Marked.
Remember that time Obama wore that brown suit?
Trump fires Director of National Intelligence, Coates. Nominates "loyalist" and conspiracy theorist
- Thread starter Spectrum
- Start date
Remember that time Obama wore that brown suit?
It was Beige, and I could give a damn less what color the fabric of his suit was so long as it wasn't some loud, ass Steve Harvey collection or Southern Bama shit.
Too many people focused on the wrong shit. This is why Trump is in office. You get the government you deserve.
Wouldn't
I agree.... and you get my point.
Republicans are worse than Democrats when it comes to crying about presidential dealings
Bitched and moaned about everything from the color of the mans suit to what was on his lapel. But now Democrats should just stand by quietly as Trump fucks up the free democratic election process...
Wait on it.. If you don't want to hear us talk about your hero....
You know what to do... ease on.
Like the Democrats didn't either?
Wasserman-Schultz
<cough>
Brazille
<cough>
Brennan
<cough>
Clapper
I didn't make the claim that Obama told a judge to lie for him or he fired a general because "he didn't like what he said." You made the claims so the onus is on you to provide evidence to support them, which that article does not. Otherwise I'm going to assume you're just pulling stuff out of your ass.
You scaring me with this reply eewwll.
Like I said - go do your homework. I’ve given you the names and the causes. I’m under zero obligation to lay out the timelines and facts to a level that reaches your satisfaction. This isn’t a deposition nor a court.
See this is why I am very suspicious of you just do not have the same thing to do with the other
Kimberly strassel....conservative opinion wsj opinion writer. Quote some Tucker Carlson next.
edit: oh wow, didn't see this when I wrote that above... but here's the chick you quoted from actually on with Tucker Carlson and his usual constipated look. lol, tucker trying to imply or actually explicitly say that having someone look into what the russians were doing within the trump campaign was a bad thing...
...but yeah, true... not Breitbart I guess.
more kimberly strassel:
false claim (politifact):
https://www.politifact.com/punditfa...ama-seek-back-channel-talks-iran-during-his-/
Kimberly Strassel on Obama's Imperial presidency:
come on man....
edit: oh wow, didn't see this when I wrote that above... but here's the chick you quoted from actually on with Tucker Carlson and his usual constipated look. lol, tucker trying to imply or actually explicitly say that having someone look into what the russians were doing within the trump campaign was a bad thing...
...but yeah, true... not Breitbart I guess.
more kimberly strassel:
false claim (politifact):
https://www.politifact.com/punditfa...ama-seek-back-channel-talks-iran-during-his-/
Kimberly Strassel on Obama's Imperial presidency:
come on man....
Shhhhhhh... you seem upset. Would you like some tea?
There's nothing "breibart" about it. It's already been establish in former DNI head, James Clapper's testimony, dunce.:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/brennan-and-the-2016-spy-scandal-1532039346
Now STFU and take your lumps.
Last edited:
“fucks up the free democratic election process...”
Wassermann-Schultz was head of the DNC. Brazille an officer.
It was exposed, by Brazille no less, that at the behest of HRC, they were not only intentionally sabotaging the Sanders campaign, HRC directed her to take all contributions made to support state candidate campaigns and illegally redirect them into her Federal campaign coffers, then installed her own proxy officers to run the DNC on top of washing foreign campaign donations through the Clinton Global Initiative slush fund - which took a 40% decline in donations as soon as she lost.
Brennan and Clapper - already discussed.
https://www.bgol.us/forum/threads/t...nd-conspiracy-theorist.1059439/#post-20204111
They testified in session they were pressured to spy on an “American candidate” or lose their job. Hmmm, I wonder who would have enough leverage to get the head of the DNI & CIA to do something like this despite it being illegal for the CIA to engage in an operation against a US citizen? Perhaps a Secretary they both formally reported to with a direct line to their Boss? Hmmm...
So stripping choice, accepting foreign donations, stealing contributions, sabotaging an alternative platform in the same party, subjecating a party, spying on a US citizen, weaponizing a government agency against a candidate, etc. etc.
“fucks up the free democratic election process...?”
Yes or No?
If no, what do you call it?
She is quoting factual TESTIMONY from the hearings, chief.
Her political beliefs have no bearing to the TESTIMONY given in session. She was not coaching Clapper or Brennan to say any of this.
Cmon, stop with the chaff nonsense to try to distract people then chumming the water to rile them up.
You’re better than this. Let’s just stick with the self admissions and testimony, OK. Thanks.
Let’s just stick to the testimony of Brazille, Brennan, and Clapper, please.
I love watching the country go to hell...... i love the dysfunction. I wish I could add to the fuckery some type of way.
And they were called out and sidelined. Your turn.
This
I wondered how long it would take for BGOL to suss him out. fam that is enterhoassnegros play buddy. The dude refers to himself as bi-racial on another board.
Oh.. you are.
excellent....... im here to do my part.
just waiting for him to be president again for more destruction & fuckery. I LOVE IT!!!!!
Im for whoever sends the US to hell in a hand basket.
Who was sidelined? Clapper, Brennan, and Brazille transitioned out of their positions when the administration changed.
Wasserman-Schultz resigned to get out of the blast furnace when Brazille has a crisis of conscious and leaked what the DNC had been doing.
i see nothing wrong with what trump is doing or how he does it.
Transitioned out my ass. They got respectfully booted. You claim to be a Washington insider so you know how that shit works.
You may want to brush up on your political lexicon. You said they were sidelined
A Presidential transition is not "sidelined." That's standard course of action during a party transition in the Executive branch.
https://thedsrnetwork.com/beware-the-strengthening-of-trumps-praetorian-guard/
Ratcliffe as DNI, like Barr at Justice, like Trump’s appointees to the Supreme Court and McConnell in the Senate, will be part of the president’s praetorian guard, men given positions of great power who have but a single mission, to protect and enable Trump.
Together, these men will ensure that Trump remains above the law and able to continue to attack the Constitution, corruptly profit from his office and sell out America to his Russian sponsors. Ratcliffe at DNI can do immense damage to efforts to protect our elections.
He can also help cover up the President’s wrong-doing, defend his overseas enablers, suppress or distort facts to buttress the relationships of the President and the arguments he makes for policies that support authoritarianism and more often than not gravely damage US interests.
Each line of defense-at Justice, in the Courts, in the Intelligence Community & in the Senate-will work individually and collectively to ensure Trump never pays a price for his crimes and that he is able to serve his narrow interests and those of his masters as long as he serves.
As recent history has shown, should leaders in the White House & intelligence community seek to twist facts to serve their arguments, great damage can be done. Ratcliffe, like Barr & McConnell, is a pure partisan and sees any attack on Trump as a threat–even if it is warranted.
Working in tandem with partisan media outlets like Fox, these men can turn Trump’s lies into effective truth, place the power of American institutions behind those lies…and in so doing put our entire country at even greater risk.
Don’t minimize this as another mere personnel move, more shuffling of names that don’t mean a thing. This is a consolidation of power among ultra-partisans who have no scruples and one that can play a big role in enabling Trump’s re-election and America’s decline.
They are out...spin it however you'd like.You may want to brush up on your political lexicon. You said they were sidelined
A Presidential transition is not "sidelined." That's standard course of action during a party transition in the Executive branch.
So your basic argument here is that Trump's antics are okay with you because some Democrats did some stuff too. 2nd grade logic.
Man... I want these dumb mother fuckers to get exactly what they are looking for
Trump playing 3 card monte on thier dumb asses.
Wonder what will happen to Coates initiatives to protect elections from foreign interference , particularly Russian influence and tampering ?
hey, you're on the side of the trumpites... bad team, but that's your choice... and that being the case, you're obviously going to take the conservative trumpetarian slant on everything.
Carter Page had an undisputable recent history of contact with Russian spies and being used by them as a useful idiot. One of them went to prison and the other escaped... undeniable.
George Papadopoulos got drunk and mouthed off to representatives from a friendly foreign government about the Russians having and offering team trump dirt on Hillary Clinton. Also undeniable.
Brennan and Comey, etc used those facts to start investigating what Russia was doing with and within the trump campaign. Those on the trumpetarian side see those facts and read into it that Hillary Clinton demaded that Comey and Brennan "spy" on Trump. They/you can't deny the facts (Papadopoulos and Page) so obfuscation has to be used in the form of taking existing information and taking leaps to support any opinion that they think will help, even if none of it successfully retorts the underlying facts about how the investigation started.
Team trump can't deny the facts above about Page and Papadopoulos, because they are undeniable. Can't deny that the Russian government wanted Trump to win (Putin said it on video), which in and of itself is not a crime or wrong by any means.... but... they also can't deny (well they try) that team trump welcomed the help from the Russian goverment (Don Jr's meeting, etc, Don Sr. asking Russia to hack us on video) and then proceeded to use the Casey Anthony playbook and lie about their Russian contacts until they found out that there was proof. The fact that team trump lied so much about their goings on with Russians alone tells us that they were aware of the fact that they were doing wrong... why lie if you thought you weren't out of bounds? The man himself said on more than one occasions that he had no business interests and no potential business interests in Russia, but we know that he was looking to and trying to make moves to build a tower in Moscow... yet another lie. Oh of course there's more, but a non-trumpetarian would get the point.
Trumpetarians on the other hand, not being able to deny that stuff (none of them did during the Mueller hearing) need to try with all of their might to dirty up the investigation, which is what they/you are trying to do, with success within the trumpsphere, but no success outside of it.
Carter Page had an undisputable recent history of contact with Russian spies and being used by them as a useful idiot. One of them went to prison and the other escaped... undeniable.
George Papadopoulos got drunk and mouthed off to representatives from a friendly foreign government about the Russians having and offering team trump dirt on Hillary Clinton. Also undeniable.
Brennan and Comey, etc used those facts to start investigating what Russia was doing with and within the trump campaign. Those on the trumpetarian side see those facts and read into it that Hillary Clinton demaded that Comey and Brennan "spy" on Trump. They/you can't deny the facts (Papadopoulos and Page) so obfuscation has to be used in the form of taking existing information and taking leaps to support any opinion that they think will help, even if none of it successfully retorts the underlying facts about how the investigation started.
Team trump can't deny the facts above about Page and Papadopoulos, because they are undeniable. Can't deny that the Russian government wanted Trump to win (Putin said it on video), which in and of itself is not a crime or wrong by any means.... but... they also can't deny (well they try) that team trump welcomed the help from the Russian goverment (Don Jr's meeting, etc, Don Sr. asking Russia to hack us on video) and then proceeded to use the Casey Anthony playbook and lie about their Russian contacts until they found out that there was proof. The fact that team trump lied so much about their goings on with Russians alone tells us that they were aware of the fact that they were doing wrong... why lie if you thought you weren't out of bounds? The man himself said on more than one occasions that he had no business interests and no potential business interests in Russia, but we know that he was looking to and trying to make moves to build a tower in Moscow... yet another lie. Oh of course there's more, but a non-trumpetarian would get the point.
Trumpetarians on the other hand, not being able to deny that stuff (none of them did during the Mueller hearing) need to try with all of their might to dirty up the investigation, which is what they/you are trying to do, with success within the trumpsphere, but no success outside of it.
Similar threads
