Nash to the Knicks....![]()
That would be funny...then you would have 3/5 of the starting line-up that can't cover anybody.
Call me what you wantbut the Bulls have decisions to make. Boozer is not exactly a hot commodity. He is a year or two away from consistent mediocrity. Also a Turkeyglue buyout will come quicker because his contract is shorter than Boozer's. I am not to keen on a washed up highly paid bum like Turkeyglue but this is a necessary move for the Bulls seasons down the line.
Ummmm
Jordan was a floor away from signing with the Snicks in 98.
If I'm rose in getting the super max.
Like more than Joe johnson
That would be funny...then you would have 3/5 of the starting line-up that can't cover anybody.
If the Knicks get Steve Nash they'd be the same fucking team Danandtony had in Phoenix. It makes no fucking sense.
This isn't MVP Steve Nash that we may get... I don't like it...Hopefully, I'm wrong.... Who knows???
![]()
You mean a 60-win team??
A 60 win team that constantly got its ass whooped in the post season by a team that plays defense? That 60 win team?
Which is still better than a New York team that's only won 60 games once in the last 40 years. At least it would give them a chance to compete.
You know how they say be careful when arguing with idiots because those observing cant tell you apart? Yea, well thats you right now.They're past settling for just winning 60 games. They have Amare and Melo. That's a good foundation. Start building defense around those guys. When you have 2 stars on your team you're not just settling to just win 60 games and then go into the playoffs and get smashed. They need to be building a team.
They're past settling for just winning 60 games. They have Amare and Melo. That's a good foundation. Start building defense around those guys. When you have 2 stars on your team you're not just settling to just win 60 games and then go into the playoffs and get smashed. They need to be building a team.
That would be funny...then you would have 3/5 of the starting line-up that can't cover anybody.
This is what I'm hoping for:
Derek Fisher to Orlando for Dwight Howard.
Orlando will get a clutch performer, who has five rings. I see a match made in heaven for Orlando.
Even if it was MVP Steve Nash MVP Steve Nash couldn't play a lick of defense. Its one thing to try and hide Amare and Melo's defensive efficiencies. Now you want to add in another player in Nash? They might as well just say fuck defense and just hope they can outscore the opposing team. Nash can't guard anyone and NEVER could.
If they stay @ 17 they will pick Darius Morris, many consider him the best pure pg in the draft but he's young and raw which is why learning behind billups(or nash if they can pull it) will work out. And dolan has given permission for walsh to buy at least two more firsts and seconds. The spurs r interested in selling their pick as r celtics/bulls....firsts cost 3mil each and seconds are 1.5mil... plus the knicks r tryin to trade td and 3mil for casspri...donnie is gonna go out big in his last draft and get us back what we lost in the melo deal
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
This is what I'm hoping for:
Derek Fisher to Orlando for Dwight Howard.
Orlando will get a clutch performer, who has five rings. I see a match made in heaven for Orlando.
Rose will never accept not being the highest paid player on the team.
Nope.
And what money did the sox spend?????
The red sox and Yankees yes.
They spent 100 million for a fucking jap
This is what I'm hoping for:
Derek Fisher to Orlando for Dwight Howard.
Orlando will get a clutch performer, who has five rings. I see a match made in heaven for Orlando.
I see what you mean but imo:Why does everybody hate on Jeff Green so much? He may not be great, but he is a solid performer in points, rebounds, defense, and he was a positive, mature locker room presence with the Thunder. I thought he should have been on the USA Worlds team, but he was the last cut...people in Boston wanted to hate on him because he's not the type of player that Kendrick Perkins is, and that wasn't fair...
This isn't MVP Steve Nash that we may get... I don't like it...Hopefully, I'm wrong.... Who knows???
![]()
Well chris paul will be a knick
1. he was involved in one of the worst Celtics trades this decade...
What happened?
I'm at work and just heard on the wired instead of a hard cap it will be a flex cap basically if u got money u are good if u don't oh well.
so add 4 million to everyone cap. The Pacer now have 34 millions in cap space that's if the players agree. It will move to a hard cap later but for the next couple years flex cap.
Meaning knicks can now afford cp3 in 2012 the nets this summer if dwight is a free agent can go after him and keep brook at the same time.
Teams like Lakers and Orlando can't do nothing but seem anyone under the cap of 60 million is okay
I'm at work and just heard on the wired instead of a hard cap it will be a flex cap basically if u got money u are good if u don't oh well.
so add 4 million to everyone cap. The Pacer now have 34 millions in cap space that's if the players agree. It will move to a hard cap later but for the next couple years flex cap.
Meaning knicks can now afford cp3 in 2012 the nets this summer if dwight is a free agent can go after him and keep brook at the same time.
Teams like Lakers and Orlando can't do nothing but seem anyone under the cap of 60 million is okay
I'm at work and just heard on the wired instead of a hard cap it will be a flex cap basically if u got money u are good if u don't oh well.
so add 4 million to everyone cap. The Pacer now have 34 millions in cap space that's if the players agree. It will move to a hard cap later but for the next couple years flex cap.
Meaning knicks can now afford cp3 in 2012 the nets this summer if dwight is a free agent can go after him and keep brook at the same time.
Teams like Lakers and Orlando can't do nothing but seem anyone under the cap of 60 million is okay