Where The Midterms Could Most Affect Abortion Access
On Friday, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, leaving it up to individual states to decide whether abortion is legal within their borders. As of 5 p.m. E…
U.S. Supreme Court has voted to strike down Roe vs. Wade
- Thread starter donwuan
- Start date
The Doctor Is In — And Wants You To Vote: How Physicians Are Saving Democrats After Roe
With abortion care hanging in the balance across the country, a number of doctors are turning to politics this election year.
Unethical Ohio Supreme Court justices secretly tell forced birther PAC there’s no right to abortion
It’s a really not good thing that in voters in so many states are put in charge of picking state judges, unlike almost all the other countries in the world. It’s a bad idea because a) it’s difficult for voters to make informed choices, and b) it leads...
m.dailykos.com
No lies told. Abortion is not a right. There is no right to abortion implicitly stated in the constitution.Unethical Ohio Supreme Court justices secretly tell forced birther PAC there’s no right to abortion
It’s a really not good thing that in voters in so many states are put in charge of picking state judges, unlike almost all the other countries in the world. It’s a bad idea because a) it’s difficult for voters to make informed choices, and b) it leads...m.dailykos.com
However, as I stated before, if a person lives in a state where abortions is legal, noone should infringed on that person's ability to kill that baby.
Conversely, if you live in a state where abortion is illegal and a person decides to engage in abortion whether providing or receiving the service, all parties should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
Last edited:
Clinics Offer Free Vasectomies; Demand Surges After Roe Vs. Wade Was Overturned
The efforts are part of World Vasectomy Day, originally a single-day event that now includes a year-round focus and a host of activities in November.
I posted because of what they were willing to say in private vs public.
Lol, here's something you ultra religious (and or religious cosplayer) cats are just gonna have to live with: There's a gap between the ideas you profess and REALITY as wide as the Grand Canyon itself. This is exemplified by typical Republican behavior, preaching constantly until their proclaimed values are tested by real life... case in point Herschel Walker (though he's not remotely unique or singular in this regard). When the rubber hits the road as SOON as their fake piety meets with a bit of resistance from reality they'll do what they need to do and then make all kinds of excuses for why they're some exception to the broader rule.
But if you think about it earnestly for a few minutes it's clear that women should have autonomy over their own bodies and you wouldn't stand for anything less if it were YOUR own bodily autonomy under discussion/legislation. I'm not just guessing here, it's a FACT. If it were YOUR bodily autonomy on the line you wouldn't spend even one goddamn second pretending this shit is cool, normal or righteous. This is a very simple issue that separates the honest folks from the dishonest ones as plainly as the wheat from the chaff. Stop lying to yourself first and foremost.
But if you think about it earnestly for a few minutes it's clear that women should have autonomy over their own bodies and you wouldn't stand for anything less if it were YOUR own bodily autonomy under discussion/legislation. I'm not just guessing here, it's a FACT. If it were YOUR bodily autonomy on the line you wouldn't spend even one goddamn second pretending this shit is cool, normal or righteous. This is a very simple issue that separates the honest folks from the dishonest ones as plainly as the wheat from the chaff. Stop lying to yourself first and foremost.
Last edited:
Lmao, y'all dudes are such fucking losers
How is it that I'm a loser, when you are the one who agrees with feminists and hoes? LOL
LOL. Well champ, you're a loser because you're intelligent enough to understand the issues involved but (for whatever reason) are pretending that you really believe Conservative arguments for removing women's bodily autonomy in 2022. You might as well be pretending that throwing bitches into the sea to prove they're not witches isn't retarded. You've got to understand.... I've seen you post here for over a decade and I see straight through you playboy.
^^^^
The hypocrisy that so many of you "male feminists" possess is mind boggling. You attempt to stand on the principle that a human being should have full bodily autonomy. Particularly, as it pertains to abortion, the feminist mantra, "my body my choice" is the crux of your position. This is done while completely ignoring and removing the choice of the body that exists inside of the woman. Lets be clear, I believe women and men should be able to do whatever they want to do with their bodies. With that said, understanding science and biology, it cannot be disputed that the human being that a pregnant woman is carrying is also a body. And this body belongs to an individual whose right to life are being taken away in an effort to facilitate convenience for some irresponsible women and men.
What makes this entire debate/ conversation so nonsensical is that most of the people who claim to be pro-choice actually do not agree on abortion. Additionally, there many points that pro-abortionists and anti-abortionists agree on.
Case in point:
Assume we all agree that all women everywhere should have access to abortion for life saving medical reasons. Would most agree that permitting an individual to have an abortion at any period during the pregnancy for any reason other than a medical emergency is acceptable? No. Because, most people agree that have an abortion at 6, 7, 8, or 9 months without having life threatening issues is wrong. So, why can't there be restrictions put in place that say this?? Why? Because, for most pro-choice feminist, it's all or nothing.
Ignorance.
What makes this entire debate/ conversation so nonsensical is that most of the people who claim to be pro-choice actually do not agree on abortion. Additionally, there many points that pro-abortionists and anti-abortionists agree on.
Case in point:
Assume we all agree that all women everywhere should have access to abortion for life saving medical reasons. Would most agree that permitting an individual to have an abortion at any period during the pregnancy for any reason other than a medical emergency is acceptable? No. Because, most people agree that have an abortion at 6, 7, 8, or 9 months without having life threatening issues is wrong. So, why can't there be restrictions put in place that say this?? Why? Because, for most pro-choice feminist, it's all or nothing.
Ignorance.
Re-read your post. What are your thoughts about it?
My G, you are wasting your breath going back and forth with this male feminist. Absolutely nothing he says is rooted in fact or logic. He continuously brings up religion when Absolutely noone in this or other threads has said anything about religion. He's an agent that can only regurgitate feminist talking points, and resorts to insults when actually challenged logically or statistically.
"Bodily autonomy." Really? A feminist argument.
The Selective Service is a better example of a law on the books where the federal government controls bodily autonomy. If a man is called to join, and refuses, or never signed up, then there are consequences (see: Muhammad Ali).
Women don't have an equivalent.
Roe wasn't about 'bodily autonomy' at all. It was about a regulation of which procedures the medical community may make available.
Further evidence that it isnt about bodily autonomy is in the fact that if it is violated, in non abortion states, it is the doctor who faces the consequences, not the female.
Also, remember that no one is guaranteed a 'right' to any medical procedure, period.
Keep in mind that the Gov't does this type of regulation all the time.
These points are not conservative arguments, feminist. They are factual ones.
Besides, ya'll are acting like Roe's dissolution made abortion illegal, when it only pushed it back to the states.
Last edited:
You won't find one post in this entire thread that has anyone advocating for abortion at 6-9 months unless the mother's health is at risk. The issue here is that these idiots want to ban abortion nationally regardless of the circumstance. Rape, incest, health-risk, underage. They want to ban ALL abortions. This will put the life of women at risk. If a 10 year old rape victim has to leave the state she was raped in to get an abortion then there's a real problem. And if these zealots & idiots get their way, she will have to leave the country or give birth to a rapist's child at 11.
I'll say it again. You keep framing this as the only reason a woman gets an abortion is because she was reckless & don't want to have a child. Those cases exist. But there's many cases where that is not the reason this woman is making that choice. Once again, you only have this opinion because you aren't a woman & aren't affected by this decision. You can sit on your ignorant & stupid high horse passing judgement on others waving your Herschel Walker approved gynecologist degree.
This is false. Please list any state that bans ALL abortions. I will wait.
The reason I tend to lean on women using abortion for convenience because that is the main reason they do it. Here are the facts:
- Less than 10% are for medical reasons.
- Less than 1% are for rape and incest.
- 90% are of abortions are for convenience.
Reading is fundamental. If you were in that 10% or 1%, you'd want to have the ability to receive care without fear of going to jail or leaving the country. Late term abortions were already illegal in most states unless there was a medical emergency. Stop being obtuse, you already knew that.
Want
/wänt,wônt/
verb
- 1.
have a desire to possess or do (something); wish for.
And again, when confronted with data, pro-abortionists fold up ignoring the 90%.
As I mentioned, we do not disagree regarding the less than 10%. Nor am I against ALL abortions.
You can check my post history. I've been consistent in saying that no person should be denied access to an abortion in cases of life threatening complications. I stand firm on that. I've also stated in many posts that in cases of rape and incest there should be provisions in place that permit abortions or other options. For example, I believe all rape victims should be given the immediate option/ to take a plan B pill. However, if they decline, they should not be able to come back and change their minds after significantdevelopmentof the baby has occurred. Regarding incest, unless it was rape, if both individuals engaged in consensual sex and a baby is conceived, the child should be immediately tested for any and all recessive autosomal diseases and termination should based upon extreme developmental abnormalities of the child.
A logical approach.
KFF Health Tracking Poll October 2022: The Issues Motivating Voters One Month Before The Midterm Elections
Leading up to the November 2022 midterm elections, abortion access is motivating majorities of Democratic women, women under 50 and and Democratic voters in states with abortion bans. For older vot…
www.kff.org
My first patient of the day asked me, “what is the problem with boys?”
I am seeing patients again. My partners are slowing phasing into maternity leave. This week I’m seeing patients from 7am to 6pm and then rounding at the hospital. For the next seven days I am the on call Ob-Gyn, the last three days of the seven I am...
m.dailykos.com
Simple solution for Abortion rights IMHO to truly give the people choice is to put it in the ballot for the people to vote on.
The problem is that abortion rights have been politically tied…essentially if you are first and foremosta financial conservative, your vote is going to go with a party that also is anti pro choice.
I guarantee that if they put abortion to a vote by the people likehave been and starting to do for things like legalizing Marijuana, the majority would vote for abortion to be legal by a landslide. For obvious reasons, those GOP states that have banned it aren’t going to allow it to go to a public vote.
The problem is that abortion rights have been politically tied…essentially if you are first and foremosta financial conservative, your vote is going to go with a party that also is anti pro choice.
I guarantee that if they put abortion to a vote by the people likehave been and starting to do for things like legalizing Marijuana, the majority would vote for abortion to be legal by a landslide. For obvious reasons, those GOP states that have banned it aren’t going to allow it to go to a public vote.
So if you think women should have a choice what to do with their body you’re a feminist now? Lmbaoooo these dumb fuck cave men rapists are sick. Fake ass faggots do t care about them unborn babies. What a joke. Fucking weirdo lunatics . Mind your own fucking business you gay ass bitch ass trash
Religious organizations join fight against Florida's abortion ban
After enacting a 15-week abortion ban earlier this year, Florida has faced some consistent legal back and forth. The law, known as HB 5, is facing legal opposition not only from groups in favor of reproductive freedoms, but from religious groups as...
m.dailykos.com
Sigh, this is so boring… congrats on having as nuanced a position on abortion as your average slack jawed yokel. Pushed back to the States eh? You mean the same retarded Red States that ban abortions even cases of rape or medical emergencies lol? Like I said, you and your faux conservative (and authenticity retarded conservative) folks are completely full of shit.The only reason you’re able to abstract these retarded ideas to these ridiculous extremes is because you understand it doesn’t extend to anyone you give af about. Let it be a woman (your daughter, sister, mother, aunt, grandma, etc etc) on the other end of these indefensibly stupid laws conservatives are crafting and you wouldn’t spend a second fixing your fingers to type this bullshit. And if these laws began targeting their religious nonsense a bit more upstream? (Holding men accountable for planting seeds, chaperoning extra marital dates on the basis of religious ideals etc) y’all hypocrites would be ready for war on some “This is Sparta!!” type shit.
You’ve got to understand b… I see you lol. Stop fronting and wake the fuck up
@Tito_Jackson I’ve sonned you so many times on this forum bruh. When are you going to just fall back and learn a thing or two? You can’t be a Stephen-from-Django ass nigga your whole entire life. Level up brodie.
Last edited:
Your approach is entirely illogical. If you spend even 10 minutes thinking about this seriously there’s no way you can defend your position. I challenge you to stop all this typing and seriously think through your position for 10 whole minutes. Fr.
Sigh, this is so boring… congrats on having as nuanced a position on abortion as your average slack jawed yokel. Pushed back to the States eh? You mean the same retarded Red States that ban abortions even cases of rape or medical emergencies lol? Like I said, you and your faux conservative (and authenticity retarded conservative) folks are completely full of shit.The only reason you’re able to abstract these retarded ideas to these ridiculous extremes is because you understand it doesn’t extend to anyone you give af about. Let it be a woman (your daughter, sister, mother, aunt, grandma, etc etc) on the other end of these indefensibly stupid laws conservatives are crafting and you wouldn’t spend a second fixing your fingers to type this bullshit. And if these laws began targeting their religious nonsense a bit more upstream? (Holding men accountable for planting seeds, chaperoning extra marital dates on the basis of religious ideals etc) y’all hypocrites would be ready for war on some “This is Sparta!!” type shit.
You’ve got to understand b… I see you lol. Stop fronting and wake the fuck up
Son-husband babble.
Here are 3 Facts that you cant refute, despite your whining:
- Abortion access is a regulation of the medical industry, not "wahmen's bodies"
- The selective service is a stronger example of Gov't regulation of human bodies than abortion ever was.
- You are not guaranteed a right to a medical procedure.
Last edited:
Honestly bruh you sound broken. Lmao, imagine thinking you sound hard clicking and clacking on your keyboard lol. I’d humiliate you irl tbh.
Try responding to the content of the post and stop with the creepy incel bullshit, you’re smarter than that.