Demorats cave again!!!!

PJN

Rising Star
BGOL Investor

From top left: Democratic Sens. Dick Durbin, Jacky Rosen, John Fetterman and Catherine Cortez Masto. From bottom left: Democratic Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, Maggie Hassan and Tim Kaine, with independent Sen. Angus King. - Getty Images/Reuters

From top left: Democratic Sens. Dick Durbin, Jacky Rosen, John Fetterman and Catherine Cortez Masto. From bottom left: Democratic Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, Maggie Hassan and Tim Kaine, with independent Sen. Angus King. - Getty Images/Reuters
More
A group of Democrats and one Democratic-aligned independent have helped clinch an agreement to end the government shutdown, saying they had secured a vote on the Affordable Care Act subsidies at the center of the standoff.

The negotiators argued that Republicans’ “flat refusal” to move on Democrats’ earlier proposals made clear that “this is the best possible offer we could secure.”

Here’s a look at some of those members, and their rationale for ending the shutdown.

Four of them are former governors of their home states and none are up for reelection in next year’s midterms.

Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois​

Durbin, a veteran member of Democratic leadership retiring at the end of his term, broke with Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who opposes the deal.

In a statement, Durbin said that “this bill is not perfect, but it takes important steps to reduce their shutdown’s hurt.”

He underscored the cost of the disruptions caused by the shutdown.

“For 40 days—the longest shutdown in U.S. history—federal workers went without paychecks. This includes our air traffic controllers, whose towers were already understaffed. They continued to work 10 hours days, six days per week to keep our airspace safe, with this additional stress at a life-saving job,” he said.

Sen. Angus King of Maine​

King, an independent, was just elected to a third term in 2024. While he caucuses with the Democrats, King has a penchant for bipartisan dealmaking and was also among the key negotiators expressing alarm about the consequences of the ongoing shutdown.

“The question was, is, as the shutdown progresses, is a solution on the ACA becoming any more likely? It appears not,” King said Sunday. “I think people are saying we’re not going to get what we want, although we still have a chance – because part of the deal is a vote on the ACA subsidies – but in the meantime, a lot of people are being hurt.”

Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia​

Angus King and  Tim Kaine are seen during a press conference following a vote on Capitol Hill in Washington DC, on November 9, 2025. - Anna Rose Layden/Getty Images

Angus King and Tim Kaine are seen during a press conference following a vote on Capitol Hill in Washington DC, on November 9, 2025. - Anna Rose Layden/Getty Images
Kaine was also elected to a third term in 2024. The former governor pointed to both ACA subsidies and efforts to defend the federal workforce, a key pressure point in his state, home to roughly 300,000 employees.



“I have long said that to earn my vote, we need to be on a path toward fixing Republicans’ health care mess and to protect the federal workforce,” Kaine said in a statement about the vote.

Kaine said the deal “guarantees a vote to extend Affordable Care Act premium tax credits,” and also that it “will protect federal workers from baseless firings, reinstate those who have been wrongfully terminated during the shutdown, and ensure federal workers receive back pay.”

Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania​

Fetterman, elected to the Senate in 2022, has been breaking with Democrats and voting for the House-passed short-term funding resolution. He said that the shutdown “has more than run its course.”

“If we have the votes, it’s probably going to be the minimum if it does,” he warned.

“Our party could be overplaying its hand,” he added. “I don’t think much anything has been accomplished for the last 40 days except a lot of chaos and a lot of upheaval.”

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire​

Shaheen has announced she would not seek reelection in 2026.

In a statement Sunday, Shaheen said that “waiting longer will only prolong the pain Americans are feeling because of the shutdown.”

“Let’s be clear: This is a major step that was not predetermined. I have spent years as the lead sponsor of this legislation. There is no one in the Senate who wants to see these tax credits extended more than me. But weeks of negotiations with Republicans have made clear that they will not address health care as part of shutdown talks,” Shaheen said.

Sen. Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire​

Maggie Hassan is seen during a press conference following a vote on Capitol Hill in Washington DC, on November 9, 2025. - Anna Rose Layden/Getty Images

Maggie Hassan is seen during a press conference following a vote on Capitol Hill in Washington DC, on November 9, 2025. - Anna Rose Layden/Getty Images
Hassan, another former governor, won reelection in 2022 to her swing-state seat. She told reporters that she had been hearing from residents both affected by looming spikes in health care costs and by people affected by the government shutdown.

“Our work to deliver relief for families now enters an important phase,” she said. “Congress has one month to engage in serious bipartisan negotiations to extend the Affordable Care Act’s expiring tax cuts that help people afford their health insurance.”

Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada​

Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, a Democrat from Nevada, left, and Senator Angus King, an Independent from Maine, at a news conference during a vote at the US Capitol in Washington DC, on November 9, 2025. - Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, a Democrat from Nevada, left, and Senator Angus King, an Independent from Maine, at a news conference during a vote at the US Capitol in Washington DC, on November 9, 2025. - Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg/Getty Images
More
Cortez Masto also voted to end the shutdown. Her term expires in 2028.

“Too many Americans, hardworking individuals, seniors, children were suffering,” she said at a press conference, adding that she was seeing lines at food banks that rivaled the need during the Covid-19 pandemic.

“We can open the government and we can still fight to address this looming health care crisis,” she added.

Sen. Jacky Rosen of Nevada​

Rosen, the other Democrat from Nevada, joined her colleague in voting to end the shutdown. She was reelected last year.

“Unfortunately, it’s become clear as we go deeper into the second month of this Republican government shutdown that President Trump and Washington Republicans are weaponizing their power in alarming ways to inflict unimaginable pain and suffering on working people, like fully withholding SNAP benefits and gutting our tourism industry by grinding air travel to a halt,” Rosen said in a statement.

What opponents are saying​

Many prominent members of the Democratic caucus opposed the deal and voiced ongoing concerns.

“I’m voting no on the continuing resolution that would double healthcare premiums for 20 million Americans, kick 15 million people off Medicaid & allow 50,000 Americans to die unnecessarily every year. All to give $1 trillion in tax breaks for billionaires,” Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders wrote on social media, live-streaming a speech opposing the deal.

Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego, who is eying a 2028 presidential bid, also said he was a firm “no.”

“There’s a phrase in Spanish, ‘Con salud, lo hay todo; sin salud, no hay nada.’ It means ‘With good health you have it all; without your health, you have nothing.’ It’s with that phrase in mind that I stand firm in my decision to vote no so that families across the country can get the health care they need,” Gallego said in a statement.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com
 
Actually this was smart. They will have republicans on record voting against extending ACA premium extensions.

All this while Americans will see their premiums go up.
And exactly what purpose does that serve?

This is some fucked up, dollar store kook-aid I refuse to sip.

They caved. They ALWAYS cave. They have been CAVING since CLINTON.

Who the hell cares if it is on record? This is cold comfort to someone who can't afford health care and needs it. It doesn't stock a pantry either.

This, frankly, is what apologists say in order to take one's mind off the fact they are getting rammed in the ass with a telephone pole. AGAIN.

Hi, Hoe, hi, Hoe. It's off the lurk I go...
 
Actually this was smart. They will have republicans on record voting against extending ACA premium extensions.

All this while Americans will see their premiums go up.

This American premimum has already gone up 20% so it's always fuck the other side for me......The first time ever my shit has gone up this much and I don't have a plan on the exchange.....
 
Last edited:
This American premimum has already gone up 20% so it's always fuck the other site for me......The first time ever my shit has gone up this much and I don't have a plan on the exchange.....
A direct result of the practice of the deadly art of Obama Fu: viciously beat your opponent in the knees with your nuts, until magically, bipartisanship ensues.

He FUCKED us ALL, as did the CORPORATE DEMOCRATS who had control of the presidency, the house, AND the senate, and REFUSED to allow health care for all to even be on the table.

So...I guess we are supposed to take solace in the fact they will have to VOTE to acknowledge the 25 foot dildo being shoved up our asses.

A nation of Chicken Georges, without nary a Kunta Kinte in sight. Sad.
 

Senators reach deal to reopen the government. And, countries gather for climate talks​

November 10, 20257:29 AM ET
By

Brittney Melton
Listen· 14:5814-Minute ListenPlaylist
Toggle more options

Good morning. You're reading the Up First newsletter. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to the Up First podcast for all the news you need to start your day.

Today's top stories​

A bipartisan group of senators reached a deal last night to reopen the government and end the longest shutdown in U.S. history. The vote on the first procedural step was 60 to 40, with seven Democrats and one independent joining most Republicans on the measure. The agreement would fund the government through Jan. 30.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) speaks to reporters following a vote on Capitol Hill on Nov. 9 in Washington, D.C.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) speaks to reporters following a vote on Capitol Hill on Nov. 9, 2025, in Washington, D.C. The Senate convened for a rare Sunday session in an attempt to end the government shutdown.
Anna Rose Layden/Getty Images
  • Along with the stopgap measure to fund the government, the Democrats who defected received a promise of a vote on health care, NPR's Claudia Grisales tells Up First. Some of the Democrats who voted no were furious about the defection. Sen. Elizabeth Warren stated that the defection was a terrible mistake and that the American people want them to fight for health care. The Senate has several hurdles to clear before the measure can be passed, and even then, it will need to pass the House.
The Trump administration now has two days to increase SNAP benefits from 65% to 100% after a federal appeals court refused a request to pause a lower court's orders to do so. The administration could ask the U.S. Supreme Court to get involved in the matter for the second time in just a few days. Another battle is unfolding involving states that have already paid out full benefits after a federal judge ordered it, but before the higher court said 'not so fast,' NPR's Tovia Smith says.

  • Much of these legal battles could be rendered moot with the expectation that when the government reopens, Congress can appropriate SNAP funding for the fiscal year. Smith says there is no certainty as to when families will receive the benefits after the shutdown ends, but in the past states motivated to get benefits flowing did so within a matter of days. When speaking with Americans who receive SNAP benefits, Smith has heard a sense of relief from some that they could soon receive the funds, and others have been cautiously hopeful.
World leaders are gathering in Brazil for the United Nations' annual climate summit, COP30, to negotiate the ongoing response to climate change. The event is expected to last about two weeks. This year, the United States will not take an active role in the discussions.

  • Some world leaders may be relieved that the U.S. might not show, as some are concerned that its presence could hamper the talks, according to NPR's Julia Simon. The U.S. is the second biggest polluter and will eventually need to come on board to help reach the climate goals. When it comes to tackling climate change, there are two major driving forces: politics, as exemplified by this summit, and economics, says Simon. The green economic transition is where a lot of good news for the planet is currently happening, from electric vehicles to solar power.

Cost of living​

A collage of images showing a data center, power lines and an electrical outlet.


Getty Images/Emily Bogle/NPR
NPR's series Cost of Living: The Price We Pay is examining what's driving price increases and how people are coping after years of stubborn inflation.

The price of electricity has increased 40% since February 2020, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The rise in demand for electricity is partly due to the proliferation of new data centers that support the growing artificial intelligence industry. Additionally, the price of natural gas, which is used to generate electricity, has gone up. Here's what else we know:

  • Demand for electricity is expected to grow 2.2% this year and 2.4% next year, according to the Energy Department.
  • Utilities projects that building new power supplies and a more resilient grid will exceed a trillion dollars over the next five years. If data centers receive a price break, residential customers may take on some of their costs.
  • Electricity costs can be reduced by adjusting consumption times and locations. The highest rates occur during peak demand, such as on the hottest days of summer.
Listen to why AI is partly to blame for your electricity bill going up. This week, the series will explore how we spend money and strategies for navigating complex financial situations that can affect relationships. Stay up-to-date on the latest stories here.

How are higher prices changing the way you live? Fill out this form to share your story with NPR.

Life advice​

An illustration shows two adult parents swimming in a pool from a low angle. They are surrounded by floating icons from various social media apps, including Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, email, and cloud storage. From the low angle, you can see two children standing at the edge of the pool above the water, reaching down into the pool to try to pull their parents out of the pool and into the real world.


Olga Aleksandrova for NPR
If you want your child to have a healthy relationship with technology and smartphones, it's important for parents to model good habits. A study published in 2024 found that one of the strongest predictors of a child's screen time is their parents' screen time. While it can be challenging for parents to limit screen time due to much of the work to manage the home being online, practicing moderation can set a positive example.

  • If you are with your family and would prefer to be off your device, ask yourself if that task is urgent. If it is not, save that to-do for another time.
  • Focus less on assessing the quantity of your screen time, but the quality. After your observations of what is actually beneficial, identify how you can make healthier tweaks to your screen time.
  • Create device-free zones in your home and schedule. Many parents ban devices during mealtime. You can also implement this rule during a movie night or on vacations.
For tips on how parents can be screentime role models for their children, listen to this episode of NPR's Life Kit. Subscribe to the Life Kit newsletter for expert advice on love, money, relationships and more.

3 things to know before you go​

The 729-foot ore boat Edmund Fitzgerald, shown in 1972 file photo, in Marie, Mich.

The 729-foot ore boat Edmund Fitzgerald, shown in 1972 file photo, in Marie, Mich.
Bettmann Archive/Getty Images
  1. Fifty years ago today, the Edmund Fitzgerald, a 729-foot ore boat, sank in the Great Lakes. The ship was immortalized in a surprise hit folk ballad by Gordon Lightfoot in 1976. The song is now cherished by the families of sailors who died.
  2. Are you interested in volunteering at the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles? Registration is now open, and here is what you need to know. (via LAist)
  3. James Watson, who co-discovered the structure of DNA, died last week at the age of 97.
This newsletter was edited by Yvonne Dennis.

https://www.npr.org/2025/11/10/g-s1-97152/up-first-newsletter-government-shutdown-snap-benefits-cop30
 
Dems were never going to get what they wanted. This shut down would have gone on for months . I dont see any alternative. People not getting paid for months would cause total chaos
So does large numbers of people unable to buy food.

MOST bankruptcies in the USA are the result of medical debt. NO other country can make this claim.

What do (did/would) we have to lose if the democrats were not sharing one pair of balls among 10-20 so-called men and actually FOUGHT for the people the CLAIM to be standing up for?

Since when is "standing up" the same as laying prone, sphincter open?
 
If they were going to knuckle under and capitulate, why didn't they do it in the beginning? Why allow 40 days of needless suffering just to give in midstream? This has Chuck Schumer's sorry, pathetic hands all over it. He knows Democratic voters are beyond done with him after his last act of gutlessness ended the last shutdown. So, he convinced all the senators who are either soon retiring or those who won't have to face the voters again for 4-5 years to do the dirty work for him, while giving himself the appearance of standing strong and not giving a YES vote. Unfortunately, without a knowledgeable voting base and with a useless media, he'll slip slide out of this without facing the anger and the rage he truly deserves.
 
These cowardly eight Senators just killed the ACA. Sure, the Republicans will allow a vote on subsidy funding, but that vote will fail simply because Democrats don't have the numbers to overcome a simple majority vote. Just when I think Democrats are finally showing a backbone eight of them showed jellyfish have studier spines.
 
These cowardly eight Senators just killed the ACA. Sure, the Republicans will allow a vote on subsidy funding, but that vote will fail simply because Democrats don't have the numbers to overcome a simple majority vote. Just when I think Democrats are finally showing a backbone eight of them showed jellyfish have studier spines.
I am supposed to be lurking, but I have to address this.

The ACA was not your friend. Instead of fighting for government provided health care for every citizen (even Costa Rica and Panama have this!), Obama, Pelosi, and the usual suspects decided to give an Obsession-esque blow job to the insurance industry, at the expense of the American people, by "allowing" us to buy "affordable" health care.

This is absolute BULLSHIT, and the American public is the ONLY public (except maybe Poland) stupid enough to fall for it.

Now, even the "privilege" to give the insurance industry a blow job is threatened. Only certain moneyed individuals need apply, and you STILL will have a deductible higher that Bob Marley in the middle of the Babylon by Bus tour.

Just sayin'.
 
And exactly what purpose does that serve?

This is some fucked up, dollar store kook-aid I refuse to sip.

They caved. They ALWAYS cave. They have been CAVING since CLINTON.

Who the hell cares if it is on record? This is cold comfort to someone who can't afford health care and needs it. It doesn't stock a pantry either.

This, frankly, is what apologists say in order to take one's mind off the fact they are getting rammed in the ass with a telephone pole. AGAIN.

Hi, Hoe, hi, Hoe. It's off the lurk I go...
So then continue the shutdown?
 
I am supposed to be lurking, but I have to address this.

The ACA was not your friend. Instead of fighting for government provided health care for every citizen (even Costa Rica and Panama have this!), Obama, Pelosi, and the usual suspects decided to give an Obsession-esque blow job to the insurance industry, at the expense of the American people, by "allowing" us to buy "affordable" health care.

This is absolute BULLSHIT, and the American public is the ONLY public (except maybe Poland) stupid enough to fall for it.

Now, even the "privilege" to give the insurance industry a blow job is threatened. Only certain moneyed individuals need apply, and you STILL will have a deductible higher that Bob Marley in the middle of the Babylon by Bus tour.

Just sayin'.

Sorry but I disagree. The ACA was definetly the friend of the 40 million people that can now afford insurance. It was a step in the right direction which is government funded healthcare. It got us closer to the ultimate goal of single payer healthcare or medicare for all. But yes all the compromises left it expensive and uncertain. And yes as long as insurance companies have the control of our government we won't be able to cut them out totally. And yes it's just a huge check for insurers BUT no more pre-existing conditions. They now have to charge old people a reasonable price. We can't act like the insurance envrionment after ACA was not better than before ACA.
 
Sorry but I disagree. The ACA was definetly the friend of the 40 million people that can now afford insurance. It was a step in the right direction which is government funded healthcare. It got us closer to the ultimate goal of single payer healthcare or medicare for all. But yes all the compromises left it expensive and uncertain. And yes as long as insurance companies have the control of our government we won't be able to cut them out totally. And yes it's just a huge check for insurers BUT no more pre-existing conditions. They now have to charge old people a reasonable price. We can't act like the insurance envrionment after ACA was not better than before ACA.
The plantation owner has found a way to offload all of his responsibilities onto the slave. When they used to throw our food into the dirt, it was Massa that was responsible for buying de-worming medication for his most productive slaves.
 
Sorry but I disagree. The ACA was definetly the friend of the 40 million people that can now afford insurance. It was a step in the right direction which is government funded healthcare. It got us closer to the ultimate goal of single payer healthcare or medicare for all. But yes all the compromises left it expensive and uncertain. And yes as long as insurance companies have the control of our government we won't be able to cut them out totally. And yes it's just a huge check for insurers BUT no more pre-existing conditions. They now have to charge old people a reasonable price. We can't act like the insurance envrionment after ACA was not better than before ACA.

Disagree all you want.

You are still WRONG.

Waiting for all the "steps" to be complete does NOTHING for someone with a debilitating disease NOW.

There is NO excuse, ZERO, NONE, ZILCH, for the wealthiest country in the world to be the ONLY developed nation NOT to provide health care to its citizens. This is BASIC.

Conceding that insurance companies have control of our government, and accepting it complacently, is like accepting slavery, because the other folks are in control. THIS is why we FAIL. Too many Americans are willing to accept a half filled cup of piss to drink in lieu of a clean, full glass of water.

Put the red cup own. That Kook-aid ain't good for you.
 
I am supposed to be lurking, but I have to address this.

The ACA was not your friend. Instead of fighting for government provided health care for every citizen (even Costa Rica and Panama have this!), Obama, Pelosi, and the usual suspects decided to give an Obsession-esque blow job to the insurance industry, at the expense of the American people, by "allowing" us to buy "affordable" health care.

This is absolute BULLSHIT, and the American public is the ONLY public (except maybe Poland) stupid enough to fall for it.

Now, even the "privilege" to give the insurance industry a blow job is threatened. Only certain moneyed individuals need apply, and you STILL will have a deductible higher that Bob Marley in the middle of the Babylon by Bus tour.

Just sayin'.

Tell that to the 27 million poor people and those with preexisting health conditions whom prior to the ACA were unable to get health insurance.
The ACA certainly is not a panacea and premiums are too high, thanks to Republican unwillingness to reign in insurance companies, but it was and is better than nothing.

What is needed is universal single payer health insurance but the GOP, insurance companies and stupid Americans who see that as evil socialism were in 2010 and still are fighting tooth and nail to keep that from becoming a reality. But you shitting on the ACA without taking into consideration the obstructive tactics placed upon it by bought and paid for politicians and greedy insurance company execs misses the mark and serves no purpose.
 
Last edited:
Did the Democrats at least push the affordable Care act premiums until next year or something? If not they did all this shit for nothing
 
There is NO excuse, ZERO, NONE, ZILCH, for the wealthiest country in the world to be the ONLY developed nation NOT to provide health care to its citizens. This is BASIC.

Conceding that insurance companies have control of our government, and accepting it complacently, is like accepting slavery, because the other folks are in control. THIS is why we FAIL. Too many Americans are willing to accept a half filled cup of piss to drink in lieu of a clean, full glass of water.

Put the red cup own. That Kook-aid ain't good for you.
Sure there is an excuse for the wealthiest country in the world to NOT offer healthcare to its citizens...It rhymes with capitalism!!! The same reason why you can go to Mexico and get the same drugs at a FRACTION of the price when compared to prices here. You mention this and all of a sudden you hate small business, America and don't support jobs.

This keeps happening because we have A LOT of money in our politicians pockets.
 
It doesn't but it shows how week the Democratic coalition is. And it's all because of MODERATES. I want us to understand when we talk that electability bullshit this is what we get. The moderates cave first.
It's exactly why i believe this deal was reached just so the moderates could protect the filibuster.
 
Is anybody REALLY surprised?!?!?! The letters that had gone out that the ACA had gone up wasn't in stone. They could have gone back to previous prices. But now they're more than likely going forward

They reopened on the "promise" that they will vote for the ACA pricing in January. I mean these guys are like battered spouses! 'Nah baby, I PROMISE I won't put my hands on you ever again. The first 30 times I beat you has made me a new man! I am no longer a fighter, because of your love I am now a LOVER!!!!'

As a person that wasn't on SNAP or using the ACA, I sit from a very privileged spot. So I am "mad", but not mad at the same time.


Boycott the holidays! Don't spend your money on gifts at stores that aren't black owned. Or if you have to try using sites like eBay to buy your gifts. Most of that stuff is brand new anyway and the company has already got their money for what you're buying so they aren't getting more money.
 
They did try to get Republicans to agree to a one-year subsidy extension but of course the assholes said no. :mad:
What does that mean? That means our healthcare will quadruple? If so, what was the point of holding out for the shutdown?

The Republicans were already lying blaming the entire shutdown on the Democrats, to fold and concede everything and receive nothing makes it fucking pointless
 
Back
Top