X-Men: Apocalypse' Review: It's A Franchise-Killing Disaster

The first FF was infinitely better than the most recent one. It's a kiddie version, but taking it for what it is, it wasn't that bad. The last one however...epically terrible. Crazy thing is it was decent up until they got their powers, then turned to utter shit. How do you even do that?

Yes, I was referring to the most recent FF. I disagree that it was decent at any point. Those people looked like they just got the script that morning and they were horribly miscast. The first one(s) were not bad considering. Imagine how much better they would have looked with modern FX. And more Kerry of course...:D
 
Fox can keep the movie rights just give up the creative control like Hulk and Spider-Man.

Bring them into the MCU but keep them at Fox were the X-Men can do the more dark mature adult content and also R Rated versions of Deadpool and Wolverine.

Similar to The Defenders on Netflix.
 
Someone said it best, the public resonates with Marvel, therefore all studios with comic book properties should seriously consider letting Marvel retain creative control before its too late.

I'm looking at this pragmatically: Disney paid $2Bn for freaking Star Wars....They could write a check for any other Marvel property they want.

If Fox fails with Xmen and FF, what's in it for Disney to allow Marvel to get the properties back on track? At that point if I'm Disney I tell Fox fuck you here's a check this our block now alright kid?

The Spidey deal maybe the only one like it because even shitty Spidey movies do $800 Ms. Thats a lot of money to buy back rights.
 
xmen90s.png


Kinberg confirms the next X-Men movie will be set in the 90s

You might have noticed a trend in the X-Men movies. 2011’s X-Men: First Class was set in the 1960s and its follow-up, X-Men: Days of Future Past, took place in the 1970s, with the upcomingX-Men: Apocalypse set to demolish the 1980s. One might be able to guess where the next X-Menfilm will be logically headed, and one would be right. ComingSoon.net caught up with Simon Kinberg at the film’s junket where he confirmed what you might already be thinking.

“The next one is set in the ’90s,” the franchise producer told us.

It’s unclear if Kinberg meant the next headline “X-Men” film in the series, or director Josh Boone’s in-development New Mutants feature, but check back here for further confirmation on what lies in store for Xavier’s gifted youngsters.

The X-Men comics saw a commercial boom during the 1990s following the character redesigns by Jim Lee, which went on to be the basis for the fan-favorite animated series and some of which are still being used today.

The upcoming New Mutants film is set to feature a new roster of super-powered teens, including Magik, Wolfsbane, Dani Moonstar, Cannonball, Sunspot, and Warlock with a previous report pointing toward Alexandra Shipp‘s Storm (who makes her debut in this summer’s X-Men: Apocalypse) and James McAvoy’s Professor Charles Xavier playing major roles in the film as well.


http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/ne...s-the-next-x-men-movie-will-be-set-in-the-90s


afro-shaking-head-no.gif
 
Xmem movies have been half decent, except last stand. The last xmen wasn't bad but I liked the rogue cut version better than the theatrical release.
 
It's crazy how white men are allowed to fail over and over and over again without repercussion.

Bryan Singer stinks, period. He's the Marvel equivalent to David Goyer.

Matthew Vaughn wrote and directed X-Men First Class and it was arguably the second best X-Men movie. Then Fox kicks him out to hand the reigns back to that faggit Singer who basically stuck with the script for DOFP which wasn't terrible. Now this fag gets to ruin the series again.

One of the reasons Sony let Marvel borrow the film rights to Spidey was because all the negative press they got from that hack and the pressure was on to get a deal. Unfortunately I don't think Fox will let Marvel get a crack at the X-Men. FF more likely. They'll just ride Deadpool until the wheels fall off with X-Force and New Mutants.

Fuck..
I wish I could like this post 1000 times. Nothing but the truth.
 
Wonder Woman (already in the can) justice League pushed back a few times. The rest won't happen....that's my prediction

Marvel releases movies sometimes twice a year? WB so shady they talking about releasing fims 2 years apart and 3 years from now. SMH
damn shame...
I think Shazam is going to happen - they got a greenlight actor passionate for the project - as long as he doesn't have any major flops in the next year or two WB will do it
Not sure about JL - Affleck is now an EP on it with veto on Snyder and sway over the final cut... Terrio is now head writer and overhauling the script.... barring Snyder throwing a tantrum I think WB pushes through
If WB execs and Afleck can convince Wan to stay and do Aquaman- it will happen, but if he walks :itsawrap:
 


THIS IS THE MASTER

DARKNESS OWNS EVERY SCENE HE WAS IN.

CRUISE LOOKED TERRIFIED EVERYTIME HE LOOKED AT HIM.



I know that you posted this as the joke but seriously... this is the model right here. This man Tim Curry, under a mountain of makeup and costuming was the most horrific vision of a heavy I had ever seen in my life as a kid. This is the model right here for Apocalypse. This should have been Fox's version of Thanos - the ENDGAME. Who in their movie verse is a bigger foe than him?

This is where Singer loses me. He knows what Kinberg didn't put in that script and he should feel in the blanks with performance. The start is giving us a badguy that is overpowered and frightening and charismatic and malevolent all at once.

Everything else should fall in place with a solid baddie at the helm. The Marvel movies have done it backwards and STILL they are successful even at the absence of a superior and magnificent villain (besides the always entertaining Loki) and the lost of a dangerous one (Winter Soldier)




oNE
 
X-Men: Apocalypse's Biggest Disappointment Is The Villainous Prune
gtjd0cajjjythjenyto0.jpg

Image via YouTube

As we’ve noted before, the pleasure of a superhero blockbuster lies in watching familiar, inevitable tropes refashioned in mildly refreshing ways. The people making these films are tasked not with outright originality but with clever recombination. How do we make the good guys defeat the bad guys—because they will defeat the bad guys—in a way that feels earned? How do you choreograph a centerpiece battle scene that feels balanced and involves all the characters when one of the combatants can only shape-shift and the other side controls the weather and wields a huge blade made out of psychic energy? How efficiently can we whisk our minor mutants from their homelands across Europe and Africa while leaving plenty of time for the main course? How can Bryan Singer devise yet another disorienting POV shot hurtling through the tubes of the mutant genome/complex machinery/ancient ruins?

Most pressing, in this case: how do we get anyone to care about another generic, omnipotent supervillain?

If you thought the answer might be “cast Oscar Isaac,” you were unexpectedly wrong. It’s been days since I watched the film, and only after consulting IMDB did I realize he was the guy behind the heavy-browed, brooding prune named Apocalypse. Not a beam of Isaac’s usual charisma makes its way through the three inches of bruise-purple cake frosting. By some impressive feat of writing, they took an immortal mutant demigod and rendered him so dull that you can’t be bothered to either hate him or root for him. He gets resurrected in a ritual that wouldn’t look out of place in Temple of Doom. The character that results is humorless, confusingly written, patched together from antiestablishment clichés, and fond of dry eugenics-flavored monologues. At one point, consciously or not, the movie even calls attention to how idiotic Apocalypse looks by granting Magneto (Michael Fassbender, again a high point) a gem of a diss: his first reaction upon seeing the franchise’s new villain could be paraphrased as “lmao wtf are u.” As the wiser eyes of the internet have already observed, if you tweak the color very slightly my dude looks suspiciously like Ivan Ooze from Mighty Morphin Power Rangers.


aejsscwzako4bspm3kg0.jpg

The movie centers around the newly arisen Apocalypse waking up in 1980s Cairo and recruiting a new team to do roughly what his name entails: stir shit up, cull the weak humans, allow mutants to reign supreme over the scorched earth. (He’s been attempting this periodically for millennia, transporting his consciousness into new bodies when old ones wear out.) Most of the movie consists of Apocalypse sowing chaos and the good mutants fixing things back up, with Magneto, as usual, straddling the line between the two camps.

But Apocalypse doesn’t make much sense, even setting the “suspend your disbelief, this is just a superhero movie” standard of sense. Which is to say that his character doesn’t seem to abide by any internal logic. While he seems to have control over every particle of his body and the world he walks through, he is suspiciously obsequious to human technology. He can enhance mutant powers, warp through space, and generate ornate costumes out of nothing, but still needs the services of several lame Horsemen beyond Magneto, the pretty-looking but forgettably acted Angel, Storm, and Psylocke. He appears to have powerful telepathy of his own, but still lusts after the powers of Charles Xavier—a plot point that feels contrived simply to give the villain a goal outside of plain destruction. His plan for doing so never really coheres, even as we watch nukes fired into the sky and bridges torn up and a metallic neo-pyramid erected. We get all the self-serious bloviating and none of the emotional payoff.


Apocalypse’s powers do occasionally make for some nice visuals, which is largely what you pay for in this kind of movie. Early on, several unsuspecting guys in Cairo get decapitated by dust just because the glum plum willed it. He’s not alone: Magnetodoes similarly heady work with a child’s locket a few minutes later.

The good guys provide some action as well, as they crusade once again to save the world and prove that not all mutants are out to destroy humankind.Nightcrawler is a godsend for fight scenes, adding a layer of spatial strategy to scenes that would otherwise consist largely of big bright beams blasting and missing their mark until eventually the beams clash. (Don’t worry, there are still so many freakin’ beams, many courtesy of the reintroduced Cyclops, who is okay as an angsty teen.) Quicksilver gets another funny, extended slow-mo sequence—the most crowd-pleasing shot of the movie—but when he attempts an encore in the final battle, it feels so tonally off as to be distracting; it’s bizarre to see his character, who saves so many mutants, relegated topure comic relief. We do get a brief, brutal (by X-Men standards) cameo that I won’t reveal but that you can easily guess if you’ve made it to the end of the trailer. Unfortunately, at its climax, the movie pulls the now-familiar move of retreating from the physical battlefield into a sterile abstracted mental plane, just so that Professor X and young Jean Grey (Sophie Turner, adequate but somehow just a little too muted to convince me of tortured, first-tier mutant energies roiling within her) can get their moment in the sun.

You know everything that’s going to happen in this multimillion-dollar color-by-numbers before you see it, except maybe what Apocalypse is capable of, which still won’t make any more sense by the time its over. What are the limits to his power? Even in the comics, the question is answered only in piecemeal fashion, and I’m tempted to say Apocalypse should have been have been left there rather than elevated to primary blockbuster bad guy status. At the outer fringe of his powers, though, he surely can sap the life out a cash-flush franchise that had been having plenty of fun in its last two installments.
 

Now I think that there is suppose to be a big announcement at Comic-Con, most likely Fantastic Four might be going back to Marvel or Fox will cut a deal with Disney.

The Russo Bros. said that they want Wolverine in a future MCU film, so who knows what deals might be going on behind close doors now:dunno:

i think that big announcement will be concerning Fox's X-Men themed television show based on the Hellfire Club :dunno:

as for Wolverine in the MCU they better recast him if it does happen..
as well as giving him this
wolverinecostume1-deadpool-movie-update-william-stryker-wolverine-weapon-x-jpeg-127822.jpg
 
THIS IS THE MASTER

DARKNESS OWNS EVERY SCENE HE WAS IN.

CRUISE LOOKED TERRIFIED EVERYTIME HE LOOKED AT HIM.



I know that you posted this as the joke but seriously... this is the model right here. This man Tim Curry, under a mountain of makeup and costuming was the most horrific vision of a heavy I had ever seen in my life as a kid. This is the model right here for Apocalypse. This should have been Fox's version of Thanos - the ENDGAME. Who in their movie verse is a bigger foe than him?

This is where Singer loses me. He knows what Kinberg didn't put in that script and he should feel in the blanks with performance. The start is giving us a badguy that is overpowered and frightening and charismatic and malevolent all at once.

Everything else should fall in place with a solid baddie at the helm. The Marvel movies have done it backwards and STILL they are successful even at the absence of a superior and magnificent villain (besides the always entertaining Loki) and the lost of a dangerous one (Winter Soldier)




oNE
that was the best physical representation of the devil
 
Lol I just saw the trailer before I saw this post and my thoughts were this movie is going to be terrible! This just confirms my thoughts.
 
First Class and the first original X-Men movie are the only two movies that was good to me......I don't understand,why Fox keep giving Brian Singer a fucking job.


:smh::smh::smh::smh:
 
It currently has 50% on rotten tomatoes so this reviewer aint the only one saying it sucks
 
Someone said it best, the public resonates with Marvel, therefore all studios with comic book properties should seriously consider letting Marvel retain creative control before its too late.

I'm looking at this pragmatically: Disney paid $2Bn for freaking Star Wars....They could write a check for any other Marvel property they want.

If Fox fails with Xmen and FF, what's in it for Disney to allow Marvel to get the properties back on track? At that point if I'm Disney I tell Fox fuck you here's a check this our block now alright kid?

The Spidey deal maybe the only one like it because even shitty Spidey movies do $800 Ms. Thats a lot of money to buy back rights.
Disney actually paid 4 bill for Lucas Films; Fox not gonna work with Disney because they aint under pressure like Sony was; I think that email leak really put alot of pressure on Sony; And that last Spiderman was awful; The public resonates with Marvel because they actually make good movies; and there movies,for the most part, keeps getting better; If there movies sucked, the public wouldnt resonate with nothing...
 
THIS IS THE MASTER

DARKNESS OWNS EVERY SCENE HE WAS IN.

CRUISE LOOKED TERRIFIED EVERYTIME HE LOOKED AT HIM.



I know that you posted this as the joke but seriously... this is the model right here. This man Tim Curry, under a mountain of makeup and costuming was the most horrific vision of a heavy I had ever seen in my life as a kid. This is the model right here for Apocalypse. This should have been Fox's version of Thanos - the ENDGAME. Who in their movie verse is a bigger foe than him?

This is where Singer loses me. He knows what Kinberg didn't put in that script and he should feel in the blanks with performance. The start is giving us a badguy that is overpowered and frightening and charismatic and malevolent all at once.

Everything else should fall in place with a solid baddie at the helm. The Marvel movies have done it backwards and STILL they are successful even at the absence of a superior and magnificent villain (besides the always entertaining Loki) and the lost of a dangerous one (Winter Soldier)




oNE

Man I actually went to the theater to see that shit. From the second that mufucka came on screen I was shook.lol Masterful performance. I thought it was a brother under all that makeup.
 
So I guess by the time Infinity Wars Part 2 comes out the X-Men movies will be set in the early 2000s and will just be a rerelease of the first X-Men....they making the same movies over again literally.

They're doing all that shit just to retain da rights no matter how shitty da movies are.
 
On sight I was like that ain't it.
Everyone says oh you judging pre rendered stuff
If yall don't get yall asses out of here
A big wide nose having black guy from fucking Egypt turned into that?

Why the fuck you gotta render an actor taller than the female characters who are short themselves? I mean you just don't know how disappointed I am off top alone

His voice. . That's not thunder he didn't sound like an evangelist. He sounded like well dam dude don't kill me.

Lol this lil white dude is apocalypse and the director rapes dudes and it's just ok
 
They shouldn't have even used Apocalypse or that story arc to begin with. That isn't a story arc that could be told in one movie nor is Apocalypse a villain that can be defeated in a singular movie (let alone him being far too complex of a character). That's where they first fucked up at. Then to keep givin' that piece of shit Singer da reins to these films is also where they fucked up. They stupid as hell too for not using that unused design which is straight outta da comics and cartoon of da 90's. They got decades of source material and still can't get da shit right which is baffling.
 
Last edited:
The movie looks horrible. From the trailer, it looks like Jennifer Lawrence is throwing her weight around and having the movie be about her. Just end it and move on.
Thing I don't understand. She is a role player in this movie not the star. Why did they make her the star? I mean she is in almost every trailer scene. I didn't get into the comics, but was Mystique that influential? I don't think so
 
Back
Top