Yes they would have fought over it, you think these animals that live in the wild follow proper etiquette?Interesting test would be what if there wasnt that divider between the two moneys. Would they be jealous of each other and try to take each other shit
No but I believe they have some form of etiquetteYes they would have fought over it, you think these animals that live in the wild follow proper etiquette?
Yes, kneel to the leader of the group or get killedNo but I believe they have some form of etiquette
you're an idealist. Real life will kill you.I hope the cucumber monkey got a whole bowl of grapes after that test. Homie look like he was about to get violent.
You need to watch more nature shows.No but I believe they have some form of etiquette
I wouldn't say that hate is at the forefront, but the idea that you are being treated unfairly, can bring out the animal in you. Humans react the same way. Equal pay for equal work is an example. CACs vs us and Mens vs women.Interesting! Hate is inate.
Interesting! Since of fairnss is inate.
you're an idealist. Real life will kill you
I wouldn't say that hate is at the forefront, but the idea that you are being treated unfairly, can bring out the animal in you. Humans react the same way. Equal pay for equal work is an example. CACs vs us and Mens vs women.Interesting! Hate is inate.
Perhaps your communication was flawed. Write what you mean so that no interpretation is needed. You know me personally? Actually, what I said went over YOUR head. I guess I will have to watch your future posts to point out your lack of clarity. Keep hope alive.You missed what I was saying; that he better get grapes before he got violent in their establishment. It doesn't seem like this is the first time something went over your head. You seem real comfortable there.
no the test is what happens later when they all put together in monkey population..cause i have a feeling duke wasnt done with this..


Perhaps your communication was flawed. Write what you mean so that no interpretation is needed. You know me personally? Actually, what I said went over YOUR head. I guess I will have to watch your future posts to point out your lack of clarity. Keep hope alive.
What we witnessed is how the system of racism/white supremacy gets the victims to be complicit in their oppression.
This is an experiment on creating division. People have stated the obvious already. Give a select few access to resources and neglect the other's. That will breed violence within society/communities.
I also noticed something else. The grape monkey is being made into the monkey equivalent of a coon. He won't see anything wrong with tap dancing for grapes meanwhile the other monkey sees it differently.
Maybe I'm over analyzing this but I always look deeper into racist/white supremacist intentions. They do experiments and studies to figure out how to maintain the system.
Those screaming gay are almost always the ones who have that inner doubt about their masculinity. I just read what I posted. At no point did I promise to watch you. There are several posters here who will happily indulge you. I'm sure you know who they are. Your misinterpretation of what I wrote points to the fact that you might not be an intelligent human being so I have nothing further to say to you. I have to intention of dumbing myself down to your level. Grandma always told me...If you put your hand in shit it's never going to come out smelling like ice-cream. Sadly, I can deduce that you have been getting cucumber rewards. Just be happy with it.RIF.
You're going to watch me? Nigga, that's gay.
I don't know that it did but what you are suggesting is that it would be attacking its peer based on its own misplaced anger. The grape recipient did nothing to cause the imbalance but an animal like this doesn't have the logic or common sense to realize this. Even us humans, with our advanced intelligence, engage in this type of behavior - directing our anger in the wrong direction. Clearly, the person outside the cage is the one to blame but it's easier to attack our peers.Yeah the cucumber monkey definitely stepped to the grape monkey after all that was over. He was beyond heated.![]()
The only aggression that monkey #1 displayed against another was directed not towards the other monkey - but against the human tester who was paying the monkeys unequally. He threw the "unequal pay" back at her.I don't know that it did but what you are suggesting is that it would be attacking its peer based on its own misplaced anger. The grape recipient did nothing to cause the imbalance but an animal like this doesn't have the logic or common sense to realize this. Even us humans, with our advanced intelligence, engage in this type of behavior - directing our anger in the wrong direction. Clearly, the person outside the cage is the one to blame but it's easier to attack our peers.
The only aggression that monkey #1 displayed against another was directed not towards the other monkey - but against the human tester who was paying the monkeys unequally. He threw the "unequal pay" back at her.
So, I would say in that regard, that monkey had more common sense than a lot of people.
The only aggression that monkey #1 displayed against another was directed not towards the other monkey - but against the human tester who was paying the monkeys unequally. He threw the "unequal pay" back at her.
So, I would say in that regard, that monkey had more common sense than a lot of people.
Possibly. I would like to see the same test done with both monkeys in the same cage to see whether the cucumber monkey would first rage against the human, or if it would try to jack the grape monkey for its loot at the outset. Perhaps part of it would hinge upon the level of socialization between the two monkeys prior to testing.I think it is because the person discriminating against them was clearly visible. Also, there was a separation between the two monkeys. I am going to surmise that if they were in the same cage and the other monkey felt helpless then it would turn on the other monkey in order to get the grapes.
Nope. But people of color should recognize how the machinations of white supremacy operate in such a way to divide and conquer by elevating certain victims of white supremacy above certain others, and then direct our energies at unifying against that corrupt system. The Black Panthers of the 60s had other groups of both people of color and poor whites whom they allied with - all realizing that they were living under a corrupt system that really didn't give a shit about any of them.So in terms of human inequality should humans throw the $100 bonus back because a coworker received $300? Protest yes, but don't throw something of value away because it's not the value of someone else's reward.