The reason we don’t have high speed rails is not because of ‘politics’, it’s because the government would have to take all the land around the rails and destroy all the housing/farms on it.
It would cost billions of dollars.
In China they basically take the land and give the finger and a few pennies to the owner.
Anyone that has taken trains across states realize just how many homes are right next to the train tracks. All those homes, and those in the surrounding areas would have to be destroyed.
Given how our population expects some fairness out of government, it’s not possible.
This isn't true. The infrastructure is already in place. This country has been connected by rails for almost 200 years. High speed trains wouldn't be a land grab. It would just be a huge upgrade/enhancement project. And before you tell me how wrong I am, I work for the U.S. Department of Transportation.