I truly believe that white sports writers with a desire to root for a perceived underdog played a huge part in this guy winning back to back MVP titles. All those guys responsible for giving him those awards should lose their vote. Especially in year one when Shaq was flat out robbed.
Right, ignore the guy who plays the game (and his position) at the HIGHEST LEVEL in multiple aspects (and helped his team to a 30-game turn-around in one season) for a one-dimensional giant who has no outside shot and shoots free throws worse than a grade school girl. All the HYPE is for Shaq. He's a total creation of the media (and he isn't even charismatic, without a script).
Right, ignore the guy who plays the game (and his position) at the HIGHEST LEVEL in multiple aspects (and helped his team to a 30-game turn-around in one season) for a one-dimensional giant who has no outside shot and shoots free throws worse than a grade school girl. All the HYPE is for Shaq. He's a total creation of the media (and he isn't even charismatic, without a script).
Nash deserved 3 MVPs in a room. He was robbed in the third year, which was the best of the 3. He finished 2nd.
I usually ignore you and accept you for the annoying attention starved troll that you are; However, i wanna take this opportunity to quote you just to further display how big of a clueless retard you are. You probably have no fucking idea how completely idiotic you sound. Stick to googling whore. Go bake a cake or something bitch, men are talking.Right, ignore the guy who plays the game (and his position) at the HIGHEST LEVEL in multiple aspects (and helped his team to a 30-game turn-around in one season) for a one-dimensional giant who has no outside shot and shoots free throws worse than a grade school girl. All the HYPE is for Shaq. He's a total creation of the media (and he isn't even charismatic, without a script).
Nash deserved 3 MVPs in a room. He was robbed in the third year, which was the best of the 3. He finished 2nd.
My apologies but she just never fails to make a complete ass of herself whenever she steps out of her box and attempts to do anything more than a google search. Couldnt resist a quote and laugh at that character.Please stop quoting Cunt, I'd hate to have to put y'all on ignore too.
Over JKidd?kobe deserves it. but i would not be mad if duncan got it.
lebron has not been in the league for a decade so its illogical for him to be on the all decade team
nash should not have 2 mvps. but i am okay with him being pg selection on decade team
Sounds about right!Re: Kobe named NBA 'Player of the Decade'
Sounds about right!
Funny thing is for the decade, there are 3 players that were named Sporting News Player of the year more than once. Guess which one of those players won Player of the Decade?
If you said, none, then you'd be correct.
More "faux" sports propaganda.
he had D Rob his 1st AND 2nd. and Ginobli and Parker for 3 moreummmm duncan had david robinson for his 1st title, and always had a squad. if you argument is true then who was being triple teamed this year for kobe to shine? i guess we will just disagree on this topic.
Over JKidd?
Nash deserved 3 MVPs in a room. He was robbed in the third year, which was the best of the 3. He finished 2nd.
DRob was on his last leg during the first title and was running off fumes on the second one. Parker/Gino were raw unproven rook or 2nd year players with limited contribution on the 3rd and neither were anywhere near all-star players at that point.he had D Rob his 1st AND 2nd. and Ginobli and Parker for 3 more
So are we talking teams or players? You do know Shaq in his prime was on most of those teams right? Notice the three year dark ages when Shaq left and Kobe waded in mediocrity???This Decade
Championships:
Lakers 4 Spurs 3
Finals appearances:
Lakers 6
Spurs 3
Head to Head in the playoffs:
Lakers 4
Spurs 1
Back to back:
Lakers 2
Spurs 0
Three-peat:
Lakers 1
Spurs 0
ummmm duncan had david robinson for his 1st title, and always had a squad. if you argument is true then who was being triple teamed this year for kobe to shine? i guess we will just disagree on this topic.
I'm surprised no one questioned why Lebron is on the first team. He's only been a dominant player for 3 or 4 seasons, so why is he on an all decade team.
Dam I didnt get past player of decade and the Steve Nash issue yet.I'm surprised no one questioned why Lebron is on the first team. He's only been a dominant player for 3 or 4 seasons, so why is he on an all decade team.
Because LeBron being on the first team is a minor mistake compared to the the player of the decade.
yes, yes I would...Really, you'd take Tim over Kobe as the player of the decade.
Right, ignore the guy who plays the game (and his position) at the HIGHEST LEVEL in multiple aspects (and helped his team to a 30-game turn-around in one season) for a one-dimensional giant who has no outside shot and shoots free throws worse than a grade school girl. All the HYPE is for Shaq. He's a total creation of the media (and he isn't even charismatic, without a script).
Nash deserved 3 MVPs in a room. He was robbed in the third year, which was the best of the 3. He finished 2nd.
Dam I didnt get past player of decade and the Steve Nash issue yet.
This list is a joke.
So what's your list? First and Second Team.
FIRST
G Jason Kidd
G Kobe Bryant
F Kevin Garnett
F Tim Duncan
F C Shaquille O'Neal
SECOND
G Allen Iverson
G Ray Allen
F Dirk Nowitzki
F Paul Pierce
C Yao Ming
*Sleeper-Vince Carter (he gets criticized alot but bis numbers for the last decade ar epretty fucking impressive.
Which is never.
when 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nigga, what part of "ALL DECADE" dont you understand???take out allen for Wade or Lebron.
Really, you'd take Tim over Kobe as the player of the decade.