White people and the history of EXHIBITING NON-WHITE PEOPLE IN ZOOS!


Interview with the curator Lilian Thuram:

In what way does this exhibition relate to your foundation ?

My foundation, Education Against Racism, teaches that one is not born racist, but becomes racist: racism is an intellectual construction and we have the power to deconstruct it by explaining its mechanisms. The exhibition shows how prejudices were established in society, and the way scientific racism of the 18th and 19th century was spread through the exhibitions of human zoos.

How were you inspired to create the foundation?

By my own life story. I was born in the Antilles, in the West Indies, and I arrived in Paris at nine years old. At the time, there was a cartoon, “La Noiraude” (The Blacky). The story was about a black cow, who was stupid, and a white one, who was intelligent. I was always called “Blacky,” and I and wondered why. I asked my mother, but she was unable to answer me. Growing up, and later in life meeting with anthropologists and historians, I learned about the process of racism. And in 2008, when I was playing for Barcelona in Spain, a man named Juan Campmany inspired me to create the foundation. I remember, when I was young, we used to hear, “No to racism! We are all equals!” But I think that is not enough. Awakening the awareness of racism goes beyond slogans. It is necessary to acquire a historical, scientific knowledge of social beliefs. That is why we want to deconstruct racism, by explaining it through books and exhibitions. We want to demonstrate how it was built, and became a cultural racism.

What specific activities does your foundation do?

Our scientific committee produces tools to deconstruct racism. When I visit schools, kids tell me what they know about different races and different skin colors. We give them tools, so that they understand that we’ve come to believe things that aren’t true because of the way history is taught. It is my first project for an exhibition; but we published a book Les Etoiles Noires, (“black stars”), and a manifesto. Then I have some TV programs planned, and so forth. Because it is important that this message is delivered in the culture.

Is this exhibition strategic, given the coming elections in France, and certain political issues?

No, I had been thinking about it for two years. But I hope that this exhibition will stimulate reflection. Because in today’s political situation it is important to alter our mentalities, so that we all participate in the changing society, and we all recognize ourselves as French. Those issues should be addressed in every place of the world where multiple cultures are present, and notions of superiority of one over another are questioned. Our goal is to challenge today’s society, by interrogating our past, to project ourselves into a better future.

What is your knowledge of Native Americans?

Well, as a native of the West Indies, the land of slavery, I was aware, very early, of Native populations. The slaves replaced the Natives, who were destroyed by 80 percent after Christopher Columbus‘s arrival. Why so many deaths? What did Christopher Columbus want from those lands? Colonization is a way of exploiting the people and stealing their wealth. So, indeed, I have been thinking about Native Americans. And I know that there are many tribes—during my visit to Canada, I went to the very interesting Canadian Museum of Civilization, where a guide gave us a speech on Native Americans. But I have no specific knowledge of all those tribes.

Did you ever experience racism as a professional athlete?

Yes, in Italy. I was playing football, and when black players would touch the ball, some of the supporters would imitate a monkey’s sound. I experienced it, but, luckily, I did not suffer from it. I was able to understand that this is a psychological mechanism that is triggered. I tried to understand why they would do that: It is because our culture transmits those messages. So I did not stigmatize the people who were expressing themselves in that manner.

How do you relate to this exhibition on human zoos?

I’ve always investigated the issues of slavery, colonization, and the beliefs in the superiority of the white race—the damages those beliefs do in excluding certain populations. I read Pascal Blanchard’s books, met him, and became curator of this exhibition. I think that it is important to avoid victimization, in order to understand prejudices, and the way in which they were inculcated in the society. And it is necessary to understand the visitors of that time, discovering those populations: What was the effect on them of seeing those thousands of people inside cages? And what was going on inside the cages—jails, really—with the “savages”? That was how feelings of “superiority” were built.

Did your celebrity help you in your activism ?

It made it easier, of course; as I am known, and there is an issue of trust. But what really matters is serious work. For years I have been educating myself on these issues, meeting with various people and experts. I went to Monaco at age seventeen, and finished high school by correspondence, and then became a football player at nineteen, which I did until 2008, and I won the World Cup—so yes, I wish to transmit messages through my personal success; because I feel concerned by those issues. Speaking about racism used to be taboo, but I consider it to be necessary. That is why today I dedicate my time to the foundation: because the worst thing is to be a victim of racism. And with knowledge, it is possible to acquire the right position on that matter.

What does an exhibition about human zoos, at a museum in Paris, have to do with American Indians living today in the United States ?

In 2012, the people want to know the history of the world. And that is what is told here: the story of the dominant and the dominated, and the prejudices associated to the status of submitted. When I visit the schools, I often get into a debate on the “red race” with young French children, who know little about the existence of such a race. And that is probably because there are fewer cowboy movies these days.

What sort of exhibition would you like to see about Native American history?

The first time I saw an exhibition about Native Americans was in Ottawa, and I came to understand that there are many tribes. Thus, it would be difficult to speak about “Native Americans,” as it would be of the “Africans,” who also have various customs, languages, and tribes. But that being said, my feeling is that there should be, in the United States, a museum dedicated to the Native American massacres. I do not have the impression that many Americans are aware they’re living on a land from which 80% of the original population disappeared! When a society can confront its history, then it starts to grow up. That is why, to me, it would be important that people know how America was built on a genocide. I say this, even though I am not Indian. But I imagine it would be beneficial for all, and humanity would grow, with an egalitarian vision. Because we have been misled by political speeches, speeches that made us believe in a hierarchy that is just made up in order to exploit the native populations. When you have a museum showing the real history, that is a sign that we have all grown up. Together.

Source: http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwo...n-thuram-tackles-racism-and-human-zoos-101634


 
* Just got back from Babylon France-Paris. Was able to check out the Exhibition *

<a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/jv2qo"><img src="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/newuploads/jv2qo.jpg"></a>

NB: Will share the photos I made at the Exhibition and my critical opinion of the Exhibition.

oNe!!!
 

<a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/qsoea"><img src="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/newuploads/qsoea.jpg"></a>
 
kefta is online now

Shut the fuck up typical e militant.You niggas love to wax philosophical about nigga topics and shit only niggas would care about.

Never understood why people call Black people militant for learning there culture & history!

MILITANT DEFINITION
1.
vigorously active and aggressive, especially in support of a cause: militant reformers.

2.
engaged in warfare; fighting.

3.
a militant person.

4.
a person engaged in warfare or combat.

Oh yea Nice post!
 
Cephalometer (Origin (1875–80))

<a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/lu6t9"><img src="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/newuploads/lu6t9.jpg"></a>

This instrument was used for measuring people's heads.
 

Picture of a Cephalometer with a person's head

<a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/444f4"><img src="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/newuploads/444f4.jpg"></a>

"Racial/color hierarchy" constructed in racist/white supremacist books

<a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/9gk3z"><img src="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/newuploads/9gk3z.jpg"></a>

:smh::smh::smh:
 
Cephalometer (Origin (1875–80))

<a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/lu6t9"><img src="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/newuploads/lu6t9.jpg"></a>

This instrument was used for measuring people's heads.

Is this shit related to Phrenology? :smh::smh:
 
Could be, I :dunno: but then again some of these white folks are not to be trusted. Thus, it could be related!

I found a link to this: http://discoveringbristol.org.uk/sl...er-world/black-white-in-britain/racist-ideas/

"In the 19th century, racist ideologies were strengthened by ‘fake’ sciences such as phrenology. It was believed that the shape of the skull reflected the character of the person. Phrenologists applied their theory to African skulls and classified all Africans as inferior to white races intellectually, culturally and morally. Phrenology showed Africans to be unsuited to work other than that supervised by white people. In the minds of most, this justified making Africans work as slaves."

Another link shows how this device was used to determine this: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11640160

crackers :smh:
 
I found a link to this: http://discoveringbristol.org.uk/sl...er-world/black-white-in-britain/racist-ideas/

"In the 19th century, racist ideologies were strengthened by ‘fake’ sciences such as phrenology. It was believed that the shape of the skull reflected the character of the person. Phrenologists applied their theory to African skulls and classified all Africans as inferior to white races intellectually, culturally and morally. Phrenology showed Africans to be unsuited to work other than that supervised by white people. In the minds of most, this justified making Africans work as slaves."

Another link shows how this device was used to determine this: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11640160

crackers :smh:

:smh::smh::angry:

Thanks for the Info. :cool:
 

Comparison of Skulls

<a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/9vmg8"><img src="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/newuploads/9vmg8.jpg"></a>

Various types of Skin and Hair color that were cut off from people and used to justify racism/white supremacy

<a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/hgz65"><img src="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/newuploads/hgz65.jpg"></a>


:hmm: :angry: :hmm:
 
Last edited:

Comparison of Skulls

<a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/9vmg8"><img src="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/newuploads/9vmg8.jpg"></a>

Various types of Skin and Hair color that were cut off from people and used to justify racism/white supremacy

<a href="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/hgz65"><img src="http://www.freeimagehosting.net/newuploads/hgz65.jpg"></a>


:hmm: :angry: :hmm:

Never forget this. :angry:
 
there was a great show on this that i watched tonight. exploring the intents and some of the people of the zoo's
its called the human zoo sciences dirty secrets
 
White history? Sir your are stll caught up in the matrix. You didn't answer ma questions. Now, Make a thread about other historical facts that relate to black folk. This thread is not intended to glorify what the racist/white supremacists did or still doing. Get it!

Dude just gets off now where instead of asking, you just assume...:smh::lol:

Sorry but you clicked on the wrong thread. Now, again, ask before you presume! Went over ma head? There is nothing "new" about what you listed that I have never heard of or still learning about.

You act like you are well informed. Good. But you are also still learning. Now make a thread with all those historical facts that you have listed. Trust me, its not a banable offence!

:lol::yes::D
 
Dude, once again. all that enslaving BS should not be glorified by anyone regardless if they are white or non-white. But if you want to take pride in that then be my guest.

And like i said, we have been reduced to a child like status. Spending the whole day taking about the moors and the great pyramids instead of using LOGIC to solve the problem of racism/white supremacy. Cats talk about the Moors and how powerful they were but the logical question is, If they were that powerful as we make them out to be, why are we as black folk in the situation that we are in? Talk about the Moors and the next day you are still paying taxes to the racist man and racist woman... Talk about the Moors and the next day you are still depending on the racist man and racist woman to manufacture guns for us so that we can protect ourselves from them. Makes no sense.

Other than that, Enslaving is a form of mistreatement and should not be in anyway glorified that is my position. Now, make your thread with all the facts and lets take this conversation further in your thread then i will tell you why its not good to enslave people regardless if they are black or white. And if black people ever did that, then we should be ashamed of our selves. Dude, talking about the glorification of enslaving people...:smh: You need to rethink your understanding of what our role as black people should be and/or should have been on the UNIverse.:hmm:

:bravo::bravo::bravo:
 
Back
Top