Trump fires Director of National Intelligence, Coates. Nominates "loyalist" and conspiracy theorist

Shhhhhhh... you seem upset. Would you like some tea?

.

Nobody's upset. I only get upset about things that are important to me. You aren't important. You just belong somewhere else. There is no article to post to support your post. We're talking about Trump. You're introducing a topic about Clinton when no ones talking about the Clintons. The Clintons are irrelevant to this topic. It's typical breitbart CAC whataboutism bullshit. You're a CAC at heart.
 
Got damn this boy done swallowed the whole dick... balls and all. That bullshit has been thoroughly debunked.
If there were any truth to it why would the current DOJ be sitting on it?
Have you ever heard of the term, "MAD". Mutually Assured Destruction.

It's a political weapon and tactic where you know someone may have something on you - so you let them know you equally destructive information about them.

Do you know why Edgar J. Hoover was the sitting FBI Director for decades despite being a closeted cross dressing homosexual?
Because he made sure to deploy resource to collect detailed information on every President, and member of the House or Senate whom would ever dare attempt to remove him form the position.

He never used it - but if they did, well ... MAD.

Let me ask you this. If Pelosi or Schumer were removed from office, who runs and heads the DNC? You'd have a batshit assemblage of party radicals and ultra socialists vying for direction and power, along with old guard blue dogs, mixed with in with meek moderates.

It would be a total SHIT SHOW for the DNC. Pelosi and Schumer are the only ones keeping the ship in somewhat presentable order.
 
*smirk smirk*
*condescension*

"Both sides are the same! I see nothing wrong/bizarre with Trump's appointments, revolving door or vacancies."

Even you don't really believe this shit you contrarian-for-the-sake-of-it, arguing ass nigga lol

I read sites like Breitbard and Redstate for 3 years straight...every day.. to read the counterarguments and also to understand the mentality of the loons. I recently stopped. Heist sounds just like one of those CACs from the comment section. Whataboutism runs through their veins
 
Heist has turned into a Trump loyalist defender. It’s pathetic.
Are their really people who HAVEN'T put Heist on their [/IGNORE] list?

5qghkYY.gif
 
*smirk smirk*
*condescension*

"Both sides are the same! I see nothing wrong/bizarre with Trump's appointments, revolving door or vacancies."

Even you don't really believe this shit you contrarian-for-the-sake-of-it, arguing ass nigga lol

The former President nominated to the Supreme Court an individual who previously outright lied to the Supreme Court at his request while serving as his solicitor general.

Then he demanded the resignation of an enormously respected 4-Star General who said while he respectfully disagreed with the President's strategy, he would dutifully and honorably carry out the command and mission.
No other reasons other than "I didn't like what he said."

Was anyone flipping their shit on here?

Presidents make odd calls.
 
So he don’t like that chic he nominated to CIA?

I haven't read anything where he's directly pushing to get her out, but Nunes is a full Trump lap-dog. The same sources that floated this Coates story yesterday said that Nunes was asked if he wanted this job and he said he didn't want it...he wanted to run the CIA...so Trump chose another lackey while he tries to figure out a way to get Nunes in. After he gets Nunes at the CIA, he's supposedly gonna try to replace Christopher Wray at the FBI.
 
If the CIA have any good people left they better do something about this now
 
People might end up needing to hit the streets like they did in Puerto Rico. That cat is not planning on losing even if he loses in 2020.
Folk better be prepare to fuck DC up and burn that shit down that’s the only way he leaves
 
I’m begin to agree with some of the posters about you... and I’m beginning to wonder are you black or white at this point because some of your posts especially when it comes to trump is Mad suspect
Too many sensitive dandelions on this board.

I've never seen more political pickle sniffing on this board than this period today and I've been a member of this board off and on since 1999. Every 10th post is a post about what Trump said, or did, or ate, or shat out.
IDGAF about who a President nominates. That's their privilege under Executive powers of the Constitution.
I only care about who Congress & Senate confirms. They're the standard bearers and the true decision makers when it comes to appointee positions.


As for my ethnicity... yeah, I'm pretty black. I'm just not sensitive as fuck.
 
Last edited:
I haven't read anything where he's directly pushing to get her out, but Nunes is a full Trump lap-dog. The same sources that floated this Coates story yesterday said that Nunes was asked if he wanted this job and he said he didn't want it...he wanted to run the CIA...so Trump chose another lackey while he tries to figure out a way to get Nunes in. After he gets Nunes at the CIA, he's supposedly gonna try to replace Christopher Wray at the FBI.

Mueller should’ve bagged Nunes when he had the chance.. Muddy his clown ass up.. Nunes is literally a confirmed spy for Portugal
 
Too many sensitive dandelions on this board.

I've never seen more political pickle sniffing on this board than this period today and I've been a member of this board off and on since 1999. Ever 10th post is a post about what Trump said, or did, or ate, or shat out.
IDGAF about who a President nominates. That's their privilege under Executive powers of the Constitution.
I only care about who Congress & Senate confirms. They're the standard bearers and the true decision makers when it comes to appointee positions.


As for my ethnicity... yeah, I'm pretty black. I'm just not sensitive as fuck.

He's been able to bypass them by appointing acting heads tho and the GOP rubber stamps most of his picks in the Senate because they fear him. Very few times have they truly pushed back. None of this is normal.
 
The former President nominated to the Supreme Court an individual who previously outright lied to the Supreme Court at his request while serving as his solicitor general.

Then he demanded the resignation of an enormously respected 4-Star General who said while he respectfully disagreed with the President's strategy, he would dutifully and honorably carry out the command and mission.
No other reasons other than "I didn't like what he said."

Was anyone flipping their shit on here?

Presidents make odd calls.

Heist,

You struggle... and I mean struggle to draw an equivalence between this admin and the last. No one with two brain cells to rub together will ever agree. There are legitimate critiques to be made of Obama... but goddamn, pretending that all the scandal, the poor judgment, the failure of Trump's admin isn't uniquely disastrous is just a weird chimera you "enlightened centrists" hang onto for dear life. Don't worry, you'll be pretending you saw thru his bs in a few years just like you can't find anyone who supported the Iraq war or Bush these days... y'all are predictable af lol. :lol:
 
They've just been floating shit like this...



So much shit will get released on Nunes before he gets the CIA job.. dude is literally a spy for Portugal.. I don’t think he gets to the nomination.. but Mitch is approving everyone for trump.. He feeling that heat on his neck too

And George P should be gotten 5-7 years in the bing.. instead of that clown ass 2 weeks
 
Too many sensitive dandelions on this board.

I've never seen more political pickle sniffing on this board than this period today and I've been a member of this board off and on since 1999. Every 10th post is a post about what Trump said, or did, or ate, or shat out.
IDGAF about who a President nominates. That's their privilege under Executive powers of the Constitution.
I only care about who Congress & Senate confirms. They're the standard bearers and the true decision makers when it comes to appointee positions.


As for my ethnicity... yeah, I'm pretty black. I'm just not sensitive as fuck.
I don’t believe that....You kiss trumps ass too Much for my taste
 
Heist,

You struggle... and I mean struggle to draw an equivalence between this admin and the last. No one with two brain cells to rub together will ever agree. There are legitimate critiques to be made of Obama...
Great. But for fuck's sake all these constant Trump posts are beginning to sound like some monotonous banter from abused housewives.
Call me a liar if there aren't on average three new Trump posts started each day .... on a board called BLACK GIRL ONLINE?
It's as if there needs to be a sub-forum titled, "BGOL Trump Discussion". The shit is odd.



but goddamn, pretending that all the scandal, the poor judgment, the failure of Trump's admin
I've lived through at least 6 Presidencies that I can remember and not a single one of them did not have multiple scandals. MULTIPLE.
3 years into the Presidency and certain parties are still trying to make gold from hay that occurred 1, 3, even 10 years prior to his confirmation.

As for failure of administration - I'd like for you to articulate exactly where he has failed to meet the objectives that he set forth during his campaign platform?

To wit, I submit, whether you agree or disagree, the orange fucker has been one of the most successful and productive President's in modern history in so much as ticking off the deal points in their campaign promises.

Why? He is not a professional politician. He never cared about being re-elected or protecting party. He didn't want to dance and compromise. His first year in office he kicked his own party's leaders and talking heads in the balls as much as the opposition party.

He went in with a mission and thus far, again, agree or disagree with the methods and practices, Trump has hit about 80% of the objectives the people who voted him into office wanted. That's scary efficiency for a President.

Maybe the Democrats could stand to learn a little something here versus pounding their fist and using angry press releases.
 
Great. But for fuck's sake all these constant Trump posts are beginning to sound like some monotonous banter from abused housewives.
Call me a liar if there aren't on average three new Trump posts started each day .... on a board called BLACK GIRL ONLINE?
It's as if there needs to be a sub-forum titled, "BGOL Trump Discussion". The shit is odd.




I've lived through at least 6 Presidencies that I can remember and not a single one of them did not have multiple scandals. MULTIPLE.
3 years into the Presidency and certain parties are still trying to make gold from hay that occurred 1, 3, even 10 years prior to his confirmation.

As for failure of administration - I'd like for you to articulate exactly where he has failed to meet the objectives that he set forth during his campaign platform?

To wit, I submit, whether you agree or disagree, the orange fucker has been one of the most successful and productive President's in modern history in so much as ticking off the deal points in their campaign promises.

Why? He is not a professional politician. He never cared about being re-elected or protecting party. He didn't want to dance and compromise. His first year in office he kicked his own party's leaders and talking heads in the balls as much as the opposition party.

He went in with a mission and thus far, again, agree or disagree with the methods and practices, Trump has hit about 80% of the objectives the people who voted him into office wanted. That's scary efficiency for a President.

Maybe the Democrats could stand to learn a little something here versus pounding their fist and using angry press releases.

Lol like I said man you are a reliable bet to type paragraph on paragraph pretending everything is normal and that Trump is above reproach.

Take note of the time and date. I guarantee that in a few short years you'll pretend that you were never so effusive in your praise of an obvious disaster like Trump and that the adjectives "successful" and "productive" never left your lips in relation to his Presidency/admin. You're lost bud. It's no skin off my back. Many of us in this thread had legit critiques of Obama where it counted but we were never so fucking daft to sound like your average CAC cultist. And as far as your faux surprise that folks would be discussing this retarded admin on a "porn board" (I haven't come here for porn since 2008 lol) it's just more bizarre caping on your part. :yes:
 
Mim
Have you ever heard of the term, "MAD". Mutually Assured Destruction.

It's a political weapon and tactic where you know someone may have something on you - so you let them know you equally destructive information about them.

Do you know why Edgar J. Hoover was the sitting FBI Director for decades despite being a closeted cross dressing homosexual?
Because he made sure to deploy resource to collect detailed information on every President, and member of the House or Senate whom would ever dare attempt to remove him form the position.

He never used it - but if they did, well ... MAD.

Let me ask you this. If Pelosi or Schumer were removed from office, who runs and heads the DNC? You'd have a batshit assemblage of party radicals and ultra socialists vying for direction and power, along with old guard blue dogs, mixed with in with meek moderates.

It would be a total SHIT SHOW for the DNC. Pelosi and Schumer are the only ones keeping the ship in somewhat presentable order.
So... they are holding back to protect the DNC..... check..
 
Lol like I said man you are a reliable bet to type paragraph on paragraph pretending everything is normal and that Trump is above reproach.
Everything IS normal. A President used their executive powers to replace an appointee.

Some people like the new appointee - some people hate the new appointee.
It happens every Presidency. EVERY PRESIDENCY. Rinse - repeat. So, why is this now a three and four new thread a day event on here?

Again, every time this guy so much as farts on camera - there are 4 new Trump threads! It's like battered spouse syndrome up in here.

Focus on what matters, getting behind a viable candidate with a sound campaign strategy and a fundamental platform good enough to win the 2020 election. Support them with vigor and then make sure you vote and get 10 of your friends to do the same.


were never so effusive in your praise of an obvious disaster like Trump and that the adjectives "successful" and "productive" never left your lips
Before you attempt to further coyly reinterpret my comment - I wrote that he has been successful and productive in hitting the key objectives of his platform. Period. There's not need to twist my statement or attempt to repurpose it.

Many of us in this thread had legit critiques of Obama where it counted

Good - now show me some substantive Trump critiques "where it counted."
Because I've seen very few. It's like a ninny "Oh gurlllll" festival. I mean for god sakes here are all the NEW Trump threads started over the last 48 hours! 48 hours and it's a fucking WEEKEND.




Tell me, which one of these is the legit critique that really matters?
Talk about daft... I wonder if you ever understand the meaning of the word.
 
If the new hire is anything like Trump's previous appointees then this muthafucka is woefully unqualified. Really looking forward to that. :rolleyes2:

The former President

"But but but you guys...Obama!"

nominated to the Supreme Court an individual who previously outright lied to the Supreme Court at his request while serving as his solicitor general.

Then he demanded the resignation of an enormously respected 4-Star General who said while he respectfully disagreed with the President's strategy, he would dutifully and honorably carry out the command and mission.
No other reasons other than "I didn't like what he said."

Was anyone flipping their shit on here?

Presidents make odd calls.

Sources. Run 'em!
 
Mim

So... they are holding back to protect the DNC..... check..
Do you play chess? When do you move your Queen?
As the first move, or when the King is attacked?

They're holding back in case the DNC tries to go 'nuclear.' They try an impeachment, they play their counterstrike. Simple as that.
 
Do you play chess? When do you move your Queen?
As the first move, or when the King is attacked?

They're holding back in case the DNC tries to go 'nuclear.' They try an impeachment, they play their counterstrike. Simple as that.
You're delusional.
 
WTF! Man we're doomed, it's just a matter of time before something major pop off :smh:
 
Sources. Run 'em!

FOH you talking about sources?!
Gen. Stanley McChrystal
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/24/us/politics/24mcchrystal.html

and Chief Justice ne' Solicitor General Elena Kagan.
Go look up what she re-argued before the Supreme Court to get ACA, in particular the individual mandate portion, passed through the SCOTUS review after it was found unconstitutional in the first outing. She lied to sitting judges and told them it was a tax - which would have made it legal, vs. forced consumption and subsequent penalty, which would not be legal.

Now go do your homework, boss. I don't do other people's work unless they pay me.
 
You're delusional.
No, I'm in DC. My office is a 2 minute walk away from the Capitol Building. I get to watch how this game is played out real-time every day sitting in the various watering holes of DC.
Political intelligence and leverage is not just about having the cards, but knowing when to use them.

Why would you play them now? The Dems are internally fractured and in disarray. They're doing the best job of making sure Trump gets a second term - which is sad.

But watch what happens should the Dems really press forward with impeachment. Watch. Mark this thread.
 
Great. But for fuck's sake all these constant Trump posts are beginning to sound like some monotonous banter from abused housewives.
Call me a liar if there aren't on average three new Trump posts started each day .... on a board called BLACK GIRL ONLINE?
It's as if there needs to be a sub-forum titled, "BGOL Trump Discussion". The shit is odd.

I JUST SAID THIS in another thread.

As for failure of administration - I'd like for you to articulate exactly where he has failed to meet the objectives that he set forth during his campaign platform?

To wit, I submit, whether you agree or disagree, the orange fucker has been one of the most successful and productive President's in modern history in so much as ticking off the deal points in their campaign promises.

Why? He is not a professional politician. He never cared about being re-elected or protecting party. He didn't want to dance and compromise. His first year in office he kicked his own party's leaders and talking heads in the balls as much as the opposition party.

He went in with a mission and thus far, again, agree or disagree with the methods and practices, Trump has hit about 80% of the objectives the people who voted him into office wanted. That's scary efficiency for a President.

Maybe the Democrats could stand to learn a little something here versus pounding their fist and using angry press releases.

Anyone who can look at his presidency objectively can see that. Doesn't mean you own a MAGA hat.
 
Back
Top