Re: As the Lakers prepare to retire Shaq's jersey, Kobe now appreciates his former fo
of course he does
of course he does
Two is greater than "one, too." .
SupremeExtremist said:If you read that book, while you may not agree with it, you will at least be able to to understand why Kobe would say the shit he said to the cops in Colorado.![]()
Dr Buss made the call after Shag gave him the "he goes or I go" ultimatum.
I don't have to read the book to understand what Kobe's bitch-ass did, not only to Shaq, but to Gasol as well (allegedly). Shaq should have put Kobe on the IR for months for that sucker shit....
I'm a Laker fan, but I'll tell ANYONE within earshot that I don't fuck with Kobe, nor do I fuck with niggas that subscribe to his bullshit.
Quotes? Excerpts?You dudes need to read 'Mad Game' by Roland Lazenby.
You will quickly find out why Kobe and Shaq couldn't work...
...and it wasn't just because Kobe wanted to be 'the man'.
Shaq did and said a lot of really fucked up shit to Kobe. If you read that book, while you may not agree with it, you will at least be able to to understand why Kobe would say the shit he said to the cops in Colorado.
There is REAL hatred between those dudes.
Quotes? Excerpts?
Quotes? Excerpts?
bumping this.
Yeah. Hit us with some quotes from the book if you have them.
If you look at in that narrow view, then Buss made the right decision.
However, it was Kobe in the 2004 Finals that drove Shaq to make the ultimatum.
So if Kobe just stayed in his lane, it would have never been an issue in the first place.
Come on man, that shit Kobe pulled in the 2004 Finals was fucking ridiculous (even as a Pistons fans that shit was disturbing).
Let me get it. I want to quote verbatim.
Give me about 15 to 30 minutes to read through it, and get back to ya'll.
Update: How about this: I'll update as I find them, instead of trying to post them all at once.
Yup Kobe pulled some straight b.s in the 04 finals
Let me get it. I want to quote verbatim.
Give me about 15 to 30 minutes to read through it, and get back to ya'll.
no matter what he said can't be worse than what kobe told the police
Maybe ya'll shouldn't read that book.
If ya'll don't like Kobe now...
...that book ain't gonna help at all.![]()
You can't tell the future. You see where he is now? He got 5. What in the world makes you think he'd get 5 total with Shaq then two on his own if they're struggling to get no 6.age would dictate it was going to happen ANYWAY. why not USE HIM to get as many as he's worth and then get the rest on your own.
if he used shaq for 5 then got 2
you can't tell him shit
just like you can't tell him shit now cause no matter what you say once he got that 1 without shaq the whole argument is thrown out the window.
You can't tell the future. You see where he is now? He got 5. What in the world makes you think he'd get 5 total with Shaq then two on his own if they're struggling to get no 6.
It really paints Kobe as a weirdo, anti-social, obsessed with basketball and his own goals. Tex Winter said he tried to talk to Kobe, because he said Kobe seemed like the kind of guy that would have a 'nervous breakdown' over basketball.
...I don't THINK Kobe intended to piss people off, but dude was so locked into his mode until expectation of team-play were a distant second concern.
Maybe he should've picked up golf or tennis.
How do you know this? How would one come to that conclusion in 2004? Think of players who've won once and never again, or got to the finals and lost and never got back.and Shaq won one too.
However, those guys should have won more together and Kobe could have still pickedup up two more later.
Maybe it's because I'm a Kobe fan...
...but, to me, it wasn't THAT bad. He didn't say Shaq raped anyone. He didn't even say Shaq committed a crime. He just said that Shaq pays women, and maybe he should've did that to not be in this situation.
Frankly, it's only bad because it came out. Otherwise, what can the cops do with that information other than think Shaq is a trick?
How do you know this? How would one come to that conclusion in 2004? Think of players who've won once and never again, or got to the finals and lost and never got back.
Hindsight is always 20/20. A lot of armchair quarterbacks in here.
I don't know who the "we" you're referring to are, but I never said they couldn't have won more chips together and I'm not defending Kobe (you're projecting). I'm saying that at the time Kobe, Shaq, Phil Jackson and Dr Buss felt their tandem was too damage to continue and the decision was made to stick with the guy who would go on to win more chips than the other guy. That's not a defense; those are facts. If you weren't so busy trying call Kobe out, you would see there's nothing for me to defend.Stop trying to defend Kobe for a second (notice the trend) and just think about this. We are saying that not only could Kobe have gotten the two he eventually got a few years later, he could have gotten those two and most likely at least a couple of more WITH shaq.
Shaq was still good enough to team up with Wade and take a non-competitive team to a title. That just proves that Shaq still had titles in him.
Shit, the lakers should have won in 2004 if Kobe would have stayed in his lane.
Stop with the soap opera narratives and he said she said, bruh... Dr Buss chose to roll with the player he felt would earn him more chips and money from that point forward. Of course Kobe did some dumb shit... so did Shaq. The situation reached critical mass and a basketball decision was made. I dig Shaq and Kobe, both as teammates and rivals, but nothing lasts forever, man. I'm a lifelong Lakers fan and even I'm not crying over what could have been as much as cats who don't even like the Lakers do. That's crazy.If you look at in that narrow view, then Buss made the right decision.
However, it was Kobe in the 2004 Finals that drove Shaq to make the ultimatum.
So if Kobe just stayed in his lane, it would have never been an issue in the first place.
Come on man, that shit Kobe pulled in the 2004 Finals was fucking ridiculous (even as a Pistons fans that shit was disturbing).
But as a MAN, knowing what Kobe experienced with Shaq- they bullying, the disrespect- would YOU opt for championships, or to forge your own name?I said should and could (as in possibly).
But I think we can all conclude that team was good enough to continue to compete for titles.
and for the next 4 years, the Lakers didnt even get out of the first round... So I think logically we could conclude that Kobe had a better chance of winning titles with Shaq (who was still a dominant player)
Winning with Shaq wasn't necessarily a given. What would be a given is a deteriorating relationship between two prideful men.
Yep. And it was very clear Shaq was comfortable finishing his career in a supporting role because he did it his last few years.
Kobe just wanted to take over too soon.
I don't know who the "we" you're referring to are, but I never said they couldn't have won more chips together and I'm not defending Kobe (you're projecting). I'm saying that at the time Kobe, Shaq, Phil Jackson and Dr Buss felt their tandem was too damage to continue and the decision was made to stick with the guy who would go on to win more chips than the other guy. That's not a defense; those are facts. If you weren't so busy trying call Kobe out, you would see there's nothing for me to defend.
I'm a Kobe fan and even I'm not crying over what could have been as much as cats who don't even like the Lakers do. That's crazy.
I fixed that for you.
As I fan of basketball, I would have liked to seen everything milked out of that squad. That team ended prematurely and Shaq was still in his prime (the end of it....but still in it).
Shit, how did his time in Miami end? His relationship with Kobe is better than it is with DWade.
.
But as a MAN, knowing what Kobe experienced with Shaq- they bullying, the disrespect- would YOU opt for championships, or to forge your own name?
I think you guys should put yourselves in that type of position and think about what you'd do.
Winning with Shaq wasn't necessarily a given. What would be a given is a deteriorating relationship between two prideful men.