Game Of Thrones season 2: The night is dark and full of terror................
- Thread starter GAMETHEORY
- Start date
trust us... she IS an idiot... think of anyone you know that needs to verbally affirm how smart or serious they are... I actually think Kingslayer is smarter than her, but just mentally lazy because of how brilliant Tiwin and Tyrion are...
Jaime's biggest fault is he is overly content. He lacks the ambition and self motivation of tywin and Tyrion. If Tyrion did not kill his mother at birth along with being a diminutive eye sore he would have been the apple of his fathers eye IMO. However unlike the others Tyrion actually has a heart and that would conflict with Tywins political maneuvering behind scenes.
It was surprising to see the metamorphosis of Jaime's character as the books go on though.
yeah... but Jaime actually has heart too, not like Tyrion's, but definitely always had compassion... he really was simple, just happy to excel at martial skills, and could care less about power, his character grew to be one of my favs
I disagree somewhat, besides caring about his immediate family Jaime could give a fuck about anyone else. After being kidnapped by the Starks changed him. Going through all of that caused a broadening of his perspective and he started to truly see what how different he was from Cersei and Tywin.
Last edited:
Ok you niggaz who have read the books need to be easy because your starting to drop spoilers a little bit.
http://grrm.livejournal.com/276653.html
I kinda figure they was going to do the first half of the third book...
lets continue this in the spoiler thread....
Last edited:
http://viewers-guide.hbo.com/game-of-thrones/season2/#!/map/special/areas-of-control/
another map but its not good as the map I posted last week.
another map but its not good as the map I posted last week.
No offense my man, but you are 100% wrong here. Stannis was all those things you mentioned on the surface, but he was also desperate. He dealt with Pirates and sell swords which would not be considered very honorable, but it was necessary to get ships he needed. He allows himself to come under the influence of a WHOLE NEW RELIGION than the one he was brought up with in order to gain the power that comes with it.
From outward appearances, Stannis is stern and inflexible, but in reality he's willing to do dirt in order to accomplish his goals.
I'm not sure what plotline you are referring to, but having them actually have sex answers one of the minor questions from the 2nd book. I can't say more without being spoilerish, but I don't think you have to worry about them producing an actual "son" from that sexual union.
I've been reading alot of comments and alot of people are saying the Melisandre and Stannis scene was in the book
That scene as depicted on the show was never in the books.
I'll just say this. I think by end of the 4th episode you're going to see why that sex scene was relevant.
I havent made that far in the second book,I was going by the comments I've been reading about that scene...
ALL YOU BOOK READING NIGGAS need to just step the fuck out. Seriously...you bitch ass niggas can't seem to comprehend that when you say "such and such character really grows and comes into his own later" that statement is a FUCKING SPOILER. So do us all a favor and just go to the other thread...PLEASE. Niggas in here typing in "white" font
ALL YOU BOOK READING NIGGAS need to just step the fuck out. Seriously...you bitch ass niggas can't seem to comprehend that when you say "such and such character really grows and comes into his own later" that statement is a FUCKING SPOILER. So do us all a favor and just go to the other thread...PLEASE. Niggas in here typing in "white" font
Dude! What are you talking about. This thread is simply a discussion of the season episode by episode and dudes look for explanations of what they just saw by the individuals who have already read the book. Nothing more. Nothing less. I'm sorry you came across white letters but there are no critical spoilers in this thread. I repeat: there are no critical spoilers in this thread that you should be concerned about.
Dude! What are you talking about. This thread is simply a discussion of the season episode by episode and dudes look for explanations of what they just saw by the individuals who have already read the book. Nothing more. Nothing less. I'm sorry you came across white letters but there are no critical spoilers in this thread. I repeat: there are no critical spoilers in this thread that you should be concerned about.
Dude is crying about a post I made when me and ViCious were discussing whether or not Jaime had any compassion. I dropped extremely minor spoilers in one of my responses but I covered it in white text. I since then edited and removed it to appease OutlawR.O.C. But Warbucks for some reason assumes I just dropped some huge spoilers that will ruin his viewing experience.
Dude is crying about a post I made when me and ViCious were discussing whether or not Jaime had any compassion. I dropped extremely minor spoilers in one of my responses but I covered it in white text. I since then edited and removed it to appease OutlawR.O.C. But Warbucks for some reason assumes I just dropped some huge spoilers that will ruin his viewing experience.
Naw this is the second time he's been bitching about this...I dont understand why because nobody hasnt wrote a spoiler that I know of....
Naw this is the second time he's been bitching about this...I dont understand why because nobody hasnt wrote a spoiler that I know of....
I read his response and was like WTF
oh well, I would of expected a reaction like his if I just out of the blue started naming off all the characters that are going to die and when.
Naw this is the second time he's been bitching about this...I dont understand why because nobody hasnt wrote a spoiler that I know of....
Exactly. The shit that has been said or considered a spoiler would seem like it to those who haven't paid attention to what's going on. I see it more as speculation.
When HBO's renewal of "Game of Thrones" for a third season was announced Tuesday, one question sprang to many fans' minds: How many episodes will there be?
A spokesperson for the network would not confirm that, as was the case with the first two seasons, the third season will have 10 episodes. But executive producer D.B. Weiss, whom I interviewed after the renewal announcement, said that he and fellow "Game of Thrones" executive producer David Benioff were proceeding on the assumption that Season 3 will consist of 10 episodes.
"I would say that, going forward, 10-episode seasons are really all that are possible, given our 12-month [production] cycle," Weiss said. "For this show specifically, it's really all we can do to do 10 of them in a year. I would say not to expect more than 10 a season any time in the near future ... We had always planned on a 10-episode season [for the show's third year]."
Some fans and media observers had hoped that the show, currently in its second season (Sundays at 9 p.m. ET on HBO), would get a two-season renewal, and I asked Weiss about that as well.
"I'm not aware of [HBO] having done that in the past -- doing two at a time," Weiss replied. "Generally, it seems to be a season-by-season thing."
The question was partly prompted by the theory that the show would need two seasons to deal with "A Storm of Swords," the third book in Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" novel series. But fans of the shows (and books) should not presume that certain seasons will deal with certain books, Weiss said. He said the plan that he and Benioff have involves taking on sections of the overall saga that make sense in 10-episode installments.
"We've always said that we see the show as an adaptation of George's series, not this book or that book," Weiss explained. "It's definitely true that 'A Storm of Swords' is too big to even come close to fitting in one season. We've done some shuffling around of things -- as an example, there were some things from Book 2 that ended up in Season 1, and there are probably going to be some things in Book 2 that didn't make it into Season 2 or maybe won't show up later. Book 3 is definitely too much for a 10-episode season, so we're taking the long view of the series of the whole, and trying to do as much justice as possible to George's overall epic story and be as true to the spirit as we can, while keeping it an exciting and viable and vivid as a television show that stands on its own two legs."
As I said in my conversation with Weiss, it sounds as though the way to look at upcoming season (hopefully seasons) of the show are as portions of the overall saga, not sections of particular books.
"Yeah," Weiss said. "A season of television needs to feel like a season of television. We have so many storylines to juggle, and they all need to ideally have a sense of a beginning, middle and end over the course of a season. Each character needs to feel like they're traveling a specific road in the course of a season, and coming out as a different person than they went in. It's never going to be about taking a book and ripping it in half -- 'At page 673, this is the place where [the season] ends.' It comes down to case-by-case [decisions] with each story and how best to serve each character's story going forward."
And yes, Martin himself will be writing a third-season episode. The fan site Westeros has the details on that front.
Much more from my interview with D.B. Weiss will be posted here on Monday, in addition to my review of the third episode of the season.
Check out HuffPost TV's recent interview with "Game of Thrones" actor Kit Harington (Jon Snow) and check back here later in the week for an interview with Richard Madden (Robb Stark). For my reviews of the first two episodes of "Game of Thrones" Season 2, look here and here.
"Game of Thrones" airs Sundays at 9 p.m. ET on HBO.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/11/game-of-thrones-third-season_n_1416386.html
A spokesperson for the network would not confirm that, as was the case with the first two seasons, the third season will have 10 episodes. But executive producer D.B. Weiss, whom I interviewed after the renewal announcement, said that he and fellow "Game of Thrones" executive producer David Benioff were proceeding on the assumption that Season 3 will consist of 10 episodes.
"I would say that, going forward, 10-episode seasons are really all that are possible, given our 12-month [production] cycle," Weiss said. "For this show specifically, it's really all we can do to do 10 of them in a year. I would say not to expect more than 10 a season any time in the near future ... We had always planned on a 10-episode season [for the show's third year]."
Some fans and media observers had hoped that the show, currently in its second season (Sundays at 9 p.m. ET on HBO), would get a two-season renewal, and I asked Weiss about that as well.
"I'm not aware of [HBO] having done that in the past -- doing two at a time," Weiss replied. "Generally, it seems to be a season-by-season thing."
The question was partly prompted by the theory that the show would need two seasons to deal with "A Storm of Swords," the third book in Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" novel series. But fans of the shows (and books) should not presume that certain seasons will deal with certain books, Weiss said. He said the plan that he and Benioff have involves taking on sections of the overall saga that make sense in 10-episode installments.
"We've always said that we see the show as an adaptation of George's series, not this book or that book," Weiss explained. "It's definitely true that 'A Storm of Swords' is too big to even come close to fitting in one season. We've done some shuffling around of things -- as an example, there were some things from Book 2 that ended up in Season 1, and there are probably going to be some things in Book 2 that didn't make it into Season 2 or maybe won't show up later. Book 3 is definitely too much for a 10-episode season, so we're taking the long view of the series of the whole, and trying to do as much justice as possible to George's overall epic story and be as true to the spirit as we can, while keeping it an exciting and viable and vivid as a television show that stands on its own two legs."
As I said in my conversation with Weiss, it sounds as though the way to look at upcoming season (hopefully seasons) of the show are as portions of the overall saga, not sections of particular books.
"Yeah," Weiss said. "A season of television needs to feel like a season of television. We have so many storylines to juggle, and they all need to ideally have a sense of a beginning, middle and end over the course of a season. Each character needs to feel like they're traveling a specific road in the course of a season, and coming out as a different person than they went in. It's never going to be about taking a book and ripping it in half -- 'At page 673, this is the place where [the season] ends.' It comes down to case-by-case [decisions] with each story and how best to serve each character's story going forward."
And yes, Martin himself will be writing a third-season episode. The fan site Westeros has the details on that front.
Much more from my interview with D.B. Weiss will be posted here on Monday, in addition to my review of the third episode of the season.
Check out HuffPost TV's recent interview with "Game of Thrones" actor Kit Harington (Jon Snow) and check back here later in the week for an interview with Richard Madden (Robb Stark). For my reviews of the first two episodes of "Game of Thrones" Season 2, look here and here.
"Game of Thrones" airs Sundays at 9 p.m. ET on HBO.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/11/game-of-thrones-third-season_n_1416386.html
Me too. I really at first of course didn't want to like Jamie. Wanted to hate his guts. I grew to understand him though and understand that he just really wanted to be a warrior and have the love of his sister. Like many men it's like he wanted honor and the respect of his father, but torn with the love of his ridiculous sister.
Bump
Again
Bump
Bump
Sansa the hostage. Damn she is in a bad predicament 
Similar threads
