All your doing is providing excuses for Ms. Turners bias. Ms. Turner stands to gain something if Bernie not only wins the democratic nomination but the presidency itself.Everybody's ignorant of something, man. I have no reason to have researched Nina Turner's past.
So she praised Biden in 2008. That does not mean that the only reason she criticizes him now is that she's in love with Bernie Sanders. I could quote a lot of things I said in 2008 that I don't believe anymore.
BTW, I was on this board in 2008 (using the name Costanza) and did a quick search for my old posts mentioning Biden, to see if I said anything hypocritical. In a thread I started called "Who do you respect in government," somebody posted in 2010 mentioning Biden. I replied:
Not too many people were talking about the Crime Bill in 2010, much less citing it as a reason not to support Biden.
So while I can't account for everything Nina Turner has ever said, I was criticizing Biden during Obama's first term for things that were not often talked about until Black Lives Matter started. I wasn't a Bernie supporter then-- barely knew he existed. So I'm a good example of why it is simplistic to boil all criticism from anybody who supports another candidate down to bias.
Prior to being a hardcore Bernie supporter (and standing to gain something from Bernie) she didn't have much to say about Biden. After becoming a hardcore Bernie supporter and Biden entering the race. She's now critical of him all of a sudden. Yet you see no bias



Btw I can tell you when people on this board were calling for Biden to run the first time around. I was informing people on this board that Biden was the architect of the crime bill.
Guess what? Nobody gave a fuck but now I'm sure many of those posters who didn't, now do. Funny how that works.