What if your fiancee wanted to keep her last name?

This will probably be the most controversial thing I have said to date on BGOL, but fuck it I got thick skin. :angry::angry::angry: After reading this thread I have come to the conclusion that some of you dudes ain't shit. Just some sexist ass misogynistic insecure sons of bitches. Your reasoning defies logic. You (unfortunately) like many of our other brothers wanna act like well off, rich whitey with the homemaker wife that bows to his every whim. Well guess what? You are not whitey.

If you want a woman that conventionally bows to you in every way, than get up off your ass and be the SOLE provider. No way that a two income household, where both of the adults are working equally hard can act like a house where only the man is bringing home the bacon and the woman is tending the house/raising the kids. That is not the reality for most people especially those of us that are black.

You have no right to demand that your woman be suzie homemaker if she's workin' just as hard as your ass and gettin' home like 30 minutes before, or even later than you, five to six days a week. Who the fuck are you? Place a lot of these women in situations where they don't have to work, and they will be glad to "submit" to you in some of the ways that you seem to require. Until you are in a position to do this, SHUT THE FUCK UP!

All this shit about the only way she better keep her name is if she is making money off of it, please what about basic identity mufucka? She was a person before she met you, she is a person while she is with you, and she will be a person if she leaves your ass or you die first. You want to keep your name, why? Because of its identification. Should any fully autonomous person want anything less?

Also, to those of you that say my Dad wore the pants but my mom was still strong; Congratulations! You just described every complete black family. And guess what, your dad, like mine may have walked hard, carried a big belt, and gotten the last word, but you knew who was making some of the decisions. A lot of times, the woman was handling some things behind the scenes and or keeping things together, and allowing the man to have the last word in order to appease his fragile male ego. Not to mention the fact that our mothers, grandmothers, and aunts that had men "in charge" of the household, put up with shit that any self respecting husband WILL NOT put their wife through (i.e. women outside the home).

My wife didn't hyphenate her name. She dropped her middle name and took my last name, meaning her last name is now her middle name, but potato pot-a-to, same difference. She did so because of identification and guess what, she made the decision because it is her name. She said I don't want to hyphenate cause its ugly, but I do want to keep my last name as a part of my identification because its how I have been identified for all of my life up until this point, and I want people that knew me before to be able to recognize and find me.

And it has nothing to do with who "wears the pants", people that are married and have been for sometime realize that this shit is so small on the scale of life issues, problems, and joys that you will encounter as a couple. No one "wears the pants" so to speak in every single situation. The person that "wears the pants" in a given situation is the more rational solutions oriented person with either the resources, or the plan for using the joint resources to handle whatever issue is being encountered. Surprise Surprise, this WILL NOT be the man in every situation.

Lastly, this whole "western civilization is weak" is complete bullshit. :smh: That same western civilization colonized 90% of the world and impregnated its societies with its patriarchal views. That same western civilization is responsible for the creation of the perceived male and female roles in America, and yes, your fucked up thinking. Women are not traditionally considered the weaker, more subservient people in every culture, especially a number of African cultures, at least as they were originally conceived. :angry::angry::angry:

Basically, all of you need to step back and question why A NAME bothers you so much. Is it an attack on your own fragile ego, sense of sexuality or self? :hmm::hmm::hmm:

wow...you go!
 
marriage is not the end of independence. that's yall men's problem. and even if it did, what does changing a name have to do with it? men cant recognize we have a certain pride in our name too. i always ask men if it aint a big deal and we become a union, take my name. lol. of course yall not trying to hear that. i can give my life to a man, do everything for him and a damn name is what holds him back? weak ass man imo

That is the problem. The highlighted part tells the story. Marriage for the most part is a traditional thing. If you don't want to follow the traditions........then just live together do not get marrried.

Let me ask you a question?

Would you find it acceptable if a guy you were dating seriously.......... expected THE WOMAN TO PURCHASE THE ENGAGEMENT RING and propose to HIM?


How does that make you feel.........
That is the same thing the brothers in this thread are feeling.
 
That is not true and it sounds ridiculous.

Marriage is not a business arrangement.

Marriage is a union and a testament to God or your Supreme Being. God made man first, then made the woman from man. So biologically the woman in the physical sense is already ours, because that is from where she came. The Man.

Too many of you stupid assholes did to marriage, the same you do to everything else. Made it tangible, you materialized it and placed monetary value over it. Marriage is a union of souls as God intended, ask yourself when you die and your wife dies and your children die. Who is going to answer for them. Your wife, because obviously its not you because she isnt even proud enough to solely embrace your name(your stature as a man). Let alone allow you to speak for her in the Face of God.

This is the issue, its too many punk ass men out there allowing themselves to sink to the emotional level of the woman. Where she reigns supreme. If you go to the Bible right now, the woman was made because Adam was lonely, loneliness is what sir, an emotion.

So God made a woman, so the man would not be inclined to bitch, moan, nag and complain going about things tangible like property. The man is the spiritual center of the family. He can't do this if he is thinking like a bitch. Took all of that and constructed a representative for his emotions, so he can always have his thoughts intact and focused.

Where is that now? Property my ass, that is a compromising thought that helps bring down the True stature of Man on this earth. And you sir represent a multitude of brothers with there superiority complex, falling for a mislead strong woman. Which seals your fate.

LOL @ you quoting all this biblical shit on a porn site. If that crock of shit you call the truth is factual how about you log off and never come back so that you don't wind up in hell?
 
My mother in law did that with her current husband. Needless to say, the divorce proceedings will start next week
 
As a woman on this board, no one has yet stated WHY the woman NEEDS to take her man's name. Personally, I just dont wanna change my name cuz I've had it my whole life. I don't wanna be known as something different. Marriage is about love and a union, and if a man won't marry me cuz I won't take his name, he really aint love me anyway. He thinks of me as a possession, trophy wife...fuck that!
You need to take my name because I said so. You want Half my shit but you don't want Half my name?? Fuck outta here!!!
 
actually you didnt...especially with a name like narcotraffic...very smart name to use for an adult porn board thats probably already being monitored....lemme guess, either your a woman that doesnt know how to fall back and submit to a man and now have a bitter "men aint shit" mentality or your a simp wipped by ur bitch....which side are u on homie?

its not a matter of men vs. women for me...and my screenname has nothing to do with my real life so if thats the crux of your argument you have proven yourself to be WEAK and lacking in intellectual faculties...fact is...i don't get biblical to prove some unimportant shit knowing that in the bigger scheme of things none of us on BGOL have the right to act holier than thou or use the bible as a justification for anything becuase we all go against it in one form or the other day in, day out...all i'm saying is this...if you gonna quote the bible and act like it means something to you then do it wholeheartedly and not half-assed (and denounce porn consumption, lust, sex before marriage, envy, spite, etc.)...anything other than that is hypocrisy...need me to explain it in mono-syllabic words?

i may enjoy porn, but i don't look down on women as needing to submit to me...if a woman proves herself worthy to be my wife then she is my equal, not my slave...you may look at things differently...that's on you...
 
This will probably be the most controversial thing I have said to date on BGOL, but fuck it I got thick skin. :angry::angry::angry: After reading this thread I have come to the conclusion that some of you dudes ain't shit. Just some sexist ass misogynistic insecure sons of bitches. Your reasoning defies logic. You (unfortunately) like many of our other brothers wanna act like well off, rich whitey with the homemaker wife that bows to his every whim. Well guess what? You are not whitey.

If you want a woman that conventionally bows to you in every way, than get up off your ass and be the SOLE provider. No way that a two income household, where both of the adults are working equally hard can act like a house where only the man is bringing home the bacon and the woman is tending the house/raising the kids. That is not the reality for most people especially those of us that are black.

You have no right to demand that your woman be suzie homemaker if she's workin' just as hard as your ass and gettin' home like 30 minutes before, or even later than you, five to six days a week. Who the fuck are you? Place a lot of these women in situations where they don't have to work, and they will be glad to "submit" to you in some of the ways that you seem to require. Until you are in a position to do this, SHUT THE FUCK UP!

All this shit about the only way she better keep her name is if she is making money off of it, please what about basic identity mufucka? She was a person before she met you, she is a person while she is with you, and she will be a person if she leaves your ass or you die first. You want to keep your name, why? Because of its identification. Should any fully autonomous person want anything less?

Also, to those of you that say my Dad wore the pants but my mom was still strong; Congratulations! You just described every complete black family. And guess what, your dad, like mine may have walked hard, carried a big belt, and gotten the last word, but you knew who was making some of the decisions. A lot of times, the woman was handling some things behind the scenes and or keeping things together, and allowing the man to have the last word in order to appease his fragile male ego. Not to mention the fact that our mothers, grandmothers, and aunts that had men "in charge" of the household, put up with shit that any self respecting husband WILL NOT put their wife through (i.e. women outside the home).

My wife didn't hyphenate her name. She dropped her middle name and took my last name, meaning her last name is now her middle name, but potato pot-a-to, same difference. She did so because of identification and guess what, she made the decision because it is her name. She said I don't want to hyphenate cause its ugly, but I do want to keep my last name as a part of my identification because its how I have been identified for all of my life up until this point, and I want people that knew me before to be able to recognize and find me.

And it has nothing to do with who "wears the pants", people that are married and have been for sometime realize that this shit is so small on the scale of life issues, problems, and joys that you will encounter as a couple. No one "wears the pants" so to speak in every single situation. The person that "wears the pants" in a given situation is the more rational solutions oriented person with either the resources, or the plan for using the joint resources to handle whatever issue is being encountered. Surprise Surprise, this WILL NOT be the man in every situation.

Lastly, this whole "western civilization is weak" is complete bullshit. :smh: That same western civilization colonized 90% of the world and impregnated its societies with its patriarchal views. That same western civilization is responsible for the creation of the perceived male and female roles in America, and yes, your fucked up thinking. Women are not traditionally considered the weaker, more subservient people in every culture, especially a number of African cultures, at least as they were originally conceived. :angry::angry::angry:

Basically, all of you need to step back and question why A NAME bothers you so much. Is it an attack on your own fragile ego, sense of sexuality or self? :hmm::hmm::hmm:

well said...
 
...Basically, all of you need to step back and question why A NAME bothers you so much. Is it an attack on your own fragile ego, sense of sexuality or self? :hmm::hmm::hmm:

Bro, I didn't get how bad sexism was until I got on here... I like my porn, strippers, but I'm not into this male ego trip. I don't disrespect women purely on principle or even for the reasons most of y'all do.

Always talking bout "submit" and "take your shit" and know good and well this ain't that world in 2008. I mean, you wanna be head of household, sure. You want her to have your name, fine. But don't make dumbass arguments that assume women can only have something if you buyin' it for her.

Buncha dudes up in here, we be co-signing on purely black man - centric thinking... It's cool to have a place like that, but y'all gotta get out of the mentality that gives no worth to women but pussy and doing shit for YOU. Black women have NO reason to automatically "submit," and since this ain't the days when all breadwinning work was physical, and this world is getting tougher and tougher for EVERYBODY not on top, they NEED take that shit on a case-by-case basis. Y'act like black women aren't the most burned women on earth when it comes to getting left behind with bills and kids and no career.

Y'all gotta get out of these lame one-side only arguments, that's why W is so fucked up... Why Michael Jackson is fucked up... Why Mike Vick is fucked up... surround yoursef with co-signers, you don't see when you gettin' outta hand. Co-signers create mental weakness.
 
marriage is not the end of independence. that's yall men's problem. and even if it did, what does changing a name have to do with it? men cant recognize we have a certain pride in our name too. i always ask men if it aint a big deal and we become a union, take my name. lol. of course yall not trying to hear that. i can give my life to a man, do everything for him and a damn name is what holds him back? weak ass man imo
FUCK yo name...
 
Either keep your name or take mine. No half-steppin' crap.

The name isn't that much of an issue for me, the whole "submission" idea is just male ego anyway. I'm more concerned with humility and loyalty than some vague promise of submission.

Co-sign.
 
Back
Top