launching Sputnik" - a reference to the Soviet Union's first orbiting satellite in 1957 which marked the start of the space age.

The incident, which took place in the ocean between southern Japan and Taiwan, is a major embarrassment for the Pentagon.
The lone Chinese vessel slipped past at least a dozen other American warships which were supposed to protect the carrier from hostile aircraft or submarines.

And the rest of the costly defensive screen, which usually includes at least two U.S. submarines, was also apparently unable to detect it.

According to the Nato source, the encounter has forced a serious re-think of American and Nato naval strategy as commanders reconsider the level of threat from potentially hostile Chinese submarines.

It also led to tense diplomatic exchanges, with shaken American diplomats demanding to know why the submarine was "shadowing" the U.S. fleet while Beijing pleaded ignorance and dismissed the affair as coincidence.

Analysts believe Beijing was sending a message to America and the West demonstrating its rapidly-growing military capability to threaten foreign powers which try to interfere in its "backyard".

The People's Liberation Army Navy's submarine fleet includes at least two nuclear-missile launching vessels.

Its 13 Song Class submarines are extremely quiet and difficult to detect when running on electric motors.

Commodore Stephen Saunders, editor of Jane's Fighting Ships, and a former Royal Navy anti-submarine specialist, said the U.S. had paid relatively little attention to this form of warfare since the end of the Cold War.

He said: "It was certainly a wake-up call for the Americans.

"It would tie in with what we see the Chinese trying to do, which appears to be to deter the Americans from interfering or operating in their backyard, particularly in relation to Taiwan."

In January China carried a successful missile test, shooting down a satellite in orbit for the first time.


Let say it fired 4 torpedos at the carrier, then what? The carrier would deployt counter measures that neutralise the torpedos. The two that would hit the carrier would cause huge dents. From there the carrier would sink the sub... A sub cannot sink a capital ship like a carrier with one hit. It does not happen. It would need to torpedo the carrier many times before it blew a fole large enough to make a difference. Even if the sub was blow a hole the size of the door, and 10 000 lbs of water went in, the carrier would not sink or become unable to fight. The gross weight of a Nimitz Class super carrier is between 85 000 tons and 106 000 tons for USS John Stennis.
 
neither side would win.....it would be suicidal on both sides.....it would be world war 1 all over again.
 
:hmm:During the final stages of World War II in 1945, the United States conducted two atomic bombings against the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, not china.



I'm sorry folks, but China>>>>>>>>USA
:hmm: ASIANS = Yellow folk. Ever heard of yellow fever?
 
Back
Top