people are arguing this shit in the actual meme thread...lol....



My math professor last nite told ms the answer is 2.
Why this is still ongoing I do not know.
A friend of mine who has his own tutoring company said it is 2. My original answer on Day 1.
48/2(9+3)DIVIDE
24(9+3)DISTRIBUTE
(216+72)=288 ADD
Don't Argue
![]()
EXCEL SAYS SO
You got it wrong homie.
48÷2(9+3)
Parentheses first
(9+3) = 12
THEN YOU HAVE 48/2(12)
After that you work left to right
24(12)
288
Multiplication and division are the same, therefore you work right to left after you do the parentheses.
Least that's what I recall lol. I could be wrong.
Wow...I see what's going on...you have to follow instructions and it will turn out to be 288...meaning what's in the parentheses gets calculated first. Then proceed as scheduled 48 divided by 2 multiplied by 12 which equals 288.
In simple terms...I cosign 2,000,000%
Standard Order of Operations
If one strictly uses the standard order of operations to solve mathematical expressions, the answer to the problem would be 288, which is also the same solution provided by WolframAlpha[17] and Google.[18]
By convention, the order of precedence in a mathematical expression is as follows:
Terms inside of Brackets or Parentheses.
Exponents and Roots.
Multiplication and Division.
Addition and Subtraction.
If there are two or more operations with equal precedence (such as 10÷2÷5 or 7÷2*9), those operations should be done from left to right.
Therefore, the problem “48÷2(9+3) =” would be solved like this:
48 ÷ 2 * (9+3)=
48 ÷ 2 * (12)=
48 ÷ 2 * 12=
24 * 12=
288
PEMDAS
Solving for the answer 2 is sometimes a result of doing multiplication before division. Much of the confusion can be blamed on PEMDAS (sometimes known as, “Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally”) and other similar mnemonics used to teach order of operations in schools.
As an example, PEMDAS stands for:
Parentheses
Exponentiation
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction
Whereas BEDMAS stands for:
Brackets
Exponentiation
Division
Multiplication
Addition
Subtraction
The former can lead to the implication that addition always comes before subtraction, and that multiplication always comes before division. The latter can lead to the implication that addition always comes before subtraction, and that division always comes before multiplication.
If one uses multiplication before division (PEMDAS being especially popular in the United States), the problem would be solved like this:
48 ÷ 2 * (9+3)=
48 ÷ 2 * (12)=
48 ÷ 2 * 12=
48 ÷ 24=
2
However, solving the problem like this would be considered erroneous because multiplication and division hold equal precedence.[19]
It is helpful to remember that division and multiplication are inverse operations, and thus represent the same operation written in a different way. Division is the same as multiplication of the reciprocal, and multiplication is the same as division of the reciprocal. This is similar to how addition is the same as subtraction of the negative, and how raising to the nth power is the same as taking the 1/nth root.
Implied Multiplication
However, the answer 2 could be justified by the principle of implied multiplication. For example, consider the problem "2/5x."
If one strictly follows the standard order of operations, the correct interpretation would be “(2/5)*(x).”
But many calculators and textbooks state that a higher value of precedence should be placed on implied multiplication than on explicit multiplication:
Because “5x” is implied to be "5*x," it gets higher priority than "2/5." In this case, "2/5x" would be interpreted as "(2)/(5*x)."
Returning to the original problem, if one utilizes the principles of implied multiplication, then “2(9+3)” gets higher precedence than the explicit “48/2,” and would be solved like this:
48 ÷ 2(9+3)=
48 ÷ 2(12)=
48 ÷ 24=
2
However, there is a lack of consensus on the value of implied multiplication.
48÷2(9+3) = ????
48/2(12)=
48/2=24*12=288
The Mathematician that wrote this problem says its 2. Why rehash this?
wow
÷
(
+
)=????
wow
÷
(
+
)=????
wow
÷
(
+
)=????
For heaven's sake, why did you bump this?!