Everybody post ONE pic..............................................
- Thread starter RiverCity
- Start date
Think about it...
Lexx Diamond said:
The War for Our World
Science, May 6, 2010 vindicates The Iceman Inheritance and Chosen People from the Caucasus, but beware of that “one to four percent” statistical spin.
The May 6, 2010 issue of Science, Journal of the American Academy of Sciences, has finally confirmed that modern human populations have significant Neanderthal genetic admixture. This study by the Max Planck Institute of Leipzig under the overall leadership of Dr. Svante Paabo also included some researchers from the Harvard University School of Medicine.
Behind the scenes, it seems that this DNA study’s dramatic reversal of the Paabo-Stoneking article of July 15, 1997 insisting that there was Neanderthal DNA in modern humans was due to the fact that Harvard researchers, notably geneticist Dr. David Reich, came up with data that contradicted the 1997 study by Svante Paabo (then at the University of Munich) and Mike Stoneking (then at the University of Pennsylvania).
Personally, I have always suspected that this 1997 study was purposefully concocted or even commissioned to please North American Jews and to further Israeli interests. In the 1997 study, Svante Paabo and Mike Stoneking claimed to have re-created part of the Neanderthal DNA sequence to an “acceptable” extent (2%) and then to have compared it to modern human DNA (but the complete human genome wasn’t mapped until 2005). In short, Paabo and Stoneking were comparing nothing much to nothing at all. Dr. Alan Templeton, a geneticist at the American University in St. Louis, characterized their 1997 study as “a statistical house of cards.”
At that time the acknowledged world expert on Neanderthals was Dr. Erik Trinkaus, formerly of the Anthropology Department at the University of New Mexico. His massive book was published in 1992 (Random House, and in two revised Vintage “University Format” paperback editions 1994 and 1996). Trinkaus chose to adopt the new German spelling system which hasn’t caught on among Germans. contained this observation in the concluding pages (March, 1994 Vintage paperback): “Only humans from the Near East and parts of Europe can claim Neandertals per se in their direct ancestry” (page 416, my emphasis).
The 1997 Paabo-Stoneking study published in the July issue of was highly promoted in North American media, contradicted Trinkaus, prevented Random House from issuing a cheaper mass-market paperback edition of in the Fall of 1997 and immediately enthroned Svante Paabo, in the public mind, instead of Erik Trinkaus as the world’s leading expert on Neanderthals. Naturally, the 1997 Paabo-Stoneking article also discredited my own books (1978) and (1992) because I had concluded exactly what Trinkaus had concluded, only I had said it fourteen years earlier. This new May 2010 study concedes that from “1 to 4” percent of modern human DNA is Neanderthal. However, I see and smell a little loophole just large enough for a statistical rat.
The conclusions of this new 2010 study, certainly vetted and possibly written by Paabo, are clearly intended to convey the impression that this “1 to 4 percent” of lingering Neanderthal DNA is more or less evenly distributed throughout the world except for Africa where there is supposedly Neanderthal DNA — and I find this hard to believe.
The May 2010 study even found Neanderthal DNA in New Guinea, which ishighly unlikely and I wonder who the carefully chosen modern donor was to get this supposed Neanderthal DNA. I like to joke that the DNA donor was probably the fictional (I hope) Dr. Jacob Epstein, formerly a New York doctor who now practices in Port Moresby.
This same fictional Dr. Jacob Epstein was possibly also the discoverer of the very real and too-conveniently identified DRD4 7R gene, the Neanderthal gene responsible for “civilization and progress” as we know them. However, this gene’s discovery is more usually attributed, not to my fictional Dr. Jacob Epstein, but to the Yale University School of Medicine, (see Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, January 4, 2001). This is the gene associated with “Attention Deficit Hyper-Active Disorder”. So, do we really want to know Neanderthal-inspired “civilization” and “progress” in their present forms? See The Huffington Post ”Surprising Way Your Neanderthal Genes May Affect You” by Garret LoPorto.
Personally, I sincerely hope that Garret LoPorto did not bite off his tongue while he was writing his article for because his tongue was obviously and very firmly in his cheek when he was typing it. Garret LoPorto reveals that “modern” man had been around for 163,000 years but didn’t do anything until infected with the Neanderthal DRD4 7R gene for progress (or Attention Deficit Disorder). Actually, Neanderthal-impelled “progress” and “civilization” do rather seem to be characterized by a deficit of attention toward the environment and human needs and by hyper activity to make money at any cost to western society.
And what about that lavishly Jewish-produced television documentary of only a few years ago? I could swear that documentary insisted that “Modern Man” (undefined) came out of Africa only 15,000 years ago. This documentary sustained two hours without once mentioning that nasty “N-word” (Neanderthal). Yet, of course, Neanderthals had been alive and well at least 100,000 years before Nixau, the Bushman star of II , led these modern men out of Africa. No expense was spared in propaganda documentary.
Ah. The explanation is that documentary was produced after the 1997 Cell article by Paabo and Stoneking but beforethe May 6, 2010 Science article’s proof of Neanderthal admixture in modern humans. Hence, Garret LoPorto’s article in The Huffington Post. And now, therefore, the Jews have to present some sort of an argument that all human civilization and progress derived from Neanderthal genetic contribution. Yeah, right. Can’t they ever just quit? No, that option is simply not in their genes.
Anyway, that’s the worldwide “Paabo spin” on Neanderthal DNA in modern humans and, looked at this way, “1 to 4 percent” doesn’t amount to much. Figures don’t lie but liars figure.
On June 5, 2010 the world’s population was estimated to be 6.8-billion-plus people (United States Census Bureau, Wikipedia). One percent of that is roughly 68-million and change. Four percent works out to about 278-million people. Odd, isn’t it, that this is about the population of the Middle East, according to my ? And this is the geographic homeland of the Semitic peoples, the present Judeo-Islamic Arabs and the Jews. Work it out for yourself using any good atlas.
With good maps and atlases there is a way of looking at this “1 to 4 percent” of Neanderthal DNA in modern humans that makes a great deal of historical sense. What if this Neanderthal DNA is concentrated in the Caucasus Middle East, where this 2010 study admits that Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons (or “Early Modern Humans”) met and interbred? Surely it is reasonable to suppose that the main concentration of the world’s surviving Neanderthal DNA must be in this area, discounting very modern migrations of some people by railway, steamship and aircraft transportation, and that Neanderthal DNA decreases rapidly as distance from the Caucasus centre of interbreeding increases?
There would be virtually no Neanderthal DNA in Atlantic Western Europe, but there would be more in Central Europe and much more in Eastern Europe, and especially in mountainous areas. There would be virtually none northward toward the Baltic Sea and virtually none east of Kazakhstan to Pacific Far East Asia. And we were already told that there is supposedly no Neanderthal DNA in Africa. But actually there should be at least some Neanderthal DNA in North Africa because the Arab-Muslims conquered it. Now, this sort of Neanderthal DNA distribution might to that insignificant “1 to 4 percent of Neanderthal DNA in the whole world’s population.” See? As Mark Twain put it: first come lies, then damn lies and then statistics.
However, on August 27, 2011, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), quoting a spokesman from Harvard, stated that the now-accepted level of Neanderthal DNA in modern living humanity is closer to six percent instead of “from 1 to 4 percent”. We’re gradually edging toward the objective truth since that first dramatic May 6, 2010 concession in, and the new estimate of “six percent” very comfortably accommodates the population of both the Caucasus Middle East and Islamic western and Central Asia.
Now, assuming this sort of concentration of Neanderthal DNA in the Caucasus Middle East, that “1 to 4” percent (or, now, six percent) of world population suddenly becomes very significant indeed. It means that the Semitic peoples of the Middle East — Jews, Arabs and others (like Armenians) — must, therefore, be substantially Neanderthal.
And this sort of concentration of Neanderthal DNA seems to be the case.
When the Cro-Magnons arrived on the European Atlantic Coast about 34,000 to 40,000 years ago, and they seem to have been a maritime culture, they very quickly and very heavily populated the European Atlantic seacoast, offshore islands and penetrated inland along major rivers — but they stayed in the lowlands, leaving the highlands further inland to the Neanderthals. There was no doubt some interbreeding in the foothills, like the hybrid Lapedo child of Portugal.
This pattern was repeated when the Cro-Magnons broke into the Mediterranean about 10,000 BC after the Garonne River ice barrier from the Massif Central of France to the Pyrenees finally melted (see the novel further down this website).They populated seacoasts, islands and major river valleys, leaving the mountainous interior to the Neanderthals. The northern Adriatic was populated especially heavily by Cro-Magnons and the Danilo-Hvar Culture was well established in coastal Croatia-Slovenia by 7000 BC (see further down this website).
When the world’s sea level finally rose high enough after 6,000 years of glacial melting for the Mediterranean to break through the Bosphorus into Black Sea about 5600 BC (see Pitman and Ryan, ) the same pattern was repeated yet again: maritime Cro-Magnons along the coasts, islands and major rivers and Neanderthals in the interior highlands. So that is why today we find we find taller, long-legged people along the Don, Dnieper, Rhioni, Volga and other rivers and find stockier people in the Ukrainian and Russian highlands and foothills inland from these major river lowlands.
Most unfortunately, this much-too-neat picture is considerably muddied and muddled by the fact that apparently Neanderthals alone inhabited glacial Europe for some 60,000 to 80,000 years before Cro-Magnons appeared on the European scene about 34,000 to 40,000 years ago. There are Neanderthal sites in France, Germany, Italy, Portugal and Spain dating from 100,000 to 35,000 years ago. However, the total Neanderthal population for most of that long period must have been very small, seriously curtailed by the “Ice Age” climate. Nonetheless, these truly archaic Neanderthal genes will persist to show up in the DNA of some modern French, German, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese people.
Then, too, the so-called “Denisovan hominid” must fit into this picturesomewhere. The more-than-paltry remains of this hominid — one finger bone from a young female and a tooth from another individual — were discovered in 2010 in Denisova Cave in Siberia on the northwestern border of Mongolia.
The finger bone and tooth date from about 40,000 years ago. This hominid’s DNA was apparently neither purely Neanderthal nor purely Cro-Magnon, although its DNA is very closely related to Neanderthal DNA. But it possibly or probably interbred with both Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons — if the species survived late enough to encounter Cro-Magnons. And the first Cro-Magnons they could have met, at least according to currently accepted notions of history, were the so-called “Tocharians” from either the Volga-Caspian area or even further west.
These so-called Tocharian Cro-Magnons must have arrived in the Tarim Basin area — cradled by the high Altai Mountains to the north, the high Altun Shan Mountains forming the rim of northern Tibet on the south, with the mighty Tien Shan Mountains intruding from the west almost to the Gobi Desert — about 2500 BC (but the first actual “Tocharian” artifacts discovered so far date only from about 2000 BC).
This general region was once known as the “Dzungarian Gate”, a lowland portal between the western and eastern steppes through which people (Neanderthal, Sinanthropus [“Peking Man”] and Cro-Magnons or whatever) have passed since time immemorial, and was once a well-watered steppeland with many large lakes. Myself, I tend to suspect that when the smoke of “anthropolitical” propaganda has cleared away, we will find that the few hominid remains found in Denisova Cave most probably represent a local variation on the Neanderthal genotype, possibly modified by Sinanthropus, and nothing more. Nonetheless, extravagant claims that “Denisovan” DNA affected the New Guinea, Melanesian and Australian Aboriginal populations have recently been made — has my fictional Dr. Jacob Epstein been busy with his disinformation again?
Since only these two specimens of the “Denisovan hominid” have been discovered so far (plus a possible toe bone), it might be safe to conclude that this species or sub-species was of limited population and fairly localized distribution in the Dzungarian Gate region. At any rate, there is presently no agreement as to this “Denisovan hominid’s” significance in recent human evolution.
However, if you take these patterns into account and factor-in highlands, coastal lowlands, islands and major rivers, a map is still a pretty good guide for showing surviving Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal DNA concentrations in Europe, the Middle East and eastward on to Central Asia.
On May 10, 2010 a Svante Paabo co-reseacher on the new study, Johannes Krause, said on the Mid-German TV Network that the people of the Middle East, the Semites, were at least from “10 to 20” percent Neanderthal. The Internet link to this interview on the Mid-German TV Network was deactivated on May 18, 2010.
This is what I argued in (1978), (1992) and what Erik Trinkaus at least inferred in his of 1992. However, my own calculations indicate that some Middle East Semitic populations approach 50 percent Neanderthal and in some very specific small areas, 70 percent Neanderthal. Given the usually modest Semitic populations in mountain valleys and arid landscapes of the Caucasus Middle East, this sort of Neanderthal DNA concentration among some groups would not affect that “1 to 4 percent” (or, now ”six percent”) of the total world population very much.
In my view, there are two major subspecies of technical ”humanity” presently contending for the domination of our world.
One subspecies and the most influential one in terms of its sheer numbers and geographic extent can simply be called “ordinary humanity”. Before 15th century European maritime expansion and commerce they inhabited Atlantic Western Europe, most of Africa, perhaps “Atlantis” in the past, North and South America and across the Pacific to the Far East, Japan and China. There are several geographic varieties of this subspecies differentiated mostly by skin colour and some other physical traits, but this subspecies as a whole exhibits a clear tendency toward polytheism, a tolerance of females in society and in divine affairs and a relatively low level of aggression. All varieties share a reasonable level of intelligence, very definite visual artistic ability, relatively non-protruding noses and only moderate male hairiness. Because of the differences in physical characteristics of this subspecies, it may be possible that it really consists of several subspecies that evolved separately in slightly different ways within their various geographic areas and different environments of origin. Or, it may have originally been just one East African or Southern African subspecies that migrated into various geographic areas and then evolved unique characteristics. This latter is the modern view, but it may not be correct.
However, the roughly common mentality of this subspecies, much more important than its superficial physical differences, indicates a relatively low degree of sexual dimorphism in its primal anthropological ancestry -except in areas where it has since been greatly affected biologically and culturally by the expansion of the other contending subspecies, as in Eastern, Central and Western Europe after the Jewish Diaspora of AD 70, the Hun invasion AD 451-453 and Khazar migrations from the Russian-Ukrainian steppes into Eastern and Central Europe of circa AD 1000 to 1300.
This other contending subspecies originated in what I call the “Toxic Lozenge”, a narrow elongated area extending from the Rift Valley lakes of Tanzania, Kenya and southern Ethiopia to the northern Caucasus Mountains. This Toxic Lozenge therefore encompasses the geographic epicentres of both Homo habilis and later Neanderthal development. This Toxic Lozenge is also the original homeland of the Hamitic languages and the later seemingly related Semitic ones.
Note that Ancient Egypt was well to the west of where this Toxic Lozenge crosses the Red Sea between Jiddah and Medina in Arabia - an area now called Hijaz and/or Yemen but known as Saba (biblical “Sheba”) in ancient times - the very place where the first evidence of the Hebrew language has been discovered and where Islam was also later conceived (see by Dr. Bernard Leeman much further down on this website).
Physically, this subspecies is characterized by very great nasal development, extreme hairiness in males, long torsos and short legs, extremely high numerical and spatial intelligence, very little visual artistic ability, a low level of emotional stability, fanatical monotheism, anti-feminism and a predisposition to control, enslave or exterminate “ordinary humanity”. There is some fairly recent anthropological evidence (1990-1991, see “Homo Georgicus” on Wikipedia), coming from the Caucasus Republic of Georgia, that this subspecies may derive from Homo habilis, through the Neanderthals and on to modern living representatives.
However, not all anthropologists agree that Homo habilis should be considered fully “human” as that term is rather loosely defined, but was possibly an aberrant offshoot of either Homo or Australopithecus (seeEsau’s Empire I on this website).
That is, people deriving from this Toxic Lozenge in ancient times may not be exactly human and certainly seem to be incompatible with the values and attitudes of “ordinary humanity”. However, recent historical migrants into the Toxic Lozenge represent mostly ordinary African humanity.
Much more important than physical traits, the aggression of this subspecies is responsible for its expansion from its original Toxic Lozenge both east and west to inhabit most of the “Middle East” (especially mountainous regions) and even parts of Europe, western India and northern and eastern Africa, imposing its religious and social values. In short, the people of this Toxic Lozenge have gradually driven a wedge of perhaps “not-quite-human” genes and culture between the ordinary humanity of the West and the ordinary humanity of the Far East. And this wedge has been inexorably expanded by well-known historical events from 5600 BC to the present. Despite the incessant propaganda and disinformation promulgated by this subspecies, adherence to Judaism, Judeo-Christianity and Judeo-Islam are the symptomatic indications of its biological expansion and/or cultural influence.
This Toxic Lozenge subspecies is the most influential one in terms of its extremely high aggression (see “Hard Times Among the Neanderthals”„ Journal of the American Museum of Natural History, New York, December 1978 by Dr. Erik Trinkaus and Dr. T. Dale Stewart of the Smithsonian Institute).
Neanderthals of the “Toxic Lozenge” on a rampage, circa 50,000 BC.
How aggressive are they? Trinkaus and Stewart subjected every Neanderthal bone then known to a forensic-style analysis and found over twice the number of violence-inflicted injuries as among any similar number of bones from other fossil humans. Nonetheless, though extremely violent, Neanderthals took care of their injured and elderly people (Trinkaus and Stewart; see also Ralph Solecki’s later work at Shanidar cave). Ironically, this Trinkaus and Stewart article was published one month after the publication of in November, 1978. I could certainly have used this data if it had been available a few months earlier.
This December 1978 Trinkaus-Stewart study and article adequately explains why the Middle East has been a region of chronic conflict for about 3,500 years of more or less reliably recorded human history. Very little more needs to be said or written about extreme Middle Eastern aggression itself.
However, much more can be said and written about how the Western World got drawn into Middle East confrontations
name? movie
<blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned data-instgrm-version="5" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:658px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:8px;"> <div style=" background:#F8F8F8; line-height:0; margin-top:40px; padding:50.0% 0; text-align:center; width:100%;"> <div style=" background:url(); display:block; height:44px; margin:0 auto -44px; position:relative; top:-22px; width:44px;"></div></div> <p style=" margin:8px 0 0 0; padding:0 4px;"> <a href="https://instagram.com/p/9eEG94Gzk3/" style=" color:#000; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px; text-decoration:none; word-wrap:break-word;" target="_blank">#BeckyG (@iambeckyg) is going to be bringing the action as the #YellowRanger in the @PowerRangersMovie! Let the countdown to 2017 begin.</a></p> <p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;">A photo posted by Power Rangers (@powerrangersmovie) on <time style=" font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px;" datetime="2015-10-30T17:15:11+00:00">Oct 30, 2015 at 10:15am PDT</time></p></div></blockquote>
<script async defer src="//platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js"></script>
<script async defer src="//platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js"></script>
Similar threads
