if a baby was in a coma, what is he/she doing out of the hospital? did the baby just go into a coma when they went into the venue? a mother wouldnt carry around a baby in a comatose state.![]()
[FLASH]http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/e/16711680/wshhD3sy15m8VWMaA4uI[/FLASH]
amazing
folks was hyped
Devil's Advocate, here: Why don't doctors cure cancer, AIDS or the common cold? Does the fact that they can't (or won't) negate the existence of doctors?Lol can't you see this is make-believe ? Why doesn't she go go to Walter Reed and heal amputees ?
I want to believe, but i have a feeling that the baby was doing her tongue like that because the tylenol PM was wearing off and face was numb
Lol can't you see this is make-believe ? Why doesn't she go go to Walter Reed and heal amputees ?
Lol can't you see this is make-believe ? Why doesn't she go go to Walter Reed and heal amputees ?
Devil's Advocate, here: Why don't doctors cure cancer, AIDS or the common cold? Does the fact that they can't (or won't) negate the existence of doctors?![]()
Devil's Advocate, here: Why don't doctors cure cancer, AIDS or the common cold? Does the fact that they can't (or won't) negate the existence of doctors?![]()
Devil's Advocate, here: Why don't doctors cure cancer, AIDS or the common cold? Does the fact that they can't (or won't) negate the existence of doctors?![]()
repost
Science is secular religion, b. 'Facts' and 'findings' are subjective to conventional consensus (i.e. common belief) among scientists. Comparing religion and science is only fallacious in the minds of those (like you) who reject the notion. But there, again, that rejection is subjective to opinion. Faith healing is not fail proof (for a plethora of reasons), just as is the case with science. By the way, the initial direct comparison was between medical procedures and faith healing, not religion and science.Comparing religion and science is comparing oranges and apples.That is a logical fallacy my friend. Doctors don't claim to have supernatural powers.
i dont give a fuck if its a repost or not.. dont come n mothafucka
Secular religion??? That shit is oxymoronical and makes no sense.Science is secular religion, b. 'Facts' and 'findings' are subjective to conventional consensus (i.e. common belief) among scientists. Comparing religion and science is only fallacious in the minds of those (like you) who reject the notion. But there, again, that rejection is subjective to opinion. Faith healing is not fail proof (for a plethora of reasons), just as is the case with science. By the way, the initial direct comparison was between medical procedures and faith healing, not religion and science.
ummmm being an amputee isn't a disease or sickness, therefore it can't be healed. smh.Lol can't you see this is make-believe ? Why doesn't she go go to Walter Reed and heal amputees ?
Yes, it is an oxymoron. And, yes, it does make perfect sense. But being provincial minded about the premise will not help you follow the logic.Secular religion??? That shit is oxymoronical and makes no sense.
Yescan someone in a coma breathe without a ventilator?
Science is secular religion, b. 'Facts' and 'findings' are subjective to conventional consensus (i.e. common belief) among scientists. Comparing religion and science is only fallacious in the minds of those (like you) who reject the notion. But there, again, that rejection is subjective to opinion. Faith healing is not fail proof (for a plethora of reasons), just as is the case with science. By the way, the initial direct comparison was between medical procedures and faith healing, not religion and science.
ummmm being an amputee isn't a disease or sickness, therefore it can't be healed. smh.![]()
lol, No. It's more like describing a friendship-with-benefits as 'platonic sex'.Science is a secular religion ? This is like saying the robber was bald and he had an afro![]()