I thought Capt. marvel was a dude!
Must be thinking about the one DC has,because they have one with the same name
I thought Capt. marvel was a dude!
Yeeeah! ThanksMust be thinking about the one DC has,because they have one with the same name
He was at certain points.I thought Capt. marvel was a dude!
There have been many. She was one of the recent ones.I thought Capt. marvel was a dude!
but its just too soon to do it. this will test the waters.
bana and norton's hulk are still too fresh in people's minds so they want to ease hm in as a feature this way and see what happens.
Thor doesn't translate well to screen for me. Hemsworth has been my least favorite marvel actor...
I love the way Hulk has been portrayed but I just don't see Planet hulk playing out in the universe as currently set.
I think it's too much screen time for those 2.
Galactus and Silver Surfer are just being wasted with Sony. I do find it odd that they have the Fantastic Four rights, but don't have the right to the Kree.
Like you... I don't know what they do after Thanos. They have other villains, but their other major hitters (Doom, apocalypse) are with other studios.
Side note... Does Fox also have the right to the Skrulls? Because I would love to the Skrull invasion play out in the movies. That is another amazing story line that is just being wasted right now. Unless they are saving this for the Ms. Marvel movie..
I dont think thats true....i think folks have forgotten about those two
they haven't. that's why they're so reluctant to just pull the trigger on a solo film. he's been in a few films and been reviewed great as the hulk and as the man
mark ruffalo is the hulk at this point but the stain is still there.
I always thought they had issues with who actually had the rights to do the movie. Universal still owns the Hulk solo movie rights I think.
Ruffalo recently spoke with Collider and said that the real issue here is that Universal still owns the solo Hulk movies. As far as a Hulk movie, a standalone Hulk movie, Marvel doesn't really have the rights to that yet. That's still Universal's property, so there's that issue.
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Big-Reason-We-re-Getting-Solo-Hulk-Movie-Anytime-Soon-70863.html
This article is a year old. I think they'd have NO PROBLEM making a hulk movie profitable....that norton move was almost 10 years ago
universal ,still owns worldwide distribution rights on hulk films. universal is only second to disney in world distribution of films.they haven't. that's why they're so reluctant to just pull the trigger on a solo film. he's been in a few films and been reviewed great as the hulk and as the man
mark ruffalo is the hulk at this point but the stain is still there.
Tip toe yo ass out of a comics thread.maybe they'll leave room to explore it further. maybe they'll hint at it instead of trying to cram it into the movie and then make the full planet hulk feature