Kobe named NBA 'Player of the Decade'

Chi Shot Caller

Star
Registered
Look at that team. It was horrible.

I can think of a lot worse teams with second and third best players worse then Odom and Butler... Say, the '07 Cavs that went to the conference finals for one.

Also notice that Kobe shot 43% and averaged over 4 fucking turnovers :lol::smh::confused:


Also show me another team where someone averaged 27 while 2 others averaged at least 15 and they lost that many games in the last 10 years lmao ya'll will do anything to hold up Kobe. Admit it. He couldn't be the man just yet. It's cool man, everyone isn't built like Mike and Lebron, it takes time for some... like until u turn 27 lmao
 

chemist

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I can think of a lot worse teams with second and third best players worse then Odom and Butler... Say, the '07 Cavs that went to the conference finals for one.

Also notice that Kobe shot 43% and averaged over 4 fucking turnovers :lol::smh::confused:


Also show me another team where someone averaged 27 while 2 others averaged at least 15 and they lost that many games in the last 10 years lmao ya'll will do anything to hold up Kobe. Admit it. He couldn't be the man just yet. It's cool man, everyone isn't built like Mike and Lebron, it takes time for some... like until u turn 27 lmao

06 and 07 Sonics had Ray Allen and Rashard Lewis averaging over 20 a game and Chris Wilcox averaging around 14 ppg as the third scorer. Those teams won 31 & 35 games.

Scoring averages have absolutely nothing to do with how good a team is.

We all know the West has been a much stronger conference by far since Jordan left.

Its much harder to make the playoffs in the West.

You know this, I know this, we all know this.
 

shaddy46

Potential Star
Registered
06 and 07 Sonics had Ray Allen and Rashard Lewis averaging over 20 a game and Chris Wilcox averaging around 14 ppg as the third scorer. Those teams won 31 & 35 games.

Scoring averages have absolutely nothing to do with how good a team is.

We all know the West has been a much stronger conference by far since Jordan left.

Its much harder to make the playoffs in the West.

You know this, I know this, we all know this.


cranrab thinks different
 

chemist

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
06 and 07 Sonics had Ray Allen and Rashard Lewis averaging over 20 a game and Chris Wilcox averaging around 14 ppg as the third scorer. Those teams won 31 & 35 games.

Scoring averages have absolutely nothing to do with how good a team is.

We all know the West has been a much stronger conference by far since Jordan left.

Its much harder to make the playoffs in the West.

You know this, I know this, we all know this.

cranrab thinks different

We know this but any reasonable person can look at the Conference standings this decade can see this.

Numbers don't lie.
 

cranrab

Star
BGOL Investor
J Kidd?

KG?

AI?

Kobe?

Damn rab, I know you hate bean but to hate on KG too? :smh:

who's hating? you'd actually put allen iverson on an all DECADE team? tobe's not even in the discussion.

IMO, the only legit candidates you suggest are kevin garnett and jason kidd.

but compare shaquille o'neal and kevin garnett side-by-side and you see shaquille o'neal was other-worldly.

and off topic, but why is it that everyone mercilessly knocks shaquille o'neal for not improving on his FTs, but we never see the same level of contempt for jason kidd never developing a credible outside threat (as earvin johnson did)?
 

outkastic2001

Star
Registered
Kobe_Bryant_and_Lebron_James_in_this_funny_photo.jpg

JAMES: Congratulations King Kobe on your continue success
KOBE: Thank you ninja.


Later
3074315863_8a78a77bcb_o.jpg


Why won't this ninja, go away.


at the same time
gal_sb_mcdonalds_jordanbird.jpg


BIRD: I think he may be the greatest.
JORDAN: I think your right.

:cool:
 

massdagod

Rising Star
OG Investor
DRob was on his last leg during the first title and was running off fumes on the second one. Parker/Gino were raw unproven rook or 2nd year players with limited contribution on the 3rd and neither were anywhere near all-star players at that point.

btw- You said 2 and 3. Duncan has 5titles?

So are we talking teams or players? You do know Shaq in his prime was on most of those teams right? Notice the three year dark ages when Shaq left and Kobe waded in mediocrity???
It really doesnt Matter. Kobe is the best player this Decade.

A Dominate Shaq played subpar against the best teams in the west (aka the best teams in the NBA: kings, spurs, blazers) during the 3 peat.. If it wasnt for Kobe OUTPLAYING Shaq in the Western conference playoffs throughout the 3peat, there would be no 3peat.

Period.
 

Blunt

Rising Star
Registered
The Okafor example proves that Rookie of the Year is not a barometer of future success or dominance, ...

Who said it was??? It's just the first notch in the belt on the way to multiple All-NBAs and MVPs.

As for the All-NBA selections, T-Mac and Jason Kidd were perennial selections during their prime and didn't make the list.

Neither was All-NBA every year of their careers AND Top 5 in MVP voting 4 of their first 6 years. Both only finished in the Top 5 twice over their entire careers. With Kidd the only one finishing higher than 4th once.

Status and Performance is related to playoff production.

That would exclude most NBA players.
 
Last edited:

A to Dah K

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
how the fuck is iverson and kidd over billups?
billups has been in the ECF or WCF damn near every year this decade
1 tittle
1 finals mvp
1 season mvp which he got jerked on
what has iverson and kidd done?
 

Duffle_Bag

Star
Registered
Who said it was??? It's just the first notch in the belt on the way to multiple All-NBAs and MVPs.

You did. You implied that Rookie of the Year was one of Lebron's accomplishments that should place him on an All-Decade team. And he did not win multiple MVPs during the previous decade.



Neither was All-NBA every year of their careers AND Top 5 in MVP voting 4 of their first 6 years. Both only finished in the Top 5 twice over their entire careers. With Kidd the only one finishing higher than 4th once.

Lebron finishing in the Top 5 in MVP voting in 4 of his first 6 years proves my point. He was a great player for less than a decade, so why should he be on an All-Decade team. The list should reflect people who have performed at a high level over the course of the decade, not just the previous 4 years.

That would exclude most NBA players.

Exactly why there are only 10 names on the list, out of the hundreds of players who played in the preceding 10 years.
 

durham

Rising Star
Platinum Member
duncan EASILY, look at those that he played with and count how many will make the hall, or even sniff 1st team all nba even ONCE

Kobe is all that, but player of the decade is duncan imo

and nash IS NOT a better player than AI, over the last decade

and lebron is NOT over garnett over the last decade....hes too young

Black people get educated, become sportwriters, as we sooo need a better product and alternative opinions in the media

this shit is getting out of hand
 

Blunt

Rising Star
Registered
You did. You implied that Rookie of the Year was one of Lebron's accomplishments that should place him on an All-Decade team.

It was just the first accomplishment of MANY, including 5 straight All-NBA nods!!! Which part don't you get??? He's been honored in every way possible.

And he did not win multiple MVPs during the previous decade.

Who said he did??? He won one and was a top contender three other times. And a Top Ten finisher the other two. He's been in the MVP race every year of his career.

Lebron finishing in the Top 5 in MVP voting in 4 of his first 6 years proves my point. He was a great player for less than a decade, so why should he be on an All-Decade team.

Huh??? It proves that he was a DOMINANT player for ALL 6 years of his career. You don't have to play in EVERY year of a decade in order to be judged one of its best.

The list should reflect people who have performed at a high level over the course of the decade, not just the previous 4 years.

No, the list is about players who dominated DURING the decade, and not throughout its entirety. James has been THE most significant NBA player of the last 6 years, which is a majority of the decade.

Exactly why there are only 10 names on the list, out of the hundreds of players who played in the preceding 10 years.

And LeBron is rightfully one of them. Even if he'd only played 3 years he'd be on this list because he's been such a phenom. How can you exclude the leading active scorer (and 3rd best all-time)?

An All-Decade Team isn't just about someone playing every year of a decade. It's about a player's standing WITHIN that decade.
 
Last edited:

LordSinister

One Punch Mayne
Super Moderator
who's hating? you'd actually put allen iverson on an all DECADE team? tobe's not even in the discussion.

IMO, the only legit candidates you suggest are kevin garnett and jason kidd.

but compare shaquille o'neal and kevin garnett side-by-side and you see shaquille o'neal was other-worldly.

and off topic, but why is it that everyone mercilessly knocks shaquille o'neal for not improving on his FTs, but we never see the same level of contempt for jason kidd never developing a credible outside threat (as earvin johnson did)?

I thought you were an Iverson stan, sorry.

Kobe belongs on there for making the playoffs with what was essentially a WNBA squad.

Twice

Smush Parker
Kwame Brown
Brian Cook
Devean George
Stanislav Medvedenko
Laron Profit
Chris Mihm

The only other legit NBA player on that roster was Lamar, and he's iffy.

Kobe deserves the top spot for this alone, quit hating. :lol:

ouxobl.jpg
 

Dynamo5

wannabe star
Registered
It really doesnt Matter. Kobe is the best player this Decade.

A Dominate Shaq played subpar against the best teams in the west (aka the best teams in the NBA: kings, spurs, blazers) during the 3 peat.. If it wasnt for Kobe OUTPLAYING Shaq in the Western conference playoffs throughout the 3peat, there would be no 3peat.

Period.

:smh:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/playoffs/NBA_2000.html
Against the Blazers in 00' Kobe had 2/9, 5/15, and 4/13 games

http://www.basketball-reference.com/playoffs/NBA_2001.html
Kobe definitely outshined Shaq offensively in 01' against the Spurs, but Shaq wasn't close to subpar, he still averaged his 25+, 10+

http://www.basketball-reference.com/playoffs/NBA_2002.html
Against the Kings, Kobe had games where he shot 9/21, 8/24, 11/29 and 10/26(in game 7)

Kobe was definitely important to those championships, but what you sayin' just ain't true
 

shaddy46

Potential Star
Registered
I thought you were an Iverson stan, sorry.

Kobe belongs on there for making the playoffs with what was essentially a WNBA squad.

Twice

Smush Parker
Kwame Brown
Brian Cook
Devean George
Stanislav Medvedenko
Laron Profit
Chris Mihm

The only other legit NBA player on that roster was Lamar, and he's iffy.

Kobe deserves the top spot for this alone, quit hating. :lol:

ouxobl.jpg
anytime u can take smush parker and kwame brown to the playoffs TWICE you are the fucking man.
 

Uncontainable_Spirit

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
It should be either Duncan or Shaq. There is no way that Mr. Bryant should be the player of the decade. He wasn't even the finals MVP with Shaq on the team. SMH... oh well.
 
Top