Not related but quoted this to be sure you'd see it
What are other planets, in your theory? Moons, galaxies, comets, other shit we can observe ourselves. What are they?
Flat Earthers have valid points.
- Thread starter DarkMatter-X
- Start date
What are other planets, in your theory? Moons, galaxies, comets, other shit we can observe ourselves. What are they?
fixed
parallel waves?
here start with the basic properties and physics of light
http://www.canon.com/technology/s_labo/light/001/11.html
Dumbest shit ever. Prove you're not a dragon OP. Dragons can assume human form and go totally undetected. 
What do you think this is?
Is it the same thing as this?
I'll be back later on. Gotta get back to work.
I argued this fact just like you.
They have counters for everything we throw at them.
That’s why I came to the conclusion that “I don’t know” and will not knock someone else for their beliefs.
I know about the physics of light. I'm talking about size. Keep repeating that but y'all hear what u wanna hear.
If you believe in Africa being the birthplace, then you have to believe in a Pangea Super continent. Those who ended up in South Africa and Native Americans in North America did not have the technology back then to travel from Africa to North America. The only way they would have ended up on our side of the world would be through the slow breaking up of Pangea.... most theory’s are that the first ones to settle North and South America came from Asia at a time when those land masses were close enough for people to walk across.
The main reason why I bring up Africa and the Super continent theory is because logic dictates that for one to support the belief that Africa is the mother land one would have to accept the theory of Plate tectonics. Because how else were people 20,000 years ago going to end up on our side of the world.
Not really.
Saying "i dont believe in gravity" is not a counter.
Saying " i dont believe satellites exist" is not a counter.
Saying "they are all in on it" is not a counter.
You cant have a real conversation with someone who picks and chooses which science they want to believe in.
On this board we have many members who work in scientific and technological fields and their work is based on round earth models.
I didnt do any science past high school so I dont get in those debates but when people who work in those fields tell you whats up...
I’ve read and watched almost every single thing that you posted and my responses have been based on those postings.
What do you think this is?
Is it the same thing as this?
I'll be back later on. Gotta get back to work.
Nigga
Can you just answer the fucking question
All these lame ass videos man. It kills me that yalls while narrative is everyone is just believing what they are told and yet you are unable to think for yourself and answer everything with someone else's shit. Then you can't even see why their shit is bullshit either smh.
This video, like the rest of the drivel you post, is someone who doesn't know what they are doing or what they're talking about, presenting it to others with similar lack of knowledge. Yall are really like fucking cavemen explaining this shit to each other and jumping around the campfire because you've discovered magic.
Last edited:
I believe the moon is made of foam rubber. Can you "prove" me wrong? I believe Jesus was Chinese and knew kung foo. Can you disprove This? I think everyone who is trolling this flat earth shit is secretly one of the offspring of the Earth turtle in human form, can you disprove this? I guess you can respect these beliefs as well.
What about racist that believe blacks are inferior? They have all kind of world star videos, YouTube shit and "facts" from storm front to back it up. So don't knock them for their beliefs if they call you a monkey, thug or animal cause they can post "memes" and "facts" to "prove" it.
The perspective problem is one of the things that it seems like flat earthers don’t take into account.
He keeps trying to avoid that Ether.. when it’s to fucking Hot to avoid. He needs to just let it seep into his soul and feel it.
That is what this adult human in 2017 believes, yes.
I'm sure but counters are not necessarily provable answers just responses that can't be proven or theories that weren't worth testing.
I stopped with these kats. Not a single journal article and peer reviewed work can be presented with all their claims in tact.
And yet aight nobody with the means seen this ice wall.
Exactly... my questions are based on observable logic. You don’t need to rely on anyone else’s work to come to these questions because it’s just fucking logic. Like plate tectonics... I don’t have to read anyone’s shit to understand plate tectonics. We literally see plate tectonics in action everywhere.
Hell 2 years and I’m still trying to get an answer about how lava is able to form on a flat earth.
Great Fucking response.... you get the slow clap for this one.
Man how do you fight this???
Just like the po-dunk CACs that believe Obama is a Muslim and that Trump is doing an amazing job... how can anyone expect to fight this?
no you don't...
your posts consistently demonstrate a basic lack of knowledge and comprehension of science
you are a good parrot but because you don't understand the subjects you fuck up when trying to post about the very basic and foundational.
your posts prove time and again that you are very weak in geometry and physics
(no one with a basic understanding of physics would ever ask about tidal effect on a river vs an ocean - then argue gravity doesn't exist...)
you are consistently ignorant to the properties of light - in this case light transitions from a vacuum into earth's atmosphere, but you want to argue about the size of the sun and parallel waves?
Even AFTER Fonzerelli took you back to the posts about refraction and dissipation earlier in this thread?
two words:
refractive index
don't fight -
transcend
I feel the need to also follow up this post with the fact that he is supposed to be an engineer and a professor.
I stopped with these kats. Not a single journal article and peer reviewed work can be presented with all their claims in tact.
And yet aight nobody with the means seen this ice wall.
As a scientist and engineer, I can't. I used to think I had the patience for this, but if I can't tolerate the nonsense of kats telling me they can beat J.J. Redick off the dribble and win a game against him, how do I let this consume my neuronal synapses?
I heard a dude in my men's league start talking about this shit after a game, and they deferred to me to give him a rebuttal. I asked him if he took physics at any point in his education, he replied," Yes but I don't see how that applies to the debate". I said then I don't see how applying logic and intelligence applies either and walked away...
Last edited:
If you can see other planets are round with your own eyes. What the fuk makes you think this one would be flat
Since this whole flat earth shit became popular again I’ve been reading about it.
Everyone who’s quick to dismiss the believers as stupid, tin foil hatters, etc. have not researched why those people believe the earth is flat.
Flat earthers have a great counterpoint for every argument.
I’m telling you... just research it on your own.
I still don’t believe the earth is flat, but I’m not dismissing the possibilities either due to the contradictions that flat earthers point out in the round earth theory.
People who say “find the edge”, “get a boat” have not researched at all and are being just as ignorant as you’re saying flat earthers are.
If you believe the earth is round, tell me why you believe that.
Serious question.
Why do you believe the earth is round?
You’re so quick to call these people names but you have no real proof, other than what you were taught.
People are taught the wrong thing all the time.
You can’t prove the earth is round with your own research... but yet you fully believe, to the point that you would call other people names, that the earth is round...
All this debate does is make me sit back and see just how funny both sides of the debate are.
I don’t know if the earth is flat or round.
And I’m not about to argue to death with someone that it’s either or.
I can’t prove it myself.
I sure as hell cant prove you wrong on the moon being foam.
I’ll sound as silly as you niggettes trying to tell you the moon is a rock that’s hollow and so forth.
It may be popular to believe I’m right.
But just like you niggettes, I’ll be just spitting out some shit I was taught that makes sense to me.
I swear you niggettes just don’t get it.
You apparently believe in Jesus... I’m assuming.
I’ll sound as silly as you niggettes trying to tell you the moon is a rock that’s hollow and so forth.
It may be popular to believe I’m right.
But just like you niggettes, I’ll be just spitting out some shit I was taught that makes sense to me.
I swear you niggettes just don’t get it.
You apparently believe in Jesus... I’m assuming.
Last edited:
If you can see other planets are round wtf makes you think this one would be different
dude - don't project your limitations on others...
a lot of these "niggettes" are not talking about what they read or someone might have told them...
How about this to end the debate:
We attach a camera to one of the space shuttles or satellites we send into space that will break out of the Earth's atmosphere and go into an orbit around Earth to film the whole thing to prove that the Earth is not flat, but spherical in shape.
Oh wait, muthafuckas been doing that for the last 50 years...
Matter of fact, you can pull up that footage and images by doing a fucking Google search on NASA's website.
We attach a camera to one of the space shuttles or satellites we send into space that will break out of the Earth's atmosphere and go into an orbit around Earth to film the whole thing to prove that the Earth is not flat, but spherical in shape.
Oh wait, muthafuckas been doing that for the last 50 years...
Matter of fact, you can pull up that footage and images by doing a fucking Google search on NASA's website.
That's the problem with pseudo science. It's doesn't require any of these nuts to go to an academic environment and research the flat earth theory. Scientists have zero problem in adopting something as long as its logical and it can be proved.
they would start running into people that doesn't use just physics. Let them stand in front of a panel with physicist, astrophysicist, engineers, environmental scientist, nuclear physicist, mathemticians, and the likes.
People that study these areas. Shit would be to high level for most to grasp. Instead they watch YouTube videos. Lmaooooo
What do you think this is?
Is it the same thing as this?
I'll be back later on. Gotta get back to work.
You didn't answer his question.
I watched a physics documentary the other day. What was astounding was the fact that a beam of light was found to not always travel in a straight line when hitting what appears to be solid matter.
How about this to end the debate:
We attach a camera to one of the space shuttles or satellites we send into space that will break out of the Earth's atmosphere and go into an orbit around Earth to film the whole thing to prove that the Earth is not flat, but spherical in shape.
Oh wait, muthafuckas been doing that for the last 50 years...
Matter of fact, you can pull up that footage and images by doing a fucking Google search on NASA's website.
According to some on this Board... We have never even gone into Space because we are blocked by a Dome.
All the videos are as far as we have ever gone.
I'm not making this up...