Bolivia Presidential Candidate: I'm U.S. Worst Nightmare

Makkonen said:
morales campaigned on a hardline antidrug stance- he refuses to accept us drug war aid which leaves his nation open to more outside influence than he prefers

A hardline anti-drug stance?
:smh:

You must be sniffing some Bolivian coke....


The guy, WHO JUST SO HAPPENS TO BE A FORMER COKE GROWER, has said that he is going to legalize growing coke for...TEA :confused:

C'mon, you sound foolish here but let's not delve into the realm of stupidity and ignorance.... :rolleyes:



Makkonen said:
drugs and criminality are big bad issues for our people but not as much as the white and black politicians and other AMERICANS who add extra stigma and punishment to poor man's coke high


Save that BS for someone who can't see through it llike the empty window pane it is....

We have a "weed"(cocaine) that we have the opportunity to kill at the root(the coke farms that may be as legal as cornfields in Iowa), yet you want to attempt to kill the weed by plucking off it's leaves?


There's a time and a place for your argument concerning policy makers adding a stigma and punishment to poor man's coke high, but this is not the place....

Stop worrying about what Whitey and Black Whiteys will think about you and do to you, especially when you have a chance to dent the supply dramtically....


Makkonen said:
i dont dig coke but it isnt a barrier to economic success or living for most of the millions of white american people who use it


It's not a barrier because it's not FLOODING their neighborhoods. If there were drug dealers on every corner in Surburbia and the kids and adults were using these drugs the you would see a dramatic decline in the economy and quality of life because of loss of man hours, less productivity, etc., but you won't see that because 60% of the thousands upon thousands of tons of coke and heroin that is shipped around the world lands in Harlem...Watts...Anacostia...Camden...any "enclave" of Black people can be chosen here.

Makkonen said:
funny how the nsa can find out what you told your momma yesterday on the phone but have no idea about all the metric tons of cargo entering the nation

This is the crux of the matter....

You are pointing five fingers five different ways when this is my one, simple contention:

The US government should focus on invading and destroying coke producing nation's ability to produce coke.

You, on the other hand, have the defeatist mentality that since it won't possibly happen we should simply not even hypothesize it....


Makkonen said:
alcohol and tobacco kill more people than coke and cost tax payers like us more money to deal with but u want to recruit to invade south america?


Alcohol and tobacco DO NOT CAUSE ADDICTIONS THAT RESULT IN STEALING AND WANTON MURDER. For you to even try to compare these two to narcotics is laughable....

Makkonen said:
last time your wife cheated on you did you go find a stranger to beat the shit out of?

No, I handle the problem at the source as the USA should do by invading these countries....


To answer your terribly thought-out analogy, I would have divorced my wife after I addressed what it was that caused her to cheat....

Get it?

No?

I didn't think so....


Makkonen said:
did it make you feel better?


Wouldn't have approached the cat....


Makkonen said:
did it stop your wife from cheating?


Yes, me leaving her certainly stopped her from cheating because now she is no longer my wife....


Makkonen said:
at least you and que are on the same page of what book I have no fuckin idea

You can say that again!
 
Jim_Browski said:

A hardline anti-drug stance?
:smh:

You must be sniffing some Bolivian coke....


The guy, WHO JUST SO HAPPENS TO BE A FORMER COKE GROWER, has said that he is going to legalize growing coke for...TEA :confused:

C'mon, you sound foolish here but let's not delve into the realm of stupidity and ignorance.... :rolleyes:

how does saying "i dont want US bases in my country" = "want some crack?" ?

read up dumbass coca aint cocaine or crack


Reuters said:
Bolivia's Morales further slams US drug policies

By Adriana BarreraMon Dec 19, 5:08 PM ET

Evo Morales, who won Bolivia's presidential election on vows to end a U.S. campaign against coca growing, stepped up his criticism of American anti-drug policies on Monday, accusing Washington of using drug fighting efforts to militarize the region.

In his first news conference since claiming victory on Sunday Morales -- who took a surprisingly strong majority and will be Bolivia's first Indian leader -- insisted he was opposed to drugs but disputed Washington's methods.

"The fight against drug trafficking is a false pretext for the United States to install military bases and we're not in agreement," he told reporters.

"We support an effective fight against drugs. Neither cocaine or drug trafficking are part of the Bolivian culture," he said in his stronghold of Cochabamba as the first official results from Sunday's vote trickled in.

Washington considers Morales, who first rose to power as the leader of the country's coca leaf farmers, an enemy in its anti-drug fight in Bolivia, the third biggest cocaine producer after Colombia and Peru.

The U.S. government insists much of Bolivia's coca is processed into cocaine, but farmers say they grow the plant for traditional medicinal uses, herbal teas and religious ceremonies.

According to UN statistics, Bolivia put 107 tons of cocaine on world markets last year. The United States spends $150 million a year on anti-drug efforts in Bolivia.

Some analysts said the United States should move quickly to engage Morales and discuss ways to bridge their differences.

"I would hope that Morales' position would lead to the U.S. taking a more realistic policy because if there's one thing we've learned in last 20 years is we can't stop the drug trade," said Nicolas Shumway, director of the Institute of Latin American Studies at the University of Texas, Austin.

"What I'm hoping is the U.S. will listen to him and try and hear his concerns and not just try to impose a policy on Bolivia unilaterally," Shumway said.

NO CALL FROM WASHINGTON

Morales' leading rivals conceded defeat when results tabulated by local media Sunday showed him heading for a resounding victory, taking slightly more than 50 percent of the vote.

With 33 percent of the official results tallied Monday, Morales led with 48 percent to 35 percent for Jorge Quiroga, a conservative former president. The official count will take several days but based on media calculations Morales' vote tally is expected to remain near 50 percent.

If Morales gets more than half of the votes he will avoid having to face a congressional vote between the two top vote-getters as required by Bolivian law.

Asked by reporters if he had been contacted any Bush administration officials after he emerged as the likely victor, Morales said no. "I don't expect to be, either," he said.

Morales, a lawmaker who admires Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's drive for regional cooperation to counter U.S. influence, drew his most fervent support from Bolivia's indigenous majority.

Many Bolivian Indians see one of their own reversing what most see as more than 500 years of discrimination under leaders of European heritage, beginning with slavery in Spanish colonial silver mines.

"There is hope that things are finally going to change," said Carlos Pilco, a 48-year-old mechanic, in El Alto, a satellite city to La Paz and home to hundreds of thousands of indigenous Bolivians.

Aymara Indian law student Jorge Quispe, 30, urged Bolivians to give the new leader time to implement his program.

Street protests over the country's economic policies have unseated two presidents since 2003.

"Bolivians have to think about what ways we can support our president, he said.

(Additional reporting Fiona Ortiz in El Alto)

Copyright © 2006 Reuters Limited.




jimbrownski said:
Save that BS for someone who can't see through it llike the empty window pane it is....

We have a "weed"(cocaine) that we have the opportunity to kill at the root(the coke farms that may be as legal as cornfields in Iowa), yet you want to attempt to kill the weed by plucking off it's leaves?



how did that prohibition thing work with alcohol? cocaine's doing alot better though isnt it :rolleyes:


There's a time and a place for your argument concerning policy makers adding a stigma and punishment to poor man's coke high, but this is not the place....
:smh: yeah ignore the attainable while you fantasize about invading the world to stop drug imports

btw- how are the troops in afghanistan working out that opium thing? :smh:

jimbrownski said:
Stop worrying about what Whitey and Black Whiteys will think about you and do to you, especially when you have a chance to dent the supply dramtically....

you're smokin crack right now arent you


jimbronski said:
It's not a barrier because it's not FLOODING their neighborhoods. If there were drug dealers on every corner in Surburbia and the kids and adults were using these drugs the you would see a dramatic decline in the economy and quality of life because of loss of man hours, less productivity, etc., but you won't see that because 60% of the thousands upon thousands of tons of coke and heroin that is shipped around the world lands in Harlem...Watts...Anacostia...Camden...any "enclave" of Black people can be chosen here.

really? 60% of coke and heroin lands in american ghettos? source?

its not a barrier because of the criminality, drug laws, law enforcement efforts etc that you dont want to address right now






jimbrownski said:
This is the crux of the matter....

You are pointing five fingers five different ways when this is my one, simple contention:

The US government should focus on invading and destroying coke producing nation's ability to produce coke.

You, on the other hand, have the defeatist mentality that since it won't possibly happen we should simply not even hypothesize it....

you rather dream about invading nations to stop drug trafficking than discuss actually plausible and rational ideas like dealing with unfair mandatory minimums and other activities that would diminish urban poverty and drug use

like i said- afghanistan is the biggest heroin producer in the world and we run that country and have troops there- now what?




jimbrownski said:
Alcohol and tobacco DO NOT CAUSE ADDICTIONS THAT RESULT IN STEALING AND WANTON MURDER. For you to even try to compare these two to narcotics is laughable....

the "stealing and wanton murder" you describe do not come close to the physical and economic death and destruction caused by tobacco(Nicotine) and alcohol addiction
Im not cheerleadin cocaine by any means, its garbage, but legal drugs that I mentioned do more damage. research it if you dont believe it






jim brownski said:
No, I handle the problem at the source as the USA should do by invading these countries....

without a customer there is no problem and again your idea is fantasy and stupid


To answer your terribly thought-out analogy, I would have divorced my wife after I addressed what it was that caused her to cheat....
Get it?

No?

I didn't think so....
Wouldn't have approached the cat....

dumbass

are you gonna invade Alabama and Tennessee over methamphetamines(Crystalmeth)?
:smh: prohibition doesn't work and trying to regulate agriculture worldwide to stop the procurement of an item people want wont work either
where there's a will there's a way- stop the desire and the product becomes a non-issue




jimbrownski said:
Yes, me leaving her certainly stopped her from cheating because now she is no longer my wife....
call betty ford

:smh: does bolivia drive our people to smoke crack? no - the drug of choice wont matter as long as conditions are right for certain people to desire that type of product.
coke, alcohol, crystal meth etc something else will take its place

and besides that maybe if imf puppets werent fuckin over those poor people they wouldnt have to grow coca
short of invasion there are many other ways to get coca production down- but invasion would be the first to occur to a dumbass like u

go invade your ass and pull your head out



You can say that again!


go invade your ass and pull your head out
 
<font size="5"><center>Bolivia, Brazil:
Morales Spurs Brazilian Energy Independence</font size></center>


STRATFOR
Global Intelligence Brief
January 12, 2006

Summary

Brazilian oil company Petroleo Brasileiro SA on Jan. 11 announced plans to expand oil and natural gas production in the Santos Basin, off the coast of southeastern Brazil. The company's move represents a step toward easing the country's dependence on Bolivian gas -- and distancing Brazil from its unstable neighbor to the west.

Analysis

Petroleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobras), Brazil's state-affiliated oil company, announced a new plan to increase domestic oil and natural gas production Jan. 11. Brazil, long concerned about the unstable political situation in neighboring Bolivia, will use the effort to allay the country's dependence on Bolivian natural gas … and will succeed.

Petrobras hopes to increase oil production by 100,000 barrels per day and natural gas production in the Santos Basin, located off Brazil's southeastern coast, by 10.5 billion cubic meters per year -- roughly equivalent to Bolivia's natural gas exports to Brazil. The 10-year project, expected to cost $18 billion, is expected to produce about 12 million cubic meters of natural gas per day (4.2 billion cubic meters) by 2008.

Petrobras' decision is not surprising. The election of indigenous leader Evo Morales as Bolivia's president undoubtedly made foreign companies doing business in Bolivia nervous. Morales, a former llama farmer who campaigned for the Bolivian presidency on nationalizing the natural gas industry, soon after Petrobras' statement coincidentally announced that La Paz would seize foreign companies' reserves. Petrobras anticipated the move, wisely made alternate plans -- and is in a position to follow through on its proposal.

Unlike its neighbor Argentina, Brazil has an efficiently run energy sector -- the Brazilian government holds only a 30 percent stake in Petrobras -- and does not rely on natural gas to produce electricity for home use. Brasilia, unlike Buenos Aires, does not risk the lights going out in the capital. Brazil's industrial sectors use the gas in the production of fertilizer, and will continue to rely on Bolivian supplies.

Though Petrobras eventually will be able to reduce its dependence on Bolivia, in the meantime it will remain beholden to La Paz. Morales understands this, and will exploit this reality to his advantage, but that will last only as long as Petrobras' contracts with Bolivia remain in force. Once Brazil has achieved full energy independence from Bolivia, Morales and Bolivia will need to seek new energy markets.

Morales' moves, however, have made companies and nations with continuing investments in Bolivia regret their decision not to pull out, as most foreign investors in Bolivia did in the wake of recent political instability. Such flight means Morales is shooting himself (and Bolivia) in the proverbial foot, potentially leading the landlocked South American state -- already the region's poorest -- to even greater economic ruin.

.
 
Makkonen said:
read up dumbass coca aint cocaine or crack

Huh? :confused:

Another kneegrow who has tested positive for STUPID....
:yes:

For you to say that coca isn't cocaine or crack is some sh*t that a person like Flava Flav, or Old Dirty Bastard would say...to Sly Stone.
:D

The real knee-slapper is how you actually highlighted this guy saying that cocaine and drug trafficing aren't part of the Bolivian culture. I say both he and you are full of sh*t...but you already know this:


http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/dea/product/cocaine.htm

http://www.oas.org/OASpage/press2002/en/Press98/020598be.htm




Makkonen said:
how did that prohibition thing work with alcohol?


RED HERRING ALERT!!!

RED HERRING ALERT!!!




Makkonen said:
yeah ignore the attainable while you fantasize about invading the world to stop drug imports

Kneegrow, how are you going to sit here and honestly say that getting politicians to practically overturn the foodsource of the prison indutrial complex is more attainable than invading a sovereign nation, not the world for the "protection of American citizens"?

Which one has happened most recently?




Makkonen said:
really? 60% of coke and heroin lands in american ghettos? source?

Dayum, you are worse than a jealous girlfriend....

I could tell you to look it up and REFUTE my claims, but psuedo-intellegensia like yourself will use that as an angle to doctor the post so I'll spoonfeed da baby
(please take note of how your beloved Bolivia):

"Cocaine is extracted from the leaves of the coca plant, which is indigenous to the Andean highlands of South America.22 According to interagency estimates, potential cocaine production in the Andean region of South America (Colombia, Bolivia, and Peru) accounts for virtually all worldwide cocaine production."

"Much of the cocaine produced in Colombia and Peru is bound for the United States; however, the total amount of cocaine destined for U.S. drug markets decreased sharply in 2003. Of the 612 metric tons of export-quality cocaine detected departing South America for worldwide drug markets, approximately 422 metric tons (69.0%) departed South America moving toward the United States while only 190 metric tons (31.0%) were destined for non-U.S. markets."


http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/drugfact/cocaine/



Makkonen said:
like i said- afghanistan is the biggest heroin producer in the world and we run that country and have troops there- now what?

Stop putting other variables into the argument....

The crux of the matter is that we should invade a do-nothing but grow coca country(Bolivia) and burn the coca fields. Afghanistan is another story with other stories woven into it. You, on the other hand, want to play a Black Panther reject and petition politicans(kiss a55) to get them to see your point...while they laugh at you for not being able to see the forest for the trees.



Makkonen said:
Im not cheerleadin cocaine by any means, its garbage, but legal drugs that I mentioned do more damage. research it if you dont believe it

You aren't cheerleading cocaine....

What you are doing is d*ckriding this Bolivian cat because he echos your "anti-American" sentiment....




Makkonen said:
are you gonna invade Alabama and Tennessee over methamphetamines(Crystalmeth)?

:rolleyes:

You are sounding as stupid as ever right here....




Makkonen said:
stop the desire and the product becomes a non-issue

Since you are speaking like a true crackhead out of the Bobby Brown mold, how do you propose the desire be stopped?




Makkonen said:
and besides that maybe if imf puppets werent fuckin over those poor people they wouldnt have to grow coca

If...if...if.

"If" your mom had only swallowed that fateful night you wouldn't be here spouting this rhetoric that is clearly anti-American...as you get your Black a55 up and go to work in the capitalist(American) model....


Makkonen said:
go invade your ass and pull your head out

Nah....

I have a better idea....

I think I'll invade the NIH and get the specimen of syphillis donated by your great-grandmother and used in the Tuskeegee Experiment to see if the effects have actually started to kick in on her dumb-a55ed great-grandson....

She'd be so proud of you....
:lol:
 
Makkonen said:
read up dumbass coca aint cocaine or crack

Huh? :confused:

Another kneegrow who has tested positive for STUPID....
:yes:

For you to say that coca isn't cocaine or crack is some sh*t that a person like Flava Flav, or Old Dirty Bastard would say...to Sly Stone.
:D

The real knee-slapper is how you actually highlighted this guy saying that cocaine and drug trafficing aren't part of the Bolivian culture. I say both he and you are full of sh*t...but you already know this:


http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/dea/product/cocaine.htm

http://www.oas.org/OASpage/press2002/en/Press98/020598be.htm




Makkonen said:
how did that prohibition thing work with alcohol?


RED HERRING ALERT!!!

RED HERRING ALERT!!!




Makkonen said:
yeah ignore the attainable while you fantasize about invading the world to stop drug imports

Kneegrow, how are you going to sit here and honestly say that getting politicians to practically overturn the foodsource of the prison indutrial complex is more attainable than invading a sovereign nation, not the world for the "protection of American citizens"?

Which one has happened most recently?




Makkonen said:
really? 60% of coke and heroin lands in american ghettos? source?

Dayum, you are worse than a jealous girlfriend....

I could tell you to look it up and REFUTE my claims, but psuedo-intellegensia like yourself will use that as an angle to doctor the post so I'll spoonfeed da baby
(please take note of your beloved Bolivia):

"Cocaine is extracted from the leaves of the coca plant, which is indigenous to the Andean highlands of South America.22 According to interagency estimates, potential cocaine production in the Andean region of South America (Colombia, Bolivia, and Peru) accounts for virtually all worldwide cocaine production."

"Much of the cocaine produced in Colombia and Peru is bound for the United States; however, the total amount of cocaine destined for U.S. drug markets decreased sharply in 2003. Of the 612 metric tons of export-quality cocaine detected departing South America for worldwide drug markets, approximately 422 metric tons (69.0%) departed South America moving toward the United States while only 190 metric tons (31.0%) were destined for non-U.S. markets."


http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/drugfact/cocaine/



Makkonen said:
like i said- afghanistan is the biggest heroin producer in the world and we run that country and have troops there- now what?

Stop putting other variables into the argument....

The crux of the matter is that we should invade a do-nothing but grow coca country(Bolivia) and burn the coca fields. Afghanistan is another story with other stories woven into it. You, on the other hand, want to play a Black Panther reject and petition politicans(kiss a55) to get them to see your point...while they laugh at you for not being able to see the forest for the trees.



Makkonen said:
Im not cheerleadin cocaine by any means, its garbage, but legal drugs that I mentioned do more damage. research it if you dont believe it

You aren't cheerleading cocaine....

What you are doing is d*ckriding this Bolivian cat because he echos your "anti-American" sentiment....




Makkonen said:
are you gonna invade Alabama and Tennessee over methamphetamines(Crystalmeth)?

:rolleyes:

You are sounding as stupid as ever right here....




Makkonen said:
stop the desire and the product becomes a non-issue

Since you are speaking like a true crackhead out of the Bobby Brown mold, how do you propose the desire be stopped?




Makkonen said:
and besides that maybe if imf puppets werent fuckin over those poor people they wouldnt have to grow coca

If...if...if.

"If" your mom had only swallowed that fateful night you wouldn't be here spouting this rhetoric that is clearly anti-American...as you get your Black a55 up and go to work in the capitalist(American) model....


Makkonen said:
go invade your ass and pull your head out

Nah....

I have a better idea....

I think I'll invade the NIH and get the specimen of syphillis donated by your great-grandmother and used in the Tuskeegee Experiment to see if the effects have actually started to kick in on her dumb-a55ed great-grandson....

She'd be so proud of you....
:lol:
 
Jim_Browski said:
Huh? :confused:

Another kneegrow who has tested positive for STUPID....
:yes:

For you to say that coca isn't cocaine or crack is some sh*t that a person like Flava Flav, or Old Dirty Bastard would say...to Sly Stone.
:D

so cocaine and crack grow on trees?
stfu idiot

post a cocaine or crack tree fuckin idiot







Kneegrow, how are you going to sit here and honestly say that getting politicians to practically overturn the foodsource of the prison indutrial complex is more attainable than invading a sovereign nation, ?

you seem to think that the US would invade another nation to "practically overturn the foodsource of the prison industrial complex" lmao

like i said before how is afghanistan workin out for u bitch? America really cares about that heroin :lol:



you are a fucking retard - coca is the main ingredient in cocaine and cocaine the main ingredient in crack but coca is not cocaine or crack. does kerosene rain down on the coca plant leaves on the forest floor and animals walk over it and help process it into cocaine on the jungle floor?
dumbass - the aboriginal people of bolivia have used the plant for alot longer than cocaine has existed u fuckin brainless idiot - his culture that he speaks of is not 20 years of drug trafficking - his culture is older than this nation
Your think culture is listenin to your boy george collection, you are alone in thinking that.


Stop putting other variables into the argument....
stop pretending doj cocaine traffickin reports are cultural encyclopedias shit for brains

The crux of the matter is that we should invade a do-nothing but grow coca country(Bolivia) and burn the coca fields.

ask brazil and argentina where they get their natural gas from moron- they get significant amounts of it from "donothingbutgrow coca" Bolivia again stfu




Afghanistan is another story with other stories woven into it. You, on the other hand, want to play a Black Panther reject and petition politicans(kiss a55) to get them to see your point...while they laugh at you for not being able to see the forest for the trees.

jimbowie said:
Kneegrow, how are you going to sit here and honestly say that getting politicians to practically overturn the foodsource of the prison indutrial complex is more attainable than invading a sovereign nation, not the world for the "protection of American citizens"?

Bitchass kneegrow how are you going to sit here and honestly say that getting politicians to practically overturn the foodsource of the prison indutrial complex is less attainable than getting politicians to practically overturn the foodsource of the prison indutrial complex by invading a sovereign nation?

Increasing mandatory mins for coke or decreasing unfair mandatory mins is attainable and not gonna hurt the prison industrial complex. But what you find totally impossible is far less than total irradication of cocaine imports to the US via invading other nations. Which one has a bigger impact on the "prison industrial complex? smarto? :lol:

lmao
You must be the current Drug Czar's retarded bastard son
Stop figurin out how to stop you and your crackwhore mom's addiction while on a binge




What you are doing is d*ckriding this Bolivian cat because he echos your "anti-American" sentiment....
I didnt realize that being a person of african descent who is in favor of aboriginal peoples being in control of their own nations and destinies added up to "dick ridin". If you could refrain from injecting your latent homosexuality into the conversation it would be greatly appreciated.

How is Evo anti-american? Being against Bechtel, Haliburton, fucked up treaties and economic/monetary policies does not equal being anti-american simpleton. Last time I checked there was more going on in America than raping 3rd world countries so a few white people can score a few extra millions.
Or is this the part where I quote your whinin like a lil bitch about inserting other "variables"? lol

How am I anti-american? Isn't America about freedom and justice and equality? :lol:



You are sounding as stupid as ever right here....


hey great non-answer bitch - stop being a coward and answer the questions or stfu



Since you are speaking like a true crackhead out of the Bobby Brown mold, how do you propose the desire be stopped?

really? true crackhead mold?


funny but you said


jimbowie said:
To answer your terribly thought-out analogy, I would have divorced my wife after I addressed what it was that caused her to cheat....

Get it?

No?

I didn't think so....


so first in typical moron style the analogy of stopping drug addiction by pickin indiscriminate non-causes of drug addiction to stamp out was lost on you
Got it? No? You're incapable of getting it.
Then you lost yourself in the web of bullshit you weaved when you said you wanted to diagnose why "the wife cheated" and insulted yourself by claiming discussion of the root causes of drug abuse is for crackheads. Congratulations you're a dimwitted crackhead by your own standards.


jim brownnose said:
If...if...if.

"If" my mom wasn't a crack whore I wouldn't be here spouting this rhetoric that is clearly fuckin stupid...as I get my Black a55 up and go to work as run of the mill working class crack abusing pedophile(American) model....
kill yourself - its the only way out for you


jim brownhole said:
Nah....

I have a better idea....

I think I'll invade my male partner's rectum to find my wristwatch.
:lol:

too much information :smh:


goarmy.com

go there and join up for the invasion dumbass

and stop watchin abc while youre high on wednesdays

post your next response 3 times :smh:
 
I tired of slapping your empty head around so I'll allow you the last word....

I do that with all my hoes just to give them the impression that they are more than what your mother was to your drunk father, but your lack of a "Y" chromosome will have you thinking you actually make a point when in fact I'm tired of arguing with a fool. It gets hard to tell the difference after a while...FOOL.

BTW, are you THAT lame that you had to resort to doctoring my posts?

Oh well, I hope you win an Oscar for your role in Brokeback Mountain...with your "broke back"....
 
glad you had nothing more to say on your bullshit contradictions

get back to invading your male partner bitch

here's a refresher as to why you should have never opened your cum stained mouth

your own reasoning makes your fantasy bullshit

jimbrownhole said:
Kneegrow, how are you going to sit here and honestly say that getting politicians to practically overturn the foodsource of the prison indutrial complex is more attainable than invading a sovereign nation, not the world for the "protection of American citizens"?

but i altered what you wrote of substance right? pathetic lyin lil bitch :lol:

here you go bitch

[frame]http://www.abcmedianet.com/showpage/showpage.html?program_id=ID0006&type=lead[/frame]
 
Last edited:
Makkonnen said:
glad you had nothing more to say on your bullshit contradictions

get back to invading your male partner bitch

here's a refresher as to why you should have never opened your cum stained mouth

your own reasoning makes your fantasy bullshit



but i altered what you wrote of substance right? pathetic lyin lil bitch :lol:

here you go bitch


Just like a petulant, little boy who is fresh from a visit to his local Catholic priest....
:puke: <----spit Father O'Conner's dick gravy out of your mouth


BTW, do you have any other attacks that don't show you peeking out of the closet because if all you can say to me is "dick in your mouth," "cum on your face," "dick in your ass," then I'm left to believe that this is your point of reference.... :yes:

Oh yeah, if you choose to delete your homosexual musings I suggest you highlight the jibberish and press "delete" instead of constantly wiping White-Out off the screen of your monitor.... :lol:
 
jimbowski said:
Kneegrow, how are you going to sit here and honestly say that getting politicians to practically overturn the foodsource of the prison indutrial complex is more attainable than invading a sovereign nation, not the world for the "protection of American citizens"?

still no response to how your "invasions" will not "overturn the foodsource"? pathetic
 
just putting this on the next page so no one misses it:

The next mofo that responds with the personal attacks will be GONE.
 
QueEx said:
just putting this on the next page so no one misses it:

The next mofo that responds with the personal attacks will be GONE.
depending on how many posts a person has set to view per page that wont work

"mofo"? que im shocked at your vulgarity.
 
QueEx said:
just putting this on the next page so no one misses it:

The next mofo that responds with the personal attacks will be GONE.

Why...........It was just getting interesting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!................QueEx you no fun
 
Makkonnen said:
still no response to how your "invasions" will not "overturn the foodsource"? pathetic


Shoo fly, don't bother me....

QueEx laid the law back down and saved you from being clowned on every post I saw your keystrokes, so now it's now longer fun seeing as how you actually think you have a point....

I'm through beating you across the head with facts, LINKS(
you can provide one at any time, but OOPS, I forgot, they don't have data to back up idealistic thinking), and logic.... :yes:

I now leave you to stew in your own juices, waiting with bated breath for my attention....

Your cries for attention will now fall on deaf ears...on this particular post.
:cool:
 
<font size="5"><center>Bolivian military seizes oil, gas fields</font size>
<font size="4">President says foreign firms must renegotiate their contracts</font size></center>



311xInlineGallery.jpg

Bolivia's President Evo Morales, right, accompanied by Vice President Alvaro
Garcia, wave from the balcony of the presidential palace in La Paz on
Monday. Morales ordered soldiers to occupy Bolivia's natural gas fields and
threatened to evict foreign companies unless they give Bolivia control over
the entire chain of production. JUAN KARITA: AP




Houston Chronicle
By JOHN OTIS and DAVID IVANOVICH
Copyright 2006 Houston Chronicle

BOGOTA, COLOMBIA - Making good on his main campaign pledge, Bolivia's President Evo Morales ordered troops to occupy the country's oil and natural gas fields on Monday and issued a decree giving the government majority control over the energy industry.

"The pillaging of our resources by transnational companies is over," Morales said in a speech at the San Alberto gas field in southern Bolivia. "From this day forward, all hydrocarbons in the country are nationalized."

Morales, a leftist who was elected in December, ordered troops to 56 locations around the country, officials said, including to the city of Santa Cruz where much of the industry is based. He issued a decree that stopped short of expropriation but ordered foreign companies to renegotiate their operating contracts with the state within six months or leave the country.

The decree raised taxes and royalties on the largest gas fields to 82 percent from 50 percent. And it gave the government final say in decisions over production, transportation, commercialization and exports of oil and natural gas.

An Aymara Indian who has allied himself with Presidents Hugo Chavez of Venezuela and Fidel Castro of Cuba on economic issues, Morales has long accused international energy companies of cheating the Bolivian people. Bolivia, one of Latin America's poorest countries, has the second-largest proven natural gas reserves in Latin America after Venezuela, 26.7 trillion cubic feet.

The energy companies operating in Bolivia include Britain's BG Group and BP, Brazil's Petrobras, Spanish-Argentine Repsol-YPF, France's Total, and U.S.-based Exxon Mobil Corp.

Petrobras is ranked as the country's largest gas producer and Repsol-YPF held the largest amount of reserves, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Exxon Mobil spokesman Bob Davis said company executives were monitoring developments but could not comment further.

The corporation, however, have been wary of further investment in Bolivia for some time. A year ago, Bolivia's Congress approved a new hydrocarbons law, which Morales cited as the basis for Monday's decrees. The law was designed to open the door to greater state intervention in the energy sector, following a wave of privatizations in the 1990s.

"From Exxon Mobil's perspective, this is small potatoes," said Charles Esser, an industry economist in Washington for the Energy Information Administration.

While Bolivian officials have been talking about a possible nationalization of the country's energy assets for some time, Esser was still surprised by Morales' announcement.

"Certainly, there's been a lot of talk about it, but I thought perhaps the Argentines and the Brazilians would persuade him to take some middle path because they're the most exposed," Esser said. "We, the United States, aren't importing any natural gas from Bolivia. Most of the exports are going to Brazil, with a smaller amount going into Argentina."

Though dramatic, the deployment of troops to guard all of the country's gas fields as well as oil refineries and pipelines was widely viewed as a gesture symbolizing that the installations now belong to the Bolivian state. But the military presence could also nudge foreign firms into complying with the decree, analysts said.

In addition, government engineers were prepared to take over day-to-day administration and to maintain production levels should any of the companies defy the decree, said Bolivian economist Gonzalo Chavez.

Wearing a white helmet from Bolivia's state-owned energy company known by its Spanish acronym YPFB, Morales issued the decree on his 100th day in office in a nationally televised address. As he spoke, workers hung a banner over a gas installation in the background that said: "Nationalized: Property of the Bolivian people."

Although the timing of the decree caught many analysts and energy company executives off guard, a government push for more control of the sector had long been expected.

Across much of Latin America, governments are seeking a bigger piece of the pie amid rising prices for oil and natural gas and, in some cases, control of the oil and gas fields. In Venezuela, President Chavez has increased taxes and royalties and forced international companies to sign new contracts. In Peru, presidential candidate Ollanta Humala has talked of taking similar actions if he wins election on May 28.

"Symbolically and politically, it has a very strong impact," said Chavez, the economist. "But the theme of nationalization was central to Evo's campaign and is the main issue of his government."

In La Paz, the Bolivian capital city, Morales' announcement was greeted with praise on the streets. "This is a great advance for Bolivianos," said Juan Tapia, 30, a street vendor. "We have been waiting for years for this to happen, and now it has."

Special correspondent Jean Friedman-Rudovsky contributed from La Paz, Bolivia, and Ivanovich reported from Washington.

john.otis@chron.com david.ivanovich@chron.com

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/world/3833479.html
 
[frame]http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/05/02/bolivia.brazil.reut/[/frame]
 
[frame]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5108498.stm[/frame]


funny how these dudes do more in a few days than white spainiard us backed dictators do in decades
 
Makkonnen said:
I havent been to this board in a while. Makk, I bet you that you will want to :puke: when seeing the face of Morales after you finish reading Atlas Shrugged. I am so confident in this that I will refund you the price of the book if you dont....
 
eewwll said:
I havent been to this board in a while. Makk, I bet you that you will want to :puke: when seeing the face of Morales after you finish reading Atlas Shrugged. I am so confident in this that I will refund you the price of the book if you dont....
damn - i started reading it although from the reviews im very skeptical of its content now, but after hearing that I will pick it up again
I dont care for pdfs so maybe ill buy a copy - strong endorsement there
I doubt I will ever feel like puking when seeing someone regain what was stolen from them. Unless I was the thief ;)
 
Makkonnen said:
damn - i started reading it although from the reviews im very skeptical of its content now, but after hearing that I will pick it up again
I dont care for pdfs so maybe ill buy a copy - strong endorsement there
I doubt I will ever feel like puking when seeing someone regain what was stolen from them. Unless I was the thief ;)

Atlas Shrugged usually has a I hate it or I love it type or response because Ayn Rands views are so strong. Maybe puke was an overstatement...but I bet that when you see a guy like Morales, after finishing the book, you have have a completely different opinion about them. Those types of leaders always leave the entire population more impoverished,etc because they miss a piece of the equation...that Atlas Shrugged nails right on the head like nothing else I have ever read in a novel form.It is a good read man...I read all of her other work(The Fountainhead, Rational Selfishness,etc) before reading Atlas Shrugged so the novel drove her points home.

on the pdf...shit man..i read tech docs in pdf form..but once it gets over a 100 pages I still need a hard copy...I am really interested to know what you think of the book..especially considering some of your views..
 
are you insane recommending that book to him?

his head will literally explode trying to reconcile what he reads with the real world.

say goodbye to dolemite everyone.
 
eewwll said:
Atlas Shrugged usually has a I hate it or I love it type or response because Ayn Rands views are so strong. Maybe puke was an overstatement...but I bet that when you see a guy like Morales, after finishing the book, you have have a completely different opinion about them. Those types of leaders always leave the entire population more impoverished,etc because they miss a piece of the equation...that Atlas Shrugged nails right on the head like nothing else I have ever read in a novel form.It is a good read man...I read all of her other work(The Fountainhead, Rational Selfishness,etc) before reading Atlas Shrugged so the novel drove her points home.

on the pdf...shit man..i read tech docs in pdf form..but once it gets over a 100 pages I still need a hard copy...I am really interested to know what you think of the book..especially considering some of your views..
i know the argument and I hear you but people said the same about Castro and Chavez in Venezuela and it doesnt really show true. The entire population poorer? or the rich white spainiards and other abusers poorer? Its hard to make those with nothing have less than nothing. I follow the Chinese starvation mode angle too though.

I don't like Evo because he's taking, I like him because he is righting wrongs. Would the oil and gas in his nation be sitting there unused if it werent for certain industrialists/imperialists? No doubt. But you have one group controlling another, giving them no benefits of your prosperity at their expense, destroying their way of life(regardless of your perception of it) etc.
The indigenous peoples of Africa, South America and Asia fail to see an equal level of benefit from those who hook up deals with appointed lackeys to sign away their right to rainwater etc.

But I may be jumping the gun on Rand's book since I am going off of a review.
 
Greed said:
are you insane recommending that book to him?

his head will literally explode trying to reconcile what he reads with the real world.

say goodbye to dolemite everyone.
Where's that tgijakes and condi aids solution progress report at Rufus?
 
jakes being recruited to solve aids in africa has always been in your mind, so why would it be anywhere different now.

unless you've lost your mind, which is what i've been saying for a while. good to finally get confirmation.
 
Greed said:
jakes being recruited to solve aids in africa has always been in your mind, so why would it be anywhere different now.

unless you've lost your mind, which is what i've been saying for a while. good to finally get confirmation.
I guess you still can't read bitch

LATimes Article in question said:
The hourlong session focused largely on how the administration's faith-based initiative could be expanded to combat the spread of HIV and provide help for tens of millions of children orphaned by the epidemic across Africa.

:smh: it was in my mind after they wrote it in the LA Times with a big story about what they were doing fuckin retard :lol:

i bumped the thread not like you will actually read it or anything, I know that's asking alot from lying piece of shit like you
 
la times say the us government asked preachers to help and dolemite in his typical delusional state says Dr. Rice went to jakes to solve the aids in africa problem.

you know i'm just biding my time until your head explodes.
 
Makk,

Is there some reason why you insist on calling folks bitches and shit??? Fuck,
attack a mofo's toughts and comments all day, but why all the damn name
calling ???

QueEx
 
why are you judging him?

its not his fault he wasnt raised around any male figures and learned how to express himself in the most emotional and womanly way possible. he really cant help only knowing feminine traits.

you should try to help him rather than condemn him.

thanks in advance.
 
QueEx said:
Makk,

Is there some reason why you insist on calling folks bitches and shit??? Fuck,
attack a mofo's toughts and comments all day, but why all the damn name
calling ???

QueEx

Oh my bad I didn't realize you were making distinctions on the insult thing. I apologize, I won't call him a bitch any more when he is exhibiting his republican bukake skills or deep throating GOP penis.

Its just easier to refer to him the same way everyone else who knows him does. It makes him feel better. Seriously. Look at how giddy he is. You know what? Youre right :puke: He's probably reading that "bitch" remark over and over and pulling his ponytail weave.
 
<IFRAME SRC="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5282188.stm" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5282188.stm">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top