Could you be in a multiple partner relationship? Is polygamy the future?
- Thread starter NewYorkPrince
- Start date
It was the norm back in the day and still the norm in certain cultures. If you can afford it and find partners that can make it work why not
sidebar: you can bet that some fags here are in multiple partner relationships.... like an "Animal House" of fags
These weirdos going to push the women with multple husband shit due to the 
"patriarchy". Not the version men with multiple women that transcends time(all of human history) and space(all the continents).
Funny how all the degenerate shit is pushed, but not men with multiple women.
"patriarchy". Not the version men with multiple women that transcends time(all of human history) and space(all the continents).Funny how all the degenerate shit is pushed, but not men with multiple women.
Because they love emasculatingThese weirdos going to push the women with multple husband shit due to the
Funny how all the degenerate shit is pushed, but not men with multiple women.
Only unmarried niggas talk shit about having twp wives. Let see, 2 anniversaries, 2 birthdays, 2 other gits blah, blah, blah.
As I have stated before, I don't want 2 wives, I just want my wife to let me fuck my side bitches when I want too.
As I have stated before, I don't want 2 wives, I just want my wife to let me fuck my side bitches when I want too.
Polygamy, huh...?
I find it fascinating that it's always the same dudes who can't handle one woman, who're dreaming about having two.
And what's funnier is that when this topic comes up here, (2-3 times a year) there's always someone who'll quickly shout out:
- That's how older civilizations lived.
- It's normal in the animal kingdom.
Or my personal favorite...
- Most people are in polygamous relationships now, and don't even know it.
Meanwhile, we've got this racist piece of shit who is actively trying to become president by LITERALLY stripping Black people of their rights and making it illegal to teach Black history in schools...
But hey, refusing to vote & fucking multiple women is what's truly important in the Black community and will save us all, right...? 
I find it fascinating that it's always the same dudes who can't handle one woman, who're dreaming about having two.
And what's funnier is that when this topic comes up here, (2-3 times a year) there's always someone who'll quickly shout out:
- That's how older civilizations lived.
- It's normal in the animal kingdom.
Or my personal favorite...
- Most people are in polygamous relationships now, and don't even know it.
Meanwhile, we've got this racist piece of shit who is actively trying to become president by LITERALLY stripping Black people of their rights and making it illegal to teach Black history in schools...
Last edited:
Not knowingly.
Bruh I have a very close friend and she asked me if her n I could do that with my wife and I said nope..my wife nah.. she said u didn't even ask her.. I said naw I didn't but I dont have to... all I have to do is know my wife...and she is wayy to jealous! Even after all this time of us being married she still be jealous...so how do u think she would feel me bringing up something like that.. shitted I would be lucky if I wake up...
Blunt back with his sassy feminist bullshitPolygamy, huh...?
I find fascinating that it's always the same dudes who can't handle one woman, who're dreaming about having two.
And what's funnier is that when this topic comes up here, (2-3 times a year) there's always someone who'll quickly shout out:
- That's how older civilizations lived.
- It's normal in the animal kingdom.
Or my personal favorite...
- Most people are in polygamous relationships now, and don't even know it.
Meanwhile, we've got this racist piece of shit who is actively trying to become president by LITERALLY stripping Black people of their rights and making it illegal to teach Black history in schools...
But hey, refusing to vote & fucking multiple women is what's truly important in the Black community and will save us all, right...?
Yeah.
You must be right.
'Cuz only a feminist like "Blunt" would point out that Black people are losing their rights and being "erased" from history, right...?
Clearly, what's important to you is dreaming of getting
Feminine fag energy from a 58 year old cac from Boston. Life ain’t Black and white . You can be concerned with more than one thing at a time . Then again I’m not sure why a white boy like you is worried about Black issues anyways. Only a bitch thinks all men are built the same. Some men can handle multiple women others like yourself who are frail and emotional can’t. Stay in your lane wingding.Yeah.
You must be right.
'Cuz only a feminist like "Blunt" would point out that Black people are losing their rights and being "erased" from history, right...?
Clearly, what's important to you is dreaming of gettingsomemore pussy...
Shit. I could have came in here talking about illegals displacing black residents in Chicago and other places while the MSM ignores it, how the black community has been actively replaced for decades, how the community's household income is behind, Asians, whites, and even fucking Hispanics. The list goes on.Polygamy, huh...?
I find it fascinating that it's always the same dudes who can't handle one woman, who're dreaming about having two.
And what's funnier is that when this topic comes up here, (2-3 times a year) there's always someone who'll quickly shout out:
- That's how older civilizations lived.
- It's normal in the animal kingdom.
Or my personal favorite...
- Most people are in polygamous relationships now, and don't even know it.
Meanwhile, we've got this racist piece of shit who is actively trying to become president by LITERALLY stripping Black people of their rights and making it illegal to teach Black history in schools...
But hey, refusing to vote & fucking multiple women is what's truly important in the Black community and will save us all, right...?
But I realize that people can multitask. We can talk about entertainment, sports(argue who is GOAT til the end of time), and all types of shit.
With people now being called transphobic if they don't want to date dudes cosplaying as women, this topic is a valid topic. If people can make major cases about fucking pronouns, BGOL cats can talk about polygamy. And a number of cats here are in relationships where women are cool with the setup. Provide and protect my man, some women dig it.
Yeah.
You must be right.
'Cuz only a feminist like "Blunt" would point out that Black people are losing their rights and being "erased" from history, right...?
Clearly, what's important to you is dreaming of gettingsomemore pussy...
I can certainly understand the accusation but disagree with it.
You've been around before Blunt, but your writing style echoes similarities in more ways than one. I've always wanted to comment on this, but I couldn't quite remember where I noticed that writing style until @Dr. Truth pointed it out.
LOL! DeSantis can't win his own party let alone the Presidential election. Donors started bailing the moment he started to try to rewrite history. White people care taking care of that problem.Polygamy, huh...?
I find it fascinating that it's always the same dudes who can't handle one woman, who're dreaming about having two.
And what's funnier is that when this topic comes up here, (2-3 times a year) there's always someone who'll quickly shout out:
- That's how older civilizations lived.
- It's normal in the animal kingdom.
Or my personal favorite...
- Most people are in polygamous relationships now, and don't even know it.
Meanwhile, we've got this racist piece of shit who is actively trying to become president by LITERALLY stripping Black people of their rights and making it illegal to teach Black history in schools...
But hey, refusing to vote & fucking multiple women is what's truly important in the Black community and will save us all, right...?
A black prosecutor has a rico indictment on the other boogie man. We ain't helpless and definitely don't need your help when it comes to helping ourselves.
Other than dethroning him from his perch in Florida, what should we do. If your answer is to go with Notherburger Biden then you are lost.
Spreading fear does nothing but cause confusion. ADOS/FBA are waking up to the facts that the Democrats are nothing but fake ass elite white people in new clothes.
They are simply here to steal government money and contracts from the people of whatever jurisdiction they occupy. You"ll get 10 cent on the dollar ROI just like your French colonized counterparts in Niger and Sahara Africa.
The biggest theives on the planet and you are content getting cucked and spreading fear for no reason.
Seems time consuming.
But if that that’s yo thang, then do what you do.
I’m good with traditional. Less time dealing with other people’s bullshit and more focus on what I’m trying to accomplish in life.
But if that that’s yo thang, then do what you do.
I’m good with traditional. Less time dealing with other people’s bullshit and more focus on what I’m trying to accomplish in life.
You mean paid off for his wife.. she get multiple orgasm from diff dudes and found a fall guy to buy her house
I think that "Polygyny" (males with multiple females) would be the natural order of things if white people didn't impose their laws, ethics, and moral beliefs onto people of color.
The way the economy is going, I think the wise are going to consider it as a viable way of living. It's tough to make it with two incomes today. Three incomes is a lot better than two.
If you're a millennial, I have no clue how you're going to make it in this economic climate being solo. You can't even think about buying a house... Shit, piece of shit cars are upwards of $25K.
If you're a mature person, and can get pass jealously, there are some advantages to practicing polygyny. Multiple people cooking, cleaning, and doing other daily chores/maintenance. Multiple adults can take care of the children. Multiple income was noted above already. I can see it for some.
For those who just want it for the perceived sexual benefits, I don't think it'll work out too well.
The way the economy is going, I think the wise are going to consider it as a viable way of living. It's tough to make it with two incomes today. Three incomes is a lot better than two.
If you're a millennial, I have no clue how you're going to make it in this economic climate being solo. You can't even think about buying a house... Shit, piece of shit cars are upwards of $25K.
If you're a mature person, and can get pass jealously, there are some advantages to practicing polygyny. Multiple people cooking, cleaning, and doing other daily chores/maintenance. Multiple adults can take care of the children. Multiple income was noted above already. I can see it for some.
For those who just want it for the perceived sexual benefits, I don't think it'll work out too well.
Or just get a wife who's cool with bringing in another chick for threesomes on occasions. You'd be surprised what your wife/girlfriend would be cool with if you just keep it 100.
I'm just joking. I prefer not to bring anyone in. I'm retired out the game
Wow...
- Hostility.
- Name calling.
- Overly emotional.
- Making baseless accusations.
I said it before.
I'll say it again:
Seeking Sister Wife
Season 5 Official Trailer
Debuts March 9, 2024
Season 5 Official Trailer
Debuts March 9, 2024
Florida man arrested for having 3 wives in 3 different counties
Women say there were not adequate safeguards to prevent it, since counties don't share information about wedding license applications
By: Adam Walser
May 01, 2025
www.abcactionnews.com
Michele and Henry Betsey on their wedding day in November 2019
Henry Betsey, Jr. celebrating his marriage to Brandi in 2022. They were married in Jacksonville, FL, after obtaining a marriage license in Gadsden County.
Michele Narens said she learned about Henry's other marriages when she got a call from another wife in 2024.
Henry's wives found his profile on Bumble seeking other women while he was still married to all three of them
Two of Henry's wives requested and received domestic violence protection orders
Henry Betsey, Jr., was charged with bigamy in Hernando County last year. He has pleaded "not guilty" and the case is still in court.
Women say there were not adequate safeguards to prevent it, since counties don't share information about wedding license applications
By: Adam Walser
May 01, 2025
Florida man arrested for having 3 wives in 3 different counties
A Florida man managed to marry three different women he met on dating sites in three different Florida counties.
www.abcactionnews.com
Michele and Henry Betsey on their wedding day in November 2019
Henry Betsey, Jr. celebrating his marriage to Brandi in 2022. They were married in Jacksonville, FL, after obtaining a marriage license in Gadsden County.
Michele Narens said she learned about Henry's other marriages when she got a call from another wife in 2024.
Henry's wives found his profile on Bumble seeking other women while he was still married to all three of them
Two of Henry's wives requested and received domestic violence protection orders
Henry Betsey, Jr., was charged with bigamy in Hernando County last year. He has pleaded "not guilty" and the case is still in court.
Utah Lowers Penalty for Polygamy, No Longer a Felony
An amendment that went into effect this week allows polygamy to be punished as an infraction in some cases, but it remains a felony if force, threats or other abuses are involved.
By Christine Hauser
Published May 13, 2020
Updated July 10, 2020
www.nytimes.com
A new law that took effect in Utah this week has lowered the punishment for polygamy in some cases, making it an infraction similar to a traffic summons instead of a felony punishable by a prison term.
Under Senate Bill 102, which was signed into law by Gov. Gary R. Herbert in March and went into effect on Tuesday, a married person can now take additional spouses at the same time and not be subjected to felony charges, as long as the new spouse entered into the union voluntarily.
But a polygamous marriage is still a felony if it was made by threats, fraud or force or involves abuse. Second-degree felonies can carry prison terms of up to 15 years. Barring other factors, polygamy is now an infraction, which can draw fines of up to $750 and community service.
When it was passed by the State Legislature in February, the bill exposed the debate over multiple marriages in Utah, which is believed to be the state with the highest population of polygamists.
Sound Choices Coalition, a group that opposes forced polygamous marriages, called it an “abhorrent” move “supporting a form of modern-day sex slavery.”
“Most who are living in these fundamentalist polygamous groups and families are treated as property, forced to work without pay, traded as daughters, coerced into having unwanted sex, and into giving birth to numerous children they cannot care for,” the group, which includes women who have fled polygamous unions, said in a statement.
But supporters of the bill, whose primary sponsor was State Senator Deidre M. Henderson, a Republican, said it would help people who have been coerced into such arrangements, or who have endured or witnessed abuse, by removing the fear of being prosecuted themselves because they are in a plural marriage.
“We did not legalize bigamy,” Ms. Henderson said in an interview on Wednesday. “We simply removed the fear of otherwise law-abiding polygamists of being jailed or having their children taken away from them.”
“The intent is to lower the barrier to socialization,” she said. “It is not a short-term solution.”
The new law represents a shift in how the state can prosecute polygamous marriages, whose roots in the region can be traced to tenets of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
In 1890, the church formally abandoned the practice of marriage of more than one woman to the same man, and does not consider those who engage in polygamy to be members.
But plural marriages are still practiced by fundamentalist sects and groups that have splintered from the church.
Over the years, cases in Utah have demonstrated that polygamists were less inclined to seek outside help over serious matters such as child abuse and domestic violence because they feared that they could be prosecuted as felons.
In 2001, Tom Green, a Utah husband of five and father of 29, was convicted on charges of bigamy, causing anxiety among the state’s polygamists that prosecutors would be eager to bring them to trial on the same charges, The New York Times reported.
The Utah attorney general at the time, Mark Shurtleff, said he favored reducing the charge of bigamy to a misdemeanor from a felony to encourage people to provide information about serious crimes in polygamous families.
In 2013, a federal judge struck down parts of Utah’s anti-polygamy law as unconstitutional in a case brought by Kody Brown, who, along with his four wives and 17 children, starred in the reality TV show “Sister Wives.”
The judge, Clark Waddoups, found that part of the law prohibiting “cohabitation,” the language used to restrict polygamous relationships, violated the First Amendment guarantee of free exercise of religion, as well as constitutional due process. But Judge Waddoups left standing the state’s ability to prohibit multiple marriages “in the literal sense” of having two or more valid marriage licenses.
Ms. Henderson, the bill’s chief sponsor, said polygamists who have been prosecuted in recent years have been charged for other crimes, not for bigamy.
Warren S. Jeffs, the former professed prophet of a polygamous fundamentalist sect, was sentenced to life in prison in 2011 for the sexual assault of underage girls whom he took as his brides.
Mr. Jeffs’s brother, Lyle Jeffs, who ran the church’s financial affairs, was arrested in 2017 and charged with fraud.
State Representative Jeffrey D. Stenquist, who voted against the amendment in February, said he had heard from victims and their advocates who said they did not want any reduction in the bigamy charge.
“There are still obvious penalties for abuse, but some felt this was taking away one element that helped them feel emboldened to come forward,” Mr. Stenquist, a Republican, said on Wednesday. “There was an additional criminal penalty that could be applied.”
But Connor Boyack, president of the Libertas Institute in Utah, a libertarian-leaning think tank that worked with Ms. Henderson and other supporters of the bill, said removing the specter of felony arrest takes away the ability of abusers to use it to intimidate people into silence.
“Pushing people into the shadows of society allows these abusers to get away with harming people too scared to report such abuse to the public,” Mr. Boyack said in an interview on Wednesday. “Warren Jeffs weaponized Utah’s law” by telling followers the government would take their children away, he added.
“That is the climate where abuse has been allowed to percolate,” Mr. Boyack said. “That is why we felt changing the law was so important.”
If you look at he map, it's illegal in areas where the Catholic Church has heavy dominance
An amendment that went into effect this week allows polygamy to be punished as an infraction in some cases, but it remains a felony if force, threats or other abuses are involved.
By Christine Hauser
Published May 13, 2020
Updated July 10, 2020
Utah Lowers Penalty for Polygamy, No Longer a Felony (Published 2020)
An amendment that went into effect this week allows polygamy to be punished as an infraction in some cases, but it remains a felony if force, threats or other abuses are involved.
A new law that took effect in Utah this week has lowered the punishment for polygamy in some cases, making it an infraction similar to a traffic summons instead of a felony punishable by a prison term.
Under Senate Bill 102, which was signed into law by Gov. Gary R. Herbert in March and went into effect on Tuesday, a married person can now take additional spouses at the same time and not be subjected to felony charges, as long as the new spouse entered into the union voluntarily.
But a polygamous marriage is still a felony if it was made by threats, fraud or force or involves abuse. Second-degree felonies can carry prison terms of up to 15 years. Barring other factors, polygamy is now an infraction, which can draw fines of up to $750 and community service.
When it was passed by the State Legislature in February, the bill exposed the debate over multiple marriages in Utah, which is believed to be the state with the highest population of polygamists.
Sound Choices Coalition, a group that opposes forced polygamous marriages, called it an “abhorrent” move “supporting a form of modern-day sex slavery.”
“Most who are living in these fundamentalist polygamous groups and families are treated as property, forced to work without pay, traded as daughters, coerced into having unwanted sex, and into giving birth to numerous children they cannot care for,” the group, which includes women who have fled polygamous unions, said in a statement.
But supporters of the bill, whose primary sponsor was State Senator Deidre M. Henderson, a Republican, said it would help people who have been coerced into such arrangements, or who have endured or witnessed abuse, by removing the fear of being prosecuted themselves because they are in a plural marriage.
“We did not legalize bigamy,” Ms. Henderson said in an interview on Wednesday. “We simply removed the fear of otherwise law-abiding polygamists of being jailed or having their children taken away from them.”
“The intent is to lower the barrier to socialization,” she said. “It is not a short-term solution.”
The new law represents a shift in how the state can prosecute polygamous marriages, whose roots in the region can be traced to tenets of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
In 1890, the church formally abandoned the practice of marriage of more than one woman to the same man, and does not consider those who engage in polygamy to be members.
But plural marriages are still practiced by fundamentalist sects and groups that have splintered from the church.
Over the years, cases in Utah have demonstrated that polygamists were less inclined to seek outside help over serious matters such as child abuse and domestic violence because they feared that they could be prosecuted as felons.
In 2001, Tom Green, a Utah husband of five and father of 29, was convicted on charges of bigamy, causing anxiety among the state’s polygamists that prosecutors would be eager to bring them to trial on the same charges, The New York Times reported.
The Utah attorney general at the time, Mark Shurtleff, said he favored reducing the charge of bigamy to a misdemeanor from a felony to encourage people to provide information about serious crimes in polygamous families.
In 2013, a federal judge struck down parts of Utah’s anti-polygamy law as unconstitutional in a case brought by Kody Brown, who, along with his four wives and 17 children, starred in the reality TV show “Sister Wives.”
The judge, Clark Waddoups, found that part of the law prohibiting “cohabitation,” the language used to restrict polygamous relationships, violated the First Amendment guarantee of free exercise of religion, as well as constitutional due process. But Judge Waddoups left standing the state’s ability to prohibit multiple marriages “in the literal sense” of having two or more valid marriage licenses.
Ms. Henderson, the bill’s chief sponsor, said polygamists who have been prosecuted in recent years have been charged for other crimes, not for bigamy.
Warren S. Jeffs, the former professed prophet of a polygamous fundamentalist sect, was sentenced to life in prison in 2011 for the sexual assault of underage girls whom he took as his brides.
Mr. Jeffs’s brother, Lyle Jeffs, who ran the church’s financial affairs, was arrested in 2017 and charged with fraud.
State Representative Jeffrey D. Stenquist, who voted against the amendment in February, said he had heard from victims and their advocates who said they did not want any reduction in the bigamy charge.
“There are still obvious penalties for abuse, but some felt this was taking away one element that helped them feel emboldened to come forward,” Mr. Stenquist, a Republican, said on Wednesday. “There was an additional criminal penalty that could be applied.”
But Connor Boyack, president of the Libertas Institute in Utah, a libertarian-leaning think tank that worked with Ms. Henderson and other supporters of the bill, said removing the specter of felony arrest takes away the ability of abusers to use it to intimidate people into silence.
“Pushing people into the shadows of society allows these abusers to get away with harming people too scared to report such abuse to the public,” Mr. Boyack said in an interview on Wednesday. “Warren Jeffs weaponized Utah’s law” by telling followers the government would take their children away, he added.
“That is the climate where abuse has been allowed to percolate,” Mr. Boyack said. “That is why we felt changing the law was so important.”
If you look at he map, it's illegal in areas where the Catholic Church has heavy dominance