48÷2(9+3) = ????
- Thread starter nubian
- Start date
, 
, 
, 
or 
(48 ÷ 2) * (9 + 3) = 288
Rick Ronson
Banned
Niggas are saying 2 only goes into 48....12 times 
why did you add parenthesis?
And the answer is still 2..
Why in blue skies do I see would you bump this?!
I swear...
I swear...
wow
÷
(
+
)=????
40 pages...
Because this shit was COMEDY. It needs to be in the Hall of Fame actually..
You're a year late guy.. The Mathematician that started this says the answer is 2.
The answer is 288 only if it's written like this...
(48 ÷ 2) * (9 + 3) = 288
I want to change my answer just plug this shit into Python and it said 288. I'm rolling with Python on this one.
Man you aint shit for ressurecting this old ass post
I want to change my answer just plug this shit into Python and it said 288. I'm rolling with Python on this one.
Man you aint shit for ressurecting this old ass post
...and she is wrong. Only answer the way it is written is 288
Order of Operations
PEMDAS
P-Parentheses first
E-Exponents (ie Powers and Square Roots, etc.)
MD-Multiplication and Division (left-to-right)
AS-Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)
48/2(9+3) = x
48/2(12) = x
24(12) = x
288 = x
PEMDAS
P-Parentheses first
E-Exponents (ie Powers and Square Roots, etc.)
MD-Multiplication and Division (left-to-right)
AS-Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)
48/2(9+3) = x
48/2(12) = x
24(12) = x
288 = x
I want to change my answer just plug this shit into Python and it said 288. I'm rolling with Python on this one.
Wow.....
The answer is 2!!!!!
My answer is 2. If memory serves me correct , not only do you have to do whats in parenthesis first, but also you have to remove the parethesis from the equation ( meaning do that part of the equation next ) which makes it 2. But I'm not that certain.
Who in here has kids doing that math that can answer this?
Who in here has kids doing that math that can answer this?
My answer is 2. If memory serves me correct , not only do you have to do whats in parenthesis first, but also you have to remove the parethesis from the equation ( meaning do that part of the equation next ) which makes it 2. But I'm not that certain.
bruh, read the quote below.....especially the red part, read it over and over and over........eventually it will sink in......
Order of Operations
PEMDAS
P-Parentheses first
E-Exponents (ie Powers and Square Roots, etc.)
MD-Multiplication and Division (left-to-right)
AS-Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)
48/2(9+3) = x
48/2(12) = x
24(12) = x
288 = x
bruh, read the quote below.....especially the red part, read it over and over and over........eventually it will sink in......
I understand PEMDAS. I think that a rule in it isnt being used. Dont you have to do whats in parenthesis then remove the parenthesis?
My answer is 2. If memory serves me correct , not only do you have to do whats in parenthesis first, but also you have to remove the parethesis from the equation ( meaning do that part of the equation next ) which makes it 2. But I'm not that certain.
You do the 9+3 first. 12
You then do 48/2. 24.
Then 24*12. 288
I think Sakem is right . The distributive property in effect
Nobody here is a math teacher or married to one? I'm sticking with 2
Nobody here is a math teacher or married to one? I'm sticking with 2
this was a sad. sad. sad day for BGOL-IA
still funny tho
dude you are doing the order of operations wrong... everything after the division sign is one term... what you are doing is the equivalent of putting your pants over your head and saying "see I told you it was a hat"
still funny tho
Still waiting for the special ones to justify this. I would also like to point to the ignorance of the idiot who asked this question, thinking that it would justify the answer being 2.
No wiggle room, negro. Not a single bit!
dude you are doing the order of operations wrong... everything after the division sign is one term... what you are doing is the equivalent of putting your pants over your head and saying "see I told you it was a hat"
Similar threads
