What are you talking about?
Venom, Morbius and the Hulk were not MCU films.
Dude just be saying anythingThose Hulk films are not MCU. Stop it. /thread.

What are you talking about?
Venom, Morbius and the Hulk were not MCU films.
Dude just be saying anythingThose Hulk films are not MCU. Stop it. /thread.
You both just proved my point. How can Spiderman be accepted, but not the other films?Dude just be saying anythingif it ain't Marvel studios then it don't matter to Marvel. It's really that simple...
This dude here. Let me make this real simple for you! If it does not say MARVEL STUDIOS then it's not apart of MARVEL STUDIOS!!! GET ALL THAT OTHER DUMB SHIT OUTTA HERE!!!!You both just proved my point. How can Spiderman be accepted, but not the other films?
Also, you two are saying different things.
One is saying that if it isn't MCU which is the Marvel Cinematic Universe, then it doesn't matter.
The other is saying, if it isn't produced by Marvel Studios, it doesn't matter.
This is the absurdity of most modern Marvel fans.
Abomination is in Shang Chi. This means the Hulk film is 100% a part of the MCU.
You both just proved my point. How can Spiderman be accepted, but not the other films?
Also, you two are saying different things.
One is saying that if it isn't MCU which is the Marvel Cinematic Universe, then it doesn't matter.
The other is saying, if it isn't produced by Marvel Studios, it doesn't matter.
This is the absurdity of most modern Marvel fans.
Actually, just so you can have the facts:Because Spiderman is done by Marvel Studios and is in the MCU.
Maybe you genuinely don't know this?
Did you not see Kevin Feige promoting Spiderman?
Actually, just so you can have the facts:
Spiderman is co-produced by Columbia Pictures and Marvel Studios and distributed by Sony Pictures.
Unlike Avengers Endgame which was solely produced by Marvel Studios and distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures.
But, similar to The Incredible Hulk which was solely produced by Marvel Studios and distributed by Universal Pictures. Yes, Kevin Feige is listed as a producer.
Which further supports my point that some people like to include Spiderman, but do not want to include films such a The Incredible Hulk, which was produced by KF and Marvel.
The new Spiderman trilogy was produced by Marvel.You both just proved my point. How can Spiderman be accepted, but not the other films?
Also, you two are saying different things.
One is saying that if it isn't MCU which is the Marvel Cinematic Universe, then it doesn't matter.
The other is saying, if it isn't produced by Marvel Studios, it doesn't matter.
This is the absurdity of most modern Marvel fans.
I'm gonna be in Hawaii
Just realized we're booked on an Alaskan cruise...that leaves May 2nd
Gonna hav'ta wait till I get back 2 weeks later to see this![]()
Exactly!!It's 2022. If you don't know what is produced by Marvel or whats not then you can't be helped
No, Spiderman was co-produced by both Marvel and Sony. You will not find it anywhere where it says Marvel produced Spiderman without Sony.The new Spiderman trilogy was produced by Marvel.
The Hulk is co-owned by universal, hence why there is no focus on really developing him. They would have to share profits with them for a solo Hulk movie.
Venom and that other shit is Sony, and not part of the main MCU. Morbius might be, we will find out later.
I said that for people like you!Exactly!!
Spiderman is co-produced by Columbia Pictures and Marvel Studios and distributed by Sony Pictures.
Unlike Avengers Endgame which was solely produced by Marvel Studios and distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures.
But, similar to The Incredible Hulk which was solely produced by Marvel Studios and distributed by Universal Pictures. Yes, Kevin Feige is listed as a producer.
Those Hulk films are not MCU. Stop it. /thread.
Marvel consumers they ain't fans their consumers. That dude who said he'd watch a squirrel girl show in the Ms marvel thread proves my point. They'll watch any damn thing as long as the Disney marvel brand is stamped on it. Quite a few of them don't know shit about the source material either . It's just a wave they're riding. Take marvel fa.... I mean consumers.You both just proved my point. How can Spiderman be accepted, but not the other films?
Also, you two are saying different things.
One is saying that if it isn't MCU which is the Marvel Cinematic Universe, then it doesn't matter.
The other is saying, if it isn't produced by Marvel Studios, it doesn't matter.
This is the absurdity of most modern Marvel fans.
I agree with this.The 2008 Hulk film is part of the MCU but I agree that the others are not part of it.
Bro, read between the lines.No, Spiderman was co-produced by both Marvel and Sony. You will not find it anywhere where it says Marvel produced Spiderman without Sony.
Yes, Hulk is a Universal property just like Spiderman is a Sony property. Your point makes zero sense. They share Spiderman profits with Sony. Read the fine print. The problem with Hulk was multifaceted beginning with the movie being wack. Second was that it wasn't as fun as Ironman. Third was Norton was a bad cast. Forth, Nort9n shifted on the movie before it was released.
Venom, and the other shit you mentioned are in Spiderman's Universe. So, Spiderman is included in that other shit you speak of.
And yes, the incredible hulk is a part of the MCU due to multiple references.
“Last time I was in New York, I broke Harlem.” This was a reference to his fight with The Abomination at the end of The Incredible Hulk.
Cmon man. Some of yall Luke to argue just to argue when you have been proved wrong three posts ago
Bro, read between the lines.
The Hulk is MCU, but they don't own the rights, hence why will never see a real incredible Hulk movie until this is resolved. Disney is not going to put the $$$ into a property they don't fully own. The guys who produced the Hulk movie were not the same guys that did Hulk. There are several Youtube videos talking about it. Fucking Edward Norton was doing rewrites and shit. How did he have that much power? Cause it wasn't really a Marvel production.
Spiderman was so damaged by Sony, they had to bow down and get the Marvel machine behind it. If you look now, Morbius is getting shitty reviews. Venom was and is ass
You also said Morbius and Venom. So tell me about them. I already know but tell me how they are MCU.
Hulk movies aint MCU.
Just like X Men ain't MCU.
You usually are are super chill poster. But you acting weird when it comes to Marvel movies.
Marvel Studios releases its films in groups called "Phases".[79][80] Phase One consists of Iron Man (2008), The Incredible Hulk (2008), Iron Man 2 (2010), Thor (2011), and Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)
I will say it again to reiterate my main point which has been prove many times over.........
Some are saying that if it isn't MCU which is the Marvel Cinematic Universe, then it doesn't matter.
Other are saying, if it isn't produced by Marvel Studios, it doesn't matter.
This is the absurdity of most modern Marvel fans.
No need to respond to him bro; he just talking to talk famMayne!
The MCU and Marvel Studios are on the the same. Hulk waa the 2nd film in the MCU.
The Tom Holland Spider-Man is MCU.
Sony had to the Marvel Studios do the character justice after the previoys trilogy. All Sony has on that bitch is a name stamp and profits but all the other shit is Marvel Studios.
All them other Marvel Chacter movies under other Studios aint MCU so in the context of this thread they dont factor into the MCU.
Fox and Sony 100% produced shit is not grouped into the MCU. Only thing common is they are Marvel characters.
And yes the MCU has dropped some duds, but these mofos made plenty of great products and huge events that hit on 100% the in theater opening night of Black Panther and Infinity War were electric. Infinity War was the most electric atmosphere while viewing a film.
Its not at my normal amc theater right now.Tickets on sale. Fandango and AMC are acting up, but I managed to get mine for the 5th.