Spawn reboot: Jamie Foxx as Al Simmons?

:hmm::hmm::hmm: Jamie Foxx as Spawn is as ridiculous as Sticky Fingaz as Blade....

sticky-fingaz-246062.jpg
Don't remind me. Too late! :(


I'm more excited about the new animated series.:yes:

NO CARTOON NETWORK THOUGH! Fuck them!:angry:
 
I say why not make the damn thing what it is: A BAD ASS HBO DARK ADULT AMINATED FEATURE. That whay you don't have to worry about actors getting old and wanting big $$$. You can do so much with animation that the human body cannot do.

I'm off the mic
 
Maybe its a white guy since spawn is white now.
I don't wanna see a White Spawn blow up after the Black Spawn sputtered at the box office. :smh:
I don't think fans need to see an Oscar level performance, anyway. Besides, Foxx is a one trick pony. He lucked up with Ray. Only other drama I could see him in is playing Mike Tyson.
An Oscar level actor should be able to play a not-Oscar level part well. Jamie could do it, but I just don't envision him as Spawn. Who would you cast as the new Spawn? :dunno:
"Say Malbolgia mane iowno bout leadin no armies mane..."

Sup with you Violator Mayne, Mayne..
:roflmao:
 
I Say Keep Michael Jai White...Just Don't Make Some Warm Beer PG-13 Bullshit Like Last Time.....Make the Movie Hard and Raw as They Did the Animated Series From HBO(the new Dredd movie should be violent inspiration of where they should be going with spawn)....Spawn is Not a Kiddie Situation :lol:

Word. And I wish like hell that they'd start showing the Spawn Animated Series on HBO late night again. I put that up there w/Batman: TAS (which is an all time favorite). Spawn on HBO was raw as fuck. Definitely nothin' for da kiddies.

And no, The Rock shouln't be cast as Spawn neither. And I like it was mentioned, I don't wanna see no white Spawn neither. :smh:
 
I Say Keep Michael Jai White...Just Don't Make Some Warm Beer PG-13 Bullshit Like Last Time.....Make the Movie Hard and Raw as They Did the Animated Series From HBO(the new Dredd movie should be violent inspiration of where they should be going with spawn)....Spawn is Not a Kiddie Situation :lol:

:yes::yes::yes: Yes and let Legendary put their magic on it...
 
In 1995, Todd McFarlane’s most iconic character came to life on the big screen in a very disappointing way. Jamie Foxx apparently wants to change that as according to an interview Foxx did at Comic-Con with Movies.com, the actor is “aggressively pursuing” rebooting Spawn with Foxx playing the titular demon.

Per Movies.com’s interview with Foxx:
As versatile as Foxx seems to be these days, there are still projects he’s trying to make happen, including an adaptation of the comic character Spawn, as well as a biopic about Mike Tyson. “Spawn is one, yeah. And Mike Tyson. Those are two roles I would just love to do. I’m aggressively pursuing them,”

While fanboys like myself will geek out over the notion that Spawn could be resurrected in this golden comic book movie era, another large tidbit to take away from the interview is that Foxx is trying to get back in the biopic business and play Mike Tyson. Foxx solidified his acting credibility by taking home the Best Actor Oscar for his portrayal of Ray Charles in the 2004 film Ray

A film about Tyson is going to be made at some point and getting Foxx behind the role could help keep it in the right hands.
But if boxing or guys with high pitched voices and facial tattoos isn’t your thing, Foxx apparently wants to cover all his bases and appeal to the comic book crowd with Spawn. Foxx dipped his toe in the comic book movie pond with his role as Electro in next year’s The Amazing Spider-Man 2 and it seems he’s not ready to get out just yet..

http://flicksided.com/2013/07/26/jamie-foxx-aggressively-pursuing-spawn-reboot-mike-tyson-biopic/
 
--- Except Todd McFarlane should definitely NOT be directing this shit if this is his vision. Fuck that. SPAWN a ghost. WTF

Todd McFarlane Says His ‘Spawn’ Will Be a “Hard R” About the Boogeyman!

michael-jai-white-in-spawn-1997-movie-image-620x400.jpg


This past weekend Deadpool kicked the box office’s ass, and by doing so has opened the door for other risky films to follow in its path. I spoke about this a few hours ago, and alluded to the fact thatDeadpool makes it possible for an R-rated Wolverine, which has just been announced, as well as other properties that studio’s may have been too scared to pull the trigger on.

My belief is that Todd McFarlane’s Spawn is one such case. He’s been talking about his own adaptation for years now, so much so that I hesitate covering any updates. But the timing is really good here and I’m sensing McFarlane is seeing an opportunity to get a major studio behind a reboot of Spawn.

ComicBook has the exclusive out of the New York Toy Fair, and added even more to the story that began with news of a completely screenplay (that still needs to be trimmed down).

Things get really good here when McFarlane reveals that his Spawn, which he intends to direct, will be a “Hard R” in the vein of a horror film. Shit, he compares Spawn to the Boogeyman and even states that it will be along the lines of if The Departed met Paranormal Activity – without all of the visual effects!


“In the background, there’s this thing moving around, this boogeyman. That boogeyman just happens to be something that you and I, intellectually, know is Spawn,” he explained. “Will he look like he did in the first movie? No. Will he have a supervillain he fights? No. He’s going to be the spectre, the ghost.”

He likens Spawn’s presence in the new movie to that of the lurking evil in Japanese horror films (and their Hollywood remakes) like ‘The Grudge’ or ‘The Ring.’

“I think they all work because there’s only one thing in the movie that’s not normal. There’s not five things, there’s one thing that’s the boogeyman. So that’ll be Spawn,” he said. “He’s this thing that just whooshes in, this ghost that moves and will f*** you up if you’re in the wrong place in the wrong time, and the rest of the movie will look real, and be this real drama. He’s just this ghost, this thing behind it.”

It’s a take on the character, moving even farther from the superhero comics that birthed it, that McFarlane has been wanting to explore for awhile, but it also has a practical application.

“Basically, I can make this version of the movie on a budget without crazy special effects,” he said with a slight chuckle. “I want to keep it small, keep it tight, so they’ll let me direct it!”


http://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3...s-spawn-will-be-a-hard-r-about-the-boogeyman/

__________________________________________________________________

This guy has a legitimate chance now to make the SPAWN movie that all of us have been wanting for most of our lives and this dude wants him to basically be CANDYMAN with a fucking mask. :smh::smh:
 
That sounds like bullshit. :smh: Kinda shit is that? How does that work as a reboot?

So now you don't have to cast a black man as a super hero lead and the movie becomes some detective crime thriller not super hero movie. :smh:
 
This is still a risky film to make. I don't expect a company to have the balls to do it with a big budget. They didn't even have faith in Deadpool. :lol: They spent 50 million not the budget so just in case if it flopped they wouldn't get hit too hard. Spawn is a much more darker project.
 
This is still a risky film to make. I don't expect a company to have the balls to do it with a big budget. They didn't even have faith in Deadpool. :lol: They spent 50 million not the budget so just in case if it flopped they wouldn't get hit too hard. Spawn is a much more darker project.
You can do Spawn with a 50 million dollar budget as long as you go HARD R with it. The first one had the perfect guy playing Spawn and Violator. It also had Teresa Russel in her finest. The problem is that everything else sucked.

But I do think that the best thing about Deadpool is that it might finally allow Hard properties likes Sandman, Witchblade, or The Darkness to come to light. The Darkness being the hardest to pull though, because that shit would be a little too intense.
 
R rating doesnt mean a good movie...dont know why people keep eluding to that...

i mean some movies get a boost from it cuz of the kinda character it is but if the shit sucks it just sucks...

see both Punishers...i think war zone didnt even break 10 mil total...smh
 
R rating doesnt mean a good movie...dont know why people keep eluding to that...

i mean some movies get a boost from it cuz of the kinda character it is but if the shit sucks it just sucks...

see both Punishers...i think war zone didnt even break 10 mil total...smh

Completely agree.... but the main point is that hopefully this will allow them to greenlight more R-rated Superhero movies. And actually Slam... Sadly there were 3 punisher films.


Update..
Actually the 1st one wasn't that bad.

MV5BNDcyNDY5MDE5NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzIyODkxMQ@@._V1_SX640_SY720_.jpg


 
R rating doesnt mean a good movie...dont know why people keep eluding to that...

i mean some movies get a boost from it cuz of the kinda character it is but if the shit sucks it just sucks...

see both Punishers...i think war zone didnt even break 10 mil total...smh

Dredd unfortunately didnt do big numbers either..
 
Dredd unfortunately didnt do big numbers either..

The second dredd was amazing. I think the problem with Dredd is that people had a bad taste with the second one. Also Karl Urban is not a headliner. Same thing with Thomas Jane and the dude who played Frank Castle in the sequel. Ryan Reynolds (even though he has had alot of bombs) is still a household name and the marketing for this movie was amazing. It all basically started with that leaked footage from last year. Then it had two amazing trailers and a great online video campaign. It was a brilliant move and something Fox really isn't known to do.
 
That sounds like bullshit. :smh: Kinda shit is that? How does that work as a reboot?

So now you don't have to cast a black man as a super hero lead and the movie becomes some detective crime thriller not super hero movie. :smh:

In his defense he's been talking abouting this version for years, but if it really isn't focusing on Spawn I'm not interested.

I'd prefer if they just brought back the animated series.
 
In his defense he's been talking abouting this version for years, but if it really isn't focusing on Spawn I'm not interested.

I'd prefer if they just brought back the animated series.

Side note... Your name reminded me of this.... Now is the time for a fucking Guyver live action reboot. It is the perfect time. With the right script you could make that movie for 30 million dollars.
 
R rating doesnt mean a good movie...dont know why people keep eluding to that...

i mean some movies get a boost from it cuz of the kinda character it is but if the shit sucks it just sucks...

see both Punishers...i think war zone didnt even break 10 mil total...smh


110% cosign dude.
Cats are acting like because a superhero movie gets an "R" rating that somehow it's automatically better. When nothing could be further from the truth.
Certain superheroes would definitely benefit from an R rating but I don't believe most would.

- Deadpool ain't Spiderman.
- Blade ain't Captain America.
- Spawn ain't Batman.
- The Authority ain't The Avengers.



You can do Spawn with a 50 million dollar budget as long as you go HARD R with it. The first one had the perfect guy playing Spawn and Violator. It also had Teresa Russel in her finest. The problem is that everything else sucked.

But I do think that the best thing about Deadpool is that it might finally allow Hard properties likes Sandman, Witchblade, or The Darkness to come to light. The Darkness being the hardest to pull though, because that shit would be a little too intense.

Actually bro it was Theresa Randle in Spawn:
Theresa-Randle.jpg


Not Theresa Russell
Theresa-Russell-photo-2596.jpg


Although Theresa Russell WAS in Spider Man 3
 
110% cosign dude.
Cats are acting like because a superhero movie gets an "R" rating that somehow it's automatically better. When nothing could be further from the truth.
Certain superheroes would definitely benefit from an R rating but I don't believe most would.

- Deadpool ain't Spiderman.
- Blade ain't Captain America.
- Spawn ain't Batman.
- The Authority ain't The Avengers.





Actually bro it was Theresa Randle in Spawn:
Theresa-Randle.jpg


Not Theresa Russell
Theresa-Russell-photo-2596.jpg


Although Theresa Russell WAS in Spider Man 3

LOL... M/S on my part. I was close enough.
 
Side note... Your name reminded me of this.... Now is the time for a fucking Guyver live action reboot. It is the perfect time. With the right script you could make that movie for 30 million dollars.

I'm not sure if it would work. Deadpool and Kick Ass worked because they had elements of comedy.

I actually liked both the last punisher and Judge Dredd movies, but I don't recall anyone talking about them.I also didn't think the last Robocop was that bad either (wasn't rated R), but it kind of seems like people aren't really into more pure action type movies anymore.
 
Back
Top