man FJP if you respond to this idiocy than youre just as much of fool as he is
I cant lie man Im a debater I wanna crush that stupid ass argument so bad.


man FJP if you respond to this idiocy than youre just as much of fool as he is
man FJP if you respond to this idiocy than youre just as much of fool as he is
Cowboy fans just don't want to hear the truth! He didn't deserve to be in the Hall! The playoffs have nothing to do with getting in in the first place. There are plenty of players who got in that never played in the playoffs or never did much to get in. ARE YOU REALLY GOING TO TRY TO SAY THAT IRVING NUMBERS ARE MBETTER THAN AVERAGE?
I cant lie man Im a debater I wanna crush that stupid ass argument so bad.![]()
Cowboy fans just don't want to hear the truth! He didn't deserve to be in the Hall! The playoffs have nothing to do with getting in in the first place. There are plenty of players who got in that never played in the playoffs or never did much to get in. ARE YOU REALLY GOING TO TRY TO SAY THAT IRVING NUMBERS ARE MBETTER THAN AVERAGE?
So dominant that they didn't win shit![]()
Alright fuck it....you baited me. Did you just say the playoffs have nothing to do with it?![]()
Again...336 rec. 5,462yds 16.3ypc 51TDs Those are Lynn Swanns stats. Shit worst than eveyrbody in question. Yet Swann...first ballot. Because of POSTSEASON success...winning EVERYTHING. To get in with no postseason success a player has to be utterly dominant to the point you cant ignore...EXAMPLE Barry Sanders. Barry with a couple rings would probably be considered the greatest player ever. At the same time he was so dominant, he had to get in. His impact. The way he changed the entire gameplan of the other team...was hall worthy.
And what exactly did "Carters" Vikings do at all in that time? Nothing. Thats the point. Im not saying Carter wasnt good. But being hall of fame to me is ANOTHER level. A level that needs to stop being "given" away because of big stats.
The hall is NOT only about numbers, thats why you keep missing the damn point. At no point does it say that. The hall honors the greats who have given great contributions to the sport... Super Bowl wins are the biggest contribution a player can have outside of stats. Not just stats, what did your stats mean. Clark wont get in because he wasnt the preimminent WR threat on his own team, Monk was... Not one time did I say Irvin had exceptional numbers...but he was an exceptional contributor to an exceptional team.Swann and the rest of the guys on those steeler teams got in solely because they were the first dinasty. I never thought that Swann should have been a HOF!!
The HAll is only about numbers!! Not playoff or superbowl wins! Solely what a player has done in his individual career. And I will say it as long as you do not wish to accept it but Irvings #'s were just average. He and Clark are almost identical in every category even down to the # of pro bowls (5) each and the # of 1st team all pro selections (1) each. They both have had playoff success and multiple rings, so if #'s are what get you in why isn't Clark even being considered?
The hall is NOT only about numbers, thats why you keep missing the damn point. At no point does it say that. The hall honors the greats who have given great contributions to the sport... Super Bowl wins are the biggest contribution a player can have outside of stats. Not just stats, what did your stats mean. Clark wont get in because he wasnt the preimminent WR threat on his own team, Monk was... Not one time did I say Irvin had exceptional numbers...but he was an exceptional contributor to an exceptional team.
And what has Moss ever won???... Im not deying Moss is a better athlete, but just because a player is on a TEAM that doesnt win, mean absolutly nothing... Carter was a better receiver, no point in tryin to argue that point.
It is just about #'s! Individual #'s. Average #'s equal average player and that's what Irving was... AVERAGE WITH A BIG MOUTH AND ALL THE BS THAT CAME WITH IT.
Moss had a larger impact. Carter was definitely a better all around WR...However Moss was WAY more dominant at the position. Far more. Moss was the most feared player at his position for damn near half his career. Atleast Moss has gone to the Super Bowl. A player that is on a team that doesnt win means alot. Look at how marinos legacy is hindered by not winning.
ARE YOU REALLY GOING TO TRY TO SAY THAT IRVING NUMBERS ARE MBETTER THAN AVE he avergaeRAGE?[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]
Don't you realize that Moss was able to do what he did in Minn because he had Carter on the other side of him? Moss hasn't come close to doing what he did in Minn since. The Pats could have had me @ the wr spot and still gone to the superbowl. Moss was not the reason they got there. Didn't they get there with Troy Brown and some other no name wr? Moss won't get in the Hall! You know all they are gonna say is he didn't play hard every play and never duplicated the #'s he did when he had Carter on the field with him.
Irvin was a regular for 8 years. Over those 8 straight years he averaged 83 catches, 1,300 Yards (15.7 Avg.) and 6 TDs per year (while also winning Super Bowls). That's WAY above "average" for ANY receiver, nevermind a tough, possession type one.
The Difference between Ed and Mike are.....Mike actually started and put in work for his rings, dont insult that man with that bullshit comparison.![]()
Don't you realize that Moss was able to do what he did in Minn because he had Carter on the other side of him?
On the real man Blunt just ended the argument right here.![]()
I dont get the hate on Irvin...not going to repeat any of the stats because they have already been posted by you cats.. but Only Irvin and Rice consistently abused Deion Sanders because they were perfect route runners...
In 2 years Rod Smith better be on the first HOF ballot:
And he better get in.
I dont get the hate on Irvin...not going to repeat any of the stats because they have already been posted by you cats.. but Only Irvin and Rice consistently abused Deion Sanders because they were perfect route runners...
Whoa! Andre Rison was ROBBED. Why wasn't he on any of the HOF ballots?
Receptions: 743
Yards: 10205
TDs: 84
Superbowl wins: 1
class of 2011:
M. Faulk
D. Sanders
T. Brown
C. Carter
C. Haley
+1 from the old-timers pool
thoughts?
And you left out some things too. How many rings does Clark have?I had to fix that for you, you left out some things.
Swann shouldnt be there. He's proof that the voters fuck up sometime. Dude was a kiss ass who benefited from being a media guy and politic's.336 rec. 5,462yds 16.3ypc 51TDs
Those are Swanns stats which are paltry in comparison to anybody listed. So what is your stat argument saying? Nothing.
What kind of offense did Clark play in?
how many years did Irvin play compared to those guys???
and what kind of offense did Irvin play in compared to those guys???
u niggas stay losing
Not a shot in hell.In 2 years Rod Smith better be on the first HOF ballot:
Rec: 849
Yards: 11389
TDs: 68
Superbowl wins: 2
And he better get in.