White Male Privilege Rebuttal Construction Thread

I think it's important to have this ready today.

Here is my response (this is my first draft). I could work on it some more later.

<6. Assigned to eewwllThe truth is, though, that I have been exceptionally privileged in my life, albeit not in the way any detractors would have it.
It has been my distinct privilege that my grandparents came to America.

The very truth of the matter is that your entire existence in this country is based on privilege. The U.S. government (along with other western governments) legislated the type of immigrants they wanted. If your grandparents had been Haitians, for instance, you likely wouldn't even be in this country. Either you're intellectually bankrupt on this point or being extremely disingenuous. Take a look at the history of laws concerning immigration and naturalization in the United States if you would like to educate yourself. Your parents were privileged to fit the desired profile.



First, that there was a place at all that would take them from the ruins of Europe. And second, that such a place was one where they could legally enter, learn the language, and acclimate to a society that ultimately allowed them to flourish.

Yes. Your grandparents ,as privileged whites from Europe, were allowed to enter a place where other whites from Europe had successfully pillaged and built on the back of slave labor. Surely that had nothing to do with your parents ability to rise from the ashes of war-torn Europe. Certainly, if your grandparents were blacks from Senegal, they would have been afforded the same opportunities. Surely.





It was their privilege to come to a country that grants equal protection under the law to its citizens, that cares not about religion or race, but the content of your character.


I'm not even sure where to start with this statement. You're praising a country for offering equal protection by law to its citizens during a time where certain citizens, indeed, did not have equal protection by law. Only your white male privileged soul would allow you to vomit such profound contradictions into the air in such a proud way. Surely, you are aware that, when your parents came to this country, only a specific subsector of society was even allowed to enter a voting booth (amongst a plethoa of other things?)


It was my privilege that my grandfather was blessed with resolve and an entrepreneurial spirit, and that he was lucky enough to come to the place where he could realize the dream of giving his children a better life than he had.
>

While your grandparents were building their business, they may have taken the time to read about the Tulsa race riots that destroyed a vibrtant black community dubbed "The Black Wall Street". Those destroyed communities didn't have resolve and an entrepreneurial spirit, huh? They were just unlucky to be born in a place where their own government sanctioned viligante attacks on their communities.

Blistering!
 
Here's what I don't get, whites in privy positions are quick to point out how some great grandparent had to survive some atrocity. WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH YOU?!!!! Funny how they can fall back on something that DIDN'T HAPPEN TO THEM to justify their privilege, but we can't use slavery and it's Jim Crow repercussions to explain our overall plight, because "that had nothing to do with us or them." They're quick to tell us "I never owned slaves.", yeah, you never had to escape Nazi controlled Poland in the dead of night either, so shut up about it. Whether you want to admit it or not, white skin gives you certain advantages in this country. Just you because you don't acknowledge it, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.

*puts away soapbox. goes back to studying for exam*
 
Last edited:
I read that response in its entirety and if I could shake all of y'all hands I would. That is an AMAZING read.

Grammatical errors aside, may I offer the following:

I think the main critique I have is the flow of the letter. You can look at it and tell that it was written by more than one person. This IMO gives the impression that it's not one collective thought but instead a group of ideas mashed together.

To edit this would require a melding of points (combing the references if the Black Wall Street or holocaust citations, for example) to make them one collective thought. As it reads now it's a bunch of chapters of a book without much distinction of when one chapter ends and the next begins. and yes I see the Roman numerals but i think that won't be in the final draft and it further proves my point because even without those I could probably tell when the baton is passed from one person to the next.

To remedy this I'd take the approach of having each persons thoughts on a separate sheet of paper and take the ideas expressed and combine those thoughts into one.

Right now, as is, this shit is ether. You get this to flow like water and it turns to Hiroshima.....

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
 
damn, just seeing this.

excellent work, fellas.

this fuckin cornball actually got looks for this crock of turds.
 
Here's what I don't get, whites in privy positions are quick to point out how some great grandparent had to survive some atrocity. WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH YOU?!!!! Funny how they can fall back on something that DIDN'T HAPPEN TO THEM to justify their privilege, but we can't use slavery and it's Jim Crow repercussions to explain our overall plight, because "that had nothing to do with us or them." They're quick to tell us "I never owned slaves.", yeah, you never had to escape Nazi controlled Poland in the dead of night either, so shut up about it. Whether you want to admit it or not, white skin gives you certain advantages in this country. Just you because you don't acknowledge it, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.

*puts away soapbox. goes back to studying for exam*




The existing of federal agencies today points to the validity of the issues we raise, EEOC etc and the compensation paid to black farmers etc..


What i normally do is correlate the struggle of other groups e.g. women and the real movement in corporate america to promote women to leadership positions.

Then ask if that is not valid.

If it is then why is 400 years of that fuckery on a much larger scale and impact not valid?

Then i say you didn't own slaves

But what would you say to the child of the neighbor your dad robbed?

My bad, I didn't do it while cheesing with the benefits of the ill-gotten gain?

What do you call someone who drives the getaway car but didn't go into the bank to do the actual robbery?


:cool:
 
Should I had sources to my post....lord knows I have them....

Whatever sources you have could be left here in this thread or the original I started as jewels for others to enjoy.....:yes: I for one would love to have that information.

And to Kaya that point about racism being about skin color as much as feminism is about a moustache...... Wowsers

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
 
i'm a little late to the party, but i'd like to take a stab at the final edit if you guys don't mind.
 
The existing of federal agencies today points to the validity of the issues we raise, EEOC etc and the compensation paid to black farmers etc..


What i normally do is correlate the struggle of other groups e.g. women and the real movement in corporate america to promote women to leadership positions.

Then ask if that is not valid.

If it is then why is 400 years of that fuckery on a much larger scale and impact not valid?

Then i say you didn't own slaves

But what would you say to the child of the neighbor your dad robbed?

My bad, I didn't do it while cheesing with the benefits of the ill-gotten gain?


What do you call someone who drives the getaway car but didn't go into the bank to do the actual robbery?


:cool:

:cheers:
 
The existing of federal agencies today points to the validity of the issues we raise, EEOC etc and the compensation paid to black farmers etc..


What i normally do is correlate the struggle of other groups e.g. women and the real movement in corporate america to promote women to leadership positions.

Then ask if that is not valid.

If it is then why is 400 years of that fuckery on a much larger scale and impact not valid?

Then i say you didn't own slaves

But what would you say to the child of the neighbor your dad robbed?

My bad, I didn't do it while cheesing with the benefits of the ill-gotten gain?

What do you call someone who drives the getaway car but didn't go into the bank to do the actual robbery?


:cool:

Yo ...... my sides!!! :roflmao2:

Sometimes there's so much truth in something you just gotta laugh

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
 
i'm a little late to the party, but i'd like to take a stab at the final edit if you guys don't mind.

Please do. I always thought the final editing (because this is being crowd-written) was always going to be a very serious issue (like spider said).
 
"Sure, they escaped the Nazis and whatnot, but they were also given the lushest part of an occupied country with the help of the most powerful governments in the world, AND that "country" gets about 8 billion dollars per year from us. Where does the "struggle" end and "privilege" kick in for them? Where's the line?" - the wife
 
I have a lot of reading to do in here

and it sickens me looking at the vote count

we have too many coons and crackas on this site
 
I read that response in its entirety and if I could shake all of y'all hands I would. That is an AMAZING read.

Grammatical errors aside, may I offer the following:

I think the main critique I have is the flow of the letter. You can look at it and tell that it was written by more than one person. This IMO gives the impression that it's not one collective thought but instead a group of ideas mashed together.

To edit this would require a melding of points (combing the references if the Black Wall Street or holocaust citations, for example) to make them one collective thought. As it reads now it's a bunch of chapters of a book without much distinction of when one chapter ends and the next begins. and yes I see the Roman numerals but i think that won't be in the final draft and it further proves my point because even without those I could probably tell when the baton is passed from one person to the next.

To remedy this I'd take the approach of having each persons thoughts on a separate sheet of paper and take the ideas expressed and combine those thoughts into one.

Right now, as is, this shit is ether. You get this to flow like water and it turns to Hiroshima.....

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
Wouldn't it make more sense to present it as a point-counterpoint piece rather than as one long overarching response?
 
My contribution #4 :


"First, that there was a place at all that would take them from the ruins of Europe. And second, that such a place was one where they could legally enter, learn the language, and acclimate to a society that ultimately allowed them to flourish."

Unfortunately, during that very same time, other groups were not "allowed" to flourish.
Examples:
FBI's illegal COINTELPRO operation http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/cointelpro.html
Eq
The need for Civil Rights legislation
The need for a federal agency called Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Equal work, equal pay legislation which we are still struggling with, the status quo being white males.
Don't ask, Don't Tell legislation

The fact that there are African Americans who migrate to Germany and flourish do NOT invalidate the existence of systematic programs that existed to destroy Jews and surely does not place blame on those Jews who failed to flourish in Germany today.




"Maybe my privilege is that they worked hard enough to raise four children, and to send them to Jewish day school and eventually City College."


You said earlier "acclimate to a society", yet your parents chose for you to attend a Jewish school.
Why?
Shouldn't you have attended an American school? Learn't American values?
Is there something wrong with American schools? The same schools African Americans, Hispanics and Asians attend?

What exists in Jewish schools that you could not get from an American school?


End of contribution



Thoughts;

Our arguments should be broad enough that it covers systematic discrimination of several groups since he is painting utopia for everyone.

It's easy to talk shit about AA but not so easy to do for groups like women and gays, he bites and it's all over


:lol:

Imma call you,"The Toaster". You just singed his entire premise.
 
Couple things. That's not the final, order of the piece, like I said it was put in order so writers can find their part and easily identify what they said and give the concerns about their area before final editing which will be posted here.

other than that i got no problems with sammy editing as well as fixing the flow of the piece or if we want, to post it as point counterpoint. it's up to us.
 
Couple things. That's not the final, order of the piece, like I said it was put in order so writers can find their part and easily identify what they said and give the concerns about their area before final editing which will be posted here.

other than that i got no problems with sammy editing as well as fixing the flow of the piece or if we want, to post it as point counterpoint. it's up to us.
i think it makes it more digestible for the short attention spanned ass layperson, and also makes the editing a little easier.

really just editing for redundancy and grammar for the most part.

you guys are some very intelligent brothers.
 
i think it makes it more digestible for the short attention spanned ass layperson, and also makes the editing a little easier.

really just editing for redundancy and grammar for the most part.

you guys are some very intelligent brothers.

alright have at it. i want to put it up on the site today so it can be shared across various social media streams. :yes:

Title will be
What's The Easiest Way To Prove White Privilege Does Exist? Write An Essay Claiming It Doesn't.
 
you guys are some very intelligent brothers.

I agree. Everyone who has contributed has done everyone proud. Hopefully this will be the start of something. Maybe collectively start a blog that challenges racial issues from sports to politics. Who knows?
 
I wish someone would remind his delusional, ignorant ass that those grandparents of his who were running from the Nazis had black soldiers from America who came to help save their asses and even though these heroic soldiers came to help their asses, German PWO's were treated better than the black soldiers buy white US troops!!!! His Jew ass needs to choke on that for a while.. this is a perfect example that racism is a cancer and white skin always is always treated better, so YES you benefit fromwhite skin!
 
i think it makes it more digestible for the short attention spanned ass layperson, and also makes the editing a little easier.

really just editing for redundancy and grammar for the most part.

you guys are some very intelligent brothers.
I have to say, this is much stronger than I would have anticipated. Wish I had the time to get into it.
 
The question whites need to understand concerning white privilege is not that whites need to apologize for it, but to accept the probability of it existing. Considering that in most instances, whites use a historical narrative centered around the doggedness of self-assertiveness misses the counter-argument that some 'people' were denied that opportunity during the same period asserted. So to imply that his current success is based solely on individual effort and not privilege runs contrary to the historical fact that some were denied that. And that the mindset needed to 'justify' these conditions for others are in fact the underpinnings for a society wherein those opportunities denied others are more available if effort is given; If you are considered a member of the dominating group. Narcissism is considered a mental illness; Denial and self-aggrandizement are symptoms of this condition, therefore the targets of the authors assessments need not consider this nonsense because his entire argument is false, and delusional.
 
The question whites need to understand concerning white privilege is not that whites need to apologize for it, but to accept the probability of it existing. Considering that in most instances, whites use a historical narrative centered around the doggedness of self-assertiveness misses the counter-argument that some 'people' were denied that opportunity during the same period asserted. So to imply that his current success is based solely on individual effort and not privilege runs contrary to the historical fact that some were denied that. And that the mindset needed to 'justify' these conditions for others are in fact the underpinnings for a society wherein those opportunities denied others are more available if effort is given; If you are considered a member of the dominating group. Narcissism is considered a mental illness; Denial and self-aggrandizement are symptoms of this condition, therefore the targets of the authors assessments need not be considered because his entire argument is false, and delusional.

I started to write something along these lines as a part of the response to his intro and I think this point needs to be a part of this.

Nobody is asking him to apologize! It's just about having a basic level of consciousness and understanding.
 
Wouldn't it make more sense to present it as a point-counterpoint piece rather than as one long overarching response?

That was my original thought. I like it better in point-counterpoint form. It just needs to still be cohesive (in terms of appearing as one voice).
 
That was my original thought. I like it better in point-counterpoint form. It just needs to still be cohesive (in terms of appearing as one voice).

I think that is the best way to present it too. I tried to make shorter paragraphs because that's how Internet readers read. I think bold subheadings should be used too. Most of us put our pieces out rather quickly, so grammatical errors are to be expected.
 
I think that is the best way to present it too. I tried to make shorter paragraphs because that's how Internet readers read. I think bold subheadings should be used too. Most of us put our pieces out rather quickly, so grammatical errors are to be expected.

Yep. I agree on the bold subheadings if possible.
 
Back
Top