Enron Cats? GUILTY!!!

TopGun said:
Good, Get Bush Next For Impersonating A President
I'm no conspiracy nut or anything like that, but I think this conviction was all planned. See it's like this, kenny, has to go down to preserve what's left of GW's reputation as being tough on corruption. GW will pardon kenny in two years before he leaves office. The two year timeframe will allow GW to say kenny has learned his lesson.

It makes perfect sense
 
<font face="helvetica, verdana" size="3" color="#000000">
the quilty verdict is no surprise, "it wasn't planned". Ken's peeps couldn't save him, his crimes were too great.he was too greedy. enron was the seventh largest corporation in the United States .you ain’t going to get away with destroying thousands of peoples lives as billions of dollars evaporate into thin air, even if you are as connected as Ken Lay was. Ken Lay was a member of the <b><font color="#d90000">Trilateral Commission</b></font> and of course was the single largest financial contributor to the “bush crime family”. “Kenny Boy” was what baby bush called him. Baby bush & Papa bush both used Lay’s corporate jet as their air limousine to go wherever they wanted. Even the bush dog once rode Kenny Boy’s jet when he went to the vet. Kenny is a long time made member of the "bush crime family" <b><font color="#d90000">The Bush's & Ken Lay-Peas In A Pod</b></font>

Download and watch the movie - Enron - The Smartest Guys In The Room - if you are confused or unaware of the herculean magnitude of Lay’s criminal actions. You’ll hear Enron traders laughing as they bankrupt senior citizens………GO STRAIGHT TO JAIL..Ken & Jeff.</font>

<font color="#d90000" size="4" face="arial black">Enron - The Smartest Guys In The Room avi</font>
 
SOB's are eligible for life sentences. Watch them get 10 years and serve only 6.
Probably will wind up at "Club Fed"
 
<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">
Enron Scandal Puts the GOP on Trial</font>
<font face="arial unicode ms, trebuchet ms, verdana" size="3" color="#000000"><b>

<img src="http://www.alternet.org/images/managed/Columnists_scheer.jpg">
By Robert Scheer

Posted on February 2, 2006</b>

http://www.alternet.org/story/31700/

Finally, after four years of legal maneuvering, the trial of Enron top dogs Ken Lay and Jeffrey Skilling opens a new window on the outrageous practices of our modern-day robber barons.

But it is depressing that the politicians who benefited from Lay's largess, and who enabled Enron's chicanery by changing the law, are going unpunished and even uncriticized. Indeed, the larger crime, in any proper moral dimension of that word, was committed in the rewriting of the law on corporate regulation to permit Enron's very existence as a humongous stock market swindler.

There simply would be no Enron story were it not for the deregulation of the energy market ushered in by Republican politicians, as Lay himself acknowledged freely in a 2000 interview when asked to explain the "common thread" in Enron's business model. "I think the common elements first are that, basically, we are entering markets or in markets that are deregulating or have recently deregulated, and so they have become competitive, moving from monopoly franchise-type businesses to competitive, market-oriented businesses," said Lay.

Enron's domination of those deregulated markets was made possible, to a large degree, through the work of the powerful Washington couple Phil Gramm, then-Republican senator from Texas, and his wife Wendy, then chair of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Perhaps predictably, neither Gramm has been charged with any crimes in connection with the Enron scandal, and both are barely mentioned in the two leading books on the scandal, by New York Times business writers. But their antics, well documented (pdf file) by the leading public-interest watchdog group, Public Citizen, are the key to understanding the Enron debacle.

Back in 1993, when Enron was an upstart energy trader and Wendy Gramm occupied the chair of the CFTC, she granted the company, the biggest contributor to her husband's political campaigns, a very valuable ruling exempting its trading in futures contracts from federal government regulation. She resigned her position six days later, not surprising given that she was a political appointee and Bill Clinton had just defeated her boss, the first President Bush.

Five weeks after her resignation, she was appointed to Enron's board of directors, where she served on the delinquent audit committee until the collapse of the company. There was perfect quid pro quo symmetry to Wendy Gramm's lucrative career: Bush appoints her to a government position where she secures Enron's profit margin; Lay, a close friend and political contributor to Bush, then takes care of her nicely once she leaves her government post. Although she holds a PhD in economics and often is cited as an expert on the deregulation policies she so ardently champions, Gramm insists that while serving on the audit committee she was ignorant of the corporation's accounting machinations.

Despite her myopia, or because of it, she was rewarded with more than $1 million in compensation.

A similar claim of ignorance of Enron's shenanigans is the defense of her husband, who received $260,000 in campaign contributions from Enron before he pushed through legislation exempting companies like Enron from energy trading regulation.

"This act," Public Citizen noted, "allowed Enron to operate an unregulated power auction -- EnronOnline -- that quickly gained control over a significant share of California's electricity and natural gas market."

The gaming of the California market, documented in grotesque detail in the e-mails of Enron traders, led to stalled elevators, hospitals without power and an enormous debt inflicted on the state's taxpayers. It was only after the uproar over California's rolling blackouts, which Enron helped engineer, that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finally re-imposed regulatory control -- and thereby began the ultimate unraveling of Enron's massive pyramid of fraud.

Because the second President Bush effectively stalled a more timely response by the FERC, Enron's demise came too late to prevent California from losing its shirt in its desperate attempt to keep the lights on. The state was forced to hurriedly sign price-gouging long-term energy contracts in order to prevent more damage.

And Bush, even at that late date, still attempted to save Enron by reversing the policy of the Clinton administration aimed at closing off foreign tax shelters of the type favored by the company's duplicitous executives. Bush, who received $1.14 million in campaign contributions from Enron, according to Public Citizen, couldn't understand why the company should not be allowed to have 874 subsidiaries located in offshore tax and bank havens.

As the trial reveals just how fraudulent those offshore Enron operations apparently were, keep in mind that this President Bush was most loath to clear out those refuges of corporate pirates.

</font>
 
<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">
THE AL CAPONE OF ELECTRICITY</font><font face="tahoma" size="4" color="#0000ff"><b>
Ken Lay Will Get Away with his Real Crimes</b></font>


<font face="georgia" size="3" color="#000000">
<b>
<img src="http://www.gregpalast.com/images/photo_greg.gif">
By GREG PALAST

May 24, 2006</b>

Al Capone cut throats, machine-gunned people to build his gang and went to jail -- for not filing his taxes properly. Likewise, Ken Lay, buccaneer of the power industry, will go down -- if the jury doesn't buy his alibi -- for not filing his SEC forms properly.
<table border="5" width="135" id="table1" cellspacing="4" cellpadding="4" bordercolorlight="#FF0000" bordercolordark="#FF0000" bgcolor="#000000" height="158" align=right>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.gregpalast.com/armedmadhouse/images/lay.jpg"></td>
</tr>
</table>


And just as Capone went up the river leaving us a permanent legacy of organized crime, so Lay, whether or not he's sent to the slammer, has left us, with the connivance of a few well-placed politicos, an electricity system that is little more than a playground for power-industry predators.

We've been here before. In the 1930s, a character named Samuel Insull created the first giant power holding companies. Insull played fast and loose with his account books, fast and loose with cash for politicians and pocketed millions by gouging electricity customers. Insull was indicted, like Lay, for crimes against his stockholders.

In 1933, President Roosevelt made Insull's power piracy a crime. FDR signed the Public Utility Holding Company Act and laws that capped the profit of electricity monopolies. The act required them to keep lights on by accounting for all maintenance expenses, barred &quot;trading&quot; electricity and, most important, banned donations by the power giants to politicians.

Fast-forward to January 2001. The George W. Bush administration, within 72 hours of his inauguration, issued an executive order lifting the Clinton Energy Department's effective ban on speculative trading in the California power market. The state was still in crisis, facing blackouts and 300 percent increases in power bills, the result of &quot;deregulating&quot; its electric system, as first suggested by Lay.

Instead of a &quot;free&quot; market, California's electricity bidding system became a fixed casino where Lay's operatives and a tight-knit cabal of corporate cronies jacked up prices through such tricks as &quot;death star,&quot; &quot;ricochet&quot; and &quot;kilowatt laundering.&quot;

In one instance, Enron &quot;sold&quot; the state 500 megawatts of electricity to go over a 15-megawatt line. Enron knew that sending that much power through those wires would have burned them to a crisp. To prevent this Enron-designed blackout, the state scrambled for other sources of electricity, which Enron and friends sold them at a big mark-up.

California's Independent System Operator put the cost to consumers of this &quot;gaming&quot; at $6.3 billion in a six-month period. Under the Roosevelt rules, when utilities were regulated to a fare-thee-well, the gaming rooms would have been busted.

Instead, the games have been institutionalized. For example, TXU, the corporate alias of Texas Utilities, has seen earnings per share rise 500 percent in five years. The reason: So-called deregulation allows the company to sell electricity at a price based on the sky-high cost of oil although much of its power is produced from cheaper coal or uranium. In effect, deregulation has become de-criminalization of price gouging.

Even more sinister than Bush's hasty executive order allowing Enron to resume speculation in the California power market was his appointment of Pat Wood as chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the government's electricity cops. The choice of Wood was suggested, in secret, by Enron.

This put Lay one step ahead of Al Capone who had to buy the cops. Lay just had them appointed.

Wood may have been as honest as the day is long, but on his watch, Enron and the industry treaded through the power market like Godzilla through a kindergarten. And it continues under a new chairman, also suggested by Enron.

What about the $6.3 billion filched from the wallets of California consumers, let alone the larger sums taken in by power profiteers nationwide? The Lay-blessed federal regulators barely batted an eye.

Lay's brainchild of deregulation was coupled with his other grand idea: a massive increase in industry largesse to politicians. By unsubtle, but perfectly legal, means around FDR's prohibition on political donations, Enron PACs and its executives became the top Bush funders.

Capone never lived to see armed robbery made legal. But Lay, even if convicted, can leave the courthouse for the Big House knowing power profiteering is now as legal as prayer. On July 14, 2005, Roosevelt's Public Utility Holding Company Act, bulwark of consumer protection, was repealed by a Congress fattened with utility industry cash.


<strong>-------</strong>
<em><strong>On June 6, Penguin Dutton will publish Greg Palast's new book,</em> Armed Madhouse: Dispatches From the Front Lines of the Class War. including the Project Censored Award-winning story of The Governator of California and the Enron chief, &quot;<strong>When Ahnold Got Lay'd.&quot;</strong><em><a href="http://www.gregpalast.com/armedmadhouse/preorder.html"> Order it today</a>

Palast, an internationally recognized expert on Enron and electricity market manipulation, is co-author of &quot;Democracy and Regulation,&quot; the United Nations guide to control of the utility industry.

View his investigative reports for Harper's Magazine and BBC Television's Newsnight at <a href="http://www.gregpalast.com">www.GregPalast.com</a></em>.
</font>
 
<font face="tahoma" size="4" color="#d90000">
Enron Movie Stream.
Illuminating & Amazing!!!
A Must See!!
A clinical expose about greed $$$$ .</font>

[wm]http://www.truthstream.org/video/othervid_Enron_The_Smartest_Guys_In_The_Room.wmv[/wm]
 
Last edited:
<IFRAME SRC="http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/05/news/newsmakers/lay_death/index.htm?cnn=yes" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/05/news/newsmakers/lay_death/index.htm?cnn=yes">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Last edited:
Enron's Skilling gets 24 years

All Reuters NewsHOUSTON (Reuters) - Former Enron Corp. chief executive Jeff Skilling was sentenced on Monday to more than 24 years in prison for leading a financial fraud that destroyed the company and came to symbolize a dark era for corporate America.

U.S. District Judge Sim Lake, in handing out the harshest sentence yet in the Enron saga, said Skilling's crimes "have imposed on hundreds if not thousands of people a lifetime of poverty."


SOURCE: http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?feed=OBR&Date=20061023&ID=6128353



_________________________________________________________________

Ken Lay's Nest Egg

Thousands of former Enron employees saw their retirement funds disappear when the energy giant collapsed--but Kenneth Lay has millions socked away in lawsuit-proof investments.

By Bill Hogan
February 21, 2002


Late last month, the wife of former Enron chairman Kenneth Lay tearfully told a national television audience that she and her husband were struggling to avoid personal bankruptcy following the collapse of the Houston energy-trading company. What Linda Lay failed to tell viewers of NBC's Today show, however, was that she and her husband had shifted millions in personal assets to investments that are beyond the reach of creditors or legal judgments.


SOURCE: http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2002/02/enron_insure.html
 
Enron's Skilling gets 24 years

October 24, 2006


All Reuters NewsHOUSTON (Reuters) - Former Enron Corp. chief executive Jeff Skilling was sentenced on Monday to more than 24 years in prison for leading a financial fraud that destroyed the company and came to symbolize a dark era for corporate America.

U.S. District Judge Sim Lake, in handing out the harshest sentence yet in the Enron saga, said Skilling's crimes "have imposed on hundreds if not thousands of people a lifetime of poverty."


SOURCE: http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?feed=OBR&Date=20061023&ID=6128353

<font size="5"><Center>Enron's Jeffrey Skilling Sentence Overturned</font size><font size="4">

Is Enron's Jeffrey Skilling a 2010 Scottsboro Boy?
Maybe not, but Justice Sonia Sotomayor uses his
unlikely defense before the Supreme Court to give
a primer on how to pick an unbiased jury.</font size></center>



The Root
By: Sherrilyn A. Ifill
June 26, 2010


If you're convicted after spending a reported $30 million on legal fees to keep from going to jail, it makes sense to go all in and take your case all the way up to the Supreme Court. It paid off for Jeffrey Skilling, who prevailed in challenging the constitutionality of the legal doctrine used to convict him in Houston for his role in the collapse of energy giant Enron.

A unanimous court led by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg held that the federal statute criminalizing "honest services fraud" was meant to target the receipt of bribes and kickbacks. The government's theory -- that Skilling violated the statute by misrepresenting the financial health of Enron to shareholders -- falls outside the scope of conduct that Congress intended to reach in enacting the statute. The Supreme Court chose not to overturn his conviction, but punted the case back to a lower court to determine whether Skilling should go free.


<font size="4">The Scottsboro Boys Defense</font size>

Most interesting, of course, was the Supreme Court's treatment of Jeffrey Skilling's "Scottsboro Boys" defense, in which the former CEO claims that:

<center><font size="3">he was convicted in what amounted
to a mob atmosphere in Houston.</font size>
</center>

<font size="3"]A little background:
In 1932's Powell v. Alabama, the Supreme Court overturned the conviction of several young black men who were falsely accused of raping two white women on a train, in part on the grounds that the mob atmosphere during the trial had denied the black defendants due process.​

Seventy-eight years later:
Skilling made a similar argument in his case, charging that the inflamed passions of jurors in Houston, where the Enron implosion decimated the pension funds of scores of Houstonians, had been stoked by portrayals of him in the media as guilty until proven innocent. Skilling argued that the judge had presided over a hasty and unfair process of juror voir dire, and had allowed several jurors with dubious claims to impartiality to serve.​
</font size>

It was a nervy argument to make. Jeffrey Skilling is not the image that comes to mind when most of us think about trial by mob. But you don't get to be CEO of one of the largest corporations in the United States without having some chutzpah, and Skilling's lawyers pressed this argument to some sympathetic ears at oral argument before the Supreme Court.


<font size="4">Justice Sotomayor Looked At the Judge's Conduct</font size>

Although a majority of the court ultimately rejected Skilling's argument that his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury had been violated, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a concurring opinion joined by Justices Stephen Breyer and the soon-to-depart John Paul Stevens, found that the judge did not properly ensure that Skilling faced an unbiased jury. On that basis alone, she would have granted Skilling a new trial. It was clear from oral argument in the case that Sotomayor was concerned about the juror-bias claim in Skilling's case. She expressed open incredulity that the juror voir dire had lasted only five hours (pdf).


In her opinion, Sotomayor focuses on the conduct of the trial judge in failing to take strong-enough measures to purge the jury pool of bias and to ensure the jury's impartiality. Sotomayor's experience as a former trial judge is on full display in her opinion, in which she painstakingly points out the district court's "anemic questioning" of prospective jurors who she contends "made written and oral comments suggesting active antipathy toward" Skilling.

Anyone who thinks it's not important to include former trial judges on the Supreme Court (and not just the usual lineup of former federal appellate judges) should read Sotomayor's point-by-point critique of the trial judge's voir dire in Skilling -- a voir dire she found rife with "deficiencies in form and content." Her dismantling of the trial judge's supervision of jury selection in the case may well become a kind of voir dire checklist for federal trial judges presiding over a high-profile criminal case in the future. After carefully reviewing the record, Sotomayor ultimately deems it "highly likely that at least some of the seated jurors harbored ... biases that a more probing inquiry would likely have exposed."

In some ways, Sotomayor's dissent is a bit tough to take. There's something very 21st century and a little too post-racial about Jeffrey Skilling as the latest "Scottsboro Boy." But fair is fair. And even millionaires are entitled to an unbiased jury. It's more important that Sotomayor has laid out clear direction to trial judges who should more aggressively safeguard the impartiality of the criminal tribunal for defendants, most of whom will not have $30 million at their disposal for their defense, and whose cases will likely never be heard by the Supreme Court.

Perhaps that's what is most disturbing about this case: that the Supreme Court agreed to hear it at all. The court takes fewer and fewer cases each year, and if it wanted to address the vagueness of the "honest services fraud" statute, it could have done so through the other case it decided that day, in which it vacated a conviction under that statute. But during the same term that the court decided to hear Skilling's case, it turned down Carruth v. Alabama, a case challenging the Alabama state court's determination that death row inmates have no right to counsel in cases they directly appeal to the Alabama Supreme Court. In 2008 the court refused to hear Barbour v. Haley, in which 40 indigent Alabama death row inmates challenged the state's failure to afford a right to counsel for death row prisoners in post-conviction review cases. What makes Skilling's challenge to the fairness of his trial more urgent than these?

Still, it's refreshing to read in Sotomayor's Skilling dissent an opinion that is filled with a practical, real-world assessment of what bias looks like, and the rigor it takes to uncover juror bias. Sotomayor, in this sense, brings a breath of fresh, trial-experienced air to a Supreme Court that too often ignores the significance of inferences and common sense in its naive search for the inevitable missing "smoking gun."


http://www.theroot.com/views/enron-jeffrey-skilling-scottsboro-boy?page=0,0
 
You really pulled this one back from the archives. I still don't believe Ken Lay is dead. I think he is living the life of a Potentate on a Brazilian Amazonian hidden plantation.
 
You really pulled this one back from the archives. I still don't believe Ken Lay is dead. I think he is living the life of a Potentate on a Brazilian Amazonian hidden plantation.

Well, LOL, if he is, he can come out now ! :lol:
 
Back
Top