
^^^
Dawg, you just made some mathamatical equation and went on some long tangent about how science and math doesn't prove anything. Then when you're proven wrong, you say, "oh, but you just went about the equation another way", so dude puts it in a way that is straight to the point and shows you how you're fundamentally wrong. Then you resort to quoting some deeper math theory. It's like you're overthinking shit sometimes. On one level, I'm all for it, many of my friends say the same about me, but I'm just pointing it out.
Trust me i'm not over thinking. Everything I type is well thought out. I promise you.
I said that there's no proof in science.
I NEVER SAID MATH DOESN'T PROVE ANYTHING. Again, quote where i've said this. I'll type it in caps again: QUOTE WHERE I SAID THAT THERE's NO PROOF IN MATH.
It appears you keep accusing me of shit that you never back up. I've asked you several times to quote some of the shit you've accused me of and I get crickets.
His first attempt to disprove it was WRONG (incomplete at best). His second attempt, WHICH HAD ABSOLUTELY NO RELATION to the first attempt was right. And I acknowledged it. And like I said in a previous post (which you clearly overlooked, as usual) that was the whole point of my posting that 1+1= 0 'proof' in the first place!
What deeper math theory? Gödel's Incompleteness Theory? If you're not familiar with it why don't you look it up? Google it. Skeptical inquiry, right? Or you're just gonna dismiss it as bullshit without investigation? Like the blind religious folks?
Or just because you're not familiar with it all of the sudden it's a "deep math theory?"
Or is it possible that i'm not "over thinking it" and you're just under thinking it?
As for the creationism/evolution thing, my bad- I truly read that wrong.I didn't say that you put it ahead, I thought you were putting them on equal footing. And true, abiogenesis would be a less stupid place to start.
OK.
I will attempt to copy your stream of debate
Poster:1+1=2
YOU: ah yes, but can you really PROVE it? YOU, my friend are JUST LIKE THE RELIGIOUS PEOPLE YOU CLAIM TO HATE
Post:not on an abstract level, but on a level that is USEFUL to us as human, I CAN. And what I can prove on this level is much different is held to a much different burden of proof than say, a claim of the supernatural.See? two apples, I'm eating them right now. want one?
No. not so fast.
I see an apple and an apricot. LOL. Don't you notice that your statement: "And what I can prove on this level is much different is held to a much different burden of proof than say, a claim of the supernatural." suggests that scientific claims and religious claims shouldn't be held to the same standard?
Admit it man, you're selectively reading my posts.
OK. I'll ask you this question directly since everyone else keeps dodging it. How can you qualitatively and quantitatively scientifically 'prove' (or verify, whatever) a very REAL life phenomena like, how much you love your mother?"
YOU: I could eat one, but would I REALLY be eating it? Surely you've heard of the Newtonian principles of apple eating.. if I eat the apple then it would cease to exist, and we would no longer have TWO


da fuck?
Yeah. Ok, so uhm, we've gotten to that classic threshold point of discussions like this where ambiguous figuratives take over. Yeah. We're about done.
At least we can agree to disagree on some issues. Good discussion.
I agree with something you said in another post about anthropomorphism being a logical step in earlier days, sometimes you just lose me. I actually look to support your arguments, but I swear in your zeal to be middle of the road, you tend to come off as just another religious defender.
@ religious defender. Like St. Michael huh.
Why are you so scared of the middle of the road? Not being facetious here, i'm really curious. What's so threatening about this?
And athropomorphism hasn't disappeared. In a sense, it's still as innate and intuitive 20,000 years ago as it is today. Just in a different form.
And cmon man, you can make a post about evolution RIGHT here on this freethinking friendly board (well, fairly anyway), and you will get loads of people coming in here with that ape bullshit. It aint just my friends. I'll bet you money, you got friends or fam on that same bullshit.
Hey, you're right. And I never said it's just your friends. I know mad people who think evolution means man came from apes. Shit, this interpretation is more popular than you'd think. My mom thinks it.
I didn't feel like quoting you, I paraphrased
OK.