you don't get it brotha, that homosexual is saying cops have the right to do whatever they want to whoever they want whenever they damn well please because they have a badge. he's the type to suck his coworker's dick because a man on the phone tells him to.
you never provided proof that she stole anything, you repeatedly implied that cops are beyond reproach and should not be questioned. you also said that it's irrelevant why the cop was arresting her, even if it was for no reason. you are a worthless idiot and i don't care if i pissed you off and i don't need you sympathy. i'm far better off than you in this world.Awww mannn, you didn't really go there, did you? Damn, I was having fun arguing with you up until this point. But is your argument so weak, that you have to resort to this type of response? Or are you just trying to piss me off?
Either way, at this point I just feel sorry for you.
all you've done is dodge the posts of myself and others who clearly had you cornered, and made yourself look very stupid while doing so. i combine insults with my points because it's more fun. not one person can say i don't present valid points while spewing bile at people who show themselves to be less intelligent than myself. i'm an asshole, deal with it.
@ the cop being scared by a 15 year old girl. I see why they call you it
That's an excellent response seeing as there is so much contextually that is missing from that video. Great points.i-moses,
I'm glad you caught that. in a society that has clear double standards in the treatment of its citizens, i'm kind of surprised that in 2007 we cannot be clear about some things.
1. the call for her as a 15 year old to take responsibility for being out late while Bush pardons Scooter Libby for obstruction of justice speaks to a DOUBLE STANDARD. There is no black responsibility and white responsibility. Equal treatment under the law is a constitutional right not a privilege.
2. It does not matter what she has in her possession. His stop was because she was out after curfew.
You are innocent under proven guilty.
3. What was the cop's concern when he stopped her?
Was it to ensure she made it home safely?
Was it to provide protection of this minor from elements in society such as pedophiles?
Was it to see what "these no good black kids" are up to?
4. Cops are trained i.e. they are provided possible scenarios and their responses to those actions are conditioned.
If this falls out of the scope of his training then appropriate action should be taken
5. If this was a black cop and the girl was a 15yr old white kid, would we expect to see outrage by the community?
6. Which of you "black" members would have punched a white 15yr old child in the face on camera if you were the cop?
7. Was the camera turned on the record the "expected" violence when a cop stops a person of color?
What role did this expectation play in how the officer handled the situation?
Was it to help justify his eventual actions by repeating commands to the camera?
Was his concern documenting his efforts so that his eventual use of force would be justified because he had no intent to resolve the situation peacefully?
These are the type of questions we need to ask as a people to ensure there is equal treatment under the law.
Some people in this thread sounds like it is a privilege not to be treated equally.
stockholm syndrome anyone???
Help me bro, i'm losing patience with you.........
You haven't answered the question:
The question that is being asked here is whether or not the cop followed procedure?
You never address this part of it.
In all your post you state what the girl should have done.
Please explain what the cop should have done.
Stop running.
Is that supposed to make her older than 15?
She is still motherfucking 15 !!!
She is a 15 yr old girl sexually abused by men more than twice her age.
If she is "known", why doesn't the cops set up a sting to arrest the fucking perverts who solicit sex from that minor?????
Their priorities are fucked up...............
