The Zimmerman Trial: Justice for Trayvon! (Let's discuss it)

Selma Mora was her name I believe. She was a pretty strong prosecution witness.

By the way; not great looking or anything, but she has some huge tittays:


selma-mora-demo.jpg



What's this spanish chick's name?
 
Last edited:
Here is Zimmerman's buddy arguing that the gun had a trigger safety...



48 Second Mark..

http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2013/06/28/ng-zimmerman-trial-taaffe-gun-green.hln.html

<object width="416" height="234" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="ep"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_embed_2x_container.swf?site=cnn&profile=desktop&context=embedwww&videoId=us/2013/06/28/ng-zimmerman-trial-taaffe-gun-green.hln&contentId=us/2013/06/28/ng-zimmerman-trial-taaffe-gun-green.hln" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_embed_2x_container.swf?site=cnn&profile=desktop&context=embedwww&videoId=us/2013/06/28/ng-zimmerman-trial-taaffe-gun-green.hln&contentId=us/2013/06/28/ng-zimmerman-trial-taaffe-gun-green.hln" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="234"></embed></object>

I cannot stand this dude.

I wish someone ends his life.

He called trayvon a thug the other day on HLN. Yesterday, he referred to Rachel Geantel's testimony as "Precious" :hmm:
 
Here is Zimmerman's buddy arguing that the gun had a trigger safety...



48 Second Mark..

http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2013/06/28/ng-zimmerman-trial-taaffe-gun-green.hln.html

<object width="416" height="234" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="ep"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_embed_2x_container.swf?site=cnn&profile=desktop&context=embedwww&videoId=us/2013/06/28/ng-zimmerman-trial-taaffe-gun-green.hln&contentId=us/2013/06/28/ng-zimmerman-trial-taaffe-gun-green.hln" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_embed_2x_container.swf?site=cnn&profile=desktop&context=embedwww&videoId=us/2013/06/28/ng-zimmerman-trial-taaffe-gun-green.hln&contentId=us/2013/06/28/ng-zimmerman-trial-taaffe-gun-green.hln" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="234"></embed></object>




My question is: when did Zimmerman chamber a round? I'm sure he didn't walk around with a round in the pip? If he did that would go to show how irresponsible he was as a gun owner or that was always waiting for something to jump off!

And that whos on top whos on bottom, all irrelevant because they have clearly showed Zimmerman to be the aggressor from the beginning!
Also they do no need the voice analysis of the screams! any one hearing that tape knows that was a kid screaming for his life!
 
No, It shows that your original mistake was so far off, thus you're not a man of letters. Good morning.

Phonetically it wasn't that far off. I think it takes a better man to correct his mistakes than dwell on it, and an even better man than the one who dwell on the mistakes of others. Good riddance.
 
Phonetically it wasn't that far off. I think it takes a better man to correct his mistakes than dwell on it, and an even better man than the one who dwell on the mistakes of others. Good riddance.
Yeah, coming from the dude who criticized someone who can't write cursive for not being well versed, just to make himself feel good. If you're going to throw stones, you better be perfect. By the way, check your grammar above. You were warned to not start this dialogue.;)

Mr. High skill set :lol:
 
Interesting.. this guy puts Zimmerman on the bottom while it seemed none of the other neighbors did. I assume he came outside early in the scuffle
 
Yeah, coming from the dude who criticized someone who can't write cursive for not being well versed, just to make himself feel good. If you're going to throw stones, you better be perfect. By the way, check your grammar above. You were warned to not start this dialogue.;)

Mr. High skill set :lol:

No one was throwing stones, but if that's how you perceived it :dunno::dunno:

Thanks for my new nickname though.

BTW, I stand by my grammar earlier.
 
So far only witness to say Zimmerman might be the one at the bottom.

Don't trust him either since he is a "CAC"
 
Witness is trying to be a smart ass but coming off abrasive. I bet he won't trend today though...
 
Love the last line of questions to which the witness stated "No" in relation to someone slamming a head into the concrete, or punching down and so on.
 
Woke up late, so I'm just catching the new witness in mid-testimony. I'm guessing the prosecution knew what his story was already, so they must have called him up to the stand to get him first, and get it over with, because he's sounding more like a defense witness so far.
 
White cracker is in cahoots with the defense. I bet he's a Rush 24/7 member with a membership at Storm Front.
 
That asshole Frank Taffy said on the Jane Velez show earlier this week, that a male neighbor had changed his story a little after the new black panthers started making noise in the area. I'm wondering if this guy is that guy, because although he is more of a defense witness, Mark O'mara doesn't seem to be getting everything he wants out of him.
 
asshole Frank Taffy said on the Jane Velez show earlier this week, that a male neighbor had changed his story a little after the new black panthers started making noise in the area. I'm wondering if this guy is that guy, because although he is more of a defense witness, Mark O'mara doesn't seem to be getting everything he wants out of him.

Exactly. He's coming off as a the white man they need.
 
I could have swore one of the women said that the one that was on top started to walk towards her after the shooting. Now this fool is saying Trayvon was on top. This dude is lying like shit

Sent from my GT-P6210 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
 
I love that last answer - That is just my opinion...In relation to if the voice he heard was the voice from the bottom, and Zimmerman's.
 
That asshole Frank Taffy said on the Jane Velez show earlier this week, that a male neighbor had changed his story a little after the new black panthers started making noise in the area. I'm wondering if this guy is that guy, because although he is more of a defense witness, Mark O'mara doesn't seem to be getting everything he wants out of him.


Hopefully the prosecution brings this up if they can verify
 
The defense is winning so far, this man is credible he's not making either side lead him......Rachael Jenteal hurt the prosecution case and from now until the end its all about repairing the damage she caused.
 
Yeah, spanish chick yesterday said the guy on top got up and walked away feeling his head and the other guy stayed down on the ground.

I don't know if he's full of shit, or just saying what he thinks he saw. He doesn't seem like he's trying to be hostile towards the prosecution or anything, but so far between the spanish chick, the other black female eye witness (not Renee, the other black chick that testified on Wed) and the white woman eye witness, I think he is the only one putting Zimmerman on the bottom.


I could have swore one of the women said that the one that was on top started to walk towards her after the shooting. Now this fool is saying Trayvon was on top. This dude is lying like shit

Sent from my GT-P6210 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
 
The defense is winning so far, this man is credible he's not making either side lead him......Rachael Jenteal hurt the prosecution case and from now until the end its all about repairing the damage she caused.

According to black folks on Facebook, Twitter, News One, BET and the Root her testimony was great and powerful, ground moving in eloquence and added much needed gravitas to the trial.:rolleyes:

Saying she fucked up with her funky ass attitude and inability to understand simple questions is a no-no.

If this case is lost and ONE juror comes back and says "Rachael Jenteal's attitude turned me off and made her non credible" I'm wondering will everyone give her a pass and so "She did her best"?????:confused:

-Edit-

I don't think this man is credible at all, I think he's lying and has an agenda. BUT the thing people don't understand is that many jurors make decisions on emotion and not facts and depending on who they are they can be swayed by who they like the most or how they see a witness. In the Jody Arias trial one of the jurors (a man) said he couldn't give her the death penalty because she was so attractive to him....:hmm::hmm::hmm:
 
Back
Top