I believe this to be 100% true.Me and you know it was Haslam's decision to draft him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe this to be 100% true.Me and you know it was Haslam's decision to draft him.
![]()
Mary Kay Cabot and Tony Grossi are the definitions of a hater....
How do you draft a guy and not give him first team reps...
How is he suppose to know what he needs to improve on?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Shedeur talked about this yesterday. He seems to have really taken to Flacco and hes said that he needs to get through his reads faster. Honestly, I hope Watson comes back so Shedeur will get cut and go to a better organization. Even if hes not starting, id rather him be in a better situation where someone really wants him and is not just going through the motions. Every indication (and in the limited clips that I've seen) Shedeur is better than Gabriel. When doing the joint practices, they will really be able to tell separate themselves.
When it comes to drafting quarterbacks, NFL teams don’t have a scouting problem. They have a thinking problem in my opinion. They’re not evaluating quarterbacks; they’re confirming biases. Instead of adapting to the modern game, they’re still searching for the next version of a quarterback archetype that doesn’t even fit today’s league.
They want tall. They want a cannon arm. They want a “pro-style system” background, even though most college systems are hybridized now and almost none reflect NFL offenses. They want clean footwork, good combined numbers, and a smile that looks good on draft night.
And they call this "evaluation."
That’s how you pass on a Lamar Jackson. That’s how you let a Jalen Hurts fall to the second round. That’s how you overdraft a Zach Wilson or convince yourself that a 24-year-old with 13 college starts and a textbook release is somehow “NFL-ready.”
Here’s what they refuse to grasp: College success is not about running the “right system.” It’s about winning in chaos, elevating teammates, managing variables, and responding to pressure, not in a clean pocket, but in real-time.
So if you’re drafting a rookie quarterback, stop looking for the “most NFL-like system” or whether he played under center 15% of the time. Start asking:
A Real Rookie QB Evaluation Model:
Chaos Translation Quotient: How does this QB perform when things break down? Can he create solutions when protection fails or receivers improvise?
Team Elevation Score: Did he raise the level of average players? Did his line play better with him at the helm? Did he change the expectations of the program?
Adaptability Grade: Did he work with multiple coordinators? Different schemes? Varying tempos? And how did his performance change, or didn’t?
Defensive Manipulation IQ: Can he identify coverage rotations pre- and post-snap? Does he move defenders with his eyes or body language, even if his arm isn’t elite?
Situational Mastery: Look at 3rd and 7+. Look at the red zone. Look at trailing in the 4th quarter. Who is this player when the playbook shrinks and the pressure spikes?
Processing Real-Time Tape: Don’t ask what his reads should have been. Ask what he saw. And if he saw it late, did he recover? Did he learn?
Leadership Under Fire: Not “did he give a speech,” but did teammates trust him when the game was tight? Did he communicate with the OC, fix protections, or redirect a teammate without panic?
Growth Trajectory: Did he get better every year? Every month? Every game? Or did he plateau and ride the hype machine?
What front offices call “traits” are often just camouflage for lazy evaluation. A quarterback’s ability to adapt, grow, and elevate is a trait. Everything else is window dressing.
Drafting a rookie quarterback shouldn’t be about finding the next Brady, Allen, or Mahomes. It should be about finding your guy, the one who makes sense for your team, your locker room, your city, and your timeline.
The truth is, half the league doesn’t want a quarterback. They want a savior. They want a myth. And because of that, they keep chasing ghosts instead of building around reality.
There is a significant difference between how Shedeur Sanders has been portrayed and how he should be evaluated. When you step back and compare what he did in college to others, such as Jayden Daniels, who had a great year at LSU with a loaded roster and national support, the double standard becomes hard to ignore.
Sanders didn’t have that kind of setup. He played behind the worst offensive line in the Power Five, had no run game, and carried a first-year rebuild with composure, accuracy, and leadership. Yet he was still portrayed as not quite ready, as if the adversity he overcame didn’t strengthen his case but somehow weakened it.
And now in Cleveland, we are watching the same pattern repeat. He is showing leadership, precision, and command in camp, yet the conversation is not about what he is doing. It is about his draft slot. He is a fifth-round pick, so the verdict is already in. He is labeled not NFL-ready, just like many others before him who went on to prove the league wrong. Because let’s be honest, the NFL has missed more times than it has hit when it comes to evaluating quarterbacks. And part of that failure is baked into a system where the same recycled voices from the same coaching trees push the same narratives.
Look at the history. Kurt Warner, Joe Montana, Tony Romo, Rich Gannon, Drew Brees, and Aaron Rodgers. All underestimated. All doubted. All misread by the very system that still dominates the conversation today. What happened to the people who got it wrong? Nothing. They stayed around. They got promoted. They became media analysts, consultants, and front office executives, continuing to shape evaluations with the same flawed logic. Being wrong never cost them. It only cost the players who did not fit the mold.
Independent thought is almost nonexistent. Most of the people making these evaluations are speaking from the same playbook, shaped by legacy bias and a rigid idea of what a quarterback should look like and how they should develop. So when someone like Shedeur does not fit the mold, the instinct is to discredit them instead of reevaluating.
He is being asked to prove himself under conditions designed to support a narrative, rather than an honest analysis of his performance. And that is not player development. That is institutional inertia. The media and NFL alike are more committed to protecting their pipeline of conventional wisdom than they are to getting it right.
Sanders does not need hype. He needs a fair analysis. Until then, it is not his readiness that should be questioned. It is the system’s.
How do you draft a guy and not give him first team reps...
How is he suppose to know what he needs to improve on?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
G Bush going in..
Why the fagboys didn’t grab him? Jerry and Deion go way backThe Steelers should have grabbed him then.
Man, what a collusion fail on the NFL's part.....Why the fagboys didn’t grab him? Jerry and Deion go way back
Apparently,the Browns think Shedeur isn't ready or can't grasp the concepts even though it's a similar offense at Colorado, according to Shedeur.
The Browns are playing games.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Jerry is old and retarded in his own right. He's not known for making good player decisions.Why the fagboys didn’t grab him? Jerry and Deion go way back
As soon he said "Mary Kay Cabot " I cut it off. Sorry, she's had an agenda before he stepped on the field. With that said, she could be a mouthpiece for the coaches, who didn't want Shedeur in the first place and then they can point to him not picking up the offense.![]()
all that nigga got was a $250 fine?
all that nigga got was a $250 fine?
i was cited for doing 53mph in a 35,....and my ticket was $520.
Great we have our Cleveland insiders @ansatsusha_gouki & @BlackGoku to let us know what's really going on with Shadeur.