What is the Black Position on Illegal Immigration ???

GhostofMarcus said:
you are :lol: . all the little smart ass remarks you post.
You guys keep talking about black people is doomed and my point is illegal mexican can't doom anybody that got thier act together.
They are not going anywhere. So blacks got to get their shit right.
Jobs are not promised to anybody. period
Is America in a state such that all black people have a fair chance at having "their act together"? No.
Will added stress to a strained position benefit black people in their present state? No.
Do you actually respond to what people are posting? No.
Do you have evidence to support your position that doesn't involve "lazy black people" that you know? No.
 
GhostofMarcus said:
"No tales of shiftless negroes you know will change that. No tales of shiftless negroes will change the fact that millions of criminals are using my tax dollars to be incarcerated, educated and receive healthcare."

So that is not your statement? and vg cosign that that sums up the entire thread. So I guess that boils down to one thing your tax dollars been spend on mexicans.


And that about sums up this entire thread Dolemite. Nuff said!

-VG
Is it my only statement as your "broils down to" remark suggests? No.

Does it make any difference to you that I have presented many arguments besides that one along with real factual evidence to support it while you tell stories of "lazy negroes"? No.

Are you representing yourself intelligently here at all? No.

Evidence to support every issue I have with illegal immigration is backed up with verifiable evidence in this thread. Contest the evidence, doubt it's existence whatever you like but it is here for all to see and read if they are capable of reading.

I have no knowledge of any community in the United States that has a sizeable portion of illegal hispanics and blacks in close proximity where illegal hispanics are allied in any way whatsoever to blacks.
 
Last edited:
too god damn funny!

QueEx said:
If you throw a rock, the pig that squeals is the one it struck.

QueEx

oh shit... still laughing... :lol:

i've got another page and a half to read, then i'll respond with my perspective as a california resident and business owner/employer...
 
Greed said:
i really dont like the new dynamic on this board.

can we go back to everybody on one side and me on the other.

this is bullshit.

oh shit AGAIN... i thought i'd seen it all today... now this! :lol:

still trying to get to the bottom of page 4 so i can give my two cents...
 
Public divided over how to treat illegals

By Susan Page and Kathy Kiely, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — It's easy to understand why Congress is having so much trouble settling on an approach to immigration: Americans endorse the most controversial proposals of both those who want to penalize illegal immigrants and those who want to let them stay.

A USA TODAY/Gallup Poll taken Friday through Sunday found a majority of those surveyed want to make it a crime for foreigners to immigrate illegally to the USA and for Americans to help those illegal immigrants once they arrive.

Still, nearly two-thirds also say the government should allow illegal immigrants to remain and become U.S. citizens if they meet certain requirements over time.

"The same problems that bedevil Congress in trying to figure out how to handle immigration are bedeviling the American psyche and the American public in trying to deal with it," says Frank Newport, editor in chief of the Gallup Poll. "There's no easy solution, as Congress has discovered, and I think the public holds these same almost-contradictory attitudes about immigration."

That means the debate being waged in the halls of Congress and at rallies across the country Monday could shape public opinion and, with it, public policy.

LeRoy Gomez, 58, a part-time union representative from Fort Collins, Colo., who was among those surveyed, says the rallies have been inspiring for many Latinos — including those, like himself, whose families have been in the USA for generations. "They want to be part of the American dream," he says of the marchers.

Linda Martin, 56, a private investigator from Visalia, Calif., says the rallies she watched on TV only reinforced her view that tough measures need to be taken to deal with illegal immigrants.

"If they've come here illegally, then they all ought to be sent back," she says. Of the children shown marching, she says, "A lot of them are just doing it to get out of school."

There is nearly universal agreement on one point: The system needs fixing.

Eight in 10 say illegal immigration to the USA is "out of control." More than nine in 10 say it's important for the government to take steps this year to control the borders and deal with those illegal immigrants who already are here. The feelings about border security are particularly intense.

Yet most Americans are pessimistic about whether that effort could ever succeed.

Six in 10 say that no matter what the government does, a "sizable number" of illegal immigrants will be able to get into the country.

William Gretler, 77, of Shell Lake, Wis., worries about undocumented workers taking jobs from Americans and creating burdens for taxpayers. "The local government has to pick up their medical care, the school system has to pick up their schooling and health care systems have to pick up the price for helping keep them alive," the retired steelworker says.

On the other hand, he doesn't like the idea of forcing them to return to their home countries. "I can't see splitting up families," Gretler says, and he thinks it's "crazy" to penalize those who try to help them. The bill passed by the House of Representatives in December would make it a crime to assist illegal immigrants.

Joshua Akers, 22, a grocery-store stocker in Columbia, S.C., feels little of Gretler's ambivalence toward illegal immigrants. "I think they should be deported if they can't meet certain guidelines," he says, including having a family member who lives in the USA and already is a citizen. "They know it's wrong to come across the border and they do it anyway, which is not right."

There are close divisions over one of the most drastic proposals: building a wall. The House bill includes plans for a 700-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexican border where illegal crossings are most common.

By 48%-49%, Americans split over whether that would be effective in curbing the number of people who come here illegally.

Layne Sanders, 42, of Oakland, supports setting a cutoff date to prevent a new wave of illegal immigrants from taking advantage of any program enacted to make current ones legal. But erecting a wall is "going a little far," he says. "It's just a little too East/West Germany for my taste."

Most useful, according to those polled, would be instituting tough penalties for businesses that employ illegal immigrants; 84% call that an effective step. A similar number say that significantly increasing the number of law-enforcement officers patrolling the border would help.

By more than 2-1, they say taking steps to raise the standard of living in the immigrants' home countries would be effective, too.

"Different polls have reached different conclusions, but a common thread has been that Americans are concerned about the lack of enforcement along our borders, and rightly so," says Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. He opposes a bipartisan Senate plan — crafted last week but then ensnared in procedural roadblocks — that would allow illegal immigrants in the USA for more than five years to stay here and move toward citizenship.

Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., says Americans "know that our immigration system is broken and are demanding that Congress take action." He helped draft the Senate plan. "The only way to break the cycle of illegality is to offer a path for earned legalization."

Views on immigration differ depending on where Americans live, how much education they have — and whether their family includes a recent immigrant.

In Sara Brodsky Sieman's family, her grandparents emigrated from Lithuania and Russia, her father from Ukraine. "People come here, as they did in all the generations before us, to help the people back home, and I think that's a very important thing to remember," says Sieman, 53, a ballroom-dance instructor from Newton, Mass. "I'd like to bring people into the civic and economic life of our country, and make for them what I hope would be a more productive life and a less scary life."

When it comes to whether illegal immigrants should be able to stay in the USA and become citizens:

• Those who are immigrants or have at least one parent who is an immigrant are more likely to support the idea; 71% do so, compared with 62% among those whose parents were native-born.

• Among Democrats, 68% support citizenship for illegal immigrants, as do 65% of independents. Among Republicans, a 55% majority endorse the idea.

• By region, those in the West are most favorable, at 67% support. Those in the Midwest are least supportive, at 57%.

• Women are more supportive than men, 67% vs. 58%.

Some conservatives questioned those findings. "If you mention 'amnesty,' you tend to get much different numbers," says Will Adams, a spokesman for Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., who is leading the fight against legalization.

Lawmakers such as Kennedy who favor allowing illegal immigrants to stay deny their proposal is "amnesty" because it includes fines and other requirements.

Personal connections

Just more than one-third of those surveyed say they know a recent immigrant who they are sure is here illegally, or think may be.

Those relationships have tempered the views of James Stoddard, 52, of Santa Maria, Calif. On one hand, the salesman questions whether the children of illegal immigrants born in the USA should be granted citizenship, as they are now. On the other, he says the undocumented workers he knows personally are "good people" and "hard-working."

He adds, "Some of the ones I know I would love to have stay."

Carolyn Long, 62, a retired insurance manager from Alpharetta, Ga., says she doesn't know the legal standing of workers she sees in her neighborhood. "We have a lot of Mexicans that work ... here for the landscaping businesses, and I have no idea if they're illegal or not," she says.

In any case, her view is unyielding: "Any illegal immigrants need to be sent back to wherever they're from, and then they need to come through whatever the correct way is."

Fewer than one in five Americans think all illegal immigrants — a group estimated at as many as 12 million, equal to the population of Ohio — should be deported. A similar number say they should be allowed to stay and work for a limited amount of time.

Instead, a significant majority, 63%, say there should be a way for illegal immigrants to stay here and become citizens if they meet certain requirements.

More than eight in 10 say those requirements should include:

• Having a job.

• Learning to speak English.

• Passing a health screening.

• Paying federal taxes due on past income.

Two-thirds say illegal immigrants should be required to have lived in the United States for at least five years and pay a fine for coming to the USA illegally.

The politics of immigration is tricky, particularly in a year when control of the House and Senate could be at stake in November.

Both Democrats and Republicans have powerful constituencies that favor the Senate deal, which provides for a program to expand the number of foreign temporary, or guest, workers and legal status for most illegal immigrants. They include the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and businesses that rely on immigrant labor, some unions that would like to organize those workers and civil-rights groups. President Bush has called for bringing illegal immigrants "out of the shadows."

Both parties also have powerful constituencies that oppose the Senate proposal, however. Cornyn has been inundated with calls and mail from constituents who oppose what they see as "amnesty" for lawbreakers, the senator's spokesman, Don Stewart, says. Some African-Americans worry that illegal immigrants will hold down wages or take jobs from American-born workers.

A prized voting bloc

And neither party wants the other to get credit for passing a bill that has ignited passions among one of the nation's fastest growing and most prized voting blocs, the nation's 9.3 million Hispanic voters.

On Monday, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., and Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., issued dueling news releases blaming the other for the failure to pass a bill before Congress left town on a two-week break for Easter and Passover.

Tancredo, nationally known as a spokesman against illegal immigration, is considering a dark-horse run for the White House in 2008 as a way to highlight his concerns.

But many of the leading GOP presidential hopefuls are on the other side of the issue. Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Sam Brownback of Kansas and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska were architects of the Senate plan. After initially withholding his support, Frist also embraced the proposal.

Bush favors "comprehensive" reform, including tougher enforcement and a guest-worker program. In the USA TODAY poll, just 29% say they approve of his handling of immigration; 62% disapprove.

That dismal rating reflects the public's "frustration" with the lack of progress on immigration reform, says Rep. Henry Bonilla, a Republican whose Texas district borders Mexico. "I think the public wants to see results," he says.

Contributing: Bill Nichols and William Risser, USA TODAY
Posted 4/11/2006 12:25 AM ET
 
Re: Public divided over how to treat illegals

oh wow- usa today and all the other stories about this make it so much plainer to see the truth !


usa today said:
A prized voting bloc

And neither party wants the other to get credit for passing a bill that has ignited passions among one of the nation's fastest growing and most prized voting blocs, the nation's 9.3 million Hispanic voters.

add another new 11 million formerly illegal voters to that figure

and in 10 more years they can add all the new illegals that stream through

we already know you agree with usa today
 
What is MY Position on Illegal Immigration ???

ok.

i am AGAINST illegal immigration.

and while illegal immigration usually conjures up images of mexicans crossing US borders in california and texas, i'm also including chinese, vietnamese and hindu illegal immigrants in the northwest...

but since i've lived in southern california most of my life, and texas for a brief while, i'll speak on what i know...

i'm AGAINST illegal immigration through mexico by not only mexicans, but also hondurans, el salvadoreans, and any other central americans who wish to come here contrary to american immigration laws...

if american citizens would like to reform the immigration laws, appeal to the appropriate legislatures and let the process work...

in the meantime, the california infrastructure can do without the added 1% (or whatever amount it is) criminal element that: traffics illegal narcotics from mexico. is smuggled into california to manufacture illegal narcotics (especially in central california). commits violent acts (rape, murder) and then flee back across the border. commits other crimes and burden the judicial system.

in the meantime, california (and the nation) could use the UNPAID taxes of the UNDOCUMENTED wages...

in the meantime, any U.S. business employing illegal immigrants and not paying their fair share of employee taxes should be criminally prosecuted for fraud and tax evasion... contractors and growers come to mind immediately...

it's undeniable that illegal immigrants and their children also take advantage of social service programs created for american citizens. even if it were only a single penny per illegal immigrant, that's a single penny too much.
 
Re: Public divided over how to treat illegals

I didnt realize my opinion on this had to be totally based on opinion polls! Wow that's how you really become part of the herd! I totally see how our position is viewed by blacks and how it impacts us now!

Thanks Ghost!
 
Re: What is MY Position on Illegal Immigration ???

cranrab said:
ok.

i am AGAINST illegal immigration.

and while illegal immigration usually conjures up images of mexicans crossing US borders in california and texas, i'm also including chinese, vietnamese and hindu illegal immigrants in the northwest...

but since i've lived in southern california most of my life, and texas for a brief while, i'll speak on what i know...

i'm AGAINST illegal immigration through mexico by not only mexicans, but also hondurans, el salvadoreans, and any other central americans who wish to come here contrary to american immigration laws...

if american citizens would like to reform the immigration laws, appeal to the appropriate legislatures and let the process work...

in the meantime, the california infrastructure can do without the added 1% (or whatever amount it is) criminal element that: traffics illegal narcotics from mexico. is smuggled into california to manufacture illegal narcotics (especially in central california). commits violent acts (rape, murder) and then flee back across the border. commits other crimes and burden the judicial system.

in the meantime, california (and the nation) could use the UNPAID taxes of the UNDOCUMENTED wages...

in the meantime, any U.S. business employing illegal immigrants and not paying their fair share of employee taxes should be criminally prosecuted for fraud and tax evasion... contractors and growers come to mind immediately...

it's undeniable that illegal immigrants and their children also take advantage of social service programs created for american citizens. even if it were only a single penny per illegal immigrant, that's a single penny too much.
Tyson and other corps have plants and factories in the boonies like rural Kansas and have thousands of illegal aliens working in them. White Bread Sara the school teacher has to learn how to teach ESL now etc. The worst culprits are the Corporations and Contractors. There are only a few hundred thousand migrant jobs in Cali but millions of illegals doing other shit.
 
Re: Public divided over how to treat illegals

Dolemite said:
I didnt realize my opinion on this had to be totally based on opinion polls! Wow that's how you really become part of the herd! I totally see how our position is viewed by blacks and how it impacts us now!

Thanks Ghost!

Man it was just a article.
 
Re: What is MY Position on Illegal Immigration ???

cranrab said:
ok.

i am AGAINST illegal immigration.

and while illegal immigration usually conjures up images of mexicans crossing US borders in california and texas, i'm also including chinese, vietnamese and hindu illegal immigrants in the northwest...

but since i've lived in southern california most of my life, and texas for a brief while, i'll speak on what i know...

i'm AGAINST illegal immigration through mexico by not only mexicans, but also hondurans, el salvadoreans, and any other central americans who wish to come here contrary to american immigration laws...

if american citizens would like to reform the immigration laws, appeal to the appropriate legislatures and let the process work...

in the meantime, the california infrastructure can do without the added 1% (or whatever amount it is) criminal element that: traffics illegal narcotics from mexico. is smuggled into california to manufacture illegal narcotics (especially in central california). commits violent acts (rape, murder) and then flee back across the border. commits other crimes and burden the judicial system.

in the meantime, california (and the nation) could use the UNPAID taxes of the UNDOCUMENTED wages...

in the meantime, any U.S. business employing illegal immigrants and not paying their fair share of employee taxes should be criminally prosecuted for fraud and tax evasion... contractors and growers come to mind immediately...

it's undeniable that illegal immigrants and their children also take advantage of social service programs created for american citizens. even if it were only a single penny per illegal immigrant, that's a single penny too much.
And thats just in California.

I have two offices in Alabama, one in the Birmingham area. When in that area, once or twice a week usually, I tend to stay at one or two of the same hotels. Until last year, the support staff was mostly Black with a sprinkling of white. Now, they are all gone. Now, the whole crew, except for housekeeping manager (and she says her "time ain't long"), is Mexican. A month or so ago, I asked her what happened. She shrugged her shoulder; "they do it for little or nothing; and management wants me to give them hours; so the Black and white women had to look for something else because the hourly rate (above minimum) was just not enough when <u>they</u> were cutting deeply into their hours."

I know what she was talking about. About 9 months ago, I saw it happening. One morning, a loud knock at my door around 7:30 a.m. WTF? I went to the door and some mexican guy in street clothes asking me "check out?" I thought for a second and went out into the hallway and there were more of them: not even in a uniform, knocking on doors, cleaning rooms. I whipped out my cell phone pretending to be calling INS. I checked out headed to my office around 9. I told the Black supervisor what I had done. She rolled on the floor laughin: she said, "thats why she saw the mexicans kicking a damn wheel headed out of the parking lot" ... she wondered what had happened.

Moral of the story: It ain't just in California. Its beginning to happen in places you might not think -- in the deep south. AND, the jobs weren't fruit picking or lawn work. True, the jobs weren't executive types -- but <U>THEY WERE WANTED JOBS</U>. They were jobs that Black mothers were using to help take care of their families.

Why? - do I have the feeling a scenario similar to the one above (different jobs - same players) is repeating itself, all over America?

QueEx
 
a moment of levity...

now mexico will have millions of americans seeking mexican citizenship...

Mexico poised to allow small amounts of drugs
Congress decriminalizes possession of cocaine, heroin, ecstasy, pot

The Associated Press
Updated: 8:46 p.m. ET April 28, 2006


MEXICO CITY - Mexico’s Congress approved a bill Friday decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana, ecstasy, cocaine and heroin for personal use — a measure sure to raise questions in Washington about Mexico’s commitment to the war on drugs.

The only step remaining was the signature of the president, whose office indicated he would sign it.

Mexican officials hope the law will help police focus on large-scale trafficking operations, rather than minor drug busts. The bill also stiffens penalties for trafficking and possession of drugs — even small quantities — by government employees or near schools, and maintains criminal penalties for drug sales.

The Bush administration had no immediate reaction.

The bill, passed by Mexico’s Senate on a 53-26 vote with one abstention, had already been approved in the lower house of Congress and was sent to the desk of President Vicente Fox for his signature.

“This law gives police and prosecutors better legal tools to combat drug crimes that do so much damage to our youth and children,” presidential spokesman Ruben Aguilar said.


The bill says criminal charges will no longer be brought for possession of up to 25 milligrams of heroin, five grams of marijuana (about one-fifth of an ounce, or about four joints), and half a gram of cocaine — about half the standard street-size quantity, which is enough for several lines of the drug.

Array of other drugs allowed
“No charges will be brought against ... addicts or consumers who are found in possession of any narcotic for personal use,” according to the Senate bill, which also lays out allowable quantities for a large array of other drugs, including LSD, MDA, ecstasy — about two pills’ worth, — and amphetamines.

Some of the amounts are eye-popping: Mexicans would be allowed to possess 2.2 pounds of peyote, the button-sized hallucinogenic cactus used in some native Indian religious ceremonies.

Mexican law now leaves open the possibility of dropping charges against people caught with drugs if they are considered addicts and if “the amount is the quantity necessary for personal use.” But the exemption isn’t automatic.

The new bill drops the “addict” requirement — automatically allowing any “consumers” to have drugs — and sets out specific allowable quantities.

Sale of all drugs would remain illegal under the proposed law, unlike the Netherlands, where the sale of marijuana for medical use is legal and it can be bought with a prescription in pharmacies.

While Dutch authorities look the other way regarding the open sale of cannabis in designated coffee shops — something Mexican police seem unlikely to do — the Dutch have zero tolerance for heroin and cocaine. In both countries, commercial growing of marijuana is outlawed.

The effects could be significant, given that Mexico is rapidly becoming a drug-consuming nation as well as a shipment point for traffickers, and given the number of U.S. students who flock to border cities or resorts like Cancun and Acapulco on vacation.

“This is going to increase addictions in Mexico,” said Ulisis Bon, a drug treatment expert in Tijuana, where heroin use is rampant. “A lot of Americans already come here to buy medications they can’t get up there ... Just imagine, with heroin.”

© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 
Re: Public divided over how to treat illegals

Dolemite said:
oh wow- usa today and all the other stories about this make it so much plainer to see the truth !




add another new 11 million formerly illegal voters to that figure

and in 10 more years they can add all the new illegals that stream through

we already know you agree with usa today
This was sort of my "hold card": the vote impact that admitting 11 million illegals will have on Black political power. Maybe Tems and Ghosts don't vote or understand the power of our vote; maybe Ghosts can just go booooo ... and political power will, like black magic, be exercised. I don't think so.

Here's what I've been thinking:
- In 2000, we had 23 million blacks eligible to vote which dwarfed the 13 million eligible Latino voters.

- Now, even though Latinos have reached parity with blacks in the population -- 40% of Latinos who were of eligible voting age are non-citizens

- Only 5 percent of blacks that are of voting age are non-citizens

- There are now an estimated 10 million Latino registered voters. That compares more favorably with the 15 million black voters in the 2004 election.

- Add in 11 million Latino voters (illegals made legal) and the Latino vote will surpass the Black vote​

Why is this important? We all recall the republican efforts to woo the Black vote in the last two presidential elections. How much of our vote did Bush get? - 9-10%?? In 04 they got 40 percent of the Latino vote.

Who gives a fuck, right? I mean, fuck Bush anyway, right? RIGHT.

Not only will these soon-to-be-made-legal Latino votes that have yet to show any allegiance with US begin to affect the outcome in local races (I'm a firm believer that all politics are local), they will soon begin to have a bigger say than we do nationally. You've seen the pattern, illegal immigrants tend to locate in areas where they can afford to live. What areas of town are those: right, you got it. So, what local races will tend to be first affected? - bingo, you got it again.

But fuck that. Who gives a flying fukk about local races anyway. Hell, everybody knows that national races are where the real shit is. Well, my fellow BGOLers, wonder how important our vote will be as we look to influence either party, dems or repubs, with our issues? Both the dirtypubs and the dirtydems are conducting massive outreach efforts to the <u>Legal and Illegal</u> Latino community before your very fuckin eyes, right now, today -- as we watch the national debate on illegal immigration take place. Nah, ain't no hidin dis shit -- they doin it in yo faces.

With the tantalizing prospect of large numbers of newly enfranchised Latino voters voting Republican, there's no political incentive for Republicans to try to do more to get the black vote and if the dems already have the black vote sewed up -- no reason for them either to give 2 shits about Black voters as they will be working hard courting the Latino vote too. In other words, expending capital to woo the Latino vote will have larger returns (better chance of getting latinos to your side) than expending capital to woo the smaller and more transigent Black vote.


Latinos have already displaced US as the nation's biggest minority group. What happens when 11 million more become eligible voters ???


QueEx
 
Re: Public divided over how to treat illegals

Some people who are illegal immigrant carpetbaggers and retarded Casper types don't have to worry about displaced black workers or depleted black political power.

I'm waiting to hear what your post "broils down to".


I had to explain this before to some brothers and sisters who worked in the textile industry. I was a manager and we had facilities in the US, Mexico, India and China. They knew their jobs were going elsewhere but not why they were. They made $10-$15 an hour. The Mexicans live in the plant 6 out of 7 days a week and make $2 an hour. The Mexicans are being phased out already after only a few years. So 5-7 mexicans for every American worker. But in India we pay .25 an hour so that's 40-56 Indians per day for an American. And still we have China where its .25 to $1 a day per worker. So its 160 to 448 chinese for every American worker. Quality drops at every level but its so much cheaper to operate that you can produce magnitudes more at incredible savings. You are forced into this progression by competitors.
You can't ship anything made in China to Mexico.
Mexico is already losing most of the NAFTA manufacturers they gained to Asia. You can't ship used manufacturing equipment to Mexico. You can't take any manufacturing equipment out of Mexico if you close the plant. The Mexican Government totally regulates and inflates all telecommunication costs.
So now that everyone is leaving Mexico all those displaced workers who lived 300 days out of the year in those plants are left needing work. The next step is crossing the border. This shit will only get worse as poorer nations start pushing Mexico deeper in the whole because of the high cost of doing business there.
Mexico is highly protectionist while they expect us to be highly open. The shit is ludicrous.


On every level this is a fucked situation for our people. And notice how no one is saying how they are going to stop the influx if illegals through Mexico. A fence wont do it. There's the Gulf and Pacific too. And it will take an army to police the border.


The illegal aliens are criminals. Before one economic refugee is given amnesty I want every black economic criminal released from prison and their records cleaned and every person on the work visa list approved.
Many people break the law to feed their families. So what?
 
Re: Public divided over how to treat illegals



Immigration as reflected in foreign born (FB); where
they have settled and how many; 1990 - 2000:



back1203r.gif

back1203s.gif

back1203t.gif

back1203u.gif

back1203v.gif

back1203w.gif
 
Re: Public divided over how to treat illegals

the population of Mexico is 100 million and 40% of them live below the poverty line aka prime candidates for border jumping
 
Re: Public divided over how to treat illegals

<font size="4">Many Hispanics Oppose Illegal Immigration Boycott </font size>
By Jim Kouri, CPP on Apr 29, 2006
http://newsbyus.com/more.php?id=3291_0_1_0_M


<font size="4">Get the Other Side of the Immigration Debate; Hispanic Coalition
Tells Illegal Alien Protesters, 'You Don't Speak for Me'</font size>
4/28/2006 10:18:00 AM

WHAT: Press Conference/Media Briefing of Hispanic Coalition "You Don't Speak for Me." Topics discussed will be: Illegal Immigration, supporting strong border enforcement and no amnestia.

WHEN: Monday May 1, 10 a.m.

WHERE: National Press Club, Murrow Room 529 14th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20045

RSVP: Susan Wysoki, 804-673-1939 or 804-221-7084 (cell)
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=64778


April 28, 2006, 12:05PM
IMMIGRATION DEBATE
<font size="4">La raza not united on border
One Hispanic Minuteman says it's matter of law, not a race issue</font size>

By CYNTHIA LEONOR GARZA
Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/3825969.html


<font size="4">Not completely united
Some Hispanics say protesters not speaking for them</font size>
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_4660629,00.html


<font size="4">Illegal Aliens on the Streets 'Don't Speak for Us,'
Says New Hispanic-American Coalition </font size>

WASHINGTON, April 26 /PRNewswire/ -- Recent nationwide street
demonstrations by illegal aliens and their supporters, demanding amnesty for
12 million or more illegal immigrants, have been portrayed in the media as
representing the views of all Hispanics in the U.S. However, according to
opinion polls, including one conducted by the Pew Hispanic Center, Americans
are divided on the issue with 53% saying that people who are in the U.S.
illegally should be required to go home. According to the Pew Study, a
growing number also believe that illegal immigrants are a burden to the
country, taking jobs and housing and creating strains on the health care
system. These facts reflect the position of many Hispanic-Americans --
citizens, legal immigrants and the children of immigrants -- who strongly
oppose amnesty for illegal aliens and support enforcement of U.S. immigration
laws.
http://sev.prnewswire.com/publishing-information-services/20060427/DCW04926042006-1.html


`
 
Re: Public divided over how to treat illegals

`

Illinois: 1990 - 274,476; 2000 - 609,068; 10 year increase - 334,592 or 33,459 per year

.
 
If this is about how Blacks feel about Illegal Immigration I would have to say most of us are against it but to be realistic about this how we feel don't matter, this is really about a new business model or legalized slavery so it will be decided by nations and not by racial groups. As it stands America has given up on abolisihing slavery so the mantra is legalize immigrants and continue paying them slave wages but give them some measure of dignity, the rest of the world don't want to give them nothing, we can see that by OBL's position on the Sudan, China's human rights record and Russia's white slavery trade, so immigration is really part of Bush's war on terrorism or ending tyranny. Back to the post, Blacks see immigrants as a threat so we are against it but as things stand it don't really matter what matters is White conservatives are not ready to hand over the country to latinos and Blacks best move is to join them and demand some type of legislation outlawing illegal immigration.
 
Time for all blacks to wake up :rolleyes:

The dreary job picture for the unskilled and marginally skilled urban poor, especially the black poor, is compounded by the racially skewed attitudes of small and large employers. Even if there was not a single illegal immigrant in America, that attitude insures that black job seekers would still be just as poor and unemployed.

The employers routinely described blacks as "unskilled," "uneducated," "illiterate." "dishonest," "lacked initiative," "unmotivated," "involved with gangs and drugs," "did not understand work," "unstable," "lacked charm," "had no family values," and were "poor role models."

The consensus among these employers was that blacks brought their alleged pathologies to the work place, and were to be avoided at all costs. The researchers found that black business owners shared many of the same negative attitudes.

Other surveys have found that a substantial number of non-white business owners also refuse to hire blacks. Their bias effectively closed out another area of employment to thousands of blacks, solely based on their color.


SOURCE: Discrimination: The Root of the Black Job Crisis
By Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Pacific News Service.
Posted April 24, 2006
http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/35398/
 
`

Senator Barack Obama on illegal immigration, addressing marchers, May 1, 2006:

CHICAGO -- Illinois Sen. Barack Obama said Monday that people who oppose immigrant rights should realize that there's nothing to fear.

The Chicago Democrat spoke to a crowd of demonstrators gathered in Chicago for a rally in support of limited immigration legislation.

Obama said people who favor sealing off the borders should know that [illegal] immigrants come to America for the same reason as those in the generations before them: because they want a better future for their children.

Obama admits that some have legitimate concerns about their jobs, and he said it's important to reach out to those people and explain that the future will be better together than divided.​

`
http://www.nbc5.com/news/9141047/detail.html
 
`

A google search did not reveal any quotes for Maxine Waters on May 1, 2006, however, this article turned up for April 30, 2006:

The immigration debate is a challenging one for African Americans as evidenced by a seemingly contradictory finding by recent opinion polls. While in one poll more African Americans than whites said they think immigrants take jobs away from Americans (33 percent versus 25 percent), in another poll, more African Americans than whites or Latinos backed the proposal to allow undocumented workers a chance to become citizens (82 percent African Americans supported the idea, compared to 76 percent of Latinos and 74 percent of whites).

Illustrating a similar split, most African-American political leaders are outspoken opponents of anti-immigration laws. Still, black demonstrators protested outside the office of California House Democrat Maxine Waters, opposing her support of citizenship for undocumented workers.

Some have described the difference as between the leadership and the average person, but that even seems a little simplistic. You can find an anti-immigration sentiment among everyday African Americans reacting to a feeling they are being displaced, losing ground demographically, politically and economically.​

`
http://www.insidebayarea.com/argus/oped/ci_3769356
 
I don't agree with letting people who came here illegally stay unless they are fleeing persecution. The formula alot of illegal immigrants from all over the world employ is to get into America and stay under the radar until another amnesty comes around. Kinda like the guy who robs a couple banks and stays under the radar for at least 7 years. I still wouldn't trust that guy to work in my bank or business. And so what is going to happen to the voting power of those who are born here or came here legally when are bombarded with an influx of neo-citizens as per amnesty? Yeah I know the Mexicans are indigenous to north america but this is no longer "their land". In this world you have what you have because you can get it and keep it. I say deport them the fuck back like Haitians. If the Haitians can't come here illegally and stay then neither should mexicans.
 
I have to agree with Que, this is a country that is supposed to be governed by the rule of LAW.

As sympathetic as I may be for their situation, What right does anyone who is in this country illegally, have to demand that the laws of this county, be changed to accommodate their individual needs. The operative word being ILLEGAL.

Many people compare the demands of the Illegal immigrants, or whatever name is politically correct, to the demands of the civil rights movement.

There is NO relevant comparison. We Black men and women that marched, sat-in, died and participated in the movement, did so because the laws we protested against, were designed for us alone. The segregation laws were intended to deny us, and in fact did deny us Black citizens, the basic rights guaranteed all citizens under the constitution. By LAW, we were denied rights that everyone else took for granted.

Dogs were set upon us, because we demanded the right to vote. Fire hoses ripped the clothes off of Black men and women of all ages, because we wanted to vote and , be treated with dignity. Black Sunday a peaceful march, was halted by the violence of the State Police.

Today the illegal’s marched on our streets with a police escort.

I am not concerned with the prospect of them taking jobs away from Black folks, the Black man in this country will always be the last hired and the first fired.

I am concerned with the restaurant owner in Chicago that closed his business in sympathy with his workers, in spite of the fact that he stands to lose between 5 and 12 thousand dollars for the day. What is he paying his workers, so that he can make 12 large a day, six days a week, do the math.

Unlike the segregation laws which were intended to keep us in our place, Immigration laws apply to everyone seeking to come here. I fully understand that the laws are not enforced equally but that does not give one illegal, more rights than another illegal. Or at least it should not.

Basically, I agree there should be some way to peacefully and legally incorporate aliens into our country, but when they DEMAND that we change our laws for their benefit, that dog don’t hunt
 
I am concerned with the restaurant owner in Chicago that closed his business in sympathy with his workers, in spite of the fact that he stands to lose between 5 and 12 thousand dollars for the day. What is he paying his workers, so that he can make 12 large a day, six days a week, do the math.

A good example of the "Big Fish", taking advantage of supply & demand. These employers are breaking the law and providing a place for unskilled workers to work their way up the ladder. Hire some people who will demand a piece of the American pie, pay taxes and not claim 11 on Tax Deductions. And who follow American immigration laws.

martin%20luther%20king%20jr.jpg
 
It is too late!

There is no way to stop the flood of illegal aliens that are crossing the border. The whites are afraid of being outnumbered and becoming a minority. I am black but I see the Mexicans coming here struggling living 10-15 to a home and pooling their money. They save their money and open small businesses and help relatives at home. Blacks are at a disadvantage to begin with because we are divided as a race from the beginning. White people no longer fear us because we are killing each other either by black on black crime or drugs. A high percentage of us are in prison. It is hard to keep the younger generation in school to get a high school diplome let alone a college degree. We should look at what the Mexicans are doing and try and emulate instead of being fearful. We are the best of the best with our own rich history. All we have to do is unite and build our own from within. Be sure and vote because every vote counts.
 
Imitation is the best form of flattery. Look out for American Pop Culture. Black Icons and Black Symbolism abundant. I'm happy to hear whites no longer fear us. :rolleyes:

As for emulating Mexicans :confused: Biologically and culturally blacks have strived and are an acomplished people.
Contemporary watch tells us that as a whole blacks are misguided. Nonetheless, BLACK PEOPLE are trailblazers in this ERA.
 
Blkvoz said:
I have to agree with Que, this is a country that is supposed to be governed by the rule of LAW.

As sympathetic as I may be for their situation, What right does anyone who is in this country illegally, have to demand that the laws of this county, be changed to accommodate their individual needs. The operative word being ILLEGAL.

Many people compare the demands of the Illegal immigrants, or whatever name is politically correct, to the demands of the civil rights movement.

There is NO relevant comparison. We Black men and women that marched, sat-in, died and participated in the movement, did so because the laws we protested against, were designed for us alone. The segregation laws were intended to deny us, and in fact did deny us Black citizens, the basic rights guaranteed all citizens under the constitution. By LAW, we were denied rights that everyone else took for granted.

Dogs were set upon us, because we demanded the right to vote. Fire hoses ripped the clothes off of Black men and women of all ages, because we wanted to vote and , be treated with dignity. Black Sunday a peaceful march, was halted by the violence of the State Police.

Today the illegal’s marched on our streets with a police escort.

I am not concerned with the prospect of them taking jobs away from Black folks, the Black man in this country will always be the last hired and the first fired.

I am concerned with the restaurant owner in Chicago that closed his business in sympathy with his workers, in spite of the fact that he stands to lose between 5 and 12 thousand dollars for the day. What is he paying his workers, so that he can make 12 large a day, six days a week, do the math.

Unlike the segregation laws which were intended to keep us in our place, Immigration laws apply to everyone seeking to come here. I fully understand that the laws are not enforced equally but that does not give one illegal, more rights than another illegal. Or at least it should not.

Basically, I agree there should be some way to peacefully and legally incorporate aliens into our country, but when they DEMAND that we change our laws for their benefit, that dog don’t hunt

First, simply because they are considered "illegal" by our law doesn't mean the law is right or they don't have the right to try to pressure this government to change the law. You like trying to differentiate the plight of Mexican illegal immigrants and blacks in this country, well you need to study history a little better. First of all, when blacks were freed from slavery with the emmancipation proclaimation they were NOT considered citizens right away. There was a big movement against blacks to allow them to become citizens of America and the same bigoted and narrow-minded arguments were made against blacks as are now made by blacks against "illegal" immigrants. The main argument was presented that according to the constitution blacks were explicitly not included as citizens and by the LAW they didn't have the same rights (even when freed) as whites. It was because of the pressure by blacks in solidarity with progressive whites on the government that an amendment was made to the constitution that made blacks citizens. So the basic point is, by laws can be wrong, and non-citizens have historically fought against those wrong laws. Black people need to study history more, because they seem to not realize how these exact same situations have happened in history before against them, yet now they take the side of the ones who stood against them historically.

And you wanna point to the atrocities set upon blacks during the civil rights era as if Mexicans didn't go through that too, did you forget about the Texas Rangers?? From 1821 until more than 100 years later Native Americans and Mexicans were harrassed, driven off their land, tortured and killed. The Texas Rangers were practically the equivalent of the KKK to the Mexicans and Native Americans.

As for there being "NO" relavent comparison, you gotta get outta the tunnel-vision and you'll realize by your very own standards there's a very relavent comparison to be made. You saw we protested because of laws designed specifically for us. Well what the hell do you think the Sensennburger Bill was?? It was a law specifically geared for "illegal" immigrants, it was designed to make them felons. That's explicitly the reason for their protests and rallies, it was to protest that law, and they had every right to. Just like blacks had every right to protest all the racist and unjust laws against us.

As far as one set of illegals having more rights then others, well no illegal immigrant has more rights than another now, at least lawfully, although European immigrants are always transitioned into the society easier, illegal or not, but the point is Mexican illegal immigrants aren't asking for special treatment over other illegal immigrants, but they're doing something that no other group of illegal immigrants have had the heart or strength to do, DEMAND that we don't change our laws to make things harder for them. And again, if you study history, you'll see the only way any group of people have ever gained concessions from the ruling class of this country is by showing their strength. The labor movement didn't gain better wages, shorter days, safer conditions, and benefits until they started forming Unions and started striking to show their collective strength. Blacks didn't gain rights in this country until they started showing their might in this country. And the racist immigration laws won't be changed because the ruling class decides they wanna be "nice" to Mexican immigrants suddenly, the law that woulda made them felons didn't pass because immigrants flexed their collective muscle and DEMANDED (as you put it) not to be labeled as criminal felons.

Black people need to stand with them, we can achieve more collectively then divided, the divide and conquer strategy has always been used against the masses to stop them from uniting against the injustices and oppression imposed by those who we all really should be focusing our aggression against, the ruling class. Not focusing our aggression against a group of immigrants who have been oppressed by that same ruling class who economically exploits and destroys the economies of the native lands they come from. Black people need to be taking notes on how to win struggles from these people rather than picking up torches and pitchforks and running right along with the Klan to condemn them.
 
Shadow77 said:
First, simply because they are considered "illegal" by our law doesn't mean the law is right or they don't have the right to try to pressure this government to change the law.
You're right, they have a right to say (1) the law is inequitable,and (2) it should be changed. But you seem to suggest, however, that the law is, for some reason, wrong or immoral. You failed to state though, whats wrong with the law. Whats wrong with the law ??? What is unjust about our immigration laws that requires one (anyone) who wants to migrate to this country to go through the legal process of immigration ??? What ??? Please be specific.

You like trying to differentiate the plight of Mexican <u>illegal</u> immigrants and (legal) blacks in this country, well you need to study history a little better. First of all, when blacks were freed from slavery with the emmancipation proclaimation they were NOT considered citizens right away. There was a big movement against blacks to allow them to become citizens of America and the same bigoted and narrow-minded arguments were made against blacks as are now made by blacks against "illegal" immigrants. The main argument was presented that according to the constitution blacks were explicitly not included as citizens and by the LAW they didn't have the same rights (even when freed) as whites. It was because of the pressure by blacks in solidarity with progressive whites on the government that an amendment was made to the constitution that made blacks citizens. So the basic point is, by laws can be wrong, and non-citizens have historically fought against those wrong laws. Black people need to study history more, because they seem to not realize how these exact same situations have happened in history before against them, yet now they take the side of the ones who stood against them historically.
Maybe you need to "study history" or, at least, "understand history" before you invoke it. Without getting into what you described as the "same bigoted and narrow-minded arguments" -- though I disagree with that statement (I argue against legalizing 11 million illegals with the wave of a wand -- and I don't consider my arguments bigoted or narrowminded -- instead, I think they are based in common damn sense), lets look at what the the Constitutional amendment you speak of actually says. The 14th Amendment provides, simply:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.​
Do you see something wrong with the 14th Amendment as applied to illegal immigrants ??? Is there something wrong with a citizen of these United States being anyone other than (1) a person BORN HERE (the children of illegal immigrants born while they are here are U.S. citizens under this amendment); and (2) a person <u>naturalized</u> (naturalized is the way "immigrants" become citizens). ???

Doesn't this apply equally to Mexicans, Haitians, <u>supposedly</u> Cubans, Nigerians, Liberians, British, etc. ??? Does the 14th Amendment treat illegals playing hop-scotch across the Mexican border differently from any other people ??? More importantly, does it treat African Americans any differently from the Mexican fence jumpers ???

If you can legitimately answer "yes" to any of the questions above, you might have an argument. I suggest that you can't -- and that you can't show how the LAW is, as you suggest, is wrong.

And you wanna point to the atrocities set upon blacks during the civil rights era as if Mexicans didn't go through that too, did you forget about the Texas Rangers?? From 1821 until more than 100 years later Native Americans and Mexicans were harrassed, driven off their land, tortured and killed. The Texas Rangers were practically the equivalent of the KKK to the Mexicans and Native Americans.
Does the law treat those Mexicans differently than African Americans ??? No.

As for there being "NO" relavent comparison, you gotta get outta the tunnel-vision and you'll realize by your very own standards there's a very relavent comparison to be made. You saw we protested because of laws designed specifically for us. Well what the hell do you think the Sensennburger Bill was?? It was a law specifically geared for "illegal" immigrants, it was designed to make them felons. That's explicitly the reason for their protests and rallies, it was to protest that law, and they had every right to. Just like blacks had every right to protest all the racist and unjust laws against us.
Knowing a little history can be a dangerous thing. Knowing how to apply it can be rewarding.

Didn't the 14th Amendment put Mexicans on the same playing field as African Americans ??? Doesn't the 14th Amendment put all "Illegals" on the same playing field ??? Are Mexicans prohibited from becoming citizens of the U.S. by birth or naturalization ??? Why would you propose to make legal 11 million illegals who have <u>never applied for legal citizenship</u> ??? Get out of your tunnel vision and use your brain instead of your emotions.

As far as one set of illegals having more rights then others, well no illegal immigrant has more rights than another now, at least lawfully, although European immigrants are always transitioned into the society easier, illegal or not, but the point is <u>Mexican illegal immigrants aren't asking for special treatment</u> over other illegal immigrants, but they're doing something that no other group of illegal immigrants have had the heart or strength to do, DEMAND that we don't change our laws to make things harder for them.
Do you see whats wrong with what you're saying? If, as you said, "no illegal immigrant has more rights than another" - - then it must be that illegal Mexicans ARE ASKING FOR SPECIAL TREATMENT - aren't they?

... the racist immigration laws won't be changed because the ruling class decides they wanna be "nice" to Mexican immigrants
Please explain to us what is racist about the immigration laws and, -- please be specific. Maybe they are racist, but please explain it so that we can see what you're arguing -- so that we can distinguish fact from bullshit.

Black people need to stand with them, we can achieve more collectively then divided,
I agree with you here -- but IF AND ONLY IF they express interests which coincide with OUR INTERESTS. I haven't seen that, have you? If so, please set out in detail where they have done so. I think it would be a wonderful and powerful thing if that were so, but you saying it doesn't make it so -- so, show me when and how illegal immigrants have expressed solidarity with Black interests. Cite some of the comments of illegal immigrants and their supporters which pledge solidarity with Black interests. And, please don't give us more of whatchu think -- I wanna see, by acts and deeds, where they have pledged allegiance to the interest of Black America.


the divide and conquer strategy has always been used against the masses to stop them from uniting against the injustices and oppression imposed by those who we all really should be focusing our aggression against, the ruling class.
You know, thats a good statement. I subscribed to that statement as well. However, before there can be a "Division" of people, there must first me a "Unity" of people or at least a "Common Interest" of people. Where is the unity or common interest as set forth by the Illegal Immigrants ???

Its true, Black people are the most forgiving people on the damn planet. Trouble with that is we just keep forgiving shit, even to the point of giving - up our own interests.

Not focusing our aggression against a group of immigrants who have been oppressed by that same ruling class who economically exploits and destroys the economies of the native lands they come from. Black people need to be taking notes on how to win struggles from these people rather than picking up torches and pitchforks and running right along with the Klan to condemn them.
I suggest that what you and lot of others of us need to do is stop worrying about punishing whitey at every turn while missing opportunities to take and protect that which should be ours. We know full well how to win struggles -- lest we wouldn't have come as far as we've come. What we need to learn is to "Close the Deal" -- that is, finish with this business of overcoming and get on with seizing every damn opportunity this nation can offer any other citizen ... and jealously protect the same against all intruders, illegals included.

QueEx
 
To Shadow77

If you will bother to read my initial comments on this issue, (page 3) you may find that I am more in sympathy with the plight of the illegal immigrants than you assume.

As for my knowledge of Black history, I doubt that you are as well informed, as I am and I am sure that you do not have my experiences. That having been said, the Black struggle is not the issue here.

What is at issue is the ongoing political and social debate as to the legitimacy of the demands of the illegal immigrants residing in this country. No I do not equate the plight of the illegal workers in this country with the struggle of the Black man in this country.

To begin with the present day workers were not stolen from their native land, imported into this country against their will, and subsequently enslaved. The people at question crossed the border legally or illegally of their own volition, and will have little or no trouble in returning to their country.

The Emancipation Proclamation did not free the slaves, that statement was more propaganda than fact. Regardless the federal government had no power to enforce the edict.

The Constitution of the US did not prevent us from being citizens, that came about from a Supreme Court decision Dred Scott, 1857, which was repealed by the XIII Amendment

I intended to dissect your argument but I see the Que put in his two cents, and I see no reason to beat a dead horse, as he has covered all salient points more eloquently than I would have.

Like Que, I believe a melding of agendas relevant to both the Mexican and Black populations in this country is an approach to be desired.

It will not happen.

Too many Black and Mexican people are too preoccupied exaggerating our petty differences, combined with too many of our so called leaders preoccupied with attempting to further their own agendas to realize the benefits of such a collaboration.

If the Mexican and the Black people joined hands, we could rule this country. If we got together, the other minorities would have to join us.

It will not happen.

Because there are too many stupid people more concerned with “How the world turns” on TV, than the world in which they live. There are too many people concerned with “All My Children” than with the future of their own kids.

There are other impediments, but those two are enough to keep both the Brown and Black man in his place.
 
I'm feeling this thread because I can finally get to see the reasons why there is so much tension between the black and brown communites. Black people look at hispanics as an economic and political threat. Though it is obviously split down the middle half of the black community view hispanics as poor people oppressed by the same system we are oppressed by, the other half view them similarly to many poor white people as a threat because of economic and political competition. A minority can not be a political threat to another minority unless they team with the majority. A minority can not be an economic threat to another minority because they do not control the system.

To me brothers we only have two choices. Deport or grant citizenship. Having 11 million ILLEGAL immigrants hurts everyone but the U.S. Corporations. We can disagree on whether or not we should deport or legalize however the status quo we should all be clearly against. I haven't heard anyone who agrees with the current immigration system. So what are our choices. Deport or legalize.

So for those of you that are pro deportation I would really like to know what do we as black people have to gain from deportation.
These are my takes on the political and economic effects of deportation. I am interested in anything positive we can gain.

1. Politically we would gain nothing because Illegal immigrants can't vote so deporting them neither helps nor hurts our current political situation.
2. Economic - Some people feel that deporting 11 million consumers will have a positive effect on the economy. You will not find ONE economist that thinks deportation will help the economy. Removing 11 million consumers from an economy in hopes of improving an economy is quite frankly ridiculous from an economic standpoint. Also as we know in times of economic hardship the poor are hurt the worse. Deporting 11 million people who mostly reside in black communities will be an economic nightmare for all black and brown communities.


Bottom line is guys the brown wave is comming. I don't know if you noticed but this entire continent is full of latinos. Black people aren't supposed to be here and white people aren't supposed to be here. White people know this that is why they are trying to be friends with the latino community while playing us against them.

Whether or not we grant citizenship to latinos at this time in a hundred years they will be the majority in this country ANYWAY. By opposing the hispanic community and siding with the white majority we are throwing away an opportunity to form an alliance that could last centuries. We are always going to be the minority in this country. The only thing that is going to change is our relationship to the majority. If you guys like the relationship we have with the white majority and you want to keep them in control in light of their history of oppression of black people then you can hardly call yourself pro-black (dolemite). If you are like me and would love to see a hispanic majority as opposed to a white majority then you would definetly favor legalization. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

If you are like me and would love to see a partnership between the black and brown communities then you would support them in their time of need. I know a real partnership between the black and brown people of America would be the most powerful political and economic force this continent has ever scene.

WE HAVE MORE TO GAIN BEING FRIENDS WITH THE LATINO COMMUNITY THEN ENEMIES. Ya'll want to fight the white man and the brown man at the same time. I want to partner with the brown man to take the white man out.
This all comes from a love of my people. Period. We have nothing to fear from the latino community. They are not the reason we are poor. They are not the reason we are uneducated. The current economic and political system is the reason. I would love to shake that system up.
 
Blkvoz said:
Like Que, I believe a melding of agendas relevant to both the Mexican and Black populations in this country is an approach to be desired.

It will not happen.

Too many Black and Mexican people are too preoccupied exaggerating our petty differences, combined with too many of our so called leaders preoccupied with attempting to further their own agendas to realize the benefits of such a collaboration.

If the Mexican and the Black people joined hands, we could rule this country. If we got together, the other minorities would have to join us.

It will not happen.

Because there are too many stupid people more concerned with “How the world turns” on TV, than the world in which they live. There are too many people concerned with “All My Children” than with the future of their own kids.

There are other impediments, but those two are enough to keep both the Brown and Black man in his place.

Nothing will happen if you do not believe it can happen. If you do not think black and brown people can come together your neglecting history. Black people fought with the Mexicans in the Spanish American war. Native Americans were part of slave uprisings with blacks. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. When people are oppressed wise people bond together to rise against the oppressor.

I know black people and brown people can work together I do it everyday. Since my company started a bilingual program I have had to deal with hard core latin kings and MS-13 members. You know what we have in common. Our dislike of white people. I teach them how to adapt to the system so they do not have to be criminals. I teach them how to adapt and they love it. Other than the language barrier I have more trouble dealing with black gang members then latino. When they see someone trying to help them they have a lot of loyatly and love and they show it.

We have to get rid of this idea that the latino people are our enemies and we cannot come together. It is an illusion promoted by our oppressors so that they can maintain control.
 
Back
Top