Christian Minister Bring A Baby Out Of A Coma Live On Camera! (The Child Awakes)

if a baby was in a coma, what is he/she doing out of the hospital? did the baby just go into a coma when they went into the venue? a mother wouldnt carry around a baby in a comatose state.:hmm:
 
if a baby was in a coma, what is he/she doing out of the hospital? did the baby just go into a coma when they went into the venue? a mother wouldnt carry around a baby in a comatose state.:hmm:

she took the baby out the hospital .. wasnt you listening u fuckin dweeb
 
Devil's Advocate, here: Why don't doctors cure cancer, AIDS or the common cold? Does the fact that they can't (or won't) negate the existence of doctors? :rolleyes:

exactly!! heal amputees? Homie this was a baby in a coma bruh! amputees still have a chance to walk after amputation... if it was me having my leg/arm healed versus what i jst saw happen right there... id say chop it off! thats a young life bruh!
 
Devil's Advocate, here: Why don't doctors cure cancer, AIDS or the common cold? Does the fact that they can't (or won't) negate the existence of doctors? :rolleyes:
:confused::confused:
2ekk9ig.gif
 
Comparing religion and science is comparing oranges and apples.That is a logical fallacy my friend. Doctors don't claim to have supernatural powers.
Science is secular religion, b. 'Facts' and 'findings' are subjective to conventional consensus (i.e. common belief) among scientists. Comparing religion and science is only fallacious in the minds of those (like you) who reject the notion. But there, again, that rejection is subjective to opinion. Faith healing is not fail proof (for a plethora of reasons), just as is the case with science. By the way, the initial direct comparison was between medical procedures and faith healing, not religion and science.
 
Science is secular religion, b. 'Facts' and 'findings' are subjective to conventional consensus (i.e. common belief) among scientists. Comparing religion and science is only fallacious in the minds of those (like you) who reject the notion. But there, again, that rejection is subjective to opinion. Faith healing is not fail proof (for a plethora of reasons), just as is the case with science. By the way, the initial direct comparison was between medical procedures and faith healing, not religion and science.
Secular religion??? That shit is oxymoronical and makes no sense.
 
Science is secular religion, b. 'Facts' and 'findings' are subjective to conventional consensus (i.e. common belief) among scientists. Comparing religion and science is only fallacious in the minds of those (like you) who reject the notion. But there, again, that rejection is subjective to opinion. Faith healing is not fail proof (for a plethora of reasons), just as is the case with science. By the way, the initial direct comparison was between medical procedures and faith healing, not religion and science.

Science is a secular religion ? This is like saying the robber was bald and he had an afro:D

ummmm being an amputee isn't a disease or sickness, therefore it can't be healed. smh. :hmm:

Okay fair then why doesn't she go to Africa and heal people with Aids and Malaria ?
 
non-believers! have a lil faith n the man upstairs and youll see good things happen right nfront of ya face on a daily
 
dumb dumb dumb.

and not a medical "coma".

oh, the power of Teh Internets.
 
Back
Top