thats fantasy - where did you get that from? - last night in this thread I posted complete reporting from multiple sources on her court filings arguing against death row appeals, covering dirty prosecutors, suppression of exculpatory evidence etc
I read up on that case as well. Apparently a defendant was sent to prison on a drug charge. The prosecutors office discovered that a technician who had access to the drugs used in the case tampered with it in some way. The article didn't say if the tech person was using or selling the drugs. Nor did they use the word "tamper" but "sabotage". In a situation like this the prosecutors office is supposed to tell the defendant's attorney of the incident but they didn't because they knew that the case would get turned by the judge. The defense files a motion to have the evidence deemed inadmissible and then have the case thrown out. The prosecutor didn't want to see a guilty person go free on a technicality so they didn't say anything. Eventually the defense found out and the defendant was set free. It just so happens that the tech person was dipping in the evidence of a few more cases as well. The tech person was relieved of their duties. I believe 60 people were ultimately release on the same technicality. The AG of Cali at that time wrote a scathing op ed about the whole thing and the actions of Ms. Harris. Make no mistake...what she did was unethical, but was justice served? She did the wrong thing for the right reason imo and if someone tries to call her on that, I suspect she will be prepared. Didn't save the article but if I find it again I'll post the link.